Category Archives: POLEMICS AND APOLOGETICS

The Direction of the Conversation

Image

Most people do not study enough philosophy to realize that it is about something real.  Most people don’t learn to debate well enough to learn that if it can’t be argued rationally it is crap.  Most people don’t learn the logical fallacies or the cognitive biases.  Conversations have a direction.  The conversation is either moving towards reason in a rational direction or one party is arguing against reason, arguing for vagueness, making emotional appeals.  You are either reasoning or rationalizing.  You are either talking about something real, good, true and useful or you are trying to make a turd smell like a flower, which is it?  Be honest with yourself.

It is out of necessity that great philosophers had to pre-empt conversation.  They only want rational conversation.  Don’t waste my time with your horse shit.  You can’t prove anything using irrational means.  That is what praxis is.  You can only prove something using rational means, that is why we have due process.  If you don’t communicate correctly you don’t think correctly and you don’t act correctly.  So the reason that you aren’t communicating correctly is because you are engaged in strategic behavior to make unreason appear to be reasonable.

Image

STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION:

A phrase coined by Joxua/Shivah to describe irrational communication used to control or manipulate the flow of conversation.

Conversation blocking- a form of strategic communication designed to stop a conversation or to prevent a topic from being discussed

Conversation dropping- a form of strategic communication designed to prevent a person from acknowledging their wrong or from participating in a conversation that is going a direction they don’t want to follow.

Communicating understanding- from shared state theory of communication meaning to communicate accurately your perspective on a subject based on understanding the topic, thinking before you speak, accounting for how it will be interpreted by the listener, listening to yourself as you speak and observing pragmatically the persons understanding of what you said and their application of it.  Associated with Socratic dialectic.

http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/strategic-communication-definition-by-joxuashiva/

RELATED ARTICLES

Huge Copyright Infringement Scandal and Retraction

culero

Lynn:  Ohmigod, this is so Gnarly.  I can’t believe that this guy is actually making a big deal out of this.  You are always saying that it is best to use specific incidents to deconstruct with your philosophical and psychological models.  Can you please deconstruct this and show us how you interpret people?  Mr. Mindhacker, lol.

Joxua:  Absolutely, and I agree that this is a good example to use for this.  First of all he has started the conversation with his mind closed, he is not open to relationship or negotiation.  He is calling the use of his unprotected image, “theft” which is an exaggeration on his part, which is technically correct.  Remember that the Pharisees and Scribes used the letter of the Law against Jesus since they couldn’t debate him and win any other way.  Jesus knew more about the spirit of the law.  So he is taking a semantic truth and exaggerating the gravity of the situation, positioning himself as a moral authority.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_and_spirit_of_the_law

Now let’s examine his hyperbole of theft.  I did an image search on the word archery, to illustrate one of the golden verses of Shivastus Solomonicus, the literary character I created to reintroduce philosophy into western literature.  I was looking for an image of a Zen archer done in an ancient Japanese style, but I couldn’t find one that was minimalist or simplistic enough.  I settled for what turned out to be his, an unprotected silhouette painting, done in two colors, red and black.  How much value did it have for me?  Very little, I won’t even notice when I find another image to attach the saying to.  How much damage did I do to him?  Practically none, other than more people were exposed to his art and he could have used the photoshop I made to increase the perceived value of his lackluster painting.

Lynn:  Yeah, I mean the guy is totally over reacting, at first I thought he was talking about Patrick Whelan‘s painting, who is my friend and I have permission to post that.  He was trained in the Master’s Tradition which isn’t taught anymore and he sold two paintings to Michael Jackson.  When I saw what he was talking about I had to laugh.  Patrick even used quotes on his images increase perceived value like you said.

Stardust- Whelan Gallery

http://www2.ocregister.com/photos/jackson-whelan-art-2481258-michael-work

I keep on thinking about what you say about moral authority and the punitive verses educational relationships.  People have never seen you work.  I have seen you having 3 conversations with different pop ups, while doing photoshops, while engaged in a knock down, drag out debate, and composing a blog at the same time.  This guy acts like you were studying his style and plotted and schemed to steal his art, lol.  Ohmigod, and he was so rude.  Tell me more about his personality based on his behavior, please, with your philosophical system.

Joxua:  Well if you remember what I have said about moral authority and how it presupposes an up down relationship, and how moral authority blocks Sapiential authority, you see that he was using this paradigm to force an up down relationship with himself on top.  He entirely missed the meaning of the quote as he would have to do in order to have a sense of victory.

sagittarius-woman

I was referring to the etymology of the word “sin”, and I was arguing against moral authority because it should be subordinate to sapiential authority or the authority of wisdom and reason, and that can only be arrived at through conversation of a Socratic and equal nature.  He was arguing for moral authority so he could punish and attack.  If you remember my whole concept of punitive societies and educational societies and how structure of authority attract psychopaths, and how psychopaths have innate feelings of superiority this should all be making sense now.

New Image

Lynn:  I feel like something else is going on here.  Something stimulated his butthurt.  He is concealing something.  What do you think of that?

Joxua:  Well, I could get much farther into his head with my psychological models.  What I refer to as “Conquests of Gomers” is that Gomers in doing what they think is establishing dominance basically communicate that they are gomers.

img_00002535

You see that he refers to the Nagual tradition in his spiritual name, it is possible that he noticed that we were also spiritualists.  With spiritualists, if they have issues, they like to think of their tradition as the ONE TRUE tradition and wisdom can come from no other source.  They are threatened if they hear any other person speaking with authority on spiritual topics because it falsifies their world view.  Now this guy might be smart enough to realize that most Mexicans that harbor resentment against Europeans for forcing their culture on them also speak Spanish a European language and are Catholic a European religion, so he went back to an older native religion to validate his world view.  He might think of us as his natural enemy.

Now I don’t have resentment against any people based on sex or skin color.  I identify with reason, and I believe in equality under reason.   Not to mention I took 4 years of spanish, I was a Testigo of Jehovah, and I peer tutored spanish speaking children in high school math.  I was trained not to be racist, but many latino children aren’t, their parents tell them, “Siempre, llama me en espanol!  Recuerda tu gente!  Tienes respeto para tus abuelos!”  Mexicans don’t refer to themselves as A race they refer to themselves as THE Race, La Raza, THE People.  I have gone to restaurants where they have pictures of Emiliano Zapata to communicate that latinos will get preferential treatment, but I have never been to a restaurant that had a picture of Custer.

HermesApollonius (1)

That is why Shivastus says, first comes the philosopher king.  Until you know the logical fallacies and the cognitive biases you can’t know if you are making them, even more so if you are emotionally and mentally damaged and you don’t want to be well.  If you are in relationship with your issues and trying to prove that your issues are correct you simply cannot ever approach the realm of spirit.  This is known, first you have to become the philosopher king and then sorcery begins to happen.  Then siddhis and spiritual phenomenon begin to unfold.  Until you have killed the ego out of yourself and you are egoless you simply are not spiritual, everything that comes through you comes from the ego and not from god.

Lynn:  Wow, brilliant, that answers so many questions.  Yeah, and that is what you were saying in the holy trinity of the psyche, Mary represents moral authority and the ego, not superego.  It thinks it is channeling god but it is channeling the feminine perspective.  Until you learn to recognize ego and prevent it you can’t channel anything else and nothing else will come through but your mental diseases and issues.  It is brilliant!

This guy is such a putz, some day he is going to be bragging about how you used one of his crappy paintings.

Joxua:  Yes, he is a vagina worshipper.  He establishes dominance by pandering to a feminine audience with his crappy art.  He makes up for what he lacks in talent by catering to the bad taste and lack of discernment of his audience.

536326_10150993162506477_1281045462_n

Lynn Marie Le and fans of Patrick Whelan wearing his stardust t-shirts. 

Transgressive Sacrality and the Puritannical Mindset.

CUNT_104e29_335901

Being a westerner you are unaware that you have a western mind.  Human beings have a normative bias.  That means that we think what is normal for us is good, but not just good for us, good for everybody.  You have been given a western mind and you don’t know it, you think that you are your mind.  As such you are unaware that you have an elitist, feminist, liberal bias, that you have been indoctrinated with and exposed to all of your life.  You have been bombarded with images and narrative from that perspective.  Since the Pilgrims landed on Plymouth rock they have been preaching this perspective on life, and that perspective is antithetical to yoga, I will explain why, but first this.  This is what is normal for other. people, enjoy.

What+_fe0adb0824bdfdb631c1e5481d5e8b9b

Yoga is about non duality, it is about not thinking that you are better or superior, it is about seeing everything as onel and being in relationship with reality.  Puritans presuppose their moral authority, they presuppose their right to judge others and to judge what is good for others which is weird, because one of the tenets of this country is to be free from that manner of meddling stupidity.  3rd person parties poking their fat noses into our business and giving us their unsolicited opinions.  Externalizing your issues into the world so that you can get offended, and then you get on your high horse and start pecker slapping people with your judgments.

130606170427-04-putin-horizontal-gallery

So here is the thing for all of you pseudo spiritualist fruit balls.  Do you think that you know how a guru or spiritual master should comport himself?  What he should say and not say?  What words he should use?  I call that the Messiah Paradox, if you know what a spiritual master should be doing then you don’t really need a spiritual teacher do you?  Save yourself.

sr0285-834x1023

The fact of the matter is that the practice of Transgressive Sacrality was created to cure exactly your psychosis, your feelings that you are better than everybody because you hold your farts in and wash your hands up to your eyebrows before you eat your raw, vegan, organic, kale chips and wash it down with your wheat grass, spirulina, freshly squozen apple drink.  Transgressive sacrality is breaking taboos, as a meditation, offending social norms so that you don’t feel that you are better than everybody else by virtue of your refusing to acknowledge that you are an animal as well, that you shit and piss like everybody else.

Marilyn-Manson-marilyn-manson-29937582-2086-2560

Buddhism[edit]

In Buddhism “transcendence”, by definition, belongs to the mortal beings of the formless realms of existence. However, although such beings are at ‘the peak’ of Samsara, Buddhism considers the development of transcendence to be both temporary and a spiritual cul-de-sac, which therefore does not eventuate a permanent cessation of Samsara. This assertion was a primary differentiator from the other Sramana teachers during Gautama Buddha‘s own training and development.[5]

Alternatively, in the various forms of Buddhism — Theravada, Mahayana (especially Pure Land and Zen) and Vajrayana — the notion of transcendence sometimes includes a soteriological application. Except for Pure Land and Vajrayana, the role played by transcendent beings is minimal and at most a temporary expedient. However some Buddhists believe that Nirvana is an eternal, transcendental state beyond name and form, so for these Buddhists, Nirvana is the main concept of transcendence. The more usual interpretation of Nirvana in Buddhism is that it is a cessation – a permanent absence of something (namely suffering), and therefore it is not in any way a state which could be considered transcendent.

Primordial enlightenment and the dharma are sometimes portrayed as transcendent, since they can surpass all samsaric obstructions.

drmanhattanfromtrailer

You are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.  Watch the video below of Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh and his treatise on the word fuck.  A lot of you “spiritualists” know that you are not doing anything wrong because you aren’t doing ANYTHING.  YOU AREN’T SAYING ANYTHING.  YOU ARE BLENDING IN, AND YOU HAVE NO LIGHT TO KICK.  You are what Socrates referred to as “pretenders to wisdom.”  You wouldn’t know the truth if it slapped you in the face with it’s big hairy nuts.  God will not have his will done by cowards and instead of waking people up you are lulling them to sleep.  Your enlightenment isn’t light at all, it is a grey kind of darkness, a cloudy, smoggy, sticky white light.  Concealed, closeted, white washed graves.

Revelation 3

14“To the angel of the church in Laodicea write:

These are the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the ruler of God’s creation. 15I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other! 16So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to vomit you out of my mouth.

Get over yourselves and your stupid judgments, stop trying to do better than real.  Life isn’t all pleasantries and faerie farts, sometimes things suck.  You have to take the good with the bad.  Be content with reality.  You aren’t bringing people to heaven you are making life hell now.

daskalos-cb1a

218075_465164306877314_1896361974_n

VVVVV   OSHO’S TREATISE ON THE WORD “FUCK” VVVVV

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6D7rWLzloOI&list=PL01979C1E580588D8

WOMAN’S WORLD: Douchebag Nation (PART 2)

598479_453216694738742_1187664564_n

thank you to Adam Wolfe comedy for this photoshop

This image was originally created to encourage women to do masculine jobs while men were off sacrificing themselves for the good of the country to protect American interests in a world that was falling into the hands of evil tyrannical powers.  Certain functions needed to continue in this country to support the economy and those men that were losing their lives and risking their lives.  It became, however, a corrupted symbol for women not needing men.

WW

As women continued to promote feminine “rights” to the exclusion of reason, and in opposition to equality and fairness, the female lobby with no self scrutiny and no internally critical voice strove not for equality but for dominance of femininity over masculinity and the subjugation of masculinity in spite of the contributions men had made.  This is a recurring pattern.  These lobbies never go away, they have no incentive to, they get money to continue promoting their cause.   Every month they send out a news letter celebrating their victories, never have you heard of one of these lobbies saying, “well guess what folks, we have accomplished our goals and we are now equal, so we are not accepting any more money and we are shutting our doors”.

Think back to the prohibition…

Lips-that-touch-liquor

One of the biggest influences in the prohibition was to monopolize pussy, women wanted control of men so that they could control the happiness of the man in a depressed economy where life was miserable, and those bitches on the left look really stingy, if you know what I mean, the  Woman’s Christian Temperance Union.  You have to understand how the woman edits her consideration set.

Women are only concerned about women and children, they are not concerned for men.  I am saying this because it comes from my theory on evolutionary psychology and neural myelination as it is passed on from generation to generation.  Millions of years of repeated patterns creating the male and female brains, and a touch of hormone rewires the brains to think differently from one another.

astro-boy

Men and women are essentially the same but were compartmentalized by nature to be specialized in two different arenas that are mutually in opposition to one another.  Protection and nurturing.  Men do not feel that they are increased in value by being men, although for their own protection maybe they should.  Women on the other hand do feel that their value is increased by being a woman.  Men can survive longer in a state of nature right now.  Women in a state of nature will die almost immediately.  The reason that this neural myelination was passed on to us is because THAT IS HOW WE SURVIVED!!!  DEAD PEOPLE DON’T PASS ON NEURAL MYELINATION!!!!   In order to be tough men have to ignore their emotions, but women judging tacitly from analogy think their perspective is superior and judge masculinity and try to turn men into women.  She relies on him and yet she wants him to be like her.

batman-massacre

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/aurora-shooting-died-bullets-sweeties-article-1.1119395

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/497

The female mind only concerns itself with feminine subjects.  It doesn’t like thinking about ugliness and evil in the world.  The worst evil the woman knows about is her husband.  But because of a natural and innate arrogance she feels she is superior and tries to turn him into a woman.  She doesn’t want him thinking about manly things, doing manly things, or wanting manly things.  She tries to remove all incentives for him being a man.  He should be happy with what little she provides him in the way of reward and he should not look to indulge his masculine identity elsewhere.

This pattern repeats everywhere in our society and our history.  We the most feminine and feminized nation in the world still blame all of the bad on men and we do so tacitly, men and women.  Listen to people talking as I do being a linguistic philosopher, tally the number of times you hear this conversation… “that lady is insane a real, bitch.”  “Well, some man probably really screwed her over.”  I can’t tell you the number of times I have heard this.  If we deconstruct this for value we see that sympathy is for the woman, and she is not responsible for her own actions, or for the fact that she is not mentally or emotionally healthy, women are allowed to be crazy and self interested, damaged.  They are allowed to throw histrionic fits, and pursue their insane agendas.  The crazy person in the relationship is dominant, trust me, that is the definition of a tyrant. http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/cause-of-the-bad/

435px-leighton-god_speed

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/08/24/america-the-most-feminine-country-in-the-world/

The very word “civilization” comes from the word chevalier, the french word for knight, and we see that according to Proto-indo-european it moved over here, across continents and through time.  Men championing the whims of women.  Men the active cause women the passive cause.  And yet, in the most feminine country in the world women STILL do not take responsibility for anything.  Why should they when they can just complain about it and blame men until they fix it for you.

MARRIAGE, A WOMAN’S INSTITUTION

About 10 years ago I downloaded everything I could from I-tunes university and I would listen to it while I drive, because their is a shortage of intelligent conversation in the world which is why I have so many conversations with myself.  Anyway, back to my point, one of the pieces I downloaded was from a black, female, judge in Chicago giving a speech, she talked about the no-fault divorce and  how it was created to get women out of abusive relationships but it created this wind fall of divorce.  She blamed the loss of the American family on women, I thought this very poignant and it led me to look for answers in directions that are forbidden to society.  Unfortunately, I don’t remember her name or I would give her credit, but I thank her for her brilliant synopsis, and her moral courage in speaking out against a group few seem to have the courage to.http://articles.chicagotribune.com/keyword/no-fault-divorce/featured/4

Bill Hicks famously said, and I am paraphrasing because I can’t find the original quote, “the people in your society that you can’t criticize, they are in control.”  and from my perspective that is women.  They don’t criticize themselves and nobody else is allowed to.  They have victim status.  And you can’t say anything even constructively critical to them without being considered a bully.  Society reinforces this.

I am going to show you how this pattern repeats literally everywhere around us through something that recently happened to me.

member_20797751http://www.meetup.com/POETs-OC/members/2883667/

Now this is not a quote, I am using my philosophy and psychological technique to create the verbal equivalent or tautology of what she actually thinks based on her behavior.  This woman poses as a spiritualist and is in all point of fact a closeted man hater.  As such she tries to monopolize spiritual authority as a feminine realm.  Not being gainfully employed she coasts on the money provided her from her rich husband while at the same time, talking shit about men and her husband behind his back.  Wanting his support she also conceals the fact that she despises him.  Being in relationship with past trauma and not wanting to be emotionally and mentally healthy she holds onto her damage as a source of power.  She is a player in a grass roots spiritualist movement in orange county, that tries to marginalize masculine spiritual authority while at the same time increasing spiritual feminine authority.  http://spiritualcoop.wix.com/spiritualcoop

Humorously I wrote a piece on a blog about crediting your sources when you quote somebody or they teach you something you have never heard before.  I was in her group on facebook at the time and she started arguing against the necessity of quoting your sources and it being a form of spiritual theft.  It was ironic because a month earlier she had told my gf at the time that it was ok to use her stuff as long as she quoted her.  The difference between D. Marie and myself is that she is not an original content generator and I am.  I am an initiated shaktipat and jnani guru.  She can’t compete with my creative or spiritual content.  I knew that the people in her group were feminazis and that all they would do is plagiarize my ideas and take credit for them.

Here is another interesting tidbit.  One of D. Marie’s gurus is Jean Houston who at a meeting of  http://sistergiant.com/sistergiant/  gave a speech that basically said women need to be more concernful of men and treat them as equals.  She was complaining about the feminist spiritual movement.  Marie, who get’s some of her authority from being a disciple of Jean Houston basically entirely ignored this exhortation on her part…..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SQhxMc9DmE

Pink-wallpaper-pink-color-10579422-1024-768

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/idiocracy-douchebag-nation-part-1/

We-The-People

EVOLUTION OF THE NANNY STATE

Image

I recently got a ticket from a metered light.  It cost about $800, the only ticket I have ever gotten.  This is the definition of cruel and unusual punishment.

  • The “essential predicate” is “that a punishment must not by its severity be degrading to human dignity,” especially torture.
  • “A severe punishment that is obviously inflicted in wholly arbitrary fashion.” (Furman v. Georgia temporarily suspended capital punishment for this reason.)
  • “A severe punishment that is clearly and totally rejected throughout society.”
  • “A severe punishment that is patently unnecessary.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruel_and_unusual_punishment#United_States

Now let us imagine that we have a state that is educational instead of punitive.  I would be warned not to do it again as it was a first offense or encouraged to take a class, but we have a system that is designed to punish and fine.  The Judge wanted to reduce the fine or throw it out all together but unfortunately it has been turned into a mandatory minimum which means even the judge can’t lower it.  It is above the authority of the authority to change.  Which raises the question, whose authority is it in?

The reason that this is happening is that the moneyed powers need to make sure that they make a profit on their invention these traffic cameras.  They made it to make a profit and they are manipulating the legal system so that they can make their money back.  They don’t give a single fuck if it is right or not.

In an economy where people are living paycheck to paycheck, I just signed a lease, my room mate just lost her job, who can afford an $800 fine?  Is this not cruel and unusual and unsustainable?  and where is my money going?  It is going to pay for the technology, the people working in Arizona that send out the photos, the judge, the police, I am paying this entire, bloated structure of authority to take my hard earned cash from me.  It is like a giant upside down pyramid crushing the life out of me.

When the average person working for the government makes more money than a person privately employed you have a problem, you have an oligarchy.  When cops perceive themselves as some manner of over class instead of servants to citizens we have a problem.  Now Muslims don’t have a problem with this because they believe in castes and enforce their own superiority, but this is unamerican.  When corporations are citizens and can protect their resources and pursue their interests and legislate and lobby you have a problem.  You don’t have the money of a corporation do you?  Do you have their man power?  Do you have their lawyers?  Do you have their lobbying power?

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”
― Samuel Adams

 

Image

 

 

RESPONSE TO KRS-1

Image

 

First of all let me say that I am a fan and I like edutainment and I still bump that shit as I drive down the road in my little white Toyota yaris with my Shiva decal and my om namah shivayah tattoo.  Having said that I am not going to destroy your argument, annihilation, evisceration, decimation, with my philosophy, philology, ontology, 

We’re robbin’ and killin’, your own medicine you taste 
You built up a race on the concept of violence 
Now in ’90 you want silence 
Well, I want science, not silence but science 
Scientific fact about black 
The board of education acts as if it’s only reality 
Is talking ’bout a Tom, Dick and Harry 
So now you learn your black history is questions and answers 
Every question but the Black Panthers 
Timbuctoo existed when the caveman existed 
Why then isn’t this listed 
Is this because the blackman is the original man 
Or does it mean humanity is African 
I don’t know, but these sciences are hidden 
For some strange reason it’s forbidden 
To talk about, or converse on a political outburst 
I don’t believe that I’m the first 
Or should I say the first one, or the first one that’s done 
Music like I’m still number one 
Music like that or this is the incredible uplift 
Those that oppose get dissed 
But who will oppose the teacher when society’s a wreck 
So check the blackman’s in effect 
Near the Tigris and Euphrates Valleys in Asia 
Lies the Garden of Eden 
Where Adam became a father to humanity 
Now don’t get mad at me 
But according to facts, this seems just fantasy 
Because man, the most ancient man 
Was found thousands of years before Adam began 
And where he was found, again they can’t laugh at ya 
It’s right, dead, smack in Africa 
But due to religious and political power 
We must be denied the facts every hour 
We run to school, tryin’ to get straight A’s 
Let’s take a trip way back in the days 
To the first civilization on Earth, the Egyptians 
Giving birth to science, mathematics and music 
Religion, the list goes on, you choose it 
Egypt was the land of spiritual blessing 
Egypt was the land of facts, not guessing 
People from all over the world had come 
To learn from Egypt, Egypt number one 
So people that believe in Greek philosophy 
Know your facts, Egypt was the monopoly 
Greeks had learned from Egyptian masters 
You might say “Prove it”, well here’s the answers 
640 to 322 b.C. originates Greek philosophy 
But in that era Greece was at war 
With themselves and Persia, what’s more 
Any philosopher at that time was a criminal 
He’d be killed very simple 
This indicates that Greece had no respect 
For science or intellect 
So how the hell you created philosophy 
When you kill philosophers constantly 
The point is that we descend from kings 
Science, art and beautiful things 
African history is the worlds history 
This is the missing link and mystery 
Once we realise they all are African 
White will sit down with black and laugh again 
So judge not least ye might be judged 
By the judgement ye judge, ye shall be judged 
Matthew seven, first verse doesn’t budge 
No man should walk the Earth and sludge 
If you don’t believe, you can go and check 
To see how and where the blackman’s in effect

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_k7lFYd4PE

Now, this point about Greece hating philosophers….. Above is a link to okko Behrands THE SPIRIT OF ROMAN LAW, the foremost expert in the world on the subject.  The augures were a pre Greek Minoan cult.  Their philosophy shaped and still shapes and informs the entire structure of the civilized western world.  They developed the concept of authority, auctoritas, this concept of being under the law and beholding to it.  That is why their is Praxis which became due process and practice.  It is when your philosophy informs your behavior and not the opposite.  In order to speak with authority you have to walk your talk, the high priest is not above the law and does not create the law, like plato suggests he is the philosopher king and he can see into the archetypal causal world of ideas and idols and describe the correct relationship and the correct path.  I refer to it as “equality under reason” and it is the very definition of meritocracy which is the only valid form of government.  To explain the impact this cult had on the western world would be impossible, the words that we use to think, our very thought process was created for us and given to us by this cult.  The words that we are using, the mental categories that we have, our concept of justice and truth.  Your brain is not your brain and your thoughts are not your thoughts, your brain was created by this Greek cult.  

Egypt, like all major civilizations, had a large middle class, tradesmen, craftsmen, secret societies, it is the large middle class that moved freely from country to country spreading ideas.  This is how religions spread and philosophies spread.  This is how freemasonry moves about.  You appear to be suggesting that civilization was somehow stolen from black people by white people.  Why is it that people attribute civilization to people that currently don’t have it?  and the people that do have it somehow stole it from the people that don’t have it?  Is being civilized a finite resource and white people are using too much of it?  Are you arguing for the tragedy of the commons in regards to civilized thought? 

“A man will not relay without corruption that which he has not comprehended.”  Manly Palmer Hall

This argument is part of a recurring rhetoric to marginalize the creativity and achievement of white man.  Since the white man had the intellectual apparatus to grasp the concepts and philosophies and carry that fire with him does he not own it by being able to comprehend it?  and reproduce it?  Now, if this fire can’t be handed to another without it burning them should it not be held by the person capable of holding it until such a time as the other is ready to receive it?  and should not the one that desires the fire make himself like the one holding the fire so that he also might not get burned by the fire?  Or should I put out my fire so that we are equal and neither of us has fire? 

Image

^^^^iconographic art of joxua mourningstar^^^^

On another point, this concept of all of the music on the street being stolen from black people.  The reason people say that is because of jazz, now lets be clear, jazz is a realm of experimentation one goes into to find their unique sound.  When a person experiments to find their sound, does jazz then own that sound?  See Cornel West and i agree on this point and we have come to the same conclusion about jazz.  If a race can own a realm of experimentation that makes no sense.  Is Neil degrasse tyson stealing science because he is using scientific method which was created by white people?  

And to suggest that music and even rap didn’t exist in the white world before the intermarriage of African culture and western culture is ridiculous.  

Image

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iambic_pentameter

and on a final note this concept of a rap battle being a black thing, one of my favorite scenes in literature and my favorite play it Cyrano De Bergerac.  In the first act of the play he composes a sonnet while he is having a duel.  the reason we don’t do this anymore in the west is because of white women.  They like to put our dick in a box and keep it in their closet and only let us take it out and play with it every once in a while.  Steve Martin, my idol, remade this movie and called it Roxanne.  Apparently we share a love of Cyrano de Bergerac.  

About Christopher Hitchens…..

Image

“Since Hitchens evidently dosen’t take himself seriously, there’s no reason for anyone to…” Noam Chomsky

How many of you know that Noam Chomsky was the mentor to Christopher Hitchens?  I will say this about Hitchens, I respect him for his honest portrayal in “THE RIGHTS OF MAN” of Thomas Paine.  In a way Hitchens kind of falsifies his own perspective in describing the journey of Paine from vehement atheist to deist. Paine helped in the French Revolution and he was almost killed in the French Revolution by Atheists, he was saved by an accident as a matter of fact.  You see, Paine was sitting in his prison cell with the door open, the stupid person that was to mark the door for the order in which he was to be executed painted the number on the inside of the door, and then the door was closed later, since he was to be executed he might try to abscond, so it would be prudent to close the fucking door.  But when they started chopping off everyone’s heads they got to him and his door didn’t have a number and for some reason Thomas Paine, like the chicken shit he was didn’t tell him, “HEY GUISE, I AM NUMBER 13, ITS IN HERE IF YOU WANT TO SEE!”So the dickless wonder survived and came to the united states and realized that a modicrum of grace was needed in the American revolution, he blamed the godlessness of the atheists in France for the violence of the revolution over there and wanted to prevent a repeat in the good old United States.

Hitchens hints at a subject that I myself have discovered.  There is no way to use science to make a positive rational assertion for why human beings should have inalienable rights, likewise there is no way to use evolution to do the same.  In fact it is quite possible to use both to do the opposite.  The only way that you can make a positive rational assertion for why human beings should have inalienable rights is if you posit god in some form.  You have to assume some authority some universal law to which all people are beholding and then you can have human rights.

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/09/08/liberty-tree-thomas-paine/ http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/positive-rational-assertions-definition-by-joxuashivah/

Image

Image