Tag Archives: Aristotle

Torah Explained for Atheists part 3. Rabbi Ba’al Shivah

4 rabbi

I am going to open this piece with an exposition of the 4 rabbi’s that went into Paradise or PaRDeS and the exegesis of the story.  Later, I will return to the intro to the The Zohar: Pritzker Edition, translated with commentary by Daniel C. Matt.  Those portions that are not sourced come from the Zohar.  Let’s begin. 

The version in the Babylonian Talmud, which is the best-known, may be translated:

The Rabbis taught: Four entered the Pardes. They were Ben Azzai, Ben Zoma, Acher and Rabbi Akiva. Rabbi Akiva said to them, “When you come to the place of pure marble stones, do not say, ‘Water! Water!’ for it is said, ‘He who speaks untruths shall not stand before My eyes’ (Psalms 101:7)”. Ben Azzai gazed and died. Regarding him the verse states, ‘Precious in the eyes of G-d is the death of His pious ones’ (Psalms 116:15). Ben Zoma gazed and was harmed. Regarding him the verse states, ‘Did you find honey? Eat as only much as you need, lest you be overfilled and vomit it’ (Proverbs 25:16). Acher cut down the plantings. Rabbi Akiva entered in peace and left in peace.[3]

In the commentary printed beside the Talmud text, Rashi says that Ben Azzai died from looking at the Divine Presence. Ben Zoma‘s harm was in losing his sanity. Acher‘s “cutting down the plantings” in the orchard refers to becoming a heretic from the experience. Acher means “the other one”, and is the Talmudic term for thesageElisha ben Avuya. Rabbi Akiva, in contrast to the other three, became the leading Rabbinic figure of the era.


“Again and again Rabbi Shim’on waxes eloquent in the praise of those who study Torah, especially those who do so after midnight.  They indeed take the place of the priests and Levites of old, ‘who stand in the house of the Lord by night.’  Those who awaken nightly to study the secrets of Torah become the earthly attendants of the divine bride, ushering Her into the chamber where She will unite at dawn with Her heavenly spouse.”

This is interesting to me for a few reasons, the reference to studying Torah at midnight is interesting because it is after midnight that one practices black magick in Voodoo, modern Voodoo is based on the 6th and 7th books of Moses.  Voodoo is something you use when you have no resources and you are fighting an enemy with all the resources.  This passage portrays the Levites as a kind of Guardian, hyper vigilant to an attack from the enemy, standing in a heightened state of suspicious awareness while everybody else slumbers.

“Torah, in the Zohar is not conceived as a text, as an object, or as material, but as a living divine presence, engaged in a mutual relationship with the person who studies her.  More than that, in the zoharic consciousness Torah is compared to a beloved who carries on with her lovers a mutual dynamic courtship.”

Remember if you will my theory that the cult of the Augures who created the philosophy of law, science, and religion in the West were associated with India and the Hebrews.  The High Priest of the cult of the Augures meditated on the divine law that infused the universe, he didn’t create the law and he was subject to it.  Even the separation of powers of the president is modeled after the Philosophy of the Augure cult.  Think of Torah as the divine law that governs events in the universe.

“The beloved in the nexus of this rrelationship is entirely active.  She sends signals of her interest to her lover, she intensifies his passionate desire for her by games of revealing and hiding.  She discloses secrets that stir his curiosity.  She desires to be loved.  The beloved is is closed in an erotic progression before her lover out of a desire to reveal secrets that have been forever hidden within her.

…the day when God gave Torah to Israel and proclaimed His love for her in the song of songs.”

a rhetorical tautology of God giving man a soul by giving him philosophy…


“In the Zohar, the true subject matter that the kabbalist finds in every verse is the hieros gamos itself, the mystical union of the divine male and female – the eros that underlies and transforms Torah, making it into a symbolic textbook on the inner erocit life of God.”

I am going to paraphrase a bit, many of the texts that make the Zohar are of the stories of the rabbis under the tutelage of Rabbi Shim’on.  They like the apostles of Jesus wander and teach others, in that journey, as they are having this mystical conversation on the nature of reality and remembering their experiences and what they learn, they often encounter people and beings that have more awareness of certain principles that govern the universe and human behavior than they do.  This knowledge also enters into their canon.

“The world as first created was a true Garden of Eden because the blessed Holy One and the Sheckinah were fact to face, joined in constant embrace like that of the upper sefirot Hokhmah and Binah.  Divine blessing thus coursed through the system without interruption…”

At this point in time the Jewish people didn’t believe in making visual artistic depictions of men or animals because they feared it would lead to idolatry, but here I can trace the rhetorical tautologies and movement of ideas in this fashion.  


According to the Dalai Lama, Samantabhadra is the highest form of Buddha.  I think he meant this because this form of the Buddha represents God as the Creator in his male and female aspect, if you ponder you realize that in order to create you have to include feminine and masculine.  It might interest you to know that Heinrich Zimmer whose work was published and edited posthumously by Joseph Campbell had determined in his investigations that Buddhism was an offshoot of Hinduism as the Buddhas came from India and Nepal.  

Here the author makes mention of the myth of Plato which I will expound on for those of you who are not aware of it, and he connects it with the early Jewish myth, which is not only interesting in its implications it is also appropriate in light of my theories.

The Symposium Quotes
 “According to Greek mythology, humans were originally created with four arms, four legs and a head with two faces. Fearing their power, Zeus split them into two separate parts, condemning them to spend their lives in search of their other halves.”
“…and when one of them meets the other half, the actual half of himself, whether he be a lover of youth or a lover of another sort, the pair are lost in an amazement of love and friendship and intimacy and one will not be out of the other’s sight, as I may say, even for a moment…”
When he said this he was using the word Philia, or Brotherly love, or fraternal love, making a reference to a philosophical family, notice the word philosophy has the words philia and sophia in it.  The single soul would be Sophia, or Psyche, or Torah.  This also has to do with the Philosophy of Greek Astrology if that is interesting, you can read this piece that I wrote.  https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/09/08/philosophy-of-astrology/
hermaphrodite (n.) Look up hermaphrodite at Dictionary.comlate 14c. (harmofroditus), from Latin hermaphroditus, from Greek Hermaphroditos (Latin Hermaphroditus), son of Hermes and Aphrodite, who, in Ovid, was loved by the nymph Salmacis so ardently that she prayed for complete union with him and as a result they were united bodily, combining male and female characteristics. Also used figuratively in Middle English of “one who improperly occupies two offices.” As a name for the condition, Middle English had hermofrodito (late 14c.), hermofrodisia(early 15c.). As an adjective, from c.1600.  http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=hermaphrodite
“Adam and eve according to the aggadah, were siamese twins, conjoined back to back.  This single being is that described in Genesis 1:27:  “So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.”  …in the following chapter is the separation of this pair, in which they are first turned to face-to-face to one another, …  They had to be “sawed apart” so they might be properly united.”

If we wanted to get really esoteric I could trace this idea all the way back to India for you.  Do you double dog dare me?


I entered in piece and left in piece so I will leave it to the rest of you to figure out who burns the plants, who drops dead, and who goes insane.


Introduction to Torah for Atheists, part 1.


Here is my introductory course to Torah for Atheists.  As I have explained before the people that wrote the bible didn’t take it literally, it was written in a kind of code, PaRDeS, a mythological history that can’t really be decoded unless one is familiar with cabala, and the tree of life.  It was written in this way so it wouldn’t immediately give itself to being understood by non Jews, because it was insulting as an alternative history to a group of people bent on global domination and hostile to any other perspective but their own.

The Quotes that I have selected are from the Pritzker edition of the Zohar by Daniel c. Matt all of these quotes in this piece will be from the introduction, not the actual text.


“the sixth sefirah is represented by the third patriarch, Jacob, also called Israel.” “Jacob is in the sense the perfect human- a new adam.” “In balancing their own lives, the people of Israel imitate the God who stands at the center between right and left, balancing all the cosmic forces.”  

In the Bahir it states: “Sixth is the adorned, glorious, delightful throne of glory, the house of the world to come. Its place is engraved in wisdom as it says ‘God said: Let there be light, and there was light.'” [1]

Tiferet is the force that integrates the Sefira of Chesed (“compassion”) and Gevurah (“Strength, or Judgement (din)“). These two forces are, respectively, expansive (giving) and restrictive (receiving). Either of them without the other could not manifest the flow of Divine energy; they must be balanced in perfect proportion by balancing compassion with discipline. This balance can be seen in the role of Tiferet, wherein the conflicting forces are harmonized, and creation flowers forth. Tiferet also balances Netzach and Hod in a similar manner. In that case Hod can be seen as the intellect where Netzach is seen as emotion.


“Moses is the single human to rise to the level of Tiferet, to become ‘bridegroom of the sheckinah'”.  “When gathered in Yesod, it becomes claer that the life animating the sefirot, often described in metaphors of either light or water, is chiefly to be seen as male sexual energy, specifically as semen.” 

The reason this is important is because of the connection not only to Taoism but also to the Occult Philosophy of India.

Ojas is a Sanskrit word which literally means “vigor”. According to the principles of Ayurveda, it is the essential energy of the body which can be equated with the “fluid of life”. Those who practice Ayurveda say that Ojas is the sap of one’s life energy which, when sufficient, is equated with immunity and, when deficient, results in weakness, fatigue and ultimately disease.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ojas

From my perspective this is a rhetorical tautology and this only happens when their is a common origin.  It is a pattern that is identical to another pattern and therefore congruent.

“The biblical personality associated with the ninth sefirah is Joseph, the only figure regularly described in rabbinic literature as a tsaddiq or ‘righteous'”

Yesod, the foundation, also represents the penis, Jacob rejected the sexual advances of Potipher’s wife, this sexual good taste and purity and abstinence from unclean women is an aspect of the personality of yesod.

The sephirah of Yesod translates spiritual concepts into actions that unite us with God.

It is often associated with the Moon, because it is the sphere which reflects the light of all the other sephirot into Malkuth, and it is associated with the sexual organs, because it is here that the higher spheres connect to the earth.


“The Great Drama of Religious life, according to the kabbalists, is that of protecting Sheckinah from the forces of evil and joining Her to the holy Bridegroom who ever awaits Her.  Here one can see how medieval Jews adapted teh values of chivalry – the rescue of the maident from the clutches of evil…”

to learn more read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtly_love

The Sheckinah is god’s holy spirit, the holy Ghost of the Catholic Church, the reason the RCC made it androgynous I suspect is because of a historical breach between them and the Jews.  It was a kind of retaliation, The Catholics expected the Jews to follow them and be more like them and give up their sovereignty.

Of further interest, the Holy Spirit was a concept that came from the Evolution of Philosophy, having come to the conclusion that a God must exist for various reasons it became apparent that god was also not in our universe but outside of it, furthermore, like a person sitting in deep meditation he didn’t move, anything that moves in our world is not god.  So god in the form of the prime mover unmoved, worked his will on the earth through his feminine side which was in fact the Holy Spirit or the Sheckinah.  This idea was also taught by the Pythagorean Math cults.

The unmoved mover (Ancient Greekὃ οὐ κινούμενον κινεῖ,[1] ho ou kinoúmenon kineî, “that which moves without being moved”) or prime mover (Latinprimum movens) is a monotheistic concept advanced by Aristotle, a polytheist[2][3], as a primary cause or “mover” of all the motion in the universe.[4] As is implicit in the name, the “unmoved mover” moves other things, but is not itself moved by any prior action. In Book 12 (Greek “Λ”) of his Metaphysics, Aristotle describes the unmoved mover as being perfectly beautiful, indivisible, and contemplating only the perfect contemplation: itself contemplating. He equates this concept also with the Active Intellect.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unmoved_mover

“The primary function of Religious life, with all its duties and obligations, is to rouse the Sheckinah into a state of love.”

As we continue investigating we will see they are talking about erotic love.

The entire Zohar appears to have been written by Moses de Leon.  He appears to have entered a trance like state which is common in Qabbalistic meditations, there are even descriptions of how to do it, in Qabbalistic literature.  Of further interest the author also mentions Jacob Boehme the creator of the Illuminati entering into a similar trance like state and writing “under the force of mystical inspiration.”  I personally, am not without my own experiences in this regard, and I am sure those of you familiar with my work will agree with that.  What is interesting is that this inspired writing and the congruence and agreement with other inspired writings seems to determine cannonicity to a certain degree.  One inspired writer can often tell if and when another writer is also inspired, and their is no enmity between them.

As further evidence that the bible and other Jewish religious books were written in a kind of code I offer this testimony:

“In this context, the Zohar may be viewed as a grand defense of Judaism, a poetic demonstration of the truth and superiority of Jewish faith.  Its authors knew a great deal about Christianity, mostly from observing it at close hand but also from reading certain Christian works, including the New Testament, which Dominicans and other eager seekers of converts were only too happy to place in the hands of literate and inquisitive Jews.  The kabbalists’ attitude toward the religion of their Christian neighbors is a complex one, and it also has come down to us through a veil of self-censorship.  Jews writing in medieval Europe, especially those promulgating innovative religious teachings that were controversial even within the Jewish community, must have been well aware that their works would be read by Christian censors (often themselves Jewish apostates) who would make them pay dearly for outright insults to the Christian faith.”

“…this was also the era when the Christian image of the Jew as magician and devil-worshipper was becoming rampant.”

I have decided that I am going to conclude here and separate this section from the next section which will discuss the tora as a philosophy and as a soul which confirms a lot of my theories on history, linguistics, and philology.

Muslims, Ishmael, and Judas Iscariot, by Rabbi Ba’al Shiva


I apologize ahead of time, I am going to be repeating some of my material for those people reading my stuff for the first time, but there will be some new information in here and some new connections made for older subscribers.  

People read an ancient book that was written over millenia by multiple different authors, they assume that nothing has changed, they assume the book was written by their people about their history, none of this is true, you have to understand that the bible was written as a mythological allegory, names were changed and it was written as a myth because there was a force in the world trying to conceal and destroy the truth.  The children of the lie, the offspring of vipers, they conceal the truth about themselves, and they represent themselves falsely, all the while spreading themselves across the land in an effort to increase and expand the authority of an ancient evil.  In this blog we will go a step further towards revealing this hidden hand throughout history.

For years it was thought that it was a myth that the 12 tribes of Judah were ever used as zodiac symbols, recent evidence shows that indeed it was.



Every major world civilization has a few things in common, they have a variety of peoples there, they are wealthy or as the bible says it, “blessed by god.”  They have a large middle class.  This large middle class allows the movement of people from different cultures that are also successful, to move about freely from one culture to the next.  These craftsmen are often part of secret societies, sometimes spreading revolutionary ideas.  This allows philosophies, and best practices to be exposed to different societies.  These come from math cults started by Pythagorus, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle were part of these math cults as were Jesus an Shams.  This horizontal, democratic, movement of ideas moved through nomadic peoples, the jews, who weren’t particularly allowed to own land throughout history but were exposed to many different cultures and adopted the successful practices from those cultures.  As evidence of this pattern I offer to you the Gypsies who were named after Egypt, when coming from Egypt and were also referred to as the Romani when coming from Rome.  The poet and Sufi Mystic known as Jalāl ad-Dīn Muhammad Balkhī had the nickname Rumi being named after Rome.  His best friend, spiritual instructor, and possibly gay lover Shams was like a freemason and he was part of the Math Cults started by Pythagorus, and he was in the spirit of Jesus.  Also he was eventually kidnapped and beheaded by some of Rumi’s jealous students most likely including one of Rumi’s own sons.

Shams is the Arabic word for “sun” (شمس).  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shams

Shams-i-Tabrīzī (Persian: شمس تبریزی‎) or ‘Shams al-Din Mohammad’ (1185–1248) was a Persian[1]Muslim,[2] who is credited as the spiritual instructor of Mewlānā Jalāl ad-Dīn Muhammad Balkhi, also known as Rumi and is referenced with great reverence in Rumi’s poetic collection, in particular Diwan-i Shams-i Tabrīzī (The Works of Shams of Tabriz). Tradition holds that Shams taught Rumi in seclusion in Konya for a period of forty days, before fleeing for Damascus. The tomb of Shams-i Tabrīzī was recently nominated to be a UNESCO World Heritage Site.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shams_Tabrizi

According to contemporary Sufi tradition, Shams Tabrizi mysteriously disappeared: some say he was killed by close disciples of Mowlana Jalaluddin Rumi who were jealous of the close relationship between Rumi and Shams. It is also said that Shams Tabrizi left Konya and died in Khoy where he was buried. Sultan Walad, Rumi‘s son, in his Walad-Namamathnawi just mentions that Shams mysteriously disappeared from Konya with no more specific details.

In Jesus time Rome had reached an apex, the Roman Roads made travel very easy and since all roads lead to Rome, it attracted some unsavory characters.  Bad things started happening, all of a sudden there were these people that wouldn’t participate, these revolutionaries that wanted to take over, to judge everybody with their slave values, they felt entitled to judge and to rule everybody else.  The funny thing was they had moved their to increase their own quality of life, now why would they think that they deserved to rule, seeing as how everywhere they went they created poverty and dust and famine, and murder?

It became necessary for Jesus to resurrect the old sciences once again and to make order out of chaos.  The 12 tribes of Israel became the 12 disciples, a group of initiates sanctioned with separating the sheep from the goats and taking their message to a specific group of people so that the sheep might be saved and separated from those that didn’t respect the authority of reason.  It is possible he was in league with some Roman officials but I don’t think it was the Flavian Caesars as some have postulated, I suspect they were in league with the Pharisees as Flavius Josephus the historian that bares their name was a Pharisee.

As I mentioned in the piece, “WHO REALLY WAS JESUS, RABBI BA’AL SHIVA” Jesus didn’t like the Pharisees and he didn’t like the Samaritans, he didn’t like anybody that adhered to the Abrahamic Law Code.  He used the Good Samaritan as an example to illustrate his concept of a philosophical family a philoish, and the Good Samaritan was the exception to the rule, as we know the exception proves the rule because it is the exception.

The Samaritans are adherents of Samaritanism, an Abrahamic religion closely related to Judaism.


Conflicts between Pharisees and Sadducees took place in the context of much broader and longstanding social and religious conflicts among Jews, dating back to the Babylonian captivity and exacerbated by the Roman conquest.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees

Which raises the question, Who was Judas?  The bible very cleverly and necessarily changes names in order to implicate patterns, the word Messiah, comes from the word Moses, which is why Jesus was the greater Moses, and that words comes from proto-indo-european and can be traced back to India.

In Indian religions and Indian philosophy, Moksha (Sanskrit: मोक्षmokṣa), also called vimoksha, vimukti and mukti,[1]means emancipation, liberation or release.[2] In soteriological and eschatological sense, it connotes freedom fromsaṃsāra, the cycle of death and rebirth.[3] In epistemological and psychological sense, moksha connotes freedom, self-realization and self-knowledge.[4]   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moksha

Likewise, the name Solomon was not a real persons name although there is trace evidence in our very language that something happened there that was very significant and not unlike what happened in Rome, and is now happening in the United States and all across Europe.  Solomon derives from Shalom, and Solomon was the king of peace.

SolomonLook up Solomon at Dictionary.commasc. proper name, Biblical name of David’s son, king of Judah and Israel and wisest of all men, from Greek Solomon, from Hebrew Sh’lomoh, from shelomo “peaceful,” from shalom “peace.”  http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Solomon


So back to the question at hand, Who was Judas Iscariot, even his first name is reminiscent of Jewery, lets examine the last name for linguistic clues, Iscariot.

  • One popular explanation derives Iscariot from Hebrew איש־קריות, Κ-Qrîyôth, or “man of Kerioth“. The Gospel of John refers to Judas as “son of Simon Iscariot” (although some translations only refer to him as “the son of Simon” (Jn 6:71, Jn 13:26, King James Version)),[3] implying it was not Judas, but his father, who came from there.[4] Some speculate that Kerioth refers to a region in Judea, but it is also the name of two known Judean towns.[5]
  • A second theory is that “Iscariot” identifies Judas as a member of the sicarii.[6] These were a cadre of assassins among Jewish rebels intent on driving the Romans out of Judea. However, some historians maintain the sicarii arose in the 40s or 50s of the 1st century, in which case Judas could not have been a member.[7]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judas_Iscariot#Etymology

So, now let’s follow the trail left for us by this mythological allegory and see if we can make any sense of it.

Sicarii (Latin plural of Sicarius “dagger-men”, in Modern Hebrew rendered siqariqim סיקריקים) is a term applied, in the decades immediately preceding thedestruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE, to an extremist splinter group[1] of the JewishZealots, who attempted to expel the Romans and their partisans from the Roman province of Judea.[2] The Sicarii carried sicae, or small daggers, concealed in their cloaks, hence their name.[3] At public gatherings, they pulled out these daggers to attack Romans or Roman sympathizers, blending into the crowd after the deed to escape detection.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicarii

Hmm!  Well that is interesting!  Does that remind anybody about anything happening today?  Like maybe a tactic used ad nauseum by a certain group of people?


Let us consult the Legend of King Solomon passed down by the Freemasons to see if we can find any recurring patterns.

The legend goes as follows..

Hiram Abiff, “a widow’s son” from Tyre, skilful in the working of all kinds of metals, was employed to help build King Solomon’s Temple.

The legend tells us that one day, whilst worshipping the Grand Architect of the Universe (GAOTU) within the Holy of Holies, Hiram was attacked by three ruffians, (called ‘Jubela’, ‘Jubelo’ & ‘Jubelum’ and known collectively as ‘The Juwes’) who demanded the “Master’s word”, that is, the secret name of God.

The first ruffian, named Jubela, struck Hiram across the throat with a 24 inch gauge. The second ruffian, named Jubelo, struck Hiram’s breast, over the heart, with a square.   The third ruffian, named Jubelum, struck Hiram upon the forehead with a gavel, whereupon Hiram fell dead. His blood, therefore, was shed within the temple.

Hiram, having been killed, was carried out the East gate of the Temple and buried outside Jerusalem on Mount Moriah.  http://www.christian-restoration.com/fmasonry/hiram.htm



Well, that got weird fast.  Let’s take the Wayback machine back about 1,000 years ago and see what we can learn from history…


During the time of Moses Maimonides the Jews were once again living under the tyranny of the Persian, Babylonian, ideology of tyranny and terrorism.  Jews were allowed to practice their faith in secret paying lip service to Allah, but living in fear, not allowed to gather on the streets without attracting negative attention.  Once again they lived under fear and persecution as the Muslims tried to convert them with violence and threats and the Kara-ites with Muslim ties and sympathies were corrupting the Jewish faith by soliciting the fundamentalist Abrahamic doctrine of the earliest form of un evolved Judaism.

Much like myself Rabbi Maimonides was a Qabalist, and investigated the holy writings in his own way reinterpreting them and looking for hidden wisdom that had been left for later generations to glean.  Her is what he said:

In your letter you mention that the apostle has spurred on a number of people to believe that several verses in Scripture allude to the Madman (Mohammed), such as “bimeod meod” (Genesis 17:20), “he shined forth from Mount Paran” (Deuteronomy 33:1), “a prophet from the midst of thee” (Deuteronomy 18:15), and the promise to Ishmael “I will make him a great nation” (Genesis 17:20). These arguments have been rehearsed so often that they have become nauseating. It is not enough to declare that they are altogether feeble; nay, to cite as proofs these verses is ridiculous and absurd in the extreme. For these are not matters that can confuse the minds of anyone.

But the Muslims themselves put no faith in their own arguments, they neither accept nor cite them, because they are manifestly so fallacious. Inasmuch as the Muslims could not find a single proof in the entire Bible nor a reference or possible allusion to their prophet which they could utilize, they were compelled to accuse us saying, “You have altered the text of the Torah, and expunged every trace of the name of Mohammed therefrom.” They could find nothing stronger than this ignominious argument the falsity of which is easily demonstrated to one and all by the following facts.

The motive for their accusation lies therefore, in the absence of any allusion to Mohammed in the Torah.
The phrase “a great nation” cited above does not connote a people in possession of prophecy or a Law, but merely one large in numbers just as in reference to idolaters Scripture says “nations greater and mightier than yourselves.” (Deuteronomy 11:23).

Similarly, the phrase “bimeod meod” simply signifies “exceedingly.” Were there any allusion in the verse to Mohammed, then it would have read “and I shall bless him bimeod meod,” and whoever likes to hang on to a spider’s web might then discover a reference to Mohammed therein. As it is, since Scripture says “I shall increase him bimeod meod,” it can only denote an extravagant increment in numbers.

There is no question that the Divine assurance to Abraham to bless his descendants, to reveal the Torah to them, and to make them the Chosen People, refers only to the offspring of Isaac. For Ishmael is mentioned as an adjunct and appendage in the blessing of Isaac, which reads “and also of the son of the bond-woman will I make a nation.” (Genesis 21:13). This verse suggests that Isaac holds a primary position and Ishmael a subordinate place. This point is made even more explicit in the blessing which ignores Ishmael entirely. “For in Isaac shall seed be called in thee.” (Genesis 21:12).The meaning of God’s promise to Abraham is that the issue of Ishmael will be vast in numbers but neither pre-eminent nor the object of divine favor, nor distinguished for the attainment of excellence. Not because of them will Abraham be famed or celebrated, but by the noted and illustrious scions of Isaac. The phrase “shall be called” simply means, shall be renowned, as it does in the verse, “Let thy name be called in them, and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac.” (Genesis 48:16).  http://stephanhuller.blogspot.com/2009/08/maimonides-on-yemenite-argument-that.html




The Jews of Freemasonry, are not the Jews of today, they are the Muslims, the Ishmaelite order of Assassins cleverly rebranded by Mohammed. The KKK is wrong in blaming the Jews for the death of Jesus as He told his disciples to go not to the Samaritan Jews, and he hated the Pharisees and Sadducees that traced their origin to Babylon, he told them instead to g to the lost children of Israel.  It was the Persian Jews that wanted Jesus dead.  And the Muslims are nothing new, they claim to be of the lineage of Moses, and Jesus, but the resurrect the law code of Abraham, which is in itself a misuse since that law code was created when Abraham was individuating and separating from the Evil practices of Babylon and he had to use tactics that would succeed against a ruthless and immoral enemy.

The Muslims know that the are lying, they know that they are liars, this is no secret, it is in their own holy books.

14 - 1

Don’t let them fool you with their clever obfuscations, it is because of the nature of the Persian languages who have had caste systems for 6,000 years that their language is given to multiple different translations of meaning depending on who you are and what their intent is.  Their very language, their very thought processes are given to manipulation and concealment and lying.  This is a valid translation, it is not a transliteration, this is what they teach the inmost initiates of Islam translating it differently for suspicious westerners in order to conceal the evil intent that lies therein.







Maybe some of you can sit back and watch the Persian Babylonian Empire take over the entire world as was their intent in the beginning, but I cannot in good conscious sit back and watch it happen silently.  We have been pushed to the ends of the earth.  Historicly, every time these people come together it is them, that causes the problem because they are a psychopathic people they are arrogant, superior, entitled, histrionic, greedy, evil, conniving human beings.  Every time their has been a world power it was the introduction of these horrible human beings that signaled the collapse of that civilization.  Egypt, Israel, Rome, and now France, Germany, Britain, Australia, and eventually the United States of America.

The Origin of the Western Philosophical System


So my theory which I feel confident will stand up to the criticism of science, haplo-groups and what have you is that essentially our entire western system of philosophy, religion, logic, science, every structure of legitimate authority comes from the Aghori cult of India.  Even the words that we use still hearken back to that ancient philosophical cult, that predated the Greek culture, the cult of the Augure’s.  I am not making this up, it is a known fact, you may not know it but that doesn’t make it any less true.  

In ancient RomeAuctoritas referred to the general level of prestige a person had in Roman society, and, as a consequence, his clout, influence, and ability to rally support around his will. Auctoritas was not merely political, however; it had a numinous content and symbolized the mysterious “power of command” of heroic Roman figures. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auctoritas

28When Jesus had finished saying these things, the crowds were amazed at his teaching, 29because he taught as one who had authority, and not as their teachers of the law.  Matthew 7



I am a linguistic philosopher and a philologist, and I started noticing patterns in words that were related to one another or had similar or conjunct definitions.  This particular grouping of words is most meaningful because not only did it create the philosophy of reason and logic it created the philosophy behind all of the western structures of authority including science.  

The Aghori (Sanskritअघोर aghōra),[2] are ascetic Shaiva sadhus.

The Aghori are known to engage in post-mortem rituals. They often dwell in charnel grounds, have been witnessed smearing cremation ashes on their bodies, and have been known to use bones from human corpses for crafting skull bowls (which Shiva and other Hindu deities are often iconically depicted holding or using) and jewelry. Due to their practices that are contradictory to orthodox Hinduism, they are generally opposed.[3][4]

Pythagorus, name meant, “I am the Python”  and since the Python was a chthonic symbol (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chthonic) what he was saying was, “I am death.”  Jesus was similarly transliterated, when he said I am Adonai Sabaoth, he wasn’t saying that he was the lord of the Sabbath, he was saying he was the god of death.  


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reason is the capacity for consciously making sense of things, applying logic, for establishing and verifying facts, and changing or justifying practices, institutions, and beliefs based on new or existing information.[1] It is closely associated with such characteristically human activities as philosophysciencelanguage,mathematics, and art, and is normally considered to be a definitive characteristic of human nature.[2] The concept of reason is sometimes referred to as rationalityand sometimes as discursive reason, in opposition to intuitive reason.[3]

Reason or “reasoning” is associated with thinkingcognition, and intellect. Reason, like habit or intuition, is one of the ways by which thinking comes from one idea to a related idea. For example, it is the means by which rational beings understand themselves to think about cause and effecttruth and falsehood, and what is good or bad. It is also closely identified with the ability to self-consciously change beliefsattitudestraditions, and institutions, and therefore with the capacity for freedom and self-determination.[4]

According to Professor emeritus Okko Behrands, Octavian chose between one of two names, Romulus the first king of Rome, and Augustus the high priest of the cult of the Augure’s.  You will notice that we have 2 invasive months in our calendar, Julius and Augustus, the two roman rulers that marked the middle of the Pax Romana.  Furthermore, it threw off the numbering of the calendar months, instead of being in their proper places, Sapta, Octa, Nova, and Deca (September, October, November, and December), are 2 places removed from their correct position.  

I believe that the Agure’s were associated with Aventine hill on which Remus lived and he was not chosen for kingship of Rome because of the presence of inauspicious birds.  Auspicious that is another word that I should add to the list, Shiva is known as the Auspicious one.  The birds were carrion birds, omens of death, and as we know the Aghori would sleep in grave yards and were obsessed with death and philosophy the death of delusion and ignorance.  


Gymnosophists (Greek γυμνοσοφισταίgymnosophistai, i.e. “naked philosophers” or “naked sophists”)[1][2] is the name given by the Greeks to certain ancientIndian philosophers who pursued asceticism to the point of regarding food and clothing as detrimental to purity of thought (sadhus or yogis) and also even naked priests from Ethiopia.[2]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gymnosophists

Remember if you will that the Gymnasium is where people were taught the philosophy or Greece and indoctrinated into society.  

A little more about Pythagorus:

 Aristippus explained his name by saying, “He spoke (agor-) the truth no less than did the Pythian (Pyth-),”


There is little direct evidence as to the kind and amount of knowledge which Pythagoras acquired, or as to his definite philosophical views. Everything of the kind mentioned by Plato and Aristotle is attributed not to Pythagoras, but to the Pythagoreans. Heraclitus stated that he was a man of extensive learning;[25] andXenophanes claimed that he believed in the transmigration of souls.[26] Xenophanes mentions the story of his interceding on behalf of a dog that was being beaten, professing to recognise in its cries the

voice of a departed friend.


Pythagorean theorem

 a^2 + b^2 = c^2.

While the theorem that now bears his name was known and previously utilized by the Babylonians and Indians, he, or his students, are often said to have constructed the first proof. 



Pythagoras was also credited with devising the tetractys, the triangular figure of four rows which add up to the perfect number, ten. As a mystical symbol, it was very important to the worship of the Pythagoreans who would swear oaths by it:

And the inventions were so admirable, and so divinised by those who understood them, that the members used them as forms of oath: “By him who handed to our generation the tetractys, source of the roots of ever-flowing nature.”

—Iamblichus, Vit. Pyth., 29
Aristotle claimed that the philosophy of Plato closely followed the teachings of the Pythagoreans,[78] and Cicero repeats this claim: Platonem ferunt didicisse Pythagorea omnia (“They say Plato learned all things Pythagorean“) Bertrand Russell, in his A History of Western Philosophy, contended that the influence of Pythagoras on Plato and others was so great that he should be considered the most influential of all Western philosophers.
Pythagoras became the subject of elaborate legends surrounding his historic persona. Aristotle described Pythagoras as a wonder-worker and somewhat of a supernatural figure, attributing to him such aspects as a golden thigh, which was a sign of divinity. According to Muslim tradition, Pythagoras was said to have been initiated by Hermes (Egyptian Thoth).[55] According to accounts of Aristotle and others, some ancients believed that he had the ability to travel through space and time and to communicate with animals and plants.[56]

Influence on esoteric groups

Pythagoras started a secret society called the Pythagorean Brotherhood devoted to the study of mathematics. This had a great effect on future esoteric traditions, such as Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism, both of which were scientific/mystical groups dedicated to the study of mathematics/geometry and logical reasoning as opposed to religious dogma. Both Freemasonry and Rosicrucianism have claimed to have evolved out of the Pythagorean Brotherhood. 

jacob boehme tetractys…


Sex matters…



I catch a lot of flack for my ideas about the differences between men and women and a lot of that flack comes from feminazis, gomers, vagina worshipers, highly educated idiots and children that have been indoctrinated into man hate.  The reason that happens is because this is America the most feminized country on the planet.  The problem is this, it doesn’t matter how many morons agree with one another, it doesn’t make them more correct.  The tyranny of the stupid majority cannot go unchecked.

You have been propagandized into thinking that there is no difference between masculinity and femininity and this creates a disparate impact in favor of femininity.  This prejudice is not only dangerous for relationships and to the stability of america it is dangerous for individuals.  Women in america think that their is a magickal force that protects them from evil and bad things happening to them and they are right, that magickal force is American men.


deviant art

If you are familiar with my theories on the male brain and the female brain you know that I consider the true uncorrupted male brain to be sociopathic (not the pussified western male mind)  and the female mind is psychopathic, and the psychopath is an over coddled child.

Aristotle’s views on women

“The slave is wholly lacking the deliberative element; the female has it but it lacks authority; the child has it but it is incomplete”

Differences between male and female[edit]

Aristotle believed that nature ordained not only physical differences between male and female but mental differences as well. By comparison to man, he argued, woman is “more mischievous, less simple, more impulsive … more compassionate[,] … more easily moved to tears[,] … more jealous, more querulous, more apt to scold and to strike[,] … more prone to despondency and less hopeful[,] … more void of shame or self-respect, more false of speech, more deceptive, of more retentive memory [and] … also more wakeful; more shrinking [and] more difficult to rouse to action” (History of Animals, 608b. 1-14). Moreover, in accord with his society’s custom of allowing girls and women to eat only half as much as boys and men, he added that woman “requires a smaller quantity of nutriment” (History of Animals, 608b. 14) [2] Aristotle wrote extensively on his views of the nature of semen. His views on how a child’s sex is decided have since been abandoned.[3]

He wrote that only fair skinned women, not darker skinned women, had a sexual discharge and climaxed. He also believed this discharge could be increased by eating of pungent foods. Aristotle thought a woman’s sexual discharge was akin to that of an infertile or amputated male’s.[4][5] He concluded that both sexes contributed to the material of generation, but that the female’s contribution was in her discharge (as in a male’s) rather than within the ovary.[4]

His idea of procreation was an active, ensouling masculine element bringing life to a passive female element.[6]

While Aristotle reduced women’s roles in society, and promoted the idea that women should receive less food and nourishment than males, he also criticised the results: a woman, he thought, was then more compassionate, more opinionated, more apt to scold and to strike. He stated that women are more prone to despondency, more void of shame or self-respect, more false of speech, more deceptive, and of having a better memory.[7]  wikipedia

Book cover of an edition ofOikonomikos from 1830.

Therefore it befits not a man of sound mind to bestow his person promiscuously, or have random intercourse with women; for otherwise the base-born will share in the rights of his lawful children, and his wife will be robbed of her honor due, and shame be attached to his sons.And it is fitting that he should approach his wife in honor, full of self-restraint and awe; and in his conversation with her, should use only the words of a right-minded man, suggesting only such acts as are themselves lawful and honorable. Aristotle’s thought that a wife was best honored when she saw that her husband was faithful to her, and that he had no preference for another woman; but before all others loves, trusts her and holds her as his own.[12] Aristotle wrote that a husband should secure the agreement, loyalty, and devotion of his wife, so that whether he himself is present or not, there may be no difference in her attitude towards him, since she realizes that they are alike guardians of the common interests; and so when he is away she may feel that to her no man is kinder or more virtuous or more truly hers than her own husband.

I might remind you that every civilization that stopped studying Aristotle fell into the dark ages.  The word Oikonomikos is where the English word economics comes from and the word oikos means house.  How is our economy doing?  As women have increased in “rights” and by rights I mean power without responsibility, the right to wage a propaganda war against masculinity, the right to get divorced on a whim, the right to have disposable relationships with men and sell themselves to the highest bidder while at the same time not wanting to be thought of as sex objects, the right to not suffer or struggle for the success of a relationship, how has our American economy fared?  How has the marriage unit fared? How is relationship doing?

Men and women are not the same, when you make a false forced equality between them you upset the flow of energy between the poles.  Rain does not fall up, and water does not flow up hill.  Women enter into relationship and immediately start turning the man that they are attracted to into a woman, and when they have succeeded they move on to the next man.  It is a conquest of the ego.  But you are sabotaging yourselves, historically there is a pattern that repeats, women that turn their men into women have no defense when foreign invaders come and take the women and rape them.  The men have no incentive to defend the women having had a life time of abuse from women and having been successfully turned into women they also don’t have the ability to wage war even if they wanted to.  The women, now having a child, kind of want to keep and raise the child and they are thus assimilated into another culture.  I am not making this stuff up.  Genghis Khan is related to more people on the earth than any other single person, and he was the most prolific rapist in history.



American women, you are not winning a victory over men, you are defeating yourselves…

Women are fickle emotional creatures incapable of being reasonable an analytical consistently, when you make a woman’s emotional thinking the equal of a man’s intellectual reasoning, you destroy the possibility of a rational relationship.  This pattern is destroying the educational system, the economy, America and the world, it is ruining everything that was good about America.





What is funny is watching this ugly feminazi stonewalling Leslie, she is operating on a slippery slope, seeing years of feminist propaganda being flushed down the toilette where it belongs.  Her entire empire that was created for her by man hating women that she wants to pass on to all of her Amazonian little man hating daughters is going bye bye.  The subjugation of the American Male is coming to an end, or at least it better if we want to survive.  Stop homogenizing the sexes, they were created different for a reason, respect it.

Mung (computer term)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mung or munge is computer jargon for a series of changes to a piece of data, which are often well defined and individually reversible, but which transform the original item into an unrecognizable form. The changes may be destructive, for example by corrupting a computer file, or simply concealing, for example changes to an email address to disguise it fromspambots.

The term was coined in 1958 in the Tech Model Railroad Club at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In 1960 the backronym “Mash Until No Good” was created to describe Mung, and a while after it was revised to “Mung Until No Good”, making it one of the first recursive acronyms. It lived on as a recursive command in the editing language TECO.

Usages of the term appear in munged password (a strong, secure password created through character substitution), data munging (cleaning data from one “raw” form into a structured, purged one) and address munging (disguising an e-mail address).

Munging may also describe the constructive operation of tying together systems and interfaces that were not specifically designed to interoperate (often using the Perl programming language). Munging can also describe the processing or filtering of raw data into another form.[1]

Munging implies destruction[dubious – discuss]—to make large-scale and irrevocable changes to a file and to destroy it. Hence in the early text-adventure game Zork, also known as Dungeon, the user could mung an object and thereby destroy it (making it impossible to finish the game if the object was an important item).




ICONOGRAPHIC ART OF JOXUA MOURNINGSTAR http://iconographicart.wordpress.com/


This is one of my best self portraits and photoshops, imho.  I was inspired by the art in one of my most prized possessions, a copy of the essays of Michel de Montaigne by none other than Salvador Dali.  And yes that is me,  I took the gratuitous buttshot motif from Kevin Costner, my idol.

Below is the piece that inspired my original.



I was particularly predisposed to understand this piece because of my love and understanding of Plato.   What Dali is here illustrating is the epiphany of the universe to Plato.   Plato of course made the platonic solids and the dodecahedron represented the universe seeing as it had 12 sides and there are 12 houses in the zodiac.  You remember that Plato came up with the metaphor of the cave to represent his concept of the causal world in which the monads, or ideal forms, from which all phenomena originate.  He believed the ideas were immortal and that they pre existed things.  First there was the idea of the thing and then the thing made in the image of the idea.

Dali obviously agreed with Plato as we see that he is showing him vindicated in his piece.

A Priori and Plato’s Philosophy


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The terms a priori  used in philosophy (epistemology) to distinguish two types of knowledge, justification, or argument:

  • A priori knowledge or justification is independent of experience (for example “All bachelors are unmarried”). Galen Strawson has stated that an a priori argument is one in which “you can see that it is true just lying on your couch. You don’t have to get up off your couch and go outside and examine the way things are in the physical world. You don’t have to do any science.”;[1]
Now, the interesting question is how do we know that A = A?  If they are exactly identical then they are the same, their is only one A.  So their must be a granting of equivalent value between A and A.  How do we arrive at that?  In science the definition of the word is equal to the word itself.
Here is what i believe to be a correct reduction to Plato’s allegory of the cave.  The golden a represents the uncorrupted form of the celestial “A”  the quintessential A.  The one enslaved by ignorance can’t directly behold the celestial A, because as long as one is ignorant there is no freedom.  All he knows is the shadow of the letter A cast on the wall, the corrupt, perverted, distorted form, the shadow of its actual self, a pale distorted reflection.
Plato is also called the father of religion, as the Hindus he believed that their was a causal world in which all the uncorrupted forms existed.  And every form in this world is a copy of the original.  Aristotle believed that material existence is all that is real and our ideas are outcropping of our experiences here.  He didn’t believe that there was a world of Idea and man descended from it as did Plato.
“men die, but man is immortal.”  ~Plato
I am sure I butchered the quote and it is paraphrased, I couldn’t find the original online, but the idea he is conveying is that while the individual reflections cease to exist the idea continues and the idea, having a subtle existence lasts longer than the actual physical object.
“Philosophy will not die with Plato.”  ~Aristotle
Aristotle was arrogantly suggesting that he was the better philosopher than his teacher.  I feel that an aspect of philosophy did die with Plato as his disciples were afraid.  Aristotle, the father of science threw out anything that could not be proven in the realm of existence, refusing to entertain things that could be conceived of in the realm of thought.  To a certain extent it was an act of theft.
“Epiphenomenalism is the theory in philosophy of mind that mental phenomena are caused by physical processes in the brain or that both are effects of a common cause, as opposed to mental phenomena driving the physical mechanics of the brain. The impression that thoughts, feelings, or sensations cause physical effects, is therefore to be understood as illusory to some extent. For example, it is not the feeling of fear that produces an increase in heart beat, both are symptomatic of a common physiological origin, possibly in response to a legitimate external threat.[1]” ~wikipedia
We lost, in the losing of Plato’s perspective, the art of unlocking the genius behind each child.  He tolerated Aristotle for this reason:
“Never discourage anyone…who continually makes progress, no matter how slow.” 
― Plato
And what we lost in our educational system was this:
“Do not train a child to learn by force or harshness; but direct them to it by what amuses their minds, so that you may be better able to discover with accuracy the peculiar bent of the genius of each.”
― Plato

Bohemian Dystopia, Critique on the State of the Nation.



Bohemian Dystopia: The Anne Ominous critique on the state of the nation


How did we get here? I look around every day and I think either I am getting smarter or everybody else is devolving. Since when does the largest group of idiots get to determine policy and what it means to be American? That is called tyranny of the majority and if we understand why our country was put together the way it was it was supposed to checkmate every form of tyranny. Tyranny is the anti-Christ of reason and wisdom from the perspective of the founding fathers but this isn’t just about ships of fools, I hate everything and everyone stupid equally….

You see we are effectively turning into a feudal society, we are already a fascist society and there are elements of communism creeping in as well, and not the positive aspects of it. The wise people are slaves and are worked to death while vile idiots enjoy the surplus of others work. How did this happen? How did we get here? and how the hell do we get back??? 

What you don’t get is that when George W. Bush was in office he passed a law that gives corporations the right of people. This effectively makes them citizens, they can defend themselves and they can endorse themselves and they can pursue their own interests. Is that a bad thing? Well, who do you think they are defending themselves from? That is correct, individuals. What this essentially means is that you have been demoted as a citizen, you are now a plebeian a non citizen by proxy, because you don’t have the man-power, the skill, the knowledge, the lawyers and the money that corporations have, but relax, it gets worse. 

Money is a symbol of value, and it is exchanged after it is decided from two different perspectives that the interaction is mutually beneficial. We have been using money so long we forget what it is. When people have ridiculous amounts of wealth it is no longer about survival it is about control and influence. In order to have a consumer society you have to have a dumb society that can be manipulated through advertising. Axe body spray is not selling cologne, they are selling sex. They conflate their product with the attention of women, young men want feminine attention so they participate with the premise and buy the product. But it incentivizes an irrational and stupid society. Wild animals are smarter than domesticated breeds, they are also dangerous. Our founding fathers wanted us to be dangerous and wild and intelligent. We have failed them.

If you look at the Jewish laws they were written with a single intent, the success of the village. Every 7 years their was a forgiving of debts that couldn’t be payed off. George W. Bush repealed a similar law that the united states had. What this means is that the rich will stay rich and the poor will stay poor and get even poorer. This moves even farther from a democracy into an oligarchy, but it does more than that, it means that if you have money, no matter how you got it, you are virtuous because you have it. Being rich is a virtue in itself now, which means that we are becoming a cleptocracy, the opposite of a meritocracy. Furthermore this prevents wealthy families from losing their positions of prestige and having to compete with other technologies and skills on a level playing field. It was because of fear of not being able to compete and not being able to regain their wealth and stature that provoked this law. 

Right to rule is determined by whether your government contributes to the quality of your life or not. If your life is the same as it would be if there were no government then that government does not have the right to rule. Now, if your government is based on capitalism and nobody has jobs or money, your government does not have the right to rule. Here is another interesting little tid bit. The jobs that we do have are government jobs. If you have a government job it is like you won the lottery, you are comparatively rich. How the fuck did that happen? How is it that civil SERVANTS, are getting paid more than the average American when their job is to make life better for the rest of Americans? There is no fucking way, they should be living high on the hog when they are failing at their job. 

Every major world civilization has had one thing in common, a large middle class…. I really shouldn’t have to write the rest of this paragraph, what I just said should be enough. Jewish laws were created to maintain equity in the population. A huge disparity in wealth dispersion means there is no middle class. In the parts of northern Europe that are successfully using a type of socialism there is a wage cap. No one can earn more than so many times the minimum wage. The hidden subject is that it prevents people from hijacking the society because they possess all of the wealth. People react with horror at that concept, but money is an external incentive, there are other types of incentives, internal incentives for example. We have gotten so indoctrinated into external incentives that we don’t do anything without money, or for any other reason than money. Moral courage, righteous indignation, the world we want to live in, just some examples of internal incentives….

Think of how much of your life is spent at work. You spend all of your best energy slaving away for a corporation and you have what is left over for your friends and family and interests, assuming of course that you actually have a job. You are a slave. Not in letter but in spirit. Your every thought, action, and emotion is manipulated by the people with the money, you only think that you are in control of your own destiny and that you have options, and that is because you were manipulated into thinking that. There are two types of freedom, freedom from and freedom too. Freedom from is a feminine freedom, it prevents relationship. It removes individuals from natural consequences, this is the freedom the mother provides for the child protecting it from nature, understanding of truths that are unpleasant, and keeping it from relationships that are undesired. This is an authoritative freedom that is provided by a superior to a subordinate, it requires that the child participate and stay in its box, remaining docile and dumb. Structures of authority give us received knowledge, they do our thinking for us, and they extract their authority from us in order to do it. It makes certain presuppositions, that the mother knows enough to protect the child, that the mother knows what is good for the child, and that the child can be happy being provided for. But this model weakens society by making it stupid, complacent, and domesticated. Pleasant, but douchey and incorrect.

 Furthermore, if you examine the mind of the psychopath, as I have, you realize that they are notorious social climbers, and they climb through structures of authority. It is said that “power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely” but in my experience that is not true. A corrupt able person sees power where an incorruptible person sees responsibility, power can only be abused and the psychopath is attracted to it like a moth to a flame and like a fly to a piece of shit for the purpose of abusing that power. The incorruptible person reaches for responsibility slower than the psychopath reaches for power.
How is it that child molesters keep getting jobs where they can molest children and thieves keep getting jobs in banks and in the stock market and politics where they are allowed to regulate themselves? I have done some introspection on this subject. I have come to the conclusion that psychopaths are over-coddled children that learned how to manipulate their mothers. How do they do this? by communicating harmlessness and agreement to them, the mother does not promote foreign wills, (the father) she thinks only of feminine authority, (the child and the mother). She makes superficial, aesthetic, judgments, not judgments based on results or understanding or insight or experience. She wants smoke to be blown up her ass. She wants to be shmoozed. The psychopath wants the authority to be in tact so that he will have as much power as possible when he possesses the power so he will always argue for power even if it is against his wishes and everybody else’s. Because the child was over coddled by the mother, protected from reality, he has this feeling that he is better than others, innately superior, and incapable of doing wrong. Everything that he does is good because he is the one doing it. So some magical force makes all of his self interested strategic behavior harmless for the world and beneficent for himself. This happens on a subconscious level because being raised in a bubble that is all he experienced. Thank you mom.
 We live in the most feminine country in the world and no matter what happens women never take responsibility for the course of events. There is no hostile internal dialogue between American women and I do not trust any group of people that do not have a strong, open, internal dialogue. I don’t trust, Muslims, Mexicans, bankers, the stock market, I am sure there are others but I can’t remember who they are. . . .These lobbying organizations have spent decades silencing the masculine voice to the point where we are becoming a 3rd world country. We are too weak and stupid and dishonest to compete with the world anymore. Women presuppose the surplus created by men and their participation as well while not taking into account their desires, perspective, and happiness. Women are ruining our country just like they did ancient Rome.
 In order to unleash the highest common good, every person needs to be highly and equally educated. In Sparta, the person that was standing next to you in the phalanx, owned the farm next to you, and was voting against you on the same law in the senate. Our country was conceived with such men. That was when we were great. We are not allowed to be great like that anymore. Those men pooled their knowledge and wisdom, shared best processes, studied history, philosophy, learned about nature and how to succeed. When society is specialized, which happens in order to create profit, every person has a fractured, partial understanding, their language of experience doesn’t allow them to communicate understand or agree with the other person. the guy that puts the face on the cell phone doesn’t understand the guy that does the oil change. Just like in northern Europe and Israel, it should be mandatory for every person to spend two years in the military defending the country, because it is every Americans responsibility. Politicians would be less likely to send other peoples children to sacrifice themselves to fill their own wallets. On upon the end of their stint, they should be given a military rifle to put in their home. Don’t forget we are a nation, “of the people, by the people, and for the people”. Not of the corporations, by the people, and for the profit.
One of the tenets of communism was From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs “Jeder nach seinen Fähigkeiten, jedem nach seinen Bedürfnissen!” what this does is create a disparate impact in favor of those not capable of getting results in the real world. The capable work for the incapable, the philosopher kings work for the greedy children, and bitter widow. It creates a counter incentive for success. We are not free to, we are free from. Similarly, big business, the way we are practicing it, takes money out of the Oikos, the economy, and that money goes somewhere else. We are not keeping our money in our house. We are letting these corporate fiefdom harvest the fruit from our labor and dictate where it should go.
There are certain methods for increasing perceived value for the sake of extracting more profit. You can do more work, do it faster, lower the price, do it better, offer more support, more services, new technology, but the problem is that unlike ancient Sparta the person extracting the profit is not the person doing the work. The person extracting the work was promoted because he doesn’t harsh the buzz of his superior and because of a lack of sympathy for the person creating all the value making all the sacrifice. So this corporate douche bag, a glorified whip cracker, says, “DO THE JOB BETTER, FASTER, PAY MORE ATTENTION, BE NICE TO THE CUSTOMER, THE CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT, YOU NEED TO TAKE A PAY CUT!” and if you participate, that person turns around and puts down on his resume how successful he was and he gets a promotion and moves higher in the company so he can show less sympathy to more people and extract even more profit and have even less understanding.
I will leave you with a few quotes I have always found poignant:

I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country. Thomas Jefferson 


I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.Thomas Jefferson 

Assuming that enough has been already said in discussions outside the school concerning the best life, we will now only repeat what is contained in them. Certainly no one will dispute the propriety of that partition of goods which separates them into three classes, viz., external goods, goods of the body, and goods of the soul, or deny that the happy man must have all three. For no one would maintain that he is happy who has not in him a particle of courage or temperance or justice or prudence, who is afraid of every insect which flutters past him, and will commit any crime, however great, in order to gratify his lust of meat or drink, whowill sacrifice his dearest friend for the sake of half-a-farthing, and is as feeble and false in mind as a child or a madman.
~ Aristotle
Now it is evident that the form of government is best in which every man, whoever he is, can act best and live happily. But even those who agree in thinking that the life of virtue is the most eligible raise a question, whether the life of business and politics is or is not moreeligible than one which is wholly independent of external goods, I mean than a contemplative life, which by some is maintained to be the only one worthy of a philosopher. For these two lives- the life of the philosopher and the life of the statesman- appear to have been preferred by those who have been most keen in the pursuit of virtue, both in our own and in other ages. Which is the better is a question of no small moment; for the wise man, like the wise state, will necessarily regulate his life according to the best end.
~ Aristotle
Those who make themselves a market for the world only do so for the sake of revenue, and if a state ought not to desire profit of this kind it ought not to have such an emporium. Nowadays we often see in countries and cities dockyards and harbors very conveniently placed outside the city, but not too far off; and they are kept in dependence by walls and similar fortifications. Cities thus situated manifestly reap the benefit of intercourse with their ports; and any harm which is likely to accrue may be easily guarded against by the laws, which will pronounce and determine who may hold communication with one another, and who may not.
These are the services which every state may be said to need. For a state is not a mere aggregate of persons, but a union of them sufficing for the purposes of life; and if any of these things be wanting, it is as we maintain impossible that the community can be absolutely self-sufficing. A state then should be framed with a view to the fulfillment of these functions. There must be husbandmen to procure food, and artisans, and a warlike and a wealthy class, and priests, and judges to decide what is necessary and expedient.
Now the soul of man is divided into two parts, one of which has a rational principle in itself, and the other, not having a rational principle in itself, is able to obey such a principle. And we call a man in any way good because he has the virtues of these two parts. In which of them the end is more likely to be found is no matter of doubt to those who adopt our division; for in the world both of nature and of art the inferior always exists for the sake of the better or superior, and the better or superior is that which has a rational principle.
And the preference given to one or the other class of actions must necessarily be like the preference given to one or other part of the soul and its actions over the other; there must be war for the sake of peace, business for the sake of leisure, things useful and necessary for the sake of things honorable. All these points the statesman should keep in view when he frames his laws; he should consider the parts of the soul and their functions, and above all the better and the end; he should also remember the diversities of human lives and actions. For men must be able to engage in business and go to war, but leisure and peace are better; they must do what is necessary and indeed what is useful, but what is honorable is better. On such principles children and persons of every age which requires education should be trained. Whereas even the Hellenes of the present day who are reputed to be best governed, and the legislators who gave them their constitutions, do not appear to have framed their governments with a regard to the best end, or to have given them laws and education with a view to all the virtues, but in a vulgar spirit have fallen back on those which promised to be more useful and profitable.
Neither should men study war with a view to the enslavement of those who do not deserve to be enslaved; but first of all they should provide against their own enslavement, and in the second place obtain empire for the good of the governed, and not for the sake of exercising a general despotism, and in the third place they should seek to be masters only over those who deserve to be slaves. Facts, as well as arguments, prove that the legislator should direct all his military and other measures to the provision of leisure and the establishment of peace. For most of these military states are safe only while they are at war, but fall when they have acquired their empire; like unused iron they lose their temper in time of peace. And for this the legislator is to blame, he never having taught them how to lead the life of peace.


ImageEverthing that I know looks through me at the world, every experience, every book I have read, every interaction I have had, every person I have loved.

Aristotle, “The soul is in a way phenomena.”

My experiences in the world, of the world, look back at the world. What I know of the world turns again on the world and scrutinizes it.

God be thanked for books; they are the voices of the distant and the dead, and make us heirs of the spiritual life of past ages.Channing, William Ellery

Every time you touch the world the world leaves its mark on you and you on it.  Like two ponds touching each other and both rippling in response.  If relationship is an approaching, then how are you in relationship with relationship?  How do you approach approaching?  You judge and interpret the world and the world judges and interprets you.  You try to change the world and the world tries to change you.  Traces left on each other by lovers or gladiators.

I say that all narrative is doxography, point of view.  Research shows that we memorize facts by stringing them together with a narrative, a sutra, a suture, a stitch. That string is our personality, the narrative that we are telling ourselves about how the world works.  It creates our sense of self.  Are we pessimistic?  Are we hyper vigilante?

Imagine that when you listen to a person speaking that you are driving by a very long fence next to a road.  Beyond the fence is a castle, but you can only catch a tiny glimpse each time you pass a slat in the fence.  If you let your eyes focus on the castle it starts to take shape and the fence disappears.  You can’t see the forest because the trees are in the way.

When a person’s world starts to take shape, you begin to become aware of who is speaking and what they are actually saying.  This can be quite troubling for people that conceal what they are.  It drives them crazy, like they are always naked in front of you and clothes were never invented.



The last conversation I had with James before he ended up in jail for carjacking and vehicular homicide was about a latin phrase I had created.  “Nihilo necesare sequitur.”  I had decided that the world is irrational.  I am not even sure that relationship is possible.  Ironic that shortly after that he made national news.

Think about it this way, there is no rational path to what you want anymore.  America is no longer a meritocracy and I don’t know that the world ever was.  It is so much harder to do good in the world and you can work hard, struggle, not make any mistakes and at the last second some idiotic douchebag for no reason whatsoever decides to slap the ice cream out of your mouth.  It is much easier to destroy than to build.

Shit stains and supernovas.  What do they have in common?  Nothing, but now they are in the same sentence and you read them.  The mind immediately starts looking for some relationship, some narrative.  We don’t remember things rationally, I know, I studied mnemonics.

We all make teleological judgements, we think that this or that should happen next. I do this, you do this, but it isn’t true.  I could give a bus driver a candy bar and at that moment he could decide that the universe is telling him that he needs to eradicate cockapoos from the planet.  Likewise sequences of events communicate experiential data to us.  In the book “click” it was demonstrated through a test that people feel more positively affectionate and sympathetic to a person based entirely on how frequently they interacted with one another.  Popularity on college campuses was based mainly on how close your room was to the center of campus.  Other tests confirmed this result.

As wise king Solomon said, “The fool gathers together but it is the wise man that enjoys.”  Remember this, you have to enjoy the path.  Treat the path as the destination and enjoy the journey, don’t worry about getting to the end.  Like Krishna said in the Bhagavad Gita,  “you have the rights to your actions, not the fruits of your actions.”  And Aristotle said, “happiness is that which you do for no other reason.”  Take my advice, enjoy doing what you do and don’t look for any other reward.  Don’t pursue the byproduct, be absorbed in the quality execution of the action.