Women have a strategic advantage in relationship that they tend to exploit unbeknownst to themselves. These instincts, behaviors, and strategies have been hardwired into the human organic computer through millions of years of neural myelination that have been passed on in the form of cellular memory. Women don’t think about it, they don’t do it consciously, they aren’t aware that they tacitly interpret and judge reality in the experiencing of it.
The female mind was created to be in relationship with children. The woman thinks that femininity is superior to masculinity, that is why she is female, as such when their is a disagreement between the male and female she refuses to look from his perspective or compromise or negotiate. She uses her bias and the feminine bias of society and the children to get her way. She basically hijacks the relationship and holds it for ransom.
If you observe women’s arguing styles you realize that they can’t get over their programming, they act like a mother in the following ways. They presuppose their moral authority, they try to control the narrative as though they are talking to a child. They correct the narrative, changing words, they are not just expressing a different sentiment they think that they have the final edit on the conversation. They talk over you, interrupt your, nag, whine, repeat themselves, refuse to agree, participate, or move towards the solution or compromise, they quote people outside of the relationship whose opinions don’t matter and they will even violate the boundaries of the relationship by bringing people into the argument who are not part of the conversation in order to take their side. These are not the behaviors of a person who is in relationship or a person who give equal credence to their partner. The correlation between psychopaths and the narcissistic narrative has recently been discovered and fascinatingly, my theories show that the female brain, especially in relationship with a male brain acts psychopathicly, whereas the male brain is more sociopathic.
The female brain operates from moral authority, operating on superficial aesthetic snap decisions as to what looks right and what sounds right. The female mind is in relationship with its own authority and as such wants to expand and intensify its authority so it uses illegitimate behaviors and strategies in relationship to create a disparate impact in its own favor. While men think about creating value for the relationship women think about getting what they want from the relationship and in this way women attack the relationship. Even in a relationship of two women will try to increase their status, social climbing. Women don’t debate analytically offering evidence, and reasons, or being open to experiment, they argue emotionally not being able to conceive of any other solution besides the one that they are leaning towards. They ask leading questions, they try to control the direction of the conversation, they force an emotional moral frame editing the consideration set of the conversation as if they were the arbitrary judge of the conversation and they try to force you to participate with their premise.
The female mind sees reason as a hostile, alien, influence and refuses to participate with it, or she will conflate moral authority with sapiential authority and herself the high priestess of both, but she is absolutely incapable of not being perfectly predictable in her positions and behavior.
The woman acts as a mediator between father and child, a liaison, a go between, and she can use her position to bring the family unit closer together or to sabotage the father. She can try to win the child’s favor so that he likes her more by spoiling the child. If the father competes in this way it is more damaging for the child because he can play the parents off each other and the child starts to think in terms of possessions instead of relationship. The mother can misrepresent the father to the son and further damage the relationship between them. Some women go so far as to make the father an object of contempt and ridicule to the children.
For those of you that are familiar with my theories on emergent properties in collective judgments of societies you might remember this piece I did to illustrate how society protects women from men they are in relationship with. Note further that the man is basically accepted into a society by having children, that is his root in society, his entrance into a society. Women use every possible strategy to expand and intensify their control, to make it permanent.
Most cultures have an age of adulthood which has historically ended the authority of the mother and begins the authority of the father and the preparation of the child to be a responsible and functional part of society, which also means that the issues that the mother has protected and instilled in the child through invasive narrative or psychological manipulation have to be removed and the child has to be made mentally and emotionally healthy and a contributor to society. The child is also at this time responsible for the laws of the land and is no longer able to make appeals to feminine authority in the form of mercy and charity claiming to not be responsible for their actions and the consequences thereof. The problem with America is that none of the social strictures on women apply and at the same time women are unconscious of their instincts and processes and of the evil they do innately. They don’t have to scrutinize themselves or criticize themselves and they refuse to take responsibility for their actions or the consequences of them. At the same time the refuse to confine their attentions and judgment to realms in which they are valid and get good results, completely incapable of not tacitly judging and interpreting everything from the position of moral authority. Refusing to participate with reason they are passive aggressive and perceive themselves at the same time as being passive resisters and reformers of society while all they are really doing is making society weak and vulnerable.
- Anatomy of the Female Mind (thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com)
- Woman are Aggressive Communicators (thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com)
- Rewarding Failure/Punishing Success (terminclature.wordpress.com)
- The Destruction of Family and Other “Liberating Legacies” we can Thank Feminist Social Engineering for (thongexcavationpoetry.wordpress.com)
Ponder this, how many people have had an enjoyable experience with a bewb? Now how many people have had an enjoyable experience with a penis? The vast majority of people are not analytical philosophers, they don’t know the logical fallacies and they don’t know the cognitive biases and as such they can’t stop themselves from making them. Furthermore I have found that neural myelination accounts for 90% of the decision making of human beings which means cellular memory. I refer to humans as organic computers because they are predictable. In their judgments there are certain patterns that emerge, such as a pro female bias.
Contemplate how many more people spend on breast cancer than veterans or prostrate cancer and the fact that Veterans charities are rampant with fraud and theft, which is not tolerated with breast cancer awareness, people are much more hyper vigilant. But women didn’t sacrifice themselves for us. Every person that served protected the entire nation from threats. A woman having breasts is not necessarily a mother or our mother. Yet we are far more sympathetic to feminine concerns than masculine concerns.
Every year at least $1.5 billion is spent on breast cancer research. Some of this money comes from an ever-growing number of breast cancer non-profit organizations, but the vast majority comes from government organizations such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Defense (DoD). The funds go largely to preventionand early detection.http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772
Men women and children have the same bias, choosing in favor of femininity and weakness. Men are even insensitive to their own desires. Men don’t even question this when asked to sacrifice themselves for women and children, they just presuppose the validity of it. Women also don’t question it. Women have gotten so arrogant and so expectant that men will sacrifice their desires and wishes for women and children that even after not having contributed anything meaningful to a man’s life women finding they don’t have enough of what they want will turn to the man and expect him to sacrifice himself so that she can have more.
The manliest men go off to war, they are in relationship with death and the threats and the ugliness, they create the outside perimeter, the grizzled, gnarly, rind, the crust, the tough outer layer. That is why I say the male mind is sociopathic.
Inside that are the effeminate men, the champions of normalcy and pleasantness, captain save a ho, the white knights, the arm chair philosophers, with their feminist, elitist, bias. It is the guy that is not fit to go into battle. He acts as a moral authority protecting the women from the manly men, but also gaming the system for his own benefit. He is to cowardly to do what the manly man does. He is a champion of femininity.
The butch women essentially perform the same function as the effeminate men, protecting women from the truth, reality, ugliness, and death. Lying to women about themselves. Telling them they are equals to the men and not to worry. The butch women are closer to the women and children then the effeminate men. Women have an innate feeling of inferiority to men, Sigmond Freud got that right. If you observe women in their reasoning, arguing, and behavior, they want to control the penis, they want to own it. They want to direct the activities of the penis. They want to send it to attack their enemies. They want to control how it thinks and they want to be the focal point of its attention and the only source of its happiness.
Penis envy in Freudian psychoanalysis refers to the theorized reaction of a girl during her psychosexual development to the realization that she does not have a penis. Freud considered this realization a defining moment in the development of gender and sexual identity for women — the parallel reaction in boys to the realization that women do not have a penis being castration anxiety. In contemporary culture, the term sometimes refers inexactly or metaphorically to women who are presumed to wish they were men.
What is the most fascinating is how the behaviors used to champion negate their own arguments. The manly women copy the behavior of men, therefore demonstrating that they tacitly believe that masculinity is dominant. Fritz Perls said that you copy what ever behavior you believe is dominant when you want to win. So the fact that they use masculine behavior when they want to win demonstrates that they believe masculinity is dominant. You have to understand the psychosis that the individual must have to use a means different from their argument in order to obtain a sense of victory. Women do this because it is a natural psychopathic/female strategy to expand and increase feminine authority. Women think of themselves as a group, WOMEN. Whereas men do not think of themselves as MEN, they think of themselves as a man. Men do not feel that their position is increased by being men, while women do, and this comes from the fact that their need recognition was stimulated in that they closetedly feel inferior to men, thus the need for the repeated conquest against men.
The effeminate man will argue that the woman is the equal of man in mental function and ability, but if that is so why does she need the protection of the effeminate man? The effeminate man argues against reason, and the participation therewith to increase the amount of poontang he has available to himself and not being able to compete with the manly man in manly endeavors, he adopts a strategy flying in the face of reason he presupposes that women need protection from the manly man and that they are incapable of dealing with reality and handling the truth.
The fascinating thing about people’s judgments, when they are no analytical philosophers, is that their judgments always make themselves correct. It always justifies why they are good for wanting what they want. Because their are so many weak, stupid, and incorrect people out their all of these strategies and judgments create a disparate impact in favor of weakness, stupidity, and failure. Why are we attracted to emotional pornography? Puppies, babies, kittens? because they are harmless, because we feel like we could protect them and contribute to them, that has positive survival data for us, it means we are surviving well and that we are capable of providing for another. If we were really secure we wouldn’t judge so hatefully and immediately against things that pose potential threats. We wouldn’t be controlled by our emotional reactions and pre emptively attack people because they appear strong or smart.
http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/organic-computers-definition-by-joxuashiva/ https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/deuchebag-nation-womans-world-part-2/ http://finscribeofwisdom.blogspot.com/2012/10/unsustainable-emergent-patterns-in.html http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/armchair-philosophers/ http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/histrionic-co-morbidity-psychopaths-at-work-part-2/ http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/11/emotional-pornography/
New International Version
Babylon, the Prostitute on the Beast
1One of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and said to me, “Come, I will show you the punishment of the great prostitute, who sits by many waters. 2With her the kings of the earth committed adultery, and the inhabitants of the earth were intoxicated with the wine of her adulteries.”
3Then the angel carried me away in the Spirit into a wilderness. There I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was covered with blasphemous names and had seven heads and ten horns. 4The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet, and was glittering with gold, precious stones and pearls. She held a golden cup in her hand, filled with abominable things and the filth of her adulteries. 5The name written on her forehead was a mystery:
BABYLON THE GREAT
THE MOTHER OF PROSTITUTES
AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
6I saw that the woman was drunk with the blood of God’s holy people, the blood of those who bore testimony to Jesus.
When I saw her, I was greatly astonished. 7Then the angel said to me: “Why are you astonished? I will explain to you the mystery of the woman and of the beast she rides, which has the seven heads and ten horns. 8The beast, which you saw, once was, now is not, and yet will come up out of the Abyss and go to its destruction. The inhabitants of the earth whose names have not been written in the book of life from the creation of the world will be astonished when they see the beast, because it once was, now is not, and yet will come.
9“This calls for a mind with wisdom. The seven heads are seven hills on which the woman sits. 10They are also seven kings. Five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet come; but when he does come, he must remain for only a little while. 11The beast who once was, and now is not, is an eighth king. He belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction.
12“The ten horns you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom, but who for one hour will receive authority as kings along with the beast. 13They have one purpose and will give their power and authority to the beast. 14They will wage war against the Lamb, but the Lamb will triumph over them because he is Lord of lords and King of kings—and with him will be his called, chosen and faithful followers.”
15Then the angel said to me, “The waters you saw, where the prostitute sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations and languages. 16The beast and the ten horns you saw will hate the prostitute. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked; they will eat her flesh and burn her with fire. 17For God has put it into their hearts to accomplish his purpose by agreeing to hand over to the beast their royal authority, until God’s words are fulfilled. 18The woman you saw is the great city that rules over the kings of the earth.”
To quote my friend, Lon Milo Duquette, the bible was written by cabalists for cabalists and much of it wasn’t meant for common perusal. The rabbinical science of PaRDeS was a means of concealing and revealing meaning. In order to use it you have to be familiar with Qabbalah, and if you haven’t gained proficiency therein you will never be able to uncover the hidden meaning correctly. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pardes_(Jewish_exegesis)
The seven angels with the seven bowl is a reference to the Jewish matrika shakti, the spirits that rule over the 7 planets and days of the week. Sun day, Moon Day, Tyrs day, Thors day, freya’s day, and Saturn’s day. It is also a reference to the 7 hills on which Rome was founded. Prometheus was punished by having to roll a boulder over a hill for all eternity. Where a planet is in its orbit is referred to as either Prometheus or Epimetheus.
Now we don’t know exactly when the Jews Helenized but I believe I can cast some light on that subject but let us consider the positions of Aristotle on the subject of money.
“Yes the truth is that men’s ambition and their desire to make money are among the most frequent causes of deliberate acts of injustice.”
Aristotle felt that Merchants should be slaves, which is to say non citizens, and that they should never be allowed to rule or gain political office. Furthermore he was mistrustful of Sailors/Merchants as purveyors of vice and disease. Interestingly, it is maritime law that is responsible for going to war, not domestic law as it is imprudent for one group to declare war on another in a city state. Maritime law determines going to battle based on an inequity of trade, or a deal gone south. Compare that to the concept of: “Come, I will show you the punishment of the great prostitute, who sits by many waters”. Prostitution is a business, a prostituting of one self for money.
“With her the kings of the earth committed adultery, and the inhabitants of the earth were intoxicated with the wine of her adulteries.”
Everybody enjoys the benefits of Capitalism, but don’t seem to understand that the rewards it offers are secondary to the fact that these huge corporations, multi-nationals are taking money out of your house/oikos/economy and investing it for their own benefit, not yours. Which means that over time they will have all the money and all of the control and you will be their slaves.
The English words “economy” and “economics” can be traced back to the Greek words οἰκονόμος (i.e. “one who manages a household”), a composite word derived from οἶκος(“house”) and νέμω (“manage; distribute”) by way of οἰκονομία (“household management”). ~wikipedia
Big business sells your labor and makes a profit off of it. This is an up down relationship not a horizontal democratic relationship. if you are selling your own products and services, small business, you are the equal to the customer. If your services and products are being sold by a large corporation you are inferior to your boss and to the customer. Your boss gets rewarded for making more money off of you, while giving you less reward. Your boss benefits from illegal immigration because he can force you to compete with poor cultures that will work for less. So not only do you support them because they can’t afford licensing and insurance, and they live 20 people to a house, working 2 or more full time jobs and sending 2/3s of their income back to their poor country so that their parents who had 20 children can live an easy life without working, but you also have to compete with them. You are now the equal of a slave in your own country, TA-DAA! CONGRATULATIONS! YOU ARE SO LUCKY! AREN’T YOU GLAD YOU INDUSTRIALIZED?
If you examine the story of Moses you see an inescapable parallel between the creation of the Chassidim by Rabbi Ba’al Shem Tov and Moses. The Hebrew word Mizraim refers to Egypt but it also refers to the Nations, specifically big nations with large economies and love of money.
Now notice Jesus didn’t say that money, was the root of all evil, but THE LOVE OF MONEY. Who loves money? Merchants. Bankers. Usurers. Shylocks.
I am personally of the opinion that the Jewish reformation was to remove a mentality that had crept into the Jewish faith. That of the Persians. To this day Persians have an elitist, superior mentality. Consider how the Greeks perceived the Persians who would adorn their hair with gold before they went into battle, they would braid their hair like women and they would put on eye make up like women. To this day Muslims in Saudi Arabia and Egypt consider themselves too important to pick up their own filth, it is not a sustainable society. They bring slaves from Somalia to do it for them,
Abid (Arabic: عبد, plural Abeed عبيد or El Abeed العبيد)is a derogatory term meaning “slave” used mainly in Arab countries and is usually applied as an insult to Black people to invoke stereotypes. The name has been explained as being an allusion to the submission that Muslims owe to Allah. Meyer[attribution needed] dismisses this as “efforts by propagandists [to] explain the term away [that are] at the least, disingenuous”. ~wikipedia.
And in Egypt it is the pigs and dogs on the street that eat the garbage that everybody is too important to take care of themselves. The Kosher diet is very humble, very sustainable, very bland, it isn’t suitable for a people that consider themselves royalty and superior to others.
11They said to Moses, “Was it because there were no graves in Egypt that you brought us to the desert to die? What have you done to us by bringing us out of Egypt?12Didn’t we say to you in Egypt, ‘Leave us alone; let us serve the Egyptians’? It would have been better for us to serve the Egyptians than to die in the desert!” exodus 14:
24So the people grumbled against Moses, saying, “What are we to drink?” exodus 15:
4The rabble with them began to crave other food, and again the Israelites started wailing and said, “If only we had meat to eat! 5We remember the fish we ate in Egypt at no cost—also the cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions and garlic. 6But now we have lost our appetite; we never see anything but this manna!” numbers 11:
The economy is not coming back. In order for there to be capitalism you need some kind of large surplus to exploit. Something you have a lot of that you can give away at a small profit. We don’t have anything like that anymore. Furthermore you have to have the energy to do it. We don’t have gas anymore in the same quantities. Not everybody can afford to industrialize because they would need fossil fuels. We are rapidly seeing that atomic energy is not all it is cracked up to be, and it is not a viable solution for future energy. We need another source of energy and nothing is on the horizon.
thank you to Adam Wolfe comedy for this photoshop
This image was originally created to encourage women to do masculine jobs while men were off sacrificing themselves for the good of the country to protect American interests in a world that was falling into the hands of evil tyrannical powers. Certain functions needed to continue in this country to support the economy and those men that were losing their lives and risking their lives. It became, however, a corrupted symbol for women not needing men.
As women continued to promote feminine “rights” to the exclusion of reason, and in opposition to equality and fairness, the female lobby with no self scrutiny and no internally critical voice strove not for equality but for dominance of femininity over masculinity and the subjugation of masculinity in spite of the contributions men had made. This is a recurring pattern. These lobbies never go away, they have no incentive to, they get money to continue promoting their cause. Every month they send out a news letter celebrating their victories, never have you heard of one of these lobbies saying, “well guess what folks, we have accomplished our goals and we are now equal, so we are not accepting any more money and we are shutting our doors”.
Think back to the prohibition…
One of the biggest influences in the prohibition was to monopolize pussy, women wanted control of men so that they could control the happiness of the man in a depressed economy where life was miserable, and those bitches on the left look really stingy, if you know what I mean, the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union. You have to understand how the woman edits her consideration set.
Women are only concerned about women and children, they are not concerned for men. I am saying this because it comes from my theory on evolutionary psychology and neural myelination as it is passed on from generation to generation. Millions of years of repeated patterns creating the male and female brains, and a touch of hormone rewires the brains to think differently from one another.
Men and women are essentially the same but were compartmentalized by nature to be specialized in two different arenas that are mutually in opposition to one another. Protection and nurturing. Men do not feel that they are increased in value by being men, although for their own protection maybe they should. Women on the other hand do feel that their value is increased by being a woman. Men can survive longer in a state of nature right now. Women in a state of nature will die almost immediately. The reason that this neural myelination was passed on to us is because THAT IS HOW WE SURVIVED!!! DEAD PEOPLE DON’T PASS ON NEURAL MYELINATION!!!! In order to be tough men have to ignore their emotions, but women judging tacitly from analogy think their perspective is superior and judge masculinity and try to turn men into women. She relies on him and yet she wants him to be like her.
The female mind only concerns itself with feminine subjects. It doesn’t like thinking about ugliness and evil in the world. The worst evil the woman knows about is her husband. But because of a natural and innate arrogance she feels she is superior and tries to turn him into a woman. She doesn’t want him thinking about manly things, doing manly things, or wanting manly things. She tries to remove all incentives for him being a man. He should be happy with what little she provides him in the way of reward and he should not look to indulge his masculine identity elsewhere.
This pattern repeats everywhere in our society and our history. We the most feminine and feminized nation in the world still blame all of the bad on men and we do so tacitly, men and women. Listen to people talking as I do being a linguistic philosopher, tally the number of times you hear this conversation… “that lady is insane a real, bitch.” “Well, some man probably really screwed her over.” I can’t tell you the number of times I have heard this. If we deconstruct this for value we see that sympathy is for the woman, and she is not responsible for her own actions, or for the fact that she is not mentally or emotionally healthy, women are allowed to be crazy and self interested, damaged. They are allowed to throw histrionic fits, and pursue their insane agendas. The crazy person in the relationship is dominant, trust me, that is the definition of a tyrant. http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/cause-of-the-bad/
The very word “civilization” comes from the word chevalier, the french word for knight, and we see that according to Proto-indo-european it moved over here, across continents and through time. Men championing the whims of women. Men the active cause women the passive cause. And yet, in the most feminine country in the world women STILL do not take responsibility for anything. Why should they when they can just complain about it and blame men until they fix it for you.
MARRIAGE, A WOMAN’S INSTITUTION
About 10 years ago I downloaded everything I could from I-tunes university and I would listen to it while I drive, because their is a shortage of intelligent conversation in the world which is why I have so many conversations with myself. Anyway, back to my point, one of the pieces I downloaded was from a black, female, judge in Chicago giving a speech, she talked about the no-fault divorce and how it was created to get women out of abusive relationships but it created this wind fall of divorce. She blamed the loss of the American family on women, I thought this very poignant and it led me to look for answers in directions that are forbidden to society. Unfortunately, I don’t remember her name or I would give her credit, but I thank her for her brilliant synopsis, and her moral courage in speaking out against a group few seem to have the courage to.http://articles.chicagotribune.com/keyword/no-fault-divorce/featured/4
Bill Hicks famously said, and I am paraphrasing because I can’t find the original quote, “the people in your society that you can’t criticize, they are in control.” and from my perspective that is women. They don’t criticize themselves and nobody else is allowed to. They have victim status. And you can’t say anything even constructively critical to them without being considered a bully. Society reinforces this.
I am going to show you how this pattern repeats literally everywhere around us through something that recently happened to me.
Now this is not a quote, I am using my philosophy and psychological technique to create the verbal equivalent or tautology of what she actually thinks based on her behavior. This woman poses as a spiritualist and is in all point of fact a closeted man hater. As such she tries to monopolize spiritual authority as a feminine realm. Not being gainfully employed she coasts on the money provided her from her rich husband while at the same time, talking shit about men and her husband behind his back. Wanting his support she also conceals the fact that she despises him. Being in relationship with past trauma and not wanting to be emotionally and mentally healthy she holds onto her damage as a source of power. She is a player in a grass roots spiritualist movement in orange county, that tries to marginalize masculine spiritual authority while at the same time increasing spiritual feminine authority. http://spiritualcoop.wix.com/spiritualcoop
Humorously I wrote a piece on a blog about crediting your sources when you quote somebody or they teach you something you have never heard before. I was in her group on facebook at the time and she started arguing against the necessity of quoting your sources and it being a form of spiritual theft. It was ironic because a month earlier she had told my gf at the time that it was ok to use her stuff as long as she quoted her. The difference between D. Marie and myself is that she is not an original content generator and I am. I am an initiated shaktipat and jnani guru. She can’t compete with my creative or spiritual content. I knew that the people in her group were feminazis and that all they would do is plagiarize my ideas and take credit for them.
Here is another interesting tidbit. One of D. Marie’s gurus is Jean Houston who at a meeting of http://sistergiant.com/sistergiant/ gave a speech that basically said women need to be more concernful of men and treat them as equals. She was complaining about the feminist spiritual movement. Marie, who get’s some of her authority from being a disciple of Jean Houston basically entirely ignored this exhortation on her part…..
- Emergent Properties in Human Judgments. (thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com)
- femal douchebag (priscillaescamilla28.wordpress.com)
- Masculine and Feminine (aobanes.wordpress.com)
- Feminine and Masculine… WHATEVER! (skyefreedomlyka.wordpress.com)
- Woman are Aggressive Communicators (thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com)
- A douchebag’s lament: Pickup Artists have failed to tame the Wild American Bitch (manboobz.com)
A little about me, I was raised Jehovah’s Witness by a family that was considered strict even by JW standards. My parents expected dating to be serious and for the purpose of marriage. I wasn’t allowed to date until the age of 18 when I disappeared. The expectation that one would be able to get marriage right the first time with no experience is like expecting someone to walk up too the plate in the last inning of the last game of the World Series and hit a home run while never having swung a bat before in your life, or at least that is what it feels like to me in retrospect, as I mentioned they were strict…
After my first colossal fuck up with my fiance’ I realized that while trying to find a woman that was the opposite of my mother I had attracted to myself my mother with short blonde hair in start of long dark hair. I realized that I knew literally nothing about these evil insane creatures and I would NEVER be in an exclusive relationship with one again. I needed an enriched environment in which I could study women. So I became a male stripper because I am a fast learner. I was never allowed to dance so I was very nervous when I auditioned I had never danced before because of my upbringing but I was hired on the spot. I literally learned to dance taking my clothes off on stage in front of women.
I danced for about 2 years and I observed women during that time. People will tell you that a club is not a good place to observe women but I have found it pretty much a predictive model for all women that I have met in my life. I would like to meet a woman that doesn’t think like a woman but I haven’t been that fortunate.
To say I was a good dancer would be an understatement. To this day I am an awesome dancer, I used to be a ringer for this black AM radio station, SHUT THE DO’ with Darnell. At the peak of my career I was hired to dance at the emerald queen casino for a Jay-Z concert. I was made a feature performer and my lap dances were better than most that one can get from a woman. I know because I have had a lot of lap dances from women, they actually influenced my style a lot.
I recently saw this movie, Magic Mike, and it reminded me of the experiences that I had, the stigma that women put on you if you are a male stripper. It was frustrating for me to watch how women make choices, women are more interested in competing with one another than they are in being in relationship. The ugliest brother in the club would make a minimum of $600 a night, easily, no matter how greasy his jerry curl was or how badly his teeth had rotted away. It wasn’t like we had mainly black women in the club either, but they think in terms of stigma. They think all of the other girls want the big black dick so they want the big black dick, and they would buy lap dances from them when they couldn’t even dance, while I made a maximum of $300 a night no matter how hard I busted my ass. I wanted to break into acting or professional dancing or anything but I couldn’t get any support. Women would fuck me but they wouldn’t support me and they didn’t trust me.
I had to stop dancing because I was beginning to hate women. They couldn’t make decisions correctly and I am not allowed to smack them around a little bit. I started hating stripping. It wasn’t fun anymore and I had nothing else to learn from it, the enriched environment had been exhausted after only two years. I remember Mark tried to get me to come back to dancing and I got up on stage and I started moving and I looked out at the audience and then I stopped and my head drooped and I just walked off the stage and out the door and I never came back.
My study of women continued with a 5 year bouncing career, most of it at a Samoan night club in Seatac that is now a casino. It had a 900 capacity, two floors. I got to study women in a slightly different environment and what I learned confirmed what I had seen thus far. That was all over 10 years ago and I have continued learning in every relationship I have. People think that it is not possible to understand women, women think it is not possible to understand women, they are both wrong.
Now that I know how women think I will never get into an exclusive relationship with one. It just isn’t worth it.
Oh, yeah, one more thing. My stage name was Sweetness.
I coined this phrase to point out a false dichotomy in the way that people think and make judgments. Men are thought of as bad and dirty for being interested in the things that they are interested in, which is where the things that women are interested in come from. Women indulge themselves in feminine pornography and their is no law against it. Women are more interested in children then they are in men. A woman is sexually attracted to a man because she wants more of him in the world, but women naturally reify and expand their authority which means that once they have what they want they forget about him or try to turn him into a woman. The man can’t win, if he allows himself to be turned into a woman she loses respect for him and interest in him and moves onto the next man. If he refuses to be turned into a woman he is abused henpecked, scolded, ostracized, demeaned, nagged, divorced, and his money is taken from him.
If you think I am joking in calling it emotional pornography consider this, erectile cavities exist in two places on the human body, the penis and the nipple. Women will not tell you this but, for lots of sexually developed women that are not weird or screwed up they really, really, enjoy breast feeding. It seems that white women have a harder time being true to their animal urges than other women that don’t over analyze what feels good.
One more thing I want to add, when the world is so vastly overpopulated with idiots that breed much faster than smart people, why do we still look in awe upon women because of their ability to crap forth life from their front pooper? Why do we still respect their moral authority and charity and mercy which flies in the face of reason, and holds back the hand of Sapiential Authority, wisdom?
Ponder this, men used to refer to women as chicks, girls, babe, things that framed them as being like the fuzzy cute little animals that they are attracted to, but we aren’t allowed to use those terms anymore, we have to respect them as equals when they don’t think like us, act like us, or listen to us, and they prevent us from getting what we want. Why don’t we say that women are matronizing children. Maybe we should force women to treat children like their equals and stop condescending to them. Wouldn’t that make the world a ton better?