Tag Archives: Disparate impact

Barack Obama’s, Abomination.

obamination1

“He who Pardons the Guilty & Condemns the Righteous is an Abomination before the Lord.” Proverbs 17 : 15

In Plato’s five Regimes it was known that the purest forms of democracy create the greatest Tyrannies.  Obama & Hillary Clinton are attempting to create a Moral Equivalency, a Pure Democracy where Good & Evil are placed on Equal Footing. This pattern has been repeated over and over again by every action, word, lie, or form of strategic behavior used by the Obama/Clinton Regime.

(Mark Levin, Click here for Historical, Philosophical, Education)

(Plato’s Quote)

dipshit

(Originally posted here)

Advertisements

The Reason Obama Is Constitutionally and Morally Wrong.

2014-10-12-obama

Our Founding Fathers in their Genius and Love for us provided for us certain Positive Freedoms.  They created for us a government with checks and balances to protect us from tyranny in any form.  Our Representative Democracy was created to protect us from Tyranny in any form and one of those forms was The tyranny of the majority.

tyr•an•ny (ˈtɪr ə ni) 

n., pl. -nies.

1. arbitrary or unrestrained exercise of power; despotic abuse of authority.
2. the government or rule of a tyrant.
3. a state ruled by a tyrant.
4. oppressive or unjust government.
5. undue severity or harshness.
6. a tyrannical act.

Obama has embraced identity based politics and in doing so he is catering to the tyranny of the majority in order to arbitrarily turn the tide of public opinion in his favor.  Name dropping Ferguson Missouri in front of the United Nations, how would he feel if Michele Obama aired their dirty laundry in public?

Catering to the Mexican vote and the Vote of the Muslim majority the fastest growing population of the most illiterate and violent people on earth, is an obvious breach of protocol.

The phrase “tyranny of the majority” (or “tyranny of the masses“), used in discussing systems of democracy andmajority rule, involves the scenario in which decisions made by a majority place its interests above those of an individual or minority group, constituting active oppression comparable to that of tyrants and despots.[1] In many cases a disliked ethnic, religious or racial group is deliberately penalized by the majority element acting through the democratic process.[citation needed]

Supermajority rules, constitutional limits on the powers of a legislative body, and the introduction of a Bill of Rights have been used to counter the problem.[2] A separation of powers may also be implemented to prevent the problem from happening internally in a government.[2]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority

Obama, is planning on writing laws and passing them all by himself.

untitled

Obama was touted as the next Abraham Lincoln.  Lincoln was the great Uniter, he brought the people together and kept the Union in tact.  Obama is more like the great divider, we have never been more divided as a nation, Feminists, Christians, Muslims, Mexicans, Homosexuals.  It is more like he is trying to start a Civil War than prevent one.

Obama, intellectually, never developed beyond the point of being a biased lawyer, he never even tried to become the mental equivalent of a judge.  He was always one sided and prejudiced.  He has always been on one side, his own side, projecting his sense of self onto people that he identifies with and incapable of being impartial and judicious.

ron-burgandy-breaking-news

Our government was created to be a meritocracy of Reason and Results, not a tyranny of issues.  The world is not a better place since Obama’s rule began nor is the Nation.  To reward people based on their issues and their feelings of victimization when they haven’t raised themselves to a place where they can create value for people other than themselves, and to put them in positions of authority as equals is a sabotage of our government.  Failure is not equal to success.  Reason is not equal to unreason.  Tacitly validating people’s emotional appeals is a dynamic tautology of a logical fallacy.  The intensity of your emotion doesn’t make you any more correct.

In order to unleash the HIGHEST COMMON GOOD you need the consent of the wisest and most reasonableand most educated.  What Obama is doing is invoking the LOWEST COMMON GOOD.  He is dragging all Americans down to equality with hood rats, and welfare babies in the ghettos of the United States that only parasite off the economy, and they will only ever parasite off the economy because while they benefit from an increased quality of life in the United States they are also contemptuous of our values, the values that create the surplus that creates their quality of life.

alexis_de_tocqueville

Every act of theft or unwarranted gain in a monetary unit decreases all of the value of all of the money in that monetary unit proportionately.  Instead of being lead by our better angels Obama is being lead by his worser demons. 

There are certain terms that are synonymous with tyranny.

Arbitrary comes from the Latin arbitrarius, the source of arbiter; someone who is tasked to judge some matter.[2] An arbitrary legal judgment is a decision made at the discretion of the judge, not one that is fixed by law.[3] In some countries, a prohibition of arbitrariness is enshrined into the constitution.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrariness

When one rules in such a way as to create a disparate impact in favor of a people incapable of reimbursing or equitably returning whatever they were granted, and without an inclination to be appreciative for whatever gain they accrue from the source of that accrual, that is an act of theft and sabotage.  That is rewarding failure and punishing success.

IN CLOSING

I will leave you with this…

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;[7]

 We…solemnly publish and declare, that these colonies are and of a right ought to be free and independent states…and for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honour.”

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Thomas Jefferson

The Tyranny of Reason

Image

In order for a philosophy to be valid it has to be unfalsifiable and yet specific, and it can’t create disparate impact.  Now if you study enough philosophy you realize that every philosophy is invalid because their is a point at which the philosophy is self contradictory or it fails to get desired results.  This has less to do with philosophy and more to do with the nature of the universe being not entirely rational.  The universe itself is sometimes rational and at other times irrational.  Most people get disheartened when having studied one philosophy they find errors in it.  Most people do not study many philosophies and find the errors in those as well.  So their is no perfectly valid philosophy which is not to say that philosophy is worthless.  Philosophy is very important.

It is very difficult to be rational and yet society, successful society, is based on reason, and the success of that society is directly related to the reasonableness of that society.  So while the universe might not be rational, success in relationship is governed by reason.

Image

Relationship and society can only be successful under the auspices of reason.  Which means that analysis and not emotion have to govern society.  That means that logical fallacies such as emotional appeals cannot make up the majority of the reasoned dialogue if society and relationship are to be successful.  Which is to say that the sentimental perspective of women is not equal to that of a mentally and emotionally stable man, educated in logic, debate, and philosophy.  Women are incapable of making hard choices.  They presuppose a surplus created for them by someone else.  When you have these self-appointed moral authorities forcing us, in a failing economy, to give our money to other people while our own cupboards are going bare, instead of creating an ACTUAL SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM THAT CREATES THE MAXIMUM VALUE FOR EVERYBODY, you have the downfall of a civilization…

Image

You cannot place feminine thinking as an equal with true Reason.  It is not equal because it is dependent on it.  The feminine principle can only be merciful and charitable out of the surplus created by the masculine principle, in the form of Wisdom, Reason, Logic, Understanding, etc.  Analysis and analytical data have to be the basis of the rational relationship.

Image

I created the term “tyranny of reason” as an experiment that I was going to unleash on the world and observe the reaction that people have to it.  Due to the nature of the mind being 10x more averse to that which it doesn’t want (my philosophic calculus) people would focus in on the word “tyranny” and react negatively to it. Because human beings are organic computers (in my theories).  The female mind making superficial aesthetic snap decisions reacts before it understands.  Reason by it’s very nature does not and cannot be tyrannical.  But the word “tyranny” has negative survival data to the mind, and in my theories every thing said, or done, every object and person has survival data for the individual, communicating to the individual that they are surviving well or poorly.

Image

REASON IS PREJUDICED

A Meritocracy of Reason also creates disparate impact because not everybody can be equally reasonable.  Is Reason prejudiced?  or is Reality prejudiced?  The only sustainable relationship or society is a tyranny of reason, a system that is prejudiced towards reason and that knows how to recognize it.  People always ask me if I am prejudiced and who “my people” are.  My response, People that are reasonable.  And my love of them is directly related to their ability to be rational in relationship with me.

 organic-comp

RELATED ARTICLES

THE MARKS OF A VALID PHILOSOPHY

1208060712814

  1. Non arbitrary, it doesn’t create disparate impact.
  2. Valid in every situation, unfalsifiable, and specific.
  3. Applies to everything doesn’t ignore any subjects.
  4. Is predictive, descriptive, and predictive.
  5. Non delusional, in relationship with reality.
  6. Understands teleology, and eschatology, the movement of ideas and things through time and space in the context of that time period.
  7. Gives credit where credit is due, quotes its sources.
  8. Doesn’t conceal itself in a rational relationship, communicates understanding of it’s true nature.
  9. Never fails to act on what it knows to be true, Praxis.
  10. Authority under the philosophy doesn’t extend to making an unjust law.
  11. Everybody is equal under the law.
  12. The highest expert on the law, expounds the law, doesn’t create the law.
  13. All assertions are proven through reasoned debate, experiment, or contest.
  14. It is meritocratic, people are free to move about based on merit and understanding and correct procedure.
  15. It is internally incentivized, not externally incentivized.
  16. If it realized it is in error it admits the error, retracts the errant assertion, and corrects it.
  17. Clear, cogent, Profound, and as brief as possible.