I was raised Jehovah’s Witness and my dad was strict even for a J-dub. I had the Tao of Jeet Kune Do confiscated from me on two different occasions. I studied him like I was studying Schopenhauer, or Wittgenstein, or Plato. One of the things I found most fascinating was that he had a documented reaction time of 3 hundredths of a second. Flies have electrical brains which are faster than human brains and they have a maximum reaction time of 5 hundredths of a second. Humans with chemical brains are supposed to have a maximum reaction time of 8 hundredths of a second. How was Bruce able to be so fast?
This is a mystery I don’t think anybody else stumbled upon. I felt that Bruce had learned to put himself in a mental state where he was anticipating the future or the future was bleeding…
View original post 625 more words
I created Ascending Dragon Style Tai Chi in a time of crisis for myself. I had been a head bouncer at a Samoan night club in Seatac, for 5 years. I found myself in the cemetery on the top of Capitol Hill in Downtown Seattle. I had long been a student of Bruce Lee‘s martial philosophy, though never a student specifically of his martial art style. I had been trained by Michael Cairnes who had studied under Frank Dux, but was also a competitive martial artist that had competed against Benny the Jet Urquidez 3 times in his career I believe it was.
Michael was very talented and knowledgeable not just about Dux Ryu, he taught Pankration the Greco-roman version of Aikido and judo or joint manipulation. His main discipline was Muay Thai kick boxing. One month he trained me just on my punches and I got so fast and accurate that…
View original post 131 more words
The smallest unit of Government should be the family unit. What happens when no fault divorce allows the woman to hi jack the marriage and make marriage about her needs, wants, desires, and judgments? The family unit dissolves leaving every individual in the family exposed to the corporations so that they can extract the maximum amount of profit from every individual in the family.
Since the 1950’s you have been bombarded with propaganda and narrative that besmirch, distort, humiliate, and ridicule the american family head.
Who does this create value for? (deconstructing for value) It creates value for corporations trying to indoctrinate people into a consumer life style of conspicuous consumption? corporations. The father of the family would say, no! you can’t have a cell phone, you don’t need a cell phone, I don’t care if your classmates have a cell phone, there is no need for a 12 year old girl to have a cell phone. Furthermore, we can’t afford it.
When you are indoctrinating a society into the sklavmoral of debt spending, or credit spending, using their house that was sold to them with predatory lending tactics, and encouraging them to take out loans against it as a form of banking, that is sklavmoral. http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/11/12/sklavmoral/
How did America get so stupid? It was a war by corporations, against American Efficiency Experts, to increase the amount of consuming Americans do. They don’t want efficency, they want waste, they want you to buy things you don’t want, with money you don’t have, to impress people you don’t like.
1 john 2:
Do Not Love the World
15Do not love the world nor the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is not from the Father, but is from the world. 17The world is passing away, and also its lusts; but the one who does the will of God lives forever.
Now I am a huge fan of Mr. Banana Hands, aka, Tony Robbins, ok, not a huge fan, but I think he is cool peeps. Anyway he was the first person that introduced me to Kaizen which I immediately liked and adopted in my philosophy of ZenTao, but, the fact of the matter is that the Japanese learned this after we blew them up and felt bad so we sent the american efficiency experts over their to make things better. They adopted our philosophy and used it to defeat our american auto dealers.
After WWII, to help restore Japan, American occupation forces brought in American experts to help with the rebuilding of Japanese industry while The Civil Communications Section (CCS) developed a Management Training Program that taught statistical control methods as part of the overall material. This course was developed and taught by Homer Sarasohn and Charles Protzman in 1949-50. Sarasohn recommended W. Edwards Deming for further training in Statistical Methods. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaizen#History
Now why was it that we couldn’t compete with the Japanese over here when they were using the philosophy that we taught them? Because the corporations were trying to wag the dog, trying to upsell the american citizens products they didn’t need or want.
Now what is it exactly that the government looks like when it has an intact family unit? There are Unions. Unions make sure that you can have a family as a man, as a father, that you have protection so you can raise a family. It means that you have a rational path to increase your value and position and you can’t be fired arbitrarily or forced to compete with unlicensed, uninsured, illegal, immigrants.
Fascinating little tid bit the word Soviet in USSR is synonymous with Union. Maybe that is why it was so important for the neocons with their radical Reagonomics to try to destroy the Soviet Union?
And this is how the Neo Cons managed to get elected into office? Let us take a look at that process for a minute.
George W. Bush shopped himself around while his daddy was president to companies engaged in illegitimate business practices. Suggesting, I suspect that, his father couldn’t afford a scandal so any underhanded dealings they did would be swept under the table. Remember that when W. became president he made it illegal to find out what his connection was to Enron. Enron more or less sold “energy”. Now remember if you will that Enron was destroyed on 9/11 in the attack on the World Trade Center where it was located. Enron brokered the deal that sold “excess energy” from Texas to L.A. which was necessitated by the rolling black outs which caused lives and were found later to have been manufactured and a law suit was pending against, you guessed it, Enron.
George W. Bush was never supposed to be president, his father knew this, it was all Karl Rove’s fault and his weird, creepy attraction to Georgy that allowed it all to happen. Jeb Bush was being groomed for president. I am not a huge fan of Bush senior but the man was reasonable. He didn’t fly in the face of reason, and he backed down when he saw his course of action was unwarranted. It was so obvious to me when he broke down on stage that he was ashamed of his little pecker wood of a son, who was more like his horrible mother than himself in spite of his looks. Only his father knew how horribly junior had fucked up the country and then selling our debt to the Chinese? Junior had never had trouble not paying his debts or reneging on his deals, I assume that he thought the United States would do the same. The very man that created more debt for the U.S. than any other president in history, that is his true legacy. The man during whose term massive amounts of money disappeared over seas unaccounted for.
It reminds me of how in GODDESS OF THE MARKET, the author, Jennifer Burns talks about how Ayn Rand modeled two of her main characters after a killer who kidnapped and dismembered a little girl. If capitalism didn’t commit suicide in Ayn Rand’s time it certainly is doing so now. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeJuySjCL5g
- Great American Family Breakdown (groovydocs.wordpress.com)
- Till Death Do Us Part?!?! (writingcanvas.wordpress.com)
- What’s a fault divorce? (olshk.org)
- David Cameron, Gay Marriage and the Decline in UK Traditional Family Life: John Gelmini (dralfoldman.com)
- Kaizen (Continuous Improvement) (journeyofatrader.wordpress.com)
FROM THE LAST ORGANON OF SHIVASTUS SOLOMONICUS, THE PRIVATE MEDITATIONS
The Diamond Light, No Thingness, separated itself into energy and matter. Energy moving slowly, and energy moving quickly. Light and darkness. Pattern is the father, it is a movement of energy. Matrix is the mother, it is the matter from which life springs. In order for their to be choice their had to be options. People by their very nature choose to move closer to one or the other according to their ability. What we think of as heaven or hell is a choice between not changing or not moving and changing and moving and acting. Life itself moves. Not life holds still. Life is intelligent. Not life is predictable and unconscious. You choose to be like the father by being active and intelligent and you are allowed to approach the light. If you refuse to change and grow you draw yourself close to the mother by your actions.
Crystals grow in a matrix, but they are nothing like their surroundings. They choose to be more like the light, more transparent. Light passes through these more intelligent objects with ease, without friction or distortion. They are obviously nothing like the environment in which they were conceived, coming from some other place entirely.
How is it that something which is seems impossible to rationalize with one another, the male and the female, the darkness and the light, matter and energy, polar opposites of one another could have some from one single source? So perfectly married to one another that their is no difference or disagreement? The two substances appear to disappear all together? This is the mystery of the 6th level of initiation, the sixth heaven, the Ajna Chakra, the third eye, the alchemical marriage. The trick to this level of initiation is to realize that they were never separate to begin with, they were always one and the same thing. The true masculine and the true feminine never disagree with one another because they are equal under reason, AEQUALITATUS SUB RATIO. They both are in a relationship with god and reality, they are both truthseekers, they both are on a path, they do not arrogantly and egotistically pursue their own ends and desires and fly in the face of reason. They fulfill their functions and duties faithfully and happily. The Vexing of the spirit occurs when one party or another is over emphasizing their value, in effect worshiping the ego over reason, idolizing a false god.
Lynn: Ohmigod, this is so Gnarly. I can’t believe that this guy is actually making a big deal out of this. You are always saying that it is best to use specific incidents to deconstruct with your philosophical and psychological models. Can you please deconstruct this and show us how you interpret people? Mr. Mindhacker, lol.
Joxua: Absolutely, and I agree that this is a good example to use for this. First of all he has started the conversation with his mind closed, he is not open to relationship or negotiation. He is calling the use of his unprotected image, “theft” which is an exaggeration on his part, which is technically correct. Remember that the Pharisees and Scribes used the letter of the Law against Jesus since they couldn’t debate him and win any other way. Jesus knew more about the spirit of the law. So he is taking a semantic truth and exaggerating the gravity of the situation, positioning himself as a moral authority. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_and_spirit_of_the_law
Now let’s examine his hyperbole of theft. I did an image search on the word archery, to illustrate one of the golden verses of Shivastus Solomonicus, the literary character I created to reintroduce philosophy into western literature. I was looking for an image of a Zen archer done in an ancient Japanese style, but I couldn’t find one that was minimalist or simplistic enough. I settled for what turned out to be his, an unprotected silhouette painting, done in two colors, red and black. How much value did it have for me? Very little, I won’t even notice when I find another image to attach the saying to. How much damage did I do to him? Practically none, other than more people were exposed to his art and he could have used the photoshop I made to increase the perceived value of his lackluster painting.
Lynn: Yeah, I mean the guy is totally over reacting, at first I thought he was talking about Patrick Whelan‘s painting, who is my friend and I have permission to post that. He was trained in the Master’s Tradition which isn’t taught anymore and he sold two paintings to Michael Jackson. When I saw what he was talking about I had to laugh. Patrick even used quotes on his images increase perceived value like you said.
I keep on thinking about what you say about moral authority and the punitive verses educational relationships. People have never seen you work. I have seen you having 3 conversations with different pop ups, while doing photoshops, while engaged in a knock down, drag out debate, and composing a blog at the same time. This guy acts like you were studying his style and plotted and schemed to steal his art, lol. Ohmigod, and he was so rude. Tell me more about his personality based on his behavior, please, with your philosophical system.
Joxua: Well if you remember what I have said about moral authority and how it presupposes an up down relationship, and how moral authority blocks Sapiential authority, you see that he was using this paradigm to force an up down relationship with himself on top. He entirely missed the meaning of the quote as he would have to do in order to have a sense of victory.
I was referring to the etymology of the word “sin”, and I was arguing against moral authority because it should be subordinate to sapiential authority or the authority of wisdom and reason, and that can only be arrived at through conversation of a Socratic and equal nature. He was arguing for moral authority so he could punish and attack. If you remember my whole concept of punitive societies and educational societies and how structure of authority attract psychopaths, and how psychopaths have innate feelings of superiority this should all be making sense now.
Lynn: I feel like something else is going on here. Something stimulated his butthurt. He is concealing something. What do you think of that?
Joxua: Well, I could get much farther into his head with my psychological models. What I refer to as “Conquests of Gomers” is that Gomers in doing what they think is establishing dominance basically communicate that they are gomers.
You see that he refers to the Nagual tradition in his spiritual name, it is possible that he noticed that we were also spiritualists. With spiritualists, if they have issues, they like to think of their tradition as the ONE TRUE tradition and wisdom can come from no other source. They are threatened if they hear any other person speaking with authority on spiritual topics because it falsifies their world view. Now this guy might be smart enough to realize that most Mexicans that harbor resentment against Europeans for forcing their culture on them also speak Spanish a European language and are Catholic a European religion, so he went back to an older native religion to validate his world view. He might think of us as his natural enemy.
Now I don’t have resentment against any people based on sex or skin color. I identify with reason, and I believe in equality under reason. Not to mention I took 4 years of spanish, I was a Testigo of Jehovah, and I peer tutored spanish speaking children in high school math. I was trained not to be racist, but many latino children aren’t, their parents tell them, “Siempre, llama me en espanol! Recuerda tu gente! Tienes respeto para tus abuelos!” Mexicans don’t refer to themselves as A race they refer to themselves as THE Race, La Raza, THE People. I have gone to restaurants where they have pictures of Emiliano Zapata to communicate that latinos will get preferential treatment, but I have never been to a restaurant that had a picture of Custer.
That is why Shivastus says, first comes the philosopher king. Until you know the logical fallacies and the cognitive biases you can’t know if you are making them, even more so if you are emotionally and mentally damaged and you don’t want to be well. If you are in relationship with your issues and trying to prove that your issues are correct you simply cannot ever approach the realm of spirit. This is known, first you have to become the philosopher king and then sorcery begins to happen. Then siddhis and spiritual phenomenon begin to unfold. Until you have killed the ego out of yourself and you are egoless you simply are not spiritual, everything that comes through you comes from the ego and not from god.
Lynn: Wow, brilliant, that answers so many questions. Yeah, and that is what you were saying in the holy trinity of the psyche, Mary represents moral authority and the ego, not superego. It thinks it is channeling god but it is channeling the feminine perspective. Until you learn to recognize ego and prevent it you can’t channel anything else and nothing else will come through but your mental diseases and issues. It is brilliant!
This guy is such a putz, some day he is going to be bragging about how you used one of his crappy paintings.
Joxua: Yes, he is a vagina worshipper. He establishes dominance by pandering to a feminine audience with his crappy art. He makes up for what he lacks in talent by catering to the bad taste and lack of discernment of his audience.
Lynn Marie Le and fans of Patrick Whelan wearing his stardust t-shirts.
- Deconstructing for Value (psykolinguist.wordpress.com)
- Hunting, Platonic Relationships, and the Spirit of the Law (Methodology of Pesak 3) (shaashuim.wordpress.com)
- The Dance Floor of Deconstructionism (matthewayars.wordpress.com)
- “Can’t Get the Vertical Without the Horizontal” (thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com)
- Holy Trinity of the Psyche (esotericalrepository.wordpress.com)
- Sapiential Data (terminclature.wordpress.com)
- Non-delusion by Joxua Mourningstar (atheistfallacies.wordpress.com)
For the sake of being as analytical as possible I want to break this down into a math problem.
A = man that knows how to fish,
B = Man that doesn’t know how to fish
F = the knowledge of how to procure fish.
Now the solution that creates the most value, based on my system of efficiency towards value, is B makes himself like A. B turns into A. Other possible permutations include. A keeps on giving B fish. This could be done happily or begrudgingly, A could be being forced by some external moral authority to continue giving fish to B. Or A could be using fish as some sort of currency to get something in return, perhaps a sense of dependency, or superiority, or moral high ground. The worst solution that creates the least value is if A makes himself like B.
B + F = A
A – F = B
Now there is a transition period as B makes himself or is made in the image of A. If A participates happily there is no problem, but if B participates begrudgingly and his survival depends on his learning how to fish, there are two options, A can leave him to die, or if that is not an option, force B to learn how to fish.
Seems pretty obvious and logical doesn’t it? But then when we turn around and replace A, B, and F with specific people and skills we see that all of the intellectual confusion set in, because we invite the judgments of the stupid majority.
Now I am not a heartless bastard as some would have you think or as you yourself might think. What I am is a rational person who will not be forced to do anything that will fail or that is irrational. I want you to try to keep your emotions from clouding your judgments if you can. I call the above picture a type of “emotional pornography”. Yes, there is a problem and bad stuff is happening in the world. My question is, “what is the best solution that creates the most value for the most people?”
You might ask yourself with people like Michael Jackson and Oprah Winfry wrapping their minds and millions around the problem why does it still persist? And this is the thing understanding the problem. If you are not willing to understand the problem and use your own resources to solve it you have no business using the chicken head fallacy or the chicken hawk fallacy and arguing for what other people should do with their resources to be a part of the problem.
First of all, what kind of people conceive children in circumstances like that? Exposing their children to that living situation? I don’t want to hear your intellectual faggotry on the subject, calm your tits and keep your emotional appeals to yourself. Part of the reason that throwing money and food at the problem doesn’t work is the same reason that throwing sugar into a bottle conditioned beer is ill advised, sugar awakens the yeasts which explode to life, and then you have a bigger problem, more of what you didn’t want in the first place. You are rewarding failure. What happened to the air dropped food that was sent to Africa? Men with guns picked it up and recruited young soldiers. They said, If you want to eat you are going to be a part of our gang and you are going to kill our enemies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion
In my system, superficial aesthetic snap decisions are products of the female mind. Every individual has both a male mind and a female mind and one of them is dominant. Sentimentality, and emotional thinking prevents the wisest solutions that create the most value for the most people from being institutionalized. The Wise person says, “This is the wisest course of action.” and then the sentimental, uneducated, female mind which can be recognized by its emotional appeals and its attempt to expand and increase its own authority through mercy and charity speaks up and says, ” Do we really know that is the wisest solution? Somebody should do something right now! Look at them! They are suffering!” The female mind uses doubt, guilt, shame, and causes the hesitation to act on the wisest solution.
What is further fascinating is that the female mind in blocking the wise solution never finds out that it’s own solution is the inferior solution. A child bumps it’s head and the mother in relationship with her own authority, proving that she is the better parent, swoops down on the child, coddling it and communicating to it through her face and voice that something terrible has happened. The baby reacts not to the sensation analytically but responds to the mothers emotional data, and starts crying believing that something terrible has happened to itself. The same thing happens with the father there and the father says nothing and doesn’t react. The child looks around, thinks to itself, “that didn’t feel that good, I should probably not do that in the future.” and toddles off a little wiser for the experience. Until the mother can control her instinct she will continue to react preemptively and she will never realize that their is a better wiser solution.
All of these charities disgust me, parading their images of starving children and kicked puppies in front of everyone. It is emotional pornography. They want your money and they want to extend their influence and authority. There is no such thing as a 100% altruist. Everybody is doing what they are doing for their own benefit in one way or another. If they aren’t doing it because they love to do it then they are doing it for some other reason. They want to communicate to you that they are good people, trust them, they are harmless. I never trust people that attempt to appear harmless and good. I would be a fool to trust anybody that would tell me that they are harmless and good. Why would they tell me that in the first place? To manipulate me? To take advantage of me? I never tell people that I am harmless or good. If they ask me that then they are an idiot in the first place.
New International Version
“And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full.
- An Infinite Mystery of Balance & Harmony: Man & Woman (reclaimingthesacred.com)