J-Bone

Epic Troll

hypocrites

stoning

lost sheep

The works of Josephus provide crucial information about the First Jewish-Roman War and also represent important literary source material for understanding the context of the Dead Sea Scrolls and late Temple Judaism.

Josephan scholarship in the 19th and early 20th century became focused on Josephus’ relationship to the sect of thePharisees[citation needed]. It consistently portrayed him as a member of the sect, and as a traitor to the Jewish nation—a view which became known as the classical concept of Josephus.[20] In the mid-20th century a new generation of scholars[who?] challenged this view and formulated the modern concept of Josephus. They consider him a Pharisee, but restore his reputation in part as patriot and a historian of some standing. In his 1991 book, Steve Mason argued that Josephus was not a Pharisee but an orthodox Aristocrat-Priest who became part of the Temple…

View original post 13 more words

Advertisements

The Spiritual Mach Effect

Shivastus Solomonicus

SONY DSC

Ernst Mach suggested that as one approaches the speed of light or moves at all, the gravitational force of everything in the universe pushes against everything accelerating in the universe.

mass out there influences inertia here” Ernst Mach

I have noticed that genuinely, authentically, spiritual people often get ridiculously more resistance to their ideas than other people do.  I noticed that when I am Kicking Light people in Ego Conscious seem to act as a single unit to distract me or to antagonize me or shut me up.  I have confided in Patrick John Coleman (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Durchholz)  that it is illegal to bring “light” or Wisdom into this world, because the Authoritarians in this world being predominantly psychopathic and narcissistic are in relationship with their authority and are only interested in increasing and expanding their authority.  Narcissistic, Psychopathic, Authoritarians will act as a single unit to protect each other’s authority…

View original post 318 more words

A Fated Meeting, Rabbi Ba’al Shivah

lon milo duquette

The Chicken Qabalah was not the first book I had read on the subject.  Still when I read it it spoke to me in a unique voice.  At that time I was communing with Yeshivel who was teaching me the Sephyr Yeshivel.  Yeshivel is a curious entity, his soul energy is that of Jesus and Shiva but it is not all of Shiva’s energy and it is not the Jesus that people think existed.  He is very gentle and very soft spoken.  As I would read he would speak to me in my thoughts and emotions.

I remember reading the explanation of how Ain sof poured itself into Chockmah first and then it flowed into Binah.  Yeshivel had already taught me that Godself had made the universe by separating godself in the form of No Thingness into matter and energy simultaneously, so I immediately, violently, reacted.

wrong

Maybe Twenty years later I found myself living in Aliso Viejo California.  I started getting into painting and one of my first paintings was created with the intention that I would give it to a Chassidic Rabbi to explain for him a mystery that he didn’t understand.  I impregnated the painting with that intention.  At that time I had no idea who the rabbi might be.

564620_141011412707498_1149441917_n

About seven years later I started having some bizarre experiences, spiritual experiences.  It started around the 4th of july 2013.  My soul energy was being activated by my higher self for the work I was preparing to do.  I was receiving my calling.  I was attempting to create a spiritual revival a spiritual revolution.  Much like Jesus, my trials were now at hand.

moses maimonides

A girl that I had worked with at Whole Foods found out some of the stuff that I was interested in and told me that her step father knew some stuff about that.  I met him and came to find out he was personal friends of Lon Milo Duquette, who lived near by and who had a little class every Monday at his house as he had been doing for years.  At our first meeting I brought him the painting having realized that things had come full circle. I also brought my copy of the Chicken Qabalah which he signed for me.

chicken qabalah

I attended that class for several months as we studied the occult literature of Aleister Crowley and the implications of his work.  Lon was of high rank in the O.T.O. I repeatedly pointed out the allusions to Hindu Philosophy that for some reason Crowley had mostly left out of the explanations but which were recurring themes in his visionary poetry.  I became worried that my presence was causing a disturbance with some of Lon’s other students whom he had known for a longer time.  I started coming less frequently.

At the last few meetings Lon started teaching us about his true love.  Enochian Vision magick, of which Lon is probably the foremost expert in the world.

lon

Lon was very proud of these tablets that he had made years before and he happily trotted them out.  We eventually did some scrying in the Enochian Planes.  The first one was rather uneventful for me.  I started to have some experiences like I was going into trance and then there was silence, and then a voice spoke to me, “they are afraid of you because of who you are.”  Constance found this very, very interesting.

The next heaven that we scryed was Air of Air. That one was a lot more eventful.  I saw an image of swords crossed up and down, and then a sword in a hand raised that was in a stained glass window.  This vision occurred right after the government shut down and before I was asked to decode the symbolism of the dove attack of pope Francis.

Click here for my prediction as to whether this would be a year of peace or not.

What it meant to me was that the heavens were embroiled in a battle.  In which no compromise was possible because they were completely at odds with one another.  This was a big, serious, deal.  An astral event.  And it needed a veritable Alexander to cut the Gordion knot.  As a High Level Astral Initiate, I have never sworn a vow to any Secret Society and I come upon my knowledge through the power of my own abilities and those spiritual agencies and entities that aid me.  So nobody had the right to punish me for giving away secrets that I came upon with my own psychic abilities.

Frensham . March 2011 162

At this point it had become very obvious to me that I was having an adverse affect on the other people attending Lon’s meetings.  I stopped coming all together but I would send an emissary to bring gifts for Lon.  I felt that his students weren’t properly appreciating him as the guru he rightly was.  Most of them were interested in him doing stuff for them and trying to increase their own prestige by knowing him.  I wanted to set a good example for how one was supposed to treat a guru.  Also I was at a point where I could attend his classes in spirit without physically being present and I needed to hear myself think.  I was entering a spiritual phase known as the Curse of the Magus. I was listening to the Astral planes and I wasn’t liking what I was hearing.  I needed to be completely focused.

I had heard that Lon was starting a series of trips to China to promote his writings.  There was a plane that had mysteriously  disappeared in that area everybody was speculating where it was and what had happened to it.  I became very concerned sensing a convergence in possible time lines.  I decided to go to one of Lon’s meetings.  He was very surprised to see me as was Constance.  The topic of the missing airliner came up lightly and we speculated on what had happened to it.  I through out a response as a test.  Lon nodded his head that was a possibility.  I told him, “Don’t say that.”  We were throwing the I Ching to see what would happen on Lon’s trip.  With maybe 15 people in the class the same answers came up over and over again.  Lon would have to be very careful and he might get stuck in China for the rest of his life.  It was not a good reading.

Lon did return without event and he offered this explanation.  The people were very concerned about the missing Jet, and the topic came up almost immediately, he had remembered the conversation that we had and he didn’t speculate on what had happened to the air craft, which was completely out of character for him and against his nature, but he was very conscious and prepared and with a perfect poker face, he said he thought it was in the water.

At a later time Lon wanted to appreciate his students by doing readings on them.  I wasn’t physically present but my student at the time was so he did one for me in spirit.  Lon was astounded, he had never seen that many face cards in a single reading.  I knew the reading was legit because when I get an authentic reading this card always shows up to symbolize me.

The-Sun9

Lon had a premonition before the last card came up.  He said, “this better not be the card I think it is.”  and then he said, “Oh, my God!”

RWS_Tarot_15_Devil

lon milo duquett

Secret Society War VI, Hacking Sony.

anonymous

I am going to start this blog by going on a little tangent.  Many of you might not know but Willy Nelson, much like Al Sharpton didn’t pay his taxes for years.  And Al Sharpton much like Willy Nelson had to come out of retirement to pay off the IRS.  Al Sharpton has been the oval office 83 times since the Obama Administration took office, he is essentially the President’s official spoke’s person.  Which means that what he is doing right now, and what he has been doing for the past 6 years is at the direct behest of Obama.

PSYCHOPATHS AND TYRANTS

There is a strong correlation between Psychopathy and tyranny.  Tyranny has been referred to as aggressive narcissism.  Psychopaths don’t reform, they just become more manipulative, which is to say they have a modus operandi, a form of conquest that they continue using over and over, and they can’t stop because their sense of self is tied up in the modus operandi.  Case in point.  Data has been found missing from computers of senators computers so that they couldn’t bring certain cases before certain people, this is known as data assassination.  https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1340543?tstart=0

In case you have forgotten German Chancellor Merkel accused Obama openly of spying on her computer, the Obama Administration never specifically denied, the charge, they minced words saying that the U.S. “is not and will not.” spy on computers, somehow missing the past tense “was”.

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/10/26/is-not-will-not-was/

Ms. Merkel, who last fall declared that “spying between friends is simply unacceptable” and that the United States had opened a breach of trust that would have to be repaired, said at the news conference that “we have a few difficulties yet to overcome.” One remaining issue, she said, was the “proportionality” of the surveillance.  http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/03/world/europe/merkel-says-gaps-with-us-over-surveillance-remain.html?_r=0

NORTH KOREA DID NOT CYBER ATTACK SONY PICTURES

The moment I heard the claim I thought it was preposterous.  Not because it isn’t possible or plausible but because it wasn’t practical.  The information that they gleaned didn’t particularly hurt Sony or the United States it leveraged  Obama’s race bating strategy or what Bill Clinton referred to recently as identity based politics.  Why were they looking at the information that they were looking at? Ask yourself, who is the dictator that is getting offended at mildly racist jokes told about the president in private?

“The caution especially applies to the terror threat; the language in the terror message does not sound in sync with the standard propaganda language or aggressive rhetoric that the regime usually employs. ” http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2014/12/19-north-korea-sony-cyber-attack-moon

Even Korea says it wasn’t the source of the attack and is willing to work with the United States to discover who the real culprit is.

tumblr_luvliczyFb1qzpwi0o1_500

A LITTLE MORE ON PSYCHOPATHS

Now many of you might know about the large amount of research that I have done on psychopathology, in my psychological models.  One of the strategies of Psychopaths is to appear to be being victimized while they are victimizing.  This means that they can’t appear to be the first cause, they have to appear to be the second cause, the victim and the cause of the good.

Now let’s examine what Obama’s spokesperson and personal cheerleader said immediately after the Sony leak, as though he was prepared and being scripted.

“So the jury is still out on where we go with Amy,” Sharpton said. “We clearly are willing to deal with an immediate formula to see where we deal with breaking down the walls of inflexible and so far immovable racial exclusion in Hollywood.”

“We have agreed to having a working group deal with the racial bias and lack of diversity in Hollywood,” http://nypost.com/2014/12/18/sharpton-to-have-say-over-how-sony-makes-movies/

obama-sharpton

If you observe what I refer to as the direction of the conversation, the argument made by Al Sharpton was that the rhetoric and ideology coming out of Hollywood is not congruent with the experience of people in the black Ghettos, the ones that want’ cops to die right now.  Hollywood doesn’t portray cop killing hood rats as positively as Al Sharpton would like them to be portrayed.  He is essentially making an argument of a prima fasciae law case for proving disparate impact and benchmarking the affirmative action and vexatious litigations of lawyers to get women and minorities into positions of authority based on their sex and skin color not based on their success or results.  Hmmm, does that sound like the strategy of a person who was a lawyer but never a judge? (Barak Obama)  A person using identity based politics to force his agenda?

The argument tacitly suggests that the plight of the black people in the ghettos, whom Al Sharpton and Barak Obama have been bating, is because of the Evil Propaganda machine of Hollywood that is maligning the reputations of these soulful and earthy people that want’ to loot small businesses and assassinate the police.  They are arguing that these same people should essentially be given a portion of Hollywood cinema to make their own propaganda and show things from their own perspective, that perspective being stupid and violent.  It can’t be that that perspective failed of it’s own lack of merit, it has to be a conspiracy.

THOUGHT CRIMES BUREAU

11182

The thing that should concern everybody is that this was a private conversation.  Affirmative action has now passed into the realm of thought crime.  It isn’t bad enough that we no longer have freedom of speech as we have been forced into female communication rituals in the form of political correctness.  I can’t be proud of my culture and allow anybody else to be proud of their cultures.  We can’t talk openly and honestly about what we dislike about other people our opinions are scripted and we are bad people if we hold certain positions or have certain ideas.  The people who are allowed to be proud of and at the same time defensive of their cultures are people that have no reason to be proud of their cultures.

He said: ‘After the Obama joke, no one was going to get on the side of Amy, [Amy Pascal, Sony Pictures co-chair] and so suddenly, everyone ran for the hills. Look, I can’t make an excuse for that joke, it is what it is, a terrible mistake. Having said that, it was used as a weapon of fear, not only for everyone to disassociate themselves from Amy but also to feel the fear themselves. They know what they themselves have written in their emails, and they’re afraid.’

Clooney said he approached a large number of important people to sign his petition but kept getting rebuffed. He said that people are afraid of potential retribution.

‘This is just where we are right now, how scared this industry has been made,’ he told the magazine.

‘Quite honestly, this would happen in any industry. I don’t know what the answer is, but what happened here is part of a much larger deal. A huge deal.

‘And people are still talking about dumb emails. Understand what is going on right now, because the world just changed on your watch, and you weren’t even paying attention.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2885794/Film-studio-heads-say-never-saw-George-Clooney-s-petition-supporting-embattled-Sony-star-publicly-berated-refusing-sign.html#ixzz3N29mX1OS

“This is not just an attack on Sony,” Clooney wrote. “It involves every studio, every network, every business and every individual in this country.”

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/columnist/rieder/2014/12/22/george-clooney-emerges-as-hero-in-awful-sony-mess/20757945/

thoughtcrime is an occurrence or instance of controversial or socially unacceptable thoughts. The term is also used to describe some theological concepts such as disbelief or idolatry,[1] or a rejection of strong social or philosophical principles.[2]

The term was popularized in the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell, wherein thoughtcrime is the criminal act of holding unspoken beliefs or doubts that oppose or question the ruling party. In the book, the government attempts to control not only the speech and actions, but also the thoughts of its subjects. To entertain unacceptable thoughts is known as crimethink in Newspeak, the ideologically purified dialect of the party.[3]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime

CYBER TERRORISM

The Obama Administration and I believe Obama himself referred to this as an act of Cyber terrorism and immediately the next day, the rhetoric was being scaled down to Internet Vandalism.  Let me explain why, since corporations are now people, if this turns out to be the United States that did this under the auspices of Obamas dictate, what this means is that this is an attack on an American Citizen by the American Military, which is an act of tyranny.  Since ancient Greece, the leader of a Democratic people cannot use the military on their own people without being considered a Tyrant.

And Anonymous recently said that and I quote, “we all know the hacks didn’t come from North Korea,”.

Origins of Western Philosophy, Rabbi Ba’al Shivah

A huge help in putting together my theories was the work of Okko Behrends.  What I do is I look for the movement of ideas, words, philosophies, processes, practices (praxis) from one culture to another over time.  These create rhetorical tautologies or identical patterns.  Some cultures adopt and keep those patterns because of an affinity and others do not.

Frankly I think that the Augur’s of Pre-Greek Minoan cult were originally from India and in India I believe they were called the Aghori.

The Aghori (Sanskrit: अघोरaghōra)[2] are asceticShaivasadhus.

The Aghori in Shaivism.

The Aghori are known to engage in post-mortem rituals. They often dwell in charnel grounds, have been witnessed smearing cremationashes on their bodies, and have been known to use bones from human corpses for crafting skull bowls (which Shiva and other Hindu deities are often iconically depicted holding or using) and jewelry. Due to their practices that are contradictory to orthodox Hinduism, they are generally opposed.[3][4]

Many Aghori gurus command great reverence from rural populations as they are supposed to possess healing powers gained through their intensely eremitic rites and practices of renunciation and tápasya. They are also known to meditate and perform worship in haunted houses.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aghori

8 minutes in Behrend’s defines Auctoritatus as a form of authority not based on force but based on reason, what I refer to as Sapiential Authority.

In ancient Rome, Auctoritas referred to the general level of prestige a person had in Roman society, and, as a consequence, his clout, influence, and ability to rally support around his will. Auctoritas was not merely political, however; it had a numinous content and symbolized the mysterious “power of command” of heroic Roman figures.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auctoritas#Auctoritas_principis

28When Jesus had finished saying these things, the crowds were amazed at his teaching, 29because he taught as one who had authority, and not as their teachers of the law.  Matthew 7

cicero

44 minutes okko quotes cicero

Auctoritas is determined by it’s good results and it’s success and by the merit of reason.  The High priest of the Augure’s didn’t create the law, he didn’t manufacture it, he expounded the law that already existed in the universe the Law that governed success.  They were readers of omens, signs, and portents.

The augur was a priest and official in the classical world, especially ancient Rome and Etruria. His main role was the practice of augury, interpreting the will of the gods by studying the flight of birds: whether they are flying in groups or alone, what noises they make as they fly, direction of flight and what kind of birds they are. This was known as “taking the auspices.” The ceremony and function of the augur was central to any major undertaking in Roman society—public or private—including matters of war, commerce, and religion.

The Roman historian Livy stresses the importance of the augurs: “Who does not know that this city was founded only after taking the auspices, that everything in war and in peace, at home and abroad, was done only after taking the auspices?”[1]  

augur

It was also antithetical to tyranny. At 14 minutes tyranny = kingship.  The Augur, much like the president is supposed to be, (I am glaring at you Obama) is not above the law, they are also under the law.  This isn’t from Okko Behrends, but notice how to Remus was not chosen as the first king of Rome because he lived on Aventine hill which was full of “inauspicious birds”.  The reason the birds were present was because Aventine hill was used for the disposal of garbage and dead bodies, remember if you will that the Aghori also live in grave yards.

Roman augurs were part of a collegium of priests who shared the duties and responsibilities of the position. At the foundation of the Republic in 510 BC, the patricians held sole claim to this office.

Augury sought the divine will regarding any proposed course of action which might affect Rome’s pax, fortuna and salus (peace, good fortune and wellbeing).[2] Political, military and civil actions were sanctioned by augury, historically performed by priests of the college of augurs and by haruspices on behalf of senior magistrates.

According to Cicero, the auctoritas of ius augurum included the right to adjourn and overturn the process of law: consular election could be – and was – rendered invalid by inaugural error. For Cicero, this made the augur the most powerful authority in the Republic.

In ancient Rome the auguria were considered to be in equilibrium with the sacra (“sacred things” or “rites”) and were not the only way by which the gods made their will known. The augures publici (public augurs) concerned themselves only with matters related to the state.

The jus augurale (augural law) was rigorously secret, therefore very little about the technical aspects of ceremonies and rituals has been recorded.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augur

Shiva Shakti - Maha Shivratri

If you examine the Vigyan Bhairav Tantra you will find that the deep intimate conversation between Shiva and Shakti about the nature of reality becomes the basis of philosophical and scientific reasoning.  It became the Sohbet of Rumi and Shams and before that it was the intimate conversations that Jesus had with his disciples and before that it was the discussion of the Rabbi’s discussing Torah, or the law of the universe among themselves.

bywax

This became the Parrhesia of the ancient Greeks:

Reason is the capacity for consciously making sense of things, applying logic, establishing and verifying facts, and changing or justifying practices, institutions, andbeliefs based on new or existing information.[1] It is closely associated with such characteristically human activities as philosophy, science, language, mathematics, and art, and is normally considered[by whom?] to be a definitive characteristic of human nature.[2] The concept of reason is sometimes referred to as rationality and sometimes as discursive reason, in opposition to intuitive reason.[3]

The field of logic studies ways in which human beings reason through argument.[6]

  • The original Greek term was “λόγος”logos, the root of the modern English word “logic” but also a word which could mean for example “speech” or “explanation” or an “account” (of money handled).[7]
  • As a philosophical term logos was translated in its non-linguistic senses in Latin as ratio. This was originally not just a translation used for philosophy, but was also commonly a translation for logos in the sense of an account of money.[8]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason

In rhetoric, parrhesia is a figure of speech described as: to speak candidly or to ask forgiveness for so speaking.[1] There are three different forms of parrhesia. Parrhesia is its nominal form, is translated from Latin to English meaning “free speech”. Parrhesiazomai in its verbal form is to use parrhesia, and parrhesiastes is the one who uses parrhesia for example “one who speaks the truth”. [2] The term parrhesia first appears in Greek literature in Euripides and can be found and used in ancient Greek texts all throughout the end of the fourth century and during fifth century A.D. [3] The term is borrowed from the Greek παρρησία (πᾶν “all” and ῥῆσις “utterance, speech”) meaning literally “to speak everything” and by extension “to speak freely,” “to speak boldly,” or “boldness.” It implies not only freedom of speech, but the obligation to speak the truth for the common good, even at personal risk.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parrhesia

and that became the sciences, the logy’s, or the logic of, teleology, biology, psychology, ecology, geology, etc.  Each logy would have a guru or teacher that specialized in that subject.  The entire western civilization evolved out of this process as well as the Western brain and the way western people think in general.  Our separation of powers, our checks and balances in the government, our sense of propriety, all of them came from the same place.

27 minutes: The name Augustus was chosen by Octavian chose the name Augustus the name of the High Priest of the Augure’s instead of the name Romulus the first king of Rome, he chose between the two names.

‘In my sixth and seventh consulships [28-27 BC], after I had extinguished civil wars, and at a time when with universal consent I was in complete control of affairs, I transferred the republic from my power to the dominion of the senate and people of Rome…After this time I excelled all in influence [auctoritas], although I possessed no more official power [potestas] than others who were my colleagues in the several magistracies.’ (Res Gestae Divi Augusti 34.1-3)[[1]]

46 minutes, the separation of powers, the leader can assume command of the military upon leaving the polis, but upon entering the polis must relinquish control of the millitary, (a legitimate leader must never use the military against his people).

Compare that with what President Obama recently did, is he giving power back to the people of the united states?  Is he more like Augustus or Julius Caesar?

In the exact sense, a tyrant is an individual who arrogates to himself the royal authority without having a right to it. This is how the Greeks understood the word ‘tyrant’: they applied it indifferently to good and bad princes whose authority was not legitimate. [Rousseau, “The Social Contract”]  http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=tyrant

In a commentary of Oedipus I once read the author argued that Oedipus Rex should rightly have been called Oedipus Tyrannous because the original term didn’t have a negative meaning, it just meant popular ruler, Julius Caesar was very popular, he also was a usurper of the law.

PREEMPTIVE ARGUMENTS FOR THE HATERS

image0091

You are about to use the moving the goal fallacy with yourself as the goal and we are going to have an argument of infinite regress where you refuse to believe what I have just told you no matter how often I support it with facts.  You are not a linguisitic philosopher, an analytical philosopher or a philologist, I am.  Moreover, I am correct.

hamsa-temporary-tattoo

The Symbols above is known as the hamsa, it originated in India and was associated with the Jains, who were the Janis mentioned in the story of Moses.  The name comes from the Hindu concept of Harmlessness known as Ahimsa, notice the similar phonology?

Ahimsa (Sanskrit: अहिंसा; IAST: ahiṃsā, Pāli:[1]avihiṃsā) is a term meaning ‘not to injure’. The word is derived from the Sanskrit root hiṃs – to strike; hiṃsā is injury or harm, a-hiṃsā is the opposite of this, i.e. cause no injury, do no harm.[2][3] Ahimsa is also referred to as nonviolence, and it applies to all living beings – including all animals – according to many Indian religions.[4]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahimsa

The word itself derives from So Ham the inbreaths and outbreaths of Brahma if you are familiar with my work you know that I believe that Abraham and Brahma are one and the same, I am not the first or the only person who believes this.

Soham (सो ऽहम्so ‘ham[1]) is the Sanskrit for “I am He/That”. (See also: Tat Tvam Asi.)

When it applies to a person’s name, according to Vedic philosophy it means identifying oneself with the universe or ultimate reality. Some say that when a child is born it cries Koham-Koham which means Who am I? That is when the universe replies back Soham. You are the same as I am. It also stems from the Sanskrit word which means, “self pride.”

I am

“May [God] bless the lads, and let them carry my name, along with the name of my fathers, Abraham and Isaac. May they increase like fish in the land.” (Gen. 48:16)

The Talmud (Berachot 55b) explains that Joseph shared a special quality with fish:

“The fish in the waters are concealed by the water, and thus not susceptible to the Evil Eye. So too, the descendants of Joseph are not susceptible to the Evil Eye.” http://ravkooktorah.org/VAYEHI59.htm

Kabbalists such as myself know that “water” is a metaphor for Torah which is synonymous with the law of the Universe that is studied by rabbis, and augurs, and expounded.  Fish live in the water, so this zen like koan, which is so paradoxical is saying that the philosophers, the rational people need to be increased.  It is these philosophers who are protected from the evil eye.

The nounkohen is used in the Torah to refer to priests, both Jewish and non-Jewish, such as the Jewish nation as a whole,[1] as well as the priests (Hebrewkohanim) of Baal (2 Kings 10:19).

The Hebrew noun kohen is most often translated as “priest”, whether Jewish or pagan, such as the priests of Baal or Dagon, though Christian priests are referred to in Hebrew by the term komer (Hebrew כומר). The word derives from a Semitic root common, at minimum, to the Central Semitic languages; the cognateArabic wordكاهنkāhin means “soothsayer, augur, or priest“.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohen

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

OK ONE LAST SECRET

untitled

Epistemology Paradox Where Psychology meets Philosophy

THE PSYCHO LINGUIST

shutterstock_120619090

Ponder this, how is it that you know yourself and how is it that you know anything about the world or facts?

You know the world through yourself and you know yourself in relation to the world and the things in the world. 

Even your self image, the way you feel about yourself is determined in part by how people characterize you to yourself by how they react to you and how they treat you.  Also a lot of your self image is determined by what you don’t know about yourself.  Normal people are not depressed, but in psychology it is known that only depressed people evaluate themselves correctly.  If we examine the Dunning Kruger Effect this might be because the experienced individual compares themselves to people that are better than themselves and knows their own weaknesses and down-fallings.  Whereas an inexperienced person just has feelings about themselves.  The young…

View original post 852 more words

(E 2 V) Efficiency Towards Value Philosophy

THE PSYCHO LINGUIST

scale

One of the premises of Rational Praxis-ism, is an efficiency with value.  What has value?  Anything could potentially have value.  Value presupposes a human perspective.  Efficiency towards value demonstrates an awareness of others opinions and desires.  Possible deveations from this rational praxis include being unconscious in relationship or insensitive towards the feelings and thoughts of the people one is in relationship with, or an overt anti-social contempt of the others one is in relationship with.  Yet a third unreasonable deviation is an ascetic, hyper sensitivity to the desires of others and a lack of reasonable concern for oneself.  (you will also find that this mentality enables the other two mentalities, because it projects it’s sense of self on the other rational people in the relationship to participate with it’s world view, and this mentality is tacitly self-loathing self-sabotaging, and self defeating, and it expects reasonable people to participate with it’s…

View original post 1,146 more words