Tag Archives: cognitive bias

Liberal Logic Exposed.

hrc

Originally shared here.

Richard Goodstein was on the O’reilly Factor tonight and was defending Hillary Clinton.  The first thing he said was an equivocation based on a fundamental attribution error which is characterizing Trump as a Liar when, in spite of people constantly asserting that he is a liar he has been vindicated after every accusation and no proof has been presented proving that he lied, or attempted to mislead intentionally.  When he misspeaks because he doesn’t use a teleprompter they say that he lied.  When he uses the wrong nomenclature or he is vague or non specific they insist that he lied.

Eric Bolling held his feet to the fire and didn’t let him excuse bad behavior with assumed bad behavior and his red herring.  Goodstein proceeds with the second strategy B saying that people don’t watch Arabic TV so they don’t know whether it is true or not.   This is an obfuscation, it is either demonstrably true or it is emphatically false and the truth of the matter is that the answer is already known.  My advocates monitor the blogs from all over the world and some of my advocates do speak Arabic and Farsi here is one of the translations of their news program Click here for link! .  First of all, Arabic Television isn’t ISIS recruiting videos, so this is a tacit conflation of two different subjects.  Secondly this is an argument from the ignorance of the average person in America, it suggests sense people in general don’t know it is not known.  Which is to say it isn’t true one way or another.

When confronted with the fact that there currently are terrorist recruitment videos with Obama and Bill Clinton he uses and argument that he can’t logically use because it contradicts his own position that if a person is being used in recruitment videos they are doing something wrong and are aiding in terrorist recruitment.  He asks if it is being suggested that people shouldn’t contradict terrorist ideology because they might be used in recruitment videos.  This leading question falsifies all of his former position.  He can’t make this argument.

Liberals are creepy, disgusting, arrogant, and consciously evil.  They are so stupid that they don’t realize that everybody sees through their horse shit now.  You Godless, Lawless, Evil Doers can’t Wag the Dog anymore…

dick

Advertisements

The Reason I am MGTOW

L051247Now to be honest I am not officially a member yet because I haven’t signed on to their site.    But in another manner of speaking I have been MGTOW for years in spirit just not in name.  I started this page 3 maybe 4 years ago and it is currently connected to an ex-gf’s account.

untitledhttps://en-gb.facebook.com/pages/Adam-Wolfe/383505548376524?hc_location=stream

I have not had a lot of good luck with women in my life.  As a matter of fact the vast majority of my problems have been caused by women or been about women. https://usaguru.wordpress.com/author/

american guru

After my first girl friend and Fiance’ I promised myself that I would never get involved in an exclusive relationship with another woman until I understood women.  I spent the next 20 years studying women and relationship, human psychology, history, the occult, philosophy, philology, linguistics, etc.  I was a bouncer, a stripper, a chef, a stand up comedian, and an author.  I now will not get in an exclusive relationship with a woman BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND WOMEN.

As I was repairing the problems with modern psychology as it is practiced, I noticed something peculiar, what inspired me was deborah Tannen’s work on male and female communication rituals.  I realized that if you took every logical fallacy and every cognitive bias and used them all of the time, you would sound exactly like a woman.

This prompted me to look at the problem like this.  From a linguistic philosopher’s perspective, how are male and female brain’s in relationship with on another?  How does the extreme feminine bias of the western mind factor into emergent properties that come out of collective western judgments and opinions?  What does this mean for society and the future of Western society?  What does it mean for me?

untitled4

I realized that men have certain traits that occur more commonly than they do in women.  Our society forbids us from scrutinizing or criticizing women, it treats women like a privileged class of people that is not inclined to look at it’s own failures, learn from them, or correct them.  A type of sex based oligarchy in which women are considered moral authorities on account of having a vagina.  This was affecting the relationships of the individuals, and it was creating these social events which I began to predict with more and more accuracy.  I studied the natural inclination or women when left unchecked and what they would do, how they socially climb, how they think.  What I realized was that women were destroying the civilized world and making it weak and indefensible for the incursion of Islam.

rezn1

What I observed was the emasculation of the male mind through the forcing of female communication rituals or radical political correctness, a meritocracy of pleasantness in which a person could be an incorrect douchebag pleasantly, but you couldn’t speak the truth if it was unpleasant and you couldn’t point out the psychopaths or expose the pretenders to reason like Socrates did without being forced to drink the Hemlock.

the-mind-hackerI originally wrote a piece for my ex-gf’s blog, which she has so considerately set to invitation only, even though I generated all of the content on her blog and it was still generating web traffic without her promoting it.  The name of the piece was called “As the Structures of Authority collapse”  there was another piece called, “unsustainable emergent properties in human judgments”.  They were time stamped so you can see exactly when they were written, and that they were indeed predictive.

Anyway, I have learned not to rely on women, and I hope never to be dependent on a woman again for her to do her part in a relationship and to carry her own weight.  I want a working relationship and women, much like psychopaths, enter into relationship for their own benefit, to steal from relationship or to socially climb in relationship, they are detrimental to relationship and they antagonize their own and everybody else’s success, because they only look at things to see how those things might benefit themselves and they never create more value than they consume.  Their life some is always less than zero, they are oxygen thieves, attention suckers, and space fillers.  They aren’t homo sapiens.

brad

Participating with the Premise.

Image In debate, not only is it necessary to remain rational it is necessary to remain consistently rational.  When a person makes a logical fallacy or a cognitive bias it needs to be addressed and corrected before the conversation can continue.  If you continue the debate without correcting the error you are granting equity to the other person in the conversation.  You are acting as though they have not made an error and by staying in the conversation you are participating with the premise that they are being and have consistently been rational. If the other person in the conversation is not being rational, the conversation itself is not rational.  If one person tries to remain rational in a debate while the other person is making no effort to be rational or proceed rationally, this creates a disparate impact in favor of the person that isn’t being rational.  When you get in a fight with a clown, even if you win you lose. It is necessary to proceed correctly.  The words process and practice come from the greek word praxis.  All valid philosophies have a praxis. A philosophy by its very nature has to be self referentially consistent, if it creates disparate impact it is invalid and therefore not a rational philosophy.  If a person can’t be falsified by their own philosophy it is not a philosophy and they are not rational.  So as you see they falsify themselves by their own procedure.  A rational person proceeds rationally, nothing can be proven by irrational means, that is why due process exists.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
So, I tried to do a kind of semantic clarification in which praxis—if not on the thither side of this divide—was perhaps somehow between the theoretical and the practical as they are generally understood, and particularly as they are understood in modern philosophy. Praxis as the manner in which we are engaged in the world and with others has its own insight or understanding prior to any explicit formulation of that understanding…Of course, it must be understood that praxis, as I understand it, is always entwined with communication.  —Calvin O. Schrag[1]

Praxis is the process by which a theory, lesson, or skill is enacted, practiced, embodied, or realised. “Praxis” may also refer to the act of engaging, applying, exercising, realizing, or practicing ideas. This has been a recurrent topic in the field of philosophy, discussed in the writings of PlatoAristotleSt. AugustineImmanuel KantSøren KierkegaardKarl MarxMartin HeideggerHannah ArendtPaulo Freire,Ludwig von Mises, and many others. It has meaning in the political, educational, and spiritual realms.

 

The Direction of the Conversation

Image

Most people do not study enough philosophy to realize that it is about something real.  Most people don’t learn to debate well enough to learn that if it can’t be argued rationally it is crap.  Most people don’t learn the logical fallacies or the cognitive biases.  Conversations have a direction.  The conversation is either moving towards reason in a rational direction or one party is arguing against reason, arguing for vagueness, making emotional appeals.  You are either reasoning or rationalizing.  You are either talking about something real, good, true and useful or you are trying to make a turd smell like a flower, which is it?  Be honest with yourself.

It is out of necessity that great philosophers had to pre-empt conversation.  They only want rational conversation.  Don’t waste my time with your horse shit.  You can’t prove anything using irrational means.  That is what praxis is.  You can only prove something using rational means, that is why we have due process.  If you don’t communicate correctly you don’t think correctly and you don’t act correctly.  So the reason that you aren’t communicating correctly is because you are engaged in strategic behavior to make unreason appear to be reasonable.

Image

STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION:

A phrase coined by Joxua/Shivah to describe irrational communication used to control or manipulate the flow of conversation.

Conversation blocking- a form of strategic communication designed to stop a conversation or to prevent a topic from being discussed

Conversation dropping- a form of strategic communication designed to prevent a person from acknowledging their wrong or from participating in a conversation that is going a direction they don’t want to follow.

Communicating understanding- from shared state theory of communication meaning to communicate accurately your perspective on a subject based on understanding the topic, thinking before you speak, accounting for how it will be interpreted by the listener, listening to yourself as you speak and observing pragmatically the persons understanding of what you said and their application of it.  Associated with Socratic dialectic.

http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/strategic-communication-definition-by-joxuashiva/

RELATED ARTICLES

Treatise on Cosmic Light and the Christ Consciousness by Rabbi Ba’al Shiva

Image

This is the Sephyr Yeshivel as it was taught me by the archangel Azrael.  The black ring represents Binah, the Grey circle represents Da’ath, the brown represents unfecundated/unfertilized earth.  All of the sephiroth below Da’ath take place withing Da’ath which is also why it is the hidden sephiroth because to count it would be redundant.  Da’ath is the bedroom in which the creative intelligence exists, where the father and mother meet in the middle and become one.  Creative intelligence by it’s very necessity needs to be male and female.

Image

In this separation between matter and energy, between sun and moon, (solomon) there is the possibility of movement, and choice,

CRISIS:

Etymology[edit]

From Ancient Greekκρίσις (krisis, “a separating, power of distinguishing, decision, choice, election, judgment, dispute”), from κρίνω(krinō, “pick out, choose, decide, judge”)

This allows the illusion of free will, this allows self discovery, this allows chaos and upredictability, this allows the small self the id to become aware of the BIG SELF, god.  It allows jiva to rediscover SHIVA.  Godself mutes himself in the form of Dark matter, disappearing into the diamond light of empty space.  All we see is the noumenal world, their is no evidence of god.  And in that absence of the presence we become aware of the necessity of god.  The One Self that transcends the individual.  As our intellect becomes more and more refined we become aware that something is missing, a hidden hand, that is here and there and all around us.  And we laugh at the joke that we now understand, the slight of hand that is being perpetrated by a loving teacher, telling children an interesting bed time story that they take way too seriously and in so doing stab themselves all over with many pains.  This is the ignorance of the enslaved mind, and with this ignorance, their is no freedom.

THE CHRIST PERSONALITY

Image

Above is a symbol that was shown to me in meditation as I conversed with Azrael.  We see that 3 of the colors are hot and three cold.  As such 3 are of levity or light and 3 of gravity or earth and water.  3 masculine, and 3 feminine.  Now just as their could be red water and red earth, in the same vain there could be blue fire and green air.  In fact, out of necessity this is true.  We see that the white upward pointing triangle is latent in the 3 cool colors and at the same time the black downward pointing triangle is latent in the hot colors.  Energy is matter moving quickly and matter is energy moving very slowly, the speed or frequency at which you vibrate determines where in the spectrum you are.

Now each of the colors is a facet or a face, an angel or an angle of the Pure White Light, which is the Buddha/Krishna/Christ consciousness.  Red is catabolism or righteous indignation or Din or judgement.  Blue is anabolism, the Peace King that builds up.  Green and Orange are Flora and Fauna, Orange is appetite, sexual and other wise, I always think of Hod as the Horned God.  Green is kind of mysterious and hard to describe, essentially it stores the energy of the sun in a form that living creatures can use, as fuel.  Purple is another one that is difficult to describe, it is the most balanced of the colors, being like steam, the combination of fire and water, slightly more cold than it is hot.  It is the color of the Magus, the magician, that has married the male and female inside himself in the form of creative intelligence, this is the god man.  Yellow is the integrating intelligence, it is the color of sense of humor, it figures out how to get all the energies to cooperate for a successful endeavor.

THE PURE WHITE LIGHT

It has always been a mystery to me that everybody thinks they know what the Messiah should act like or how he should be.  If you know what he should be doing you can do it yourself, but if you need to be saved you necessarily do not know what the Christ consciousness is.  People think of the Christ personality is an absence of personality, quite the opposite is true, it is the source of all personality.  I refer to this as the Messiah Paradox.

“So, because you are lukewarm–neither hot nor cold–I am about to spit you out of my mouth.”  Revelation 3:16

People think that the messiah is going to be loved by all and openly recognized by all as the Messiah, this is not the case, the Messiah, the Logos is the incarnation of Logic and Reason, that is what makes him the son of god.  As such only those people who have attained to wisdom and are not pretenders to wisdom will be able to recognize him.  Jesus was a revolutionary figure and as such he was more a Satanic figure to most people, he threatened their perception of reality, he threatened the peace of the community, he threatened the authority of the structures of authority…

34“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35For I have come to turn

“ ‘a man against his father,

a daughter against her mother,

a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law—

36a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’c

37“Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. 38Whoever does not take up their cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39Whoever finds their life will lose it, and whoever loses their life for my sake will find it.

http://biblehub.com/niv/matthew/10.htm

525158_419926694746211_1407469946_n

PROBLEM CENTRIC NARRATIVE

PROBLEM CENTRIC NARRATIVE

Downward spiral of emotional morbidity.