Category Archives: PHILOSOPHY/PSYCHOLOGY

High Occult Science for Fidem Turbare

Silence

Part of the responsibility that I have taken on myself is to explain to leaders of the Atheist communities, who are capable of understanding, the deeper occult philosophy and meaning behind some of the religions, that these religions were indeed created by Deists and not Theists, (with the exception of Islam which was created by a violent, illiterate, child rapist, and by illiterate I mean he couldn’t read) I wanted to explain to Fidem some of the experiences she herself is going through as explained by kabbalah and Aleister Crowley’s poetry being that he was conversant in multiple different systems, as I am, to see if she gleans anything useful from it. 

Below is the tree of life, it is a Qabbalist metaphor and a memory peg system.  The theory of everything was created a long time ago by men that I refer to as the super-genii.  They didn’t have computers back in the day so they had to remember things by uploading these memory peg systems.  The curious thing about these systems is after a period of time forcing yourself to use them the system seems to start organizing information for you.  We do have cellular memory and their is a portion of ourselves that recognizes and remembers this system and reactivates.  The ancient super-genii weren’t a little smarter than we are today, they were a lot smarter, as we will see.

Tree_of_Life_2009_large

If one were to take the philosophy of astrology (prior to the discoveries 7 original planet system) and over lap it with the tree of life, and overlay that with the major tarot arcanum, you would have the fully fleshed out theory of everything. The reason that I say the theory of everything is that everything only makes sense or can make sense to the human brain.  It is the human brain that makes sense of everything, the human brain is an important component in the universe.

Qabalah has been called “the western meditation tradition” and indeed it links us back to the traditions of India being the western version of the chakra system.  Qabalah is jewish mysticism based on the Zohar, in a manner of speaking “Zohar” means light.  What is fascinating is that most jews are forbidden to study Qabbalah and even the ones that are doing it aren’t doing it correctly anymore because of an innate fear instilled in them by Jewish religious leaders.  They confuse being Jewish with being able to do Qabbalah correctly, but most of them are told to focus on the path workings, which means they never get around to meditating on the sephiroth.  This is done to give them a sense that they are studying Qabalah without ever getting anything from it.  Part of this problem comes from the fact that every time there has been a Qabbalist renaissance, their has been a revolution.  The last qabbalist renaissance was in Spain about 300 years ago, right before the Jews got kicked out of Spain.

zohan

Qabbalah, in essence, is a reinterpretation of the scripture, the Jewish religion predisposes itself to this kind of plasticity because the Pentateuch, the first  5 books of the bible, the extended version of god’s name has been devowelated, thereby predisposing itself to controversy and different interpretations, this creates a pattern something like the Sanatana Dharma inside the Jewish faith, since nobody can ultimately prove their absolute correctness or the absolute incorrectness of anybody else and since you can’t change a single letter of the pentateuch on threat of death, their is a type of equality cemented between Jews with different interpretations of the Scripture.  When times are bad on returns to the scripture and reinterprets it to remain faithful to the ancestors and still to maintain an identity in a time of turbulent change and in this manner retaining the wisdom of the Fathers.

Origins of the word[edit]

The term cabal derives from Cabala (a word that has numerous spelling variations), the Jewish mystical interpretation of the Hebrew scripture. In Hebrew it means “reception” or “tradition”, denoting the sod (secret) level of Jewish exegesis. In European culture (Christian CabalaHermetic Qabalah) it became associated withoccult doctrine or a secret.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabal#Origins_of_the_word

A political cult is a cult with a primary interest in political action and ideology.[86][87] Groups that some writers have termed as “political cults,” mostly advocating far-left or far-right agendas, have received some attention from journalists and scholars. In their 2000 book On the Edge: Political Cults Right and Left, Dennis Tourish and Tim Wohlforth discuss about a dozen organizations in the United States and Great Britain that they characterize as cults.[88]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult#Political_cults

NOW HERE IS THE PART THAT APPLIES TO YOU FIDEM

Technically, Fidem, you are highly spiritually and morally evolved, I realized this as soon as I met you, I know that you have French Jewish DNA.  Mary Magdalene went to France after Jesus death, with a girl named Black Sara or Kali Sara, you Fidem are a Kali monad, specifically this one (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durga)  There was a Qabbalist renaissance in France too, the Cathars, they claimed that the Roman Catholic Church was too motivated by money, and the RCC sacked the castle.

You Fidem are in the top 1% of society as far as morality and higher philosophy go.  Most people can’t get as high as you are in 1,000 life times.  You will prove this to yourself over time.  People have their ceilings, I would direct you to the linguistic barrier in philosophy if you want to go as high as you can.

maslows-hierarchy-of-needs

NOW THIS IS WHERE IT GETS WEIRD

All of the sephiroth below the supernal triad are in da’ath, the sephiroth that doesn’t exist, because the Jews were the cult of 10, they were obsessed with the number 10, they are the source of the decimal system.  10 commandments, tithing, 10 plagues, etc.

daath1

tithe (/ˈtð/; from Old Englishteogoþa “tenth”) is a one-tenth part of something, paid as a contribution to a religious organization or compulsory tax to government.[1] Today, tithes are normally voluntary and paid in cashcheques, orstocks, whereas historically tithes were required and paid in kind, such as agricultural products. Several European countries operate a formal process linked to the tax system allowing some churches to assess tithes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tithe

Oh, wait, I forgot something, I have to go back.  All of the patriarchs of the bible are associated with systems of magick, which is why they were written into the bible in the form of a mythological allegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abramelin_the_Mage

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enochian_magic

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6th_and_7th_Books_of_Moses

The 6th and 7th books of Moses form the basis of modern voodoo.  When you are fighting an enemy that has all of the resources with no resources you use voodoo.  The 10 plagues were a form of Voodoo.  The last plague was an evocation of Azrael, the Archangel of death.

Back to you.  As I was saying before the 7 sephiroth below Da’ath are in Da’ath.  Da’ath is considered the abyss, the attempt of the wizard/guru is to cross the abyss.  The Dragon with 7 heads and 10 horns is the ultimate power in the abyss, the physical world, any light you bring into the world marginalizes it’s authority and wounds it’s ego.  That corresponds to the 7 chakras, Jesus removed 7 demons from Mary Magdalene, he brought her to spiritual perfection.  She was his main student.  He succeeded in bringing the true religion to the west but not through the RCC instead rather through Freemasonry, the Western Guru Tradition, of which he was a member as was Shams, Rumi’s inspiration.

id, ego, superego

The Dragon is ego consciousness, it can control everybody in ego consciousness.  When you cross the abyss you are in super ego and no longer under the influence of the ego consciousness.  Not being able to get to you or at you the dragon attacks those close to you turning them on you.  Anybody in ego consciousness is a potential danger.

Fiona

What you are experiencing right now is called the curse of the Magus.  Da’ath corresponds to the visuddha chakra or the voice.  Pay close attention to Scriptures 19 and 20…

Liber B
vel Magi
sub Figura I

00. One is the Magus; twain His forces; four His weapons. These are the Seven Spirits of Unrighteousness; seven vultures of evil. Thus is the art and craft of the Magus but glamour. How shall He destroy Himself?

0. Yet the Magus hath power upon the Mother both directly and through Love. And the Magus is Love, and bindeth together That and This in his conjuration.

1. In the beginning doth the Magus speak Truth, and send forth Illusion and Falsehood to enslave the soul. Yet therein is the Mystery of Redemption.

2. By His Wisdom made He the Worlds; the Word that is God is none other than He.

3. How then shall He end His speech with Silence? For He is Speech.

4. He is the first and the last. How shall He cease to number Himself?

5. By a Magus is this writing made known through the mind of a Magister. The one uttereth clearly, and the other understandeth; yet the Word is falsehood, and the Understanding darkness. And this saying is Of All Truth.

6. Nevertheless it is written; for there be times of darkness, and this as a lamp therein.

7. With the Wand createth He.

8. With the Cup preserveth He.

9. With the Dagger destroyeth He.

10. With the Coin redeemeth He.

11. His weapons fulfil the wheel; and on What Axle that turneth is not known unto Him.

12. From all these actions must He cease before the curse of His Grade is uplifted from Him. Before He attain to That which existeth without Form.

13. And if at this time He be manifested upon earth as a Man, and therefore is this present writing, let this be His method, that the curse of His grade, and the burden of His attainment, be uplifted from Him.

14. Let Him beware of abstinence from action. For the curse of His grade is that He must speak Truth, that the Falsehood thereof may enslave the souls of men. Let him then utter that without Fear, that the Law may be fulfilled. And according to His Original Nature will that law be shapen, so that one may declare gentleness and quietness, being an Hindu; and another fierceness and servility, being a Jew; and yet another ardour and manliness, being an Arab. Yet this matter toucheth the mystery of Incarnation, and is not here to be declared.

15. Now the grade of a Magister teacheth the Mystery of Sorrow, and the grade of a Magus the Mystery of Change, and the grade of Ipsissimus the Mystery of Selflessness, which is called also the Mystery of Pan.

16. Let the Magus then contemplate each in turn, raising it to the ultimate power of Infinity. Wherein Sorrow is Joy, and Change is Stability, and Selflessness is Self. For the interplay of the parts hath no action upon the whole. And this contemplation shall be performed not by simple meditation— how much less then by reason? but by the method which shall have been given unto Him in His Initiation to the Grade.

17. Following which method, it shall be easy for Him to combine that trinity from its elements, and further to combine Sat-Chit-Ananda, and Light, Love, Life, three by three into nine that are one, in which meditation success shall be That which was first adumbrated to Him in the grade of Practicus (which reflecteth Mercury into the lowest world) in Liber XXVII, “Here is Nothing under its three Forms.”

18. And this is the Opening of the Grade of Ipsissimus, and by the Buddhists it is called the trance Nerodha-Samapatti.

19. And woe, woe, woe, yea woe, and again woe, woe, woe unto seven times be His that preacheth not His law to men!

20. And woe also be unto Him that refuseth the curse of the grade of a Magus, and the burden of the Attainment thereof.

21. And in the word CHAOS let the Book be sealed; yea, let the Book be sealed.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/oto/lib1.htm

68620_189636104511695_1047351032_n

You are beyond the abyss, don’t cling to anything in the abyss for your own sake.  Speak your truth.  I know that you have had some interesting experiences, one might refer to them as spiritual or supernatural.  There is such a thing as magick, but very few people can actually use it.  First you have to become the philosopher king, removing all of the cognitive biases and logical fallacies.  Once you have done this things will start to happen.  They are already happening for you.

Siddhis[note 1] are spiritual, magicalparanormal, or supernatural powers acquired through sadhana (spiritual practices), such asmeditation and yoga.[1] People who have attained this state are formally known as siddhas.[2]

Etymology[edit]

Siddhi is a Sanskrit noun which can be translated as “perfection”, “accomplishment”, “attainment”, or “success”.[3] In Tamil the word Siddhar/Chitthar refers to someone who has attained the Siddhic powers & knowledge. Chith is pure consciousness/knowledge in Sanskrit also.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siddhi

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siddhartha_Buddha

Siddha-artha  😉

hermesapollonius-1

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2014/02/12/channeled-message/

Advertisements

Expressions of Contempt

Image

 

I am trying to explain to people what I do and how I make predictions based on my psychological models.  Because people are acquisitively mimetic, they copy behaviors that they see being rewarded.  People copy whatever behavior they think of as winning behavior when they want to win.  So when one person succeeds in a certain behavior people emulate that behavior and that creates social patterns.  When society rewards these patterns it increases the frequency in which we see the pattern repeated and it also increases the intensity of that pattern.

The Psychologists Nalini Ambady and Robert Rosenthal developed this concept of thin slicing in their treatment of married couples.  What they found as they interviewed couples and then went back over the tape is that there were two expressions that repeatedly signaled the near demise of the relationship, disgust and contempt.  Depending on the frequency and intensity of these expressions the relationship could be determined to be very close to ending.

So I observe in conversation, on the media, in human behavior these patterns and I make predictions based on them.  So what does this mean for the near future?  Society is about to get a divorce?  No, much much worse.  The first thing I noticed when I saw Richard Dawkins for the first time was the frequency with which he would flash this feral micro expression of disgust.  And then I observed the Fundamentalist Drift of Science as the Dawkinites conflated themselves with science, I call them the cheerleaders of science.  And then I noticed the increased hostility of the conversations in the narrative and dialogue on the internet.  If you observe the body of evidence I have put together on this blog (http://atheistfallacies.wordpress.com/) you can see that I am not making these claims lightly.  I have spent a long time doing social experiments on these people to find out exactly where their heads are at.

Most people aren’t smart enough to detect Richard Dawkins subtle subterfuges in his rhetoric.  What he propounds as a philosophy is not a philosophy at all and he is not a philosopher, he is a revolutionary propagandist.  He has conflated the hatred of God (misotheism) with atheism and atheism with science.  What he is trying to do and succeeding at is making science into a machine to attack religion.  He is creating an environment where children can be exposed to the casual ridicule and hatred of religiosity, so that they start to think not only is it normal it is also good.  And then he wants to build a bridge for them into the scientific fields and into upper academia, where they will put their prejudices to work, harassing religious people and preventing them from going into certain fields.  What he is doing is so dangerous and insidious and deliberate.

This conceit that Atheists have that atheism is new, no it isn’t.  Socrates was accused of being an atheist.  So ask yourself why have you never heard of that one Atheist culture that was so successful?  Because Atheism is unviable as a form of government.  There are certain things science can’t do, and when you try to change what science can do you change what science is.  Dawkins is building a testament to his own ego.  He wants to be worshiped.  He sees himself as a kind of Moses of Science taking his people out of a heathen land.

When Karl Marx wrote his theories on Communism, he thought it was science, they even called it that.

“Scientific socialism is the term used by Friedrich Engels[1] to describe the social-political-economic theory first pioneered byKarl Marx. The purported reason why this socialism is “scientific socialism” (as opposed to “utopian socialism“) is because its theories are held to an empirical standard, observations are essential to its development, and these can result in changes and/or falsification of elements of the theory.”  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_socialism

And when the Germany adopted it, and Stalin adopted it, and Lenin adopted it, they all thought they were doing science and they couldn’t fail.  Pure atheist societies are arrogant, heartless, and violent.  You can’t use atheism or science or evolution for making an assertion that man should have inalienable rights.  They are amoral systems.  Dawkins puts religion on trial for all of the crimes that have been committed in the name of religion for thousands of years, Dawkinites assume that atheism is something new.  What they are forgetting or ignoring is that while religion has created horrors and atrocities, IT HAS BEEN AROUND AND SUCCESSFUL MORE OR LESS FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS, while atheism has never been successful, ever, for any prolonged period of time.

Atheism is moral and philosophical anarchy, it isn’t a belief system, it is the absence of the presence of the belief that god exists.  It isn’t big enough of an idea to make any assertion, you can’t build a law code on it, or a government on it.  Atheists might be found that have morality but atheism itself is amoral, and atheists don’t have to come to any agreement on what behavior is and is not acceptable, after all, it is survival of the fittest right?  If you survive or succeed you are the fittest.  Evolution works!

But yeah, things are bad and they are going to get worse… this I promise.

Image

 RELATED LINKS

The Direction of the Conversation

Image

Most people do not study enough philosophy to realize that it is about something real.  Most people don’t learn to debate well enough to learn that if it can’t be argued rationally it is crap.  Most people don’t learn the logical fallacies or the cognitive biases.  Conversations have a direction.  The conversation is either moving towards reason in a rational direction or one party is arguing against reason, arguing for vagueness, making emotional appeals.  You are either reasoning or rationalizing.  You are either talking about something real, good, true and useful or you are trying to make a turd smell like a flower, which is it?  Be honest with yourself.

It is out of necessity that great philosophers had to pre-empt conversation.  They only want rational conversation.  Don’t waste my time with your horse shit.  You can’t prove anything using irrational means.  That is what praxis is.  You can only prove something using rational means, that is why we have due process.  If you don’t communicate correctly you don’t think correctly and you don’t act correctly.  So the reason that you aren’t communicating correctly is because you are engaged in strategic behavior to make unreason appear to be reasonable.

Image

STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION:

A phrase coined by Joxua/Shivah to describe irrational communication used to control or manipulate the flow of conversation.

Conversation blocking- a form of strategic communication designed to stop a conversation or to prevent a topic from being discussed

Conversation dropping- a form of strategic communication designed to prevent a person from acknowledging their wrong or from participating in a conversation that is going a direction they don’t want to follow.

Communicating understanding- from shared state theory of communication meaning to communicate accurately your perspective on a subject based on understanding the topic, thinking before you speak, accounting for how it will be interpreted by the listener, listening to yourself as you speak and observing pragmatically the persons understanding of what you said and their application of it.  Associated with Socratic dialectic.

http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/strategic-communication-definition-by-joxuashiva/

RELATED ARTICLES

PROXIMITY IS POWER

Image

At the risk of being even more thoroughly despised, if that is possible, I will give away yet another female secret and tactic that I have discovered with my psycholinguistic models.  Women use their female communication rituals to control, influence, and manipulate proximity with shaming and guilting rituals, casting aspersions, unfounded accusations, etc.

Women keep men from their guy friends, from talking to one another, from talking about women, from strategizing how to deal with their women by suggesting that they are homosexual and that is why they are so reliant on one another.  Women know that the children are the source of their authority so they also keep the men away from the children.  When you get divorced and the kids are below a certain age, NO judge is going to take children away from their mother.  Women use this to hijack the relationship, threatening that if they don’t get their way, if they don’t get to be in charge, if he doesn’t tow the line then she will leave him, and she will get the kids, and the house, and his money.

She also keeps him away from the children by suggesting that his relationship with them is improper or that he has somehow stepped over an arbitrary line that she has created.  Funny thing is that my room mate does this same thing with MY cockapoo.  Saying I am a bad owner if I don’t take her out when she thinks I should and then at other times she spoils Monkey and at still other times she suggests that I am neglecting Monkey, all to control my behavior and to manipulate me.

The next time your wife tries to guilt you about your male friends, this is the correct answer, “YES, I AM A HUGE HOMOSEXUAL AND WE ARE GOING TO HAVE SOME FUNKY BUTTLOVING AND WE ARE GOING TO EAT THE POOPIES, AND WE ARE GOING TO TONGUE-PUNCH EACH OTHER’S FART BOXES, SO CLEVER OF YOU TO PICK UP ON OUR HOMOEROTIC TENSION, YOU ARE SUCH A SMART GIRL, NOW GO MAKE ME A SAMMICH.” 

Oh, yeah, one more thing.  Women will continuously in the course of the relationship describe to you in great detail how you are to treat them and behave when they are around, which means that when they are around they influence your behavior.  Why do they want to be around when they want to be around?  and when they want to be distant from you, why do they want to be distant from you?

Image

Anatomy of the Female Mind

Image

When I say “the female brain” I am referring to several things: the emergent patterns in the way women as a group behave and make judgments, men that have been indoctrinated into the moral superiority of women, and in a conflict or a relationship the more irrational person or psychopathic person, male or female.

I will give a brief synopsis of my theory on “organic computers”, Neural Myelination is passed on through cellular memory, successful techniques are passed on by people that survived, patterns that were repeated are neural myelinated, this myelination influences the way we perceive reality and make judgments, our judgments were informed by the need to survive of our ancestors, those patterns were created in situations where survival was difficult, those instincts in modern times can be out of touch with reality.

Image

Now, Nature, for lack of a better word compartmentalized functions into male and female functions.  The consideration set of the female mind was edited to be concerned with and for babies, to presuppose an environment created for her in which she could indulge herself in the concern for which her brain was created.  In doing so the female brain makes certain presuppositions and ignores certain factors.  Those concerns which would not be conducive to taking care of a child but would be useful in providing a safe environment for woman and child were the business of the male mind.

Men and women are essentially the same, but compartmentalized by nature to deal with two different concerns and topics in two different ways.  I discovered this when creating my psycholinguistic philosophy.  My philosophy states.

“All narrative is doxography.”

Which seems innocuous at first but it is much deeper than one might expect.  All narrative is point of view, which means that everything said characterizes the person speaking *(assuming you know how I deconstruct narrative).  It wasn’t until I started studying Deborah Tannen‘s research on Male and Female communication patterns that I realized there were two completely different consciousnesses talking to one another.  She refers to this as complimentary schizmogenesis, I think it is more like two alien species that have different values and speak two different languages.

MOTHER

Babies start off as objects, entirely dependent on their mothers, incapable of doing anything for themselves.  They can’t defend themselves, think for themselves, or provide for themselves.  Babies communicate no analytical data and only emotional data, so from the perspective of the female mind emotions have to be valid.  That which has NO value or negative value in the heat of battle is valid to women.  Deborah Tannen refers to the interpretation of the emotional data by these little piss and shit factories as “ventriloquizing”.  Where the woman acts as the pythian oracle to interpret the omens sent to her through the medium of the squirming and whining of the child.

The mother protects the child’s psychosis and aberrations as well as the child.  She doesn’t care if the child is insane, or is capable of dealing with the world at large, that has never been a concern for her, she has a man for that.  She just wants the child to live and be as happy as possible.  This is why historically there was an age or a trial to mark the end of the authority of the mother and the beginning of the training and teaching that would make the child suitable for their transition to the world.

The mother manipulates the child to do things and to think that it was the child’s own idea.  Women use these exact same strategies on men if they can get away with it.  That is just how their brain works.  Women also keep on bringing the attention of the child back to a subject and then communicating emotional data to try to influence the way the child feels about the object.  When women do this to men it is called nagging and whining, or henpecking.  I call it jingling the keys.

SASD

Due to the feminine bias that is innate in the human organism, and due to the nature of superficial, aesthetic, snap decisions coming from the feminine part of the brain.  We judge the flow of negative emotional data as good or bad.  Negative emotional data flows from the child to the mom and from the mom to the dad.  We have a negative reaction to seeing the negative emotional data flowing in the opposite direction.  This patter in collective human judgments creates emergent properties that create disparate impact in favor of unreason, women, and children.  What looks good is not always good for you.

Allow me to illustrate in this way.  The Neural Myelination created over millions of years predisposes us to think that foods that are more densely packed with Macro nutrients are good for us, because that neural myelination was created in an environment in which survival was difficult.  The more packed with positive survival data it is, the better it tastes, to the point where the animal will never eat its natural diet if it has the option.  This makes the horse fat and sickly to the point of death.  Neural Myelination wasn’t created in an environment where survival was easy so our instincts are WRONG!  We as a society redouble our efforts in the wrong direction, compounding the problem because we are not aware of the organism through which we experience life and we are thinking sentimentally instead of analytically and logically.  If you don’t know the logical fallacies and the cognitive biases you can’t keep yourself from making them. 

Horse-Face-Eating-Grain-dreamstime_110698611

*It always annoys me when I tell people that everything said characterizes the person speaking and then they start trying to psychoanalyze me without knowing my method and having NO experience themselves, and never having thought about it until I brought the subject up.  What a bunch of idiots. 

THE MARKS OF A VALID PHILOSOPHY

1208060712814

  1. Non arbitrary, it doesn’t create disparate impact.
  2. Valid in every situation, unfalsifiable, and specific.
  3. Applies to everything doesn’t ignore any subjects.
  4. Is predictive, descriptive, and predictive.
  5. Non delusional, in relationship with reality.
  6. Understands teleology, and eschatology, the movement of ideas and things through time and space in the context of that time period.
  7. Gives credit where credit is due, quotes its sources.
  8. Doesn’t conceal itself in a rational relationship, communicates understanding of it’s true nature.
  9. Never fails to act on what it knows to be true, Praxis.
  10. Authority under the philosophy doesn’t extend to making an unjust law.
  11. Everybody is equal under the law.
  12. The highest expert on the law, expounds the law, doesn’t create the law.
  13. All assertions are proven through reasoned debate, experiment, or contest.
  14. It is meritocratic, people are free to move about based on merit and understanding and correct procedure.
  15. It is internally incentivized, not externally incentivized.
  16. If it realized it is in error it admits the error, retracts the errant assertion, and corrects it.
  17. Clear, cogent, Profound, and as brief as possible.

WOMAN’S WORLD: Douchebag Nation (PART 2)

598479_453216694738742_1187664564_n

thank you to Adam Wolfe comedy for this photoshop

This image was originally created to encourage women to do masculine jobs while men were off sacrificing themselves for the good of the country to protect American interests in a world that was falling into the hands of evil tyrannical powers.  Certain functions needed to continue in this country to support the economy and those men that were losing their lives and risking their lives.  It became, however, a corrupted symbol for women not needing men.

WW

As women continued to promote feminine “rights” to the exclusion of reason, and in opposition to equality and fairness, the female lobby with no self scrutiny and no internally critical voice strove not for equality but for dominance of femininity over masculinity and the subjugation of masculinity in spite of the contributions men had made.  This is a recurring pattern.  These lobbies never go away, they have no incentive to, they get money to continue promoting their cause.   Every month they send out a news letter celebrating their victories, never have you heard of one of these lobbies saying, “well guess what folks, we have accomplished our goals and we are now equal, so we are not accepting any more money and we are shutting our doors”.

Think back to the prohibition…

Lips-that-touch-liquor

One of the biggest influences in the prohibition was to monopolize pussy, women wanted control of men so that they could control the happiness of the man in a depressed economy where life was miserable, and those bitches on the left look really stingy, if you know what I mean, the  Woman’s Christian Temperance Union.  You have to understand how the woman edits her consideration set.

Women are only concerned about women and children, they are not concerned for men.  I am saying this because it comes from my theory on evolutionary psychology and neural myelination as it is passed on from generation to generation.  Millions of years of repeated patterns creating the male and female brains, and a touch of hormone rewires the brains to think differently from one another.

astro-boy

Men and women are essentially the same but were compartmentalized by nature to be specialized in two different arenas that are mutually in opposition to one another.  Protection and nurturing.  Men do not feel that they are increased in value by being men, although for their own protection maybe they should.  Women on the other hand do feel that their value is increased by being a woman.  Men can survive longer in a state of nature right now.  Women in a state of nature will die almost immediately.  The reason that this neural myelination was passed on to us is because THAT IS HOW WE SURVIVED!!!  DEAD PEOPLE DON’T PASS ON NEURAL MYELINATION!!!!   In order to be tough men have to ignore their emotions, but women judging tacitly from analogy think their perspective is superior and judge masculinity and try to turn men into women.  She relies on him and yet she wants him to be like her.

batman-massacre

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/aurora-shooting-died-bullets-sweeties-article-1.1119395

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/497

The female mind only concerns itself with feminine subjects.  It doesn’t like thinking about ugliness and evil in the world.  The worst evil the woman knows about is her husband.  But because of a natural and innate arrogance she feels she is superior and tries to turn him into a woman.  She doesn’t want him thinking about manly things, doing manly things, or wanting manly things.  She tries to remove all incentives for him being a man.  He should be happy with what little she provides him in the way of reward and he should not look to indulge his masculine identity elsewhere.

This pattern repeats everywhere in our society and our history.  We the most feminine and feminized nation in the world still blame all of the bad on men and we do so tacitly, men and women.  Listen to people talking as I do being a linguistic philosopher, tally the number of times you hear this conversation… “that lady is insane a real, bitch.”  “Well, some man probably really screwed her over.”  I can’t tell you the number of times I have heard this.  If we deconstruct this for value we see that sympathy is for the woman, and she is not responsible for her own actions, or for the fact that she is not mentally or emotionally healthy, women are allowed to be crazy and self interested, damaged.  They are allowed to throw histrionic fits, and pursue their insane agendas.  The crazy person in the relationship is dominant, trust me, that is the definition of a tyrant. http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/cause-of-the-bad/

435px-leighton-god_speed

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/08/24/america-the-most-feminine-country-in-the-world/

The very word “civilization” comes from the word chevalier, the french word for knight, and we see that according to Proto-indo-european it moved over here, across continents and through time.  Men championing the whims of women.  Men the active cause women the passive cause.  And yet, in the most feminine country in the world women STILL do not take responsibility for anything.  Why should they when they can just complain about it and blame men until they fix it for you.

MARRIAGE, A WOMAN’S INSTITUTION

About 10 years ago I downloaded everything I could from I-tunes university and I would listen to it while I drive, because their is a shortage of intelligent conversation in the world which is why I have so many conversations with myself.  Anyway, back to my point, one of the pieces I downloaded was from a black, female, judge in Chicago giving a speech, she talked about the no-fault divorce and  how it was created to get women out of abusive relationships but it created this wind fall of divorce.  She blamed the loss of the American family on women, I thought this very poignant and it led me to look for answers in directions that are forbidden to society.  Unfortunately, I don’t remember her name or I would give her credit, but I thank her for her brilliant synopsis, and her moral courage in speaking out against a group few seem to have the courage to.http://articles.chicagotribune.com/keyword/no-fault-divorce/featured/4

Bill Hicks famously said, and I am paraphrasing because I can’t find the original quote, “the people in your society that you can’t criticize, they are in control.”  and from my perspective that is women.  They don’t criticize themselves and nobody else is allowed to.  They have victim status.  And you can’t say anything even constructively critical to them without being considered a bully.  Society reinforces this.

I am going to show you how this pattern repeats literally everywhere around us through something that recently happened to me.

member_20797751http://www.meetup.com/POETs-OC/members/2883667/

Now this is not a quote, I am using my philosophy and psychological technique to create the verbal equivalent or tautology of what she actually thinks based on her behavior.  This woman poses as a spiritualist and is in all point of fact a closeted man hater.  As such she tries to monopolize spiritual authority as a feminine realm.  Not being gainfully employed she coasts on the money provided her from her rich husband while at the same time, talking shit about men and her husband behind his back.  Wanting his support she also conceals the fact that she despises him.  Being in relationship with past trauma and not wanting to be emotionally and mentally healthy she holds onto her damage as a source of power.  She is a player in a grass roots spiritualist movement in orange county, that tries to marginalize masculine spiritual authority while at the same time increasing spiritual feminine authority.  http://spiritualcoop.wix.com/spiritualcoop

Humorously I wrote a piece on a blog about crediting your sources when you quote somebody or they teach you something you have never heard before.  I was in her group on facebook at the time and she started arguing against the necessity of quoting your sources and it being a form of spiritual theft.  It was ironic because a month earlier she had told my gf at the time that it was ok to use her stuff as long as she quoted her.  The difference between D. Marie and myself is that she is not an original content generator and I am.  I am an initiated shaktipat and jnani guru.  She can’t compete with my creative or spiritual content.  I knew that the people in her group were feminazis and that all they would do is plagiarize my ideas and take credit for them.

Here is another interesting tidbit.  One of D. Marie’s gurus is Jean Houston who at a meeting of  http://sistergiant.com/sistergiant/  gave a speech that basically said women need to be more concernful of men and treat them as equals.  She was complaining about the feminist spiritual movement.  Marie, who get’s some of her authority from being a disciple of Jean Houston basically entirely ignored this exhortation on her part…..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SQhxMc9DmE

Pink-wallpaper-pink-color-10579422-1024-768

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/idiocracy-douchebag-nation-part-1/

We-The-People