How is criticizing and scrutinizing and disagreeing with the president racist? It sounds to me that you are suggesting that even though Obama is the most powerful man in the world he is still a permanent victim because he is black.
Let’s scrutinize the ideology by which Obama was raised. Was he raised like us?
Or was he born rich and lived a privileged sheltered life in which the laws that applied to everybody else didn’t apply to him?
Let’s go back a few steps. What does it mean to love America? Does it mean to love the values of America? or does it mean to love the people in America? Or does it mean to love the constitution of America and abide by it? I think it is obvious to everybody that he only loves the Brown to black Americans, and not even Americans, as we speak he is collapsing the border and trying to allow illegals to work, and vote, and get insurance paid for by others. Which is to say that people that know nothing about this country, who do not respect the laws of this country, now have the ability to influence the substance of this country.
Furthermore, one of the tenets of this country, which was set up to protect us from any form of Tyranny, which is why we have the separation of powers. Is that you don’t write and pass laws yourself. That is a tyrannical act that violates the separation of powers. We are a representative democracy to protect us from a from of tyranny known as the Tyranny of the stupid majority. Which Obama is invoking. Making all Americans the equals of illegal, uneducated, immigrants, who hate Americans and whom he wants us to now compete with politically and financially in a stagnant economy. It probably won’t effect him or you living in your ivory towers for a while, but it will effect the working class American and the state.
f Giuliani doesn’t get to determine who loves the country, how is it you get to decide what it means to be racist?
You use the Race Card because Giuliani used the 911 card. Let me ask you a question, did you experience slavery? Have you experienced discrimination based on your race or your sex? I have, lot’s of it all my life. I have been physically beaten up several times in my life because of my race, I have been discriminated against at work all of my life because of my race and my sex. I have been denied promotions and harassed by people in my company because of my race and my sex. Both sides of my family, which were large families, were almost entirely in landscape maintenance in Phoenix Arizona. They had to compete with uninsured, uneducated, illegal immigrants, who would steal their equipment and under bid them. My father took college classes, went to seminars, and got licensed to expand his business. But Americans like yourself, who like to think that they are good open-minded and merciful people, would hire the illegals. Guess how many of my family members are still in Landscape Maintenance? That’s right, zero. I wish you would have to compete for your job with illegal immigrants, you arrogant pizza shirt.
Our Founding Fathers in their Genius and Love for us provided for us certain Positive Freedoms. They created for us a government with checks and balances to protect us from tyranny in any form. Our Representative Democracy was created to protect us from Tyranny in any form and one of those forms was The tyranny of the majority.
tyr•an•ny (ˈtɪr ə ni)
n., pl. -nies.
Obama has embraced identity based politics and in doing so he is catering to the tyranny of the majority in order to arbitrarily turn the tide of public opinion in his favor. Name dropping Ferguson Missouri in front of the United Nations, how would he feel if Michele Obama aired their dirty laundry in public?
Catering to the Mexican vote and the Vote of the Muslim majority the fastest growing population of the most illiterate and violent people on earth, is an obvious breach of protocol.
The phrase “tyranny of the majority” (or “tyranny of the masses“), used in discussing systems of democracy andmajority rule, involves the scenario in which decisions made by a majority place its interests above those of an individual or minority group, constituting active oppression comparable to that of tyrants and despots. In many cases a disliked ethnic, religious or racial group is deliberately penalized by the majority element acting through the democratic process.
Supermajority rules, constitutional limits on the powers of a legislative body, and the introduction of a Bill of Rights have been used to counter the problem. A separation of powers may also be implemented to prevent the problem from happening internally in a government.
Obama, is planning on writing laws and passing them all by himself.
Obama was touted as the next Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was the great Uniter, he brought the people together and kept the Union in tact. Obama is more like the great divider, we have never been more divided as a nation, Feminists, Christians, Muslims, Mexicans, Homosexuals. It is more like he is trying to start a Civil War than prevent one.
Obama, intellectually, never developed beyond the point of being a biased lawyer, he never even tried to become the mental equivalent of a judge. He was always one sided and prejudiced. He has always been on one side, his own side, projecting his sense of self onto people that he identifies with and incapable of being impartial and judicious.
Our government was created to be a meritocracy of Reason and Results, not a tyranny of issues. The world is not a better place since Obama’s rule began nor is the Nation. To reward people based on their issues and their feelings of victimization when they haven’t raised themselves to a place where they can create value for people other than themselves, and to put them in positions of authority as equals is a sabotage of our government. Failure is not equal to success. Reason is not equal to unreason. Tacitly validating people’s emotional appeals is a dynamic tautology of a logical fallacy. The intensity of your emotion doesn’t make you any more correct.
In order to unleash the HIGHEST COMMON GOOD you need the consent of the wisest and most reasonableand most educated. What Obama is doing is invoking the LOWEST COMMON GOOD. He is dragging all Americans down to equality with hood rats, and welfare babies in the ghettos of the United States that only parasite off the economy, and they will only ever parasite off the economy because while they benefit from an increased quality of life in the United States they are also contemptuous of our values, the values that create the surplus that creates their quality of life.
Every act of theft or unwarranted gain in a monetary unit decreases all of the value of all of the money in that monetary unit proportionately. Instead of being lead by our better angels Obama is being lead by his worser demons.
There are certain terms that are synonymous with tyranny.
Arbitrary comes from the Latin arbitrarius, the source of arbiter; someone who is tasked to judge some matter. An arbitrary legal judgment is a decision made at the discretion of the judge, not one that is fixed by law. In some countries, a prohibition of arbitrariness is enshrined into the constitution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrariness
When one rules in such a way as to create a disparate impact in favor of a people incapable of reimbursing or equitably returning whatever they were granted, and without an inclination to be appreciative for whatever gain they accrue from the source of that accrual, that is an act of theft and sabotage. That is rewarding failure and punishing success.
I will leave you with this…
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;
We…solemnly publish and declare, that these colonies are and of a right ought to be free and independent states…and for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honour.”
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Ben Affleck was recently on Bill Maher with Sam Harris and couldn’t help but start leaking his contempt and disgust before he even started talking.
He angrily asks Sam Harris, “Are you the person who understands the officially codified doctrine of Islam? You are the interpreter of that?”
The mistake that Ben Affleck is making is by trusting a psychopathic religion full of psychopathic people with psychopathic doctrines to tell the truth about themselves and their believes, when their own scripture says it is based on a lie and they have a policy of spreading and protecting their religion by lying about it.
In Islam, taqiyya تقية (alternative spellings taqiyeh, taqiya, taqiyah, tuqyah) is a form of religious dissimulation, or a legal dispensation whereby a believing individual can deny his faith or commit otherwise illegal or blasphemous acts while they are in fear or at risk of significant persecution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya
Some early Muslim jurists such as Muadh bin Jabal were opposed to the concept altogether as they felt it implied “lying” (kidhb) and “hypocrisy” (nifaq). In modern times, it is understood that both Kitman and Taqiyya are both forms of altering or concealing information. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitman
BEN AFFLECK: “How about more than a billion people who aren’t fanatical, who don’t punch women, who just want to go to school, have some sandwiches, pray 5 times a day, and don’t do any of the things you’re saying of all Muslims. It’s stereotyping.”
Dear Mister Shit4Brains Ben Affleck, all musims in good standing pay Zakat, and in doing so fund Jihad. Observe:
According to the Qur’an, the Zakat funds must be used for the following purposes.
- The Fuqara poor. They are the poor who do not beg for support.
- The Masakin. The destitute; They are the poor who beg for support.
- Amil’ Zakah. Those who administer the collection and distribution of the Zakat funds.
- Mu’Allaf. Those who may be enticed to Islam as well as new converts who need financial support.
- Riqab. Those in bondage; Those Muslim slaves who may have their freedom purchased.
- Fi sabi `Lillah. Those who are fighting in the Cause of Allah, e.g., the Mujahideen.
- Ibn as’Sabil. The wayfarer; Muslim travelers who need assistance while on a journey.
- Gharimun – ‘people burdened with debt’
Does the flag look familiar to you Mr. Too Big For His Britches Ben Affleck? Do you know what it says on it? Fi sabi `Lillah
SAM HARRIS: Just imagine you have some concentric circles. You have at the center, you have jihadists, these are people who wake up wanting to kill apostates, wanting to die trying. They believe in paradise, they believe in martyrdom. Outside of them, we have Islamists, these are people who are just as convinced of martyrdom and paradise and wanting to foist their religion on the rest of humanity but they want to work within the system. They’re not going to blow themselves up on a bus. They want to change governments, they want to use democracy against itself. Those two circles arguably are 20% of the Muslim world.
BEN AFFLECK: What are you basing that research on?
Anand Shinde“Bill Maher – This are the statistics that Bill refers to in some of his shows. Reza Aslan keeps saying that Indonesia is a model country….Ok…..30% there wants you stoned to death if you leave Islam. Some progress!!”
FACTS, STUPID! AND RESEARCH! AND READING BOOKS AND SHIT! STATISTICS SON!
HARRIS: There are a bunch of poll results that we can talk about. To give you one point of contact: 78% of British Muslims think that the Danish cartoonist should have been prosecuted. 78%. So, I’m being conservative when I roll this back to 20%. But outside of that circle you have conservative Muslims who can honestly look at ISIS and say that does not represent us, we’re horrified by that but they hold views about human rights, and about women, and about homosexuals that are deeply troubling. So, these are not Islamists, they are not jihadists, but they often keep women and homosexuals immiserated in these cultures and we have to empower the true reformers in the Muslim world to change it. And lying about doctrine and this behavior is not going to do that…
I don’t like you Ben Affleck, I think you are a schmuck a schmooze artist, a social climbing douchebag without a spine or a moral center. And you are arguing from ignorance. Everything you do and say is in relationship with your reputation in order to appear to be smarter than you actually are and in order to appear to be something that you aren’t.
Schmuck or shmuck in American English is a pejorative meaning one who is stupid or foolish; or an obnoxious, contemptible or detestable person. The word entered English from Yiddish (שמאָק, shmok), where it has similar pejorative meanings, but its original meaning in Yiddish is penis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmuck_(pejorative)
I got several quotes for this blog from the transcript found here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/10/03/bill_maher_vs_ben_affleck_on_islam_mafia_that_will_fucking_kill_you_if_you_say_the_wrong_thing.html