Tag Archives: Communication Rituals

The First Colossal Failure of Equal Pay For Equal Work

julia pierson obama

For those of you familiar with my theories on male and female brains you know that women and men edit their consideration sets differently.  Nature compartmentalized male and female brains to look at the world differently and to be successful in two different arenas.  Men think about the world, reality, threats, the unpleasant, and women confine their interests to things that make them feel good.  I am going to illustrate the predictive nature of my theories by deconstructing this incident and my belief that narrative is doxography.

We need to be more like Disney World. We need to be more friendly, inviting.”  Julia Pierson

He was confronted by a female Secret Service agent, who he overpowered, and made it all the way to the East Room, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told CBS News, citing whistleblowers.”  http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fence-jumper-made-it-further-in-white-house-than-secret-service-let-on/

Some reports say he bodily threw her aside.  Men and women are not equal because they are not the same.  The arguments of the liberals make no sense.  They say men and women are the same and then they incentivize them differently, and force men to act like women, talk like women, and think like women.  Whatever result a woman gets is equal to whatever result a man gets.  This is the natural unfolding of this false belief, of this insidious propaganda.

einstein

Look at the reasons she gave for not pursuing the sound of gunshots that struck the white house, it could have been a car “backfiring” and it was dark outside.

Secret Service agents initially rushed to respond, drawing weapons and scanning for an attack. Moments later, a supervising sergeant said there had been no shots, ordering officers to “stand down.” The command surprised officers who had heard the shots, but many who had begun to respond to a possible attack returned to their posts.  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/white-house-shooting/

shots fired at white house

whitehouse

Alexis_de_tocqueville

Advertisements

EMERGENT PROPERTIES IN HUMAN JUDGMENTS.

Image

Ponder this, how many people have had an enjoyable experience with a bewb?  Now how many people have had an enjoyable experience with a penis?  The vast majority of people are not analytical philosophers, they don’t know the logical fallacies and they don’t know the cognitive biases and as such they can’t stop themselves from making them.  Furthermore I have found that neural myelination accounts for 90% of the decision making of human beings which means cellular memory.  I refer to humans as organic computers because they are predictable.  In their judgments there are certain patterns that emerge, such as a pro female bias.

Contemplate how many more people spend on breast cancer than veterans or prostrate cancer and the fact that Veterans charities are rampant with fraud and theft, which is not tolerated with breast cancer awareness, people are much more hyper vigilant.  But women didn’t sacrifice themselves for us.  Every person that served protected the entire nation from threats.  A woman having breasts is not necessarily a mother or our mother.  Yet we are far more sympathetic to feminine concerns than masculine concerns.

Every year at least $1.5 billion is spent on breast cancer research.  Some of this money comes from an ever-growing number of breast cancer non-profit organizations, but the vast majority comes from government organizations such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Defense (DoD).  The funds go largely to preventionand early detection.http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772

girls-playing-doll1

Men women and children have the same bias, choosing in favor of femininity and weakness.  Men are even insensitive to their own desires.  Men don’t even question this when asked to sacrifice themselves for women and children, they just presuppose the validity of it.  Women also don’t question it.  Women have gotten so arrogant and so expectant that men will sacrifice their desires and wishes for women and children that even after not having contributed anything meaningful to a man’s life women finding they don’t have enough of what they want will turn to the man and expect him to sacrifice himself so that she can have more.

image2

The manliest men go off to war, they are in relationship with death and the threats and the ugliness, they create the outside perimeter, the grizzled, gnarly, rind, the crust, the tough outer layer.  That is why I say the male mind is sociopathic.

Inside that are the effeminate men, the champions of normalcy and pleasantness, captain save a ho, the white knights, the arm chair philosophers, with their feminist, elitist, bias.  It is the guy that is not fit to go into battle.  He acts as a moral authority protecting the women from the manly men, but also gaming the system for his own benefit.  He is to cowardly to do what the manly man does.  He is a champion of femininity.

-

The butch women essentially perform the same function as the effeminate men, protecting women from the truth, reality, ugliness, and death.  Lying to women about themselves.  Telling them they are equals to the men and not to worry.  The butch women are closer to the women and children then the effeminate men.  Women have an innate feeling of inferiority to men, Sigmond Freud got that right.  If you observe women in their reasoning, arguing, and behavior, they want to control the penis, they want to own it.  They want to direct the activities of the penis.  They want to send it to attack their enemies.  They want to control how it thinks and they want to be the focal point of its attention and the only source of its happiness.

Penis envy in Freudian psychoanalysis refers to the theorized reaction of a girl during her psychosexual development to the realization that she does not have a penis. Freud considered this realization a defining moment in the development of gender and sexual identity for women[1] — the parallel reaction in boys to the realization that women do not have a penis being castration anxiety. In contemporary culture, the term sometimes refers inexactly or metaphorically to women who are presumed to wish they were men.[2]

law-offices-charity-bar

What is the most fascinating is how the behaviors used to champion negate their own arguments.  The manly women copy the behavior of men, therefore demonstrating that they tacitly believe that masculinity is dominant.  Fritz Perls said that you copy what ever behavior you believe is dominant when you want to win.  So the fact that they use masculine behavior when they want to win demonstrates that they believe masculinity is dominant.  You have to understand the psychosis that the individual must have to use a means different from their argument in order to obtain a sense of victory.  Women do this because it is a natural psychopathic/female strategy to expand and increase feminine authority.  Women think of themselves as a group, WOMEN.  Whereas men do not think of themselves as MEN, they think of themselves as a man.  Men do not feel that their position is increased by being men, while women do, and this comes from the fact that their need recognition was stimulated in that they closetedly feel inferior to men, thus the need for the repeated conquest against men.

The effeminate man will argue that the woman is the equal of man in mental function and ability, but if that is so why does she need the protection of the effeminate man?  The effeminate man argues against reason, and the participation therewith to increase the amount of poontang he has available to himself and not being able to compete with the manly man in manly endeavors, he adopts a strategy flying in the face of reason he presupposes that women need protection from the manly man and that they are incapable of dealing with reality and handling the truth.

The fascinating thing about people’s judgments, when they are no analytical philosophers, is that their judgments always make themselves correct.  It always justifies why they are good for wanting what they want.  Because their are so many weak, stupid, and incorrect people out their all of these strategies and judgments create a disparate impact in favor of weakness, stupidity, and failure.  Why are we attracted to emotional pornography?  Puppies, babies, kittens?  because they are harmless, because we feel like we could protect them and contribute to them, that has positive survival data for us, it means we are surviving well and that we are capable of providing for another.  If we were really secure we wouldn’t judge so hatefully and immediately against things that pose potential threats.   We wouldn’t be controlled by our emotional reactions and pre emptively attack people because they appear strong or smart.

baby-turtle-eats-strawberry-big

http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/organic-computers-definition-by-joxuashiva/ https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/deuchebag-nation-womans-world-part-2/ http://finscribeofwisdom.blogspot.com/2012/10/unsustainable-emergent-patterns-in.html http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/armchair-philosophers/ http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/histrionic-co-morbidity-psychopaths-at-work-part-2/ http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/11/emotional-pornography/

THE LANGUAGE OF SELF DISCIPLINE

Image

 

Ponder this,

you have to hate who you are in order to change.  

As long as you like yourself you will not change, as long as you are content with yourself you will not change.  You have to despise yourself, loath your self, you have to be unpleasant with yourself, harsh with yourself.  Like a vociferous army general you have to bark at yourself and snap to attention for yourself. 

If I am fat, and I don’t want to be fat, I have to want to kill fat Joxua.  I have to humiliate and ridicule fat Joxua.  I have to take fat Joxua’s ass and put him on a treadmill.  I have to keep my eye on him like he is a criminal and he wants to steal some fat and become one with it again,  And once I kill fat joxua, if he starts crawling out of his grave again I have to stomp on his fingers and cave his head in with a shovel.  

My point is this, Male communication rituals are the language of self transformation, they are the language of self discipline.  Female communication rituals are pleasant.  Without Masculine communication rituals you don’t have the thought tools, the thought technology necessary for self transformation.  there is a theory, linguistic determinism, that essentially states that our vocabulary determines what we can do.  And its true, unless you are a wizard, or a linguistic philosopher or a shaman, you can’t break pattern without the words.  Without MCR you can’t and wont discipline yourself and you won’t change unless an outside force exerts itself on you. 

Image

BREEDING FOR STUPIDITY

Image

 

It just so happened that when I was studying Deborah Tannen’s material on male and female communication rituals and plugging it into my philosophy and psychology I was also reading THE GENIUS FACTORY by David Plotz, which is about the first sperm bank ever the one that all other sperm banks were modeled after.  It sold nothing but Nobel Prize winner sperm and not a single baby was spawned from the bank until it lowered its standards, a lot.  I have spent years figuring out why what happens does happen and how people make choices and the emergent properties of those choices and judgments.  

In just about every other culture in the world women do not choose their mates by themselves.  There are arranged marriages, there are matchmakers, etc. but in the United States women get to choose their mate without any direction based entirely on their whim and fancy.  So, how do women make those selections without guidance and without any analysis and strategy when left to their own resources?  Well, returning to the Genius Factory we find that women didn’t choose Nobel Prize sperm because they didn’t want their children to be freakishly intelligent so that they would stand out and attract attention to themselves.  They wanted their babies to blend into the herd.  

This is so interesting for so many reasons, it is telling of the female mind and the concealed contempt it has for masculinity and masculine virtue.  It wasn’t that women didn’t want their babies to rise to the top of the herd, they just wanted them to social climb in a less obvious manner, in a more manipulative manner.  Also, women naturally try to reify, and expand their personal authority.  I have observed women that will not date a man whom they can’t control or dominate, or a man that is more attractive than they are, or a man that is smarter than they are, why?  Because of the collective judgments of the herd.   Women have a hierarchy as far as importance of opinion goes. 

  1. Their own opinion
  2. The opinion of their children
  3. The opinion of other women
  4. The opinion of society
  5. The opinion of their mate

I am sitting here watching the United States go to hell every day, moving in the wrong direction, making the wrong choices, while children get stupider and stupider and I am thinking to myself “why is this going on?”  Whose sperm did women choose to get pregnant with?  SCUM!  LYING, MANIPULATIVE, PSYCHOPATHIC, STRATEGIC, SCUM!  It wasn’t until the invention of the sperm bank that people realized there was a type of man known as an “opportunistic reproducer” .  Men whose life goal it is to have as many progeny as possible and these men were pathetic losers that looked good on paper.  One pale, bald, freakish, fuck basically considered donating sperm as his “job”  he had never had another job besides that.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunistic_breeders

What is so funny is that women deliberated over their choices for long periods of time and they failed with infinite precision almost every time because they forgot to account for something in their decision making process, and that is the fact that…. wait for it……..

THEY ARE COMPLETE, FUCKING, NINCOMPOOPS!  IDIOTS!

Because of the way women edit their consideration sets they make terrible choices when it comes to relationship.  They predispose themselves to being manipulated by psychopathic men.  Because they are hostile to the things that men value they react negatively to male opinions and perspectives and avoid these.  Not only that women have auto-appraisers that look out for masculine things to attack and avoid.  http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100105050917AAUWwrV

Some of these pathetic men had as many as 26 children from multiple sperm banks.  That is a lot.  The men that thought the least of women but would never tell them that.  The men that figured out exactly what women wanted to hear and told them that.  The men that manipulated women ruthlessly without any concern for their desires, those are the men that bred the most children, and they didn’t even have to pay alimony.  Sigh….

Ponder this, right now there are women reading this article that hate my guts and want me to die.  Not because I am wrong, but because I am right.  They want me to shut up and go away, they want my voice to be strangled and shut off.  They don’t want my perspective and knowledge in the world.  And the funny thing is, I am not the psychopathic person pleasantly manipulating them.  I am pecker slapping them with the truth about themselves, and that my friends is the unforgivable sin. 

Image

Light in the World

Image

The father principle says to the mother principle

I know what I am doing.

You don’t know what I am doing and you are inducing that I don’t know what I am doing.

You have forgotten to account for the fact that you are a idiot.

You need to subtract your judgments and interpretations from the equation.

Lynn: You channeled this brilliant piece a few nights ago I wanted you to expound upon what it means symbolically and in the realm of the occult.

Joxua: Well, as you know I am personal friends with Lon Milo Duquette and I happen to know a little bit about Kabbalah.  One of the central texts of which is the Zohar which deals entirely with the topic of how light/wisdom comes into the world or is prevented from coming into the world.  This pattern is so deep and all encompassing its difficult to know where to begin.  This pattern happens in relationship of any kind.  It happens inside the individual, it happens in politics, in religion, in the family, everywhere.  These three principles are part of the psyche.

To quote Deborah Tannen, the mother “ventriloquizes” which means she turns the baby’s emotional gobbledygook into words so that the father can know what the child is thinking and she tempers the father’s voice so that it is not too harsh for the child.  The mother principle acts like the messiah, a go between, a liason, between god and man.  But she runs the risk of usurping the masculine voice and corrupting its message.  Wisdom comes into the world when the message between the father and the son is uncorrupted, when reason and action are married and not attenuated by fear or puritanical pursuits or blocked by moral authority.

The mother principle presupposes pleasantness which is unnatural especially from the perspective of the father who is in contention with the war of all against all, but pleasantness is necessary for the survival of the child, which is necessary for the survival of the species.  The mother will often protect the child’s aberrations along with the child’s feelings which means the child grows up with mental and emotional diseases if the authority of the mother is not checked.

The father wants the child to be in relationship with reality as it is and wants the child to relate functionally towards society.

What we see happening in the United States is that we do not have a passage into adulthood which ends the authority of the mother.  Grown adults are children, they constantly beg for mercy and charity appealing to the authority of the mother.  Women divorce their husbands so they don’t have to listen to them but they still extract a fee from them while indoctrinating their children into the hatred of masculinity and the worship of femininity.  Thus usurping sapiential authority and preventing wisdom from entering the world, the light of reason.

The same pattern happens inside every individual logic and reason are difficult and painful.  There is no wisdom without sacrifice, but we coddle our emotions and we protect our mental and emotional diseases, creating relationships more quickly on their account than we do ally ourselves with our better angels.

Lynn: Oh my god, that what you mean when you say the disease is in relationship with itself through us!

Joxua: Yes, if you think about the concept of demonic possession the way in which people form relationships with one another makes it seems much more plausible.  There is a force in the world that hates wisdom and rises up against it to thwart it. Light cannot be brought into the world by one person alone or without struggle which is why God does not accept the worship of cowards, weaklings or idiots. Their worship is idolatry because they don’t know God and you can’t love what you don’t know.

FIN