ZENTAO, the Philosophy of the ZED the Final Civilization…

Image

the meditations of Shivastus Solomonicus from the Last Organon

As I observed the world falling apart in it’s last years I reflected on my almost 1,000 years of life and the Wisdom that I had accumulated and I aspired to save the cream of the human race from being dragged down by the dregs.  It occurred to me that the mental faculties of the human should be perfected and their actions harmonized with their sapiens and not their emotions.  Just as in Martial Artistry one removes any form of resistance to oneself in order to move speedily and efficiently for one’s own survival and just like in philosophy one tests one’s soul for self-referential inconsistencies and removes them this process must be emulated and repeated everywhere.

Action should be bound to reason and not to emotion.  Emotion causes sympathy, charity, mercy, doubt.  It was sympathy for stupidity and failure that caused the downfall of earth, and the destruction of the greatest hope on the planet for mankind.  There should be no sympathy with error, we should not reward failure, we should not punish success.

“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need”

Does this not create disparate impact in favor of the needy?  Does this pattern not make failure a virtue?  Take into account the acquisitively mimetic nature of the human animal. Will the worst among them not copy the behaviors that they see being rewarded?  until the few that have genius and create value are enslaved by the ignorant and gluttonous?

Perfecting one’s reason and soul and constantly testing it against one’s results in reality, one should not hesitate or doubt to act on the good that one perceives.  One should immediately act on what one knows to be good and true.  Ignorant and emotional people don’t hesitate to act on stupidity and evil why does reason hesitate?  Why does evil have it’s way in the world and righteousness begs for its existence?  If reasonable people were unreasonable in action and unreasonable people reasonable in action the world would be perfect.  Why is the venom of the 3 serpents of doubt, cynicism and sarcasm not turned on themselves, let these serpents eat themselves.  Purveyors of unwisdom and Worshipers of anti logic, forcing people who have earned their rewards to squander them on others that have failed.  Why do the failures not make themselves like those that are succeeding?

Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime. ~Maimonides

 

Which is the greater gift?  the greater charity?  If I reward failure do I not have more failure in the world?  in the future?  If I open a Keg of Barley Wine and throw sugar into it does it not awaken its appetite and come alive and explode?

No, this will not do, the mercy and the charity of the mother doesn’t extend to a grown adult.  Previous cultures limited the authority of women to a certain age and then after that the child was under the authority of the father.  The father cured the emotional and mental diseases and made him acceptable to the world, initiating him into reality, just as the umbilical cord is removed mercy and charity have their limits and do not extend to psychosis and the right to be insane.  It is an appalling abomination to see a grown person who still reasons as a child and appeals to mercy and charity, and these people should not have equal voices.

The son should act on the father’s wisdom, not appeal to the mother’s mercy.  Nothing else is sustainable.  When survival is easy people forget this simple principle.  Easy living is the exception not the rule.  Everything becomes clear when the need to survive is present.  Nature and the Universe are not pleasant places, and pleasant environments are created, they are temporary and artificial and they depend on people working together in harmony and reason participating towards the same end.  You don’t allow thieves to enter and plunder all of the good that you have created.

Advertisements

Knighted or Sainted?

Image

from the Lingayat of Shivastus Solomonicus

INANE, INSANE, INANNA

ANNOINTED THE ANNUNAKI

CHOOSE WISELY, 

RED NEXT TO BLACK IS A FRIEND OF JACKS

RED NEXT TO YELLOW CAN KILL A FELLOW…

WILL YOU TAKE THE PATH OF RIGHTEOUSNESS 

OR THE SINISTER PATH? 

THE NARROW AND CRAMPED ROAD?

OR THE LEISURELY SANGUINE VEIN? 

ONE WAY YOU WILL WAX AND THE

OTHER WAY YOU WILL WAIN.

SANGUINARY LEISURE, SACRAL PLEASURE, 

SAN GREAL, SANG REAL, SANS ROYALTY, 

THE HOLY GIRL

DRUNK ON THE BLOOD OF THE PROPHETS…

RICH IN BLOOD MONEY.

Image

Your Horse Sh** Escapes You, Sir!

Image

Your horse shit escapes you, sir!

If this was a race between your intellect and your horse shit, the horse shit would be leading by a league.

Fascinating isn’t it?  That which is the slowest part of the horse is fleeter of foot than the fastest part of your reason?

Even now my nostrils cringe, my sinuses singed by the offensive odor of arrogant ignorance.

A wrathful spirits attacks the senses, you didn’t give wing to a thesis, you gave flight to a feces.

You are a veritable Mercurial Twit, in the battle of wits the unarmed man must submit to the one armed man.

Yet still these persist, these Serpents of Unwisdom, these Servants of Anti Logic,

Whore shipping their god of Unreason.  Rife with the pestilence of their Whore Moans being all out of wack.

Sentimental thinkers, reality warped by their emotions and addictions to their emotional ideas.

Strong in the disease and weak in health, they prostitute their reason to Normatization, Popular opinion.

Hiding their light they disappear into the herd.

Inoculating themselves to the cure and infecting themselves with the disease.

Intellectual faggotry and armchair philosophy are the rules of the day.

Divorced from the consequences, ignorant of the results, they march on oblivious to the reality

that they are their own worst enemy, they are sowing the seeds of their own demise, and they shall reap what they sow.

Hoist with their own petard, they invigorate their guard and fortify their grasp on their own failure, which cannot be

wrenched from their kung fu grip.  They WILL have their just deserts, gazpacho of justice, a dish best served cold.

Teleological Error

Thought Technology

Image

There is no way to pleasantly tell an idiot that they are an idiot without communicating Negative Emotional Data.  Nature wouldn’t even attempt to do so, it would just kill you.  The first actor in the relationship of mutual depreciation is the person who is wrong and who doesn’t want to acknowledge their failure.  This is why in science you have to retract assertions that have proven incorrect.  In the scenario above the person who doesn’t recognize the authority of reason and participate with it causes the problem by not being able to detect their own horse shit and not being willing to correct it and participate with reason.  As long as they are protecting their error they are responsible for the entire argument as long as the other person doesn’t over react.  But since they were not smart enough to detect their own error they don’t get to be…

View original post 99 more words

Rational Praxicism, or Ratiocracy/Logocracy, My Philosophy.

Image

So, how would I describe my philosophy?  It is impossible to sum up in one post, I have spent years studying this old philosophical relationship and the processes in it. Literally everything I say and do is based on this relationship which has been forgotten in this day and age.  Never heard of.  There is so much intellectual crap and prancing intellectual buggery floating around out there.  Even when people hear my philosophy and think to themselves, “That sounds good.”  They turn around and do the opposite, because they are using a normative bias, and haven’t learned to detect logical fallacies that they are making.  

The only way I can teach this relationship is as a type of guru with an ashram or philosopher with a gymnasium.  It has to be shown, it can’t be told, because people are terrible at detecting their own horse shit.  This is a type of relationship in which people only relate to others rationally and positively keeping their judgments to themselves.  Your resources do your will, you prehend your resources.  You have earned them they are yours.  I can’t take your resources and use them against your will.  Taxation without representation. 

Not only does a person focus on creating value for others in the community, they focus on doing so in a rational way.  The most rational person gets his way, the most rational argument wins.  Everyone in the community is a philosopher king and is working on increasing his understanding.  Nobody is above the law of reason, and everybody submits to it.  If it can’t be proven it can’t be argued.  This prevents the type of intellectual faggotry that adopts a philosophy and then is successful in spite of it, which means that you are dragging the philosophy along, you are not applying the philosophy, you are championing it and proselytizing it.  Your success should be directly related to your philosophy, your philosophy is your soul, and your sword and your word.  If you discover you are wrong your amend your philosophy and your behavior.  

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
For other uses of the word Praxis, see Praxis (disambiguation).
So, I tried to do a kind of semantic clarification in which praxis—if not on the thither side of this divide—was perhaps somehow between the theoretical and the practical as they are generally understood, and particularly as they are understood in modern philosophy. Praxis as the manner in which we are engaged in the world and with others has its own insight or understanding prior to any explicit formulation of that understanding…Of course, it must be understood that praxis, as I understand it, is always entwined with communication.
 —Calvin O. Schrag[1]

Praxis is the process by which a theory, lesson, or skill is enacted, practiced, embodied, or realised. “Praxis” may also refer to the act of engaging, applying, exercising, realizing, or practicing ideas. This has been a recurrent topic in the field of philosophy, discussed in the writings of PlatoAristotleSt. AugustineImmanuel KantSøren KierkegaardKarl MarxMartin HeideggerHannah ArendtPaulo Freire,Ludwig von Mises, and many others. It has meaning in the political, educational, and spiritual realms.

It is also important to note that because of the nature of Moral Authority and its constant habit of usurping Sapiential Authority by making emotional appeals certain guards are created for preventing the passive aggressive take over of this pattern which eventually, universally, creates the degradation of all good systems.  Processes and patterns that aren’t logical and can’t be defended logically fly in the face of reason to repeatedly destroy all of the good that was created.  Everybody, man or woman must respect the authority of reason and if they can’t defend their position rationally with rational means they are not allowed to speak.  You don’t get to argue that one person or group must spend their resources on another person or group, this thwarts meritocracy.  If you want to be merciful and charitable you do so with your own resources and your fate and reputation are tied to those that you are helping and you are responsible for their actions.  If you want to own slaves, you are responsible for them and you don’t get to use your sentimental arguments to obfuscate or caste doubt or stumble reasonable discourse on its path.  In order to be a citizen you have to be equal to the task.  There is no freedom while their is ignorance.

 Image

Everyone in the society has their personal responsibilities, what would be power if it were extracted from them in the form of a law or structure of authority to serve them.  This would then attract psychopaths which would use that authority as power.  The point is to have a democracy amongst philosopher kings, Warrior philosophers.  Only when you have equality amongst genii can you unleash the highest common good.  When you have the false forced equality of making an irresponsible, social climbing, acquisitive, idiot the equal of a philosopher king, you have sabotaged yourself and your way of life.  Psychopaths ruin all of the good by refusing to understand and participate.  Should a person not accept their responsibilities their power must be given back to them forcefully or they must not be allowed to benefit from the surplus of value created by this type of relationship.  The quality of life is created by the philosophy itself, and the immigrants to this philosophy who do not adopt it and apply it are there for no other reason but to benefit themselves without contributing value, more value than they consume.  

Image

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/08/27/praxis-of-the-rational/

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/?s=plato’s+cave

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/10/08/a-priori-and-platos-philosophy/

Holy Trinity of the Psyche

Esoteric Repository

Holy Trinity of the Psyche

Lynn: Most people don’t know that you have your own psychology and philosophy that you created.  A portion of what you do is something called philology which most people have never heard of and what you have done in your research is made a concerted effort to understand the perspective of the ancient super genii,  the people that created the myth and the religions.  What you attempted to do and succeeded in doing was understand what they were trying to communicate to us.  People that believe themselves to be religious or Christians are neither in the true sense because they didn’t understand what was being communicated to them as Manley Palmer Hall said “A man will not reproduce without corruption that which he has not comprehended”  One of your psychological systems that you have created was shared state theory of communication which states that whatever…

View original post 2,248 more words

THE 10 COMMANDMENTS OF SCIENCE

Image

 

  1. SCIENCE CANNOT PROTECT YOU FROM BEING WRONG WHEN YOU ARE WRONG BECAUSE YOU PAY LIP SERVICE TO SCIENCE.  THERE ARE NO INDULGEANCES IN SCIENCE AND SCIENCE IS NOT A GOD. 
  2. YOU DO NOT GET TO VOTE ON WHAT IS REAL, JUST BECAUSE MORE THAN ONE IDIOT BELIEVES THE SAME THING DOESN’T MAKE IT MORE TRUE.
  3. IN ORDER TO SPEAK WITH AUTHORITY ON SCIENCE YOU CANNOT SAY OR DO THINGS THAT ARE UNSCIENTIFIC, THIS IS KNOWN AS PRAXIS.
  4.  IF YOU REALIZE YOU ARE WRONG YOU HAVE TO RETRACT YOUR ERRANT ASSERTION, THAT IS HOW SCIENCE IS DONE, TIME TO BE A BIG BOY. 
  5. SCIENCE IS ABOUT ANALYSIS NOT EMOTION, ARGUING EMOTIONALLY AND GETTING OFFENDED DOESN’T MAKE YOUR POSITION MORE VALID, IT FALSIFIES YOUR POSITION.  IF YOU ARE DOING SCIENCE EMOTIONALLY YOU ARE DOING BAD SCIENCE. 
  6. EX CATHEDRA ASSERTIONS ARE UNSUPPORTED ASSERTIONS THAT PRESUPPOSE YOUR OWN AUTHORITY.  IF YOU HAD SCIENTIFIC AUTHORITY YOU WOULD BE SUPPORTING YOUR ASSERTIONS.  THE ONLY PERSON THAT CAN MAKE EX CATHEDRA ASSERTIONS IS THE POPE, ARE YOU THE POPE? 
  7. IF YOU ARE NOT EXPERIMENTING AND VERIFYING RESEARCH YOU ARE NOT A SCIENTIST AND YOUR KNOWLEDGE IS RECEIVED KNOWLEDGE, SO STOP FEELING SO SCIENCY AND MAKING THE FUNDAMENTAL ATTRIBUTION ERROR ABOUT YOURSELF. 
  8. KNOWLEDGE IS JUSTIFIED, TRUE, BELIEF, SO EVEN SCIENCE REQUIRES BELIEF.  IF YOU BELIEVE IT IS TRUE YOU ACT ON IT.  THAT IS WHY PEOPLE DON’T TRY TO WALK THROUGH WALLS, THEY BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE SOLID.  
  9. FACTS AND SCIENCE DO NOT TELL US WHAT TO DO, CONSCIENCE TELLS US WHAT TO DO.  
  10. SCIENCE DOES NOT MAKE YOU PSYCHIC, YOU STILL HAVE TO USE SOCRATIC DIALOGUE IN DEBATE. Image

Original, Analytic, Philosophic, Creative and Humorous Content.