How is criticizing and scrutinizing and disagreeing with the president racist? It sounds to me that you are suggesting that even though Obama is the most powerful man in the world he is still a permanent victim because he is black.
Let’s scrutinize the ideology by which Obama was raised. Was he raised like us?
Or was he born rich and lived a privileged sheltered life in which the laws that applied to everybody else didn’t apply to him?
Let’s go back a few steps. What does it mean to love America? Does it mean to love the values of America? or does it mean to love the people in America? Or does it mean to love the constitution of America and abide by it? I think it is obvious to everybody that he only loves the Brown to black Americans, and not even Americans, as we speak he is collapsing the border and trying to allow illegals to work, and vote, and get insurance paid for by others. Which is to say that people that know nothing about this country, who do not respect the laws of this country, now have the ability to influence the substance of this country.
Furthermore, one of the tenets of this country, which was set up to protect us from any form of Tyranny, which is why we have the separation of powers. Is that you don’t write and pass laws yourself. That is a tyrannical act that violates the separation of powers. We are a representative democracy to protect us from a from of tyranny known as the Tyranny of the stupid majority. Which Obama is invoking. Making all Americans the equals of illegal, uneducated, immigrants, who hate Americans and whom he wants us to now compete with politically and financially in a stagnant economy. It probably won’t effect him or you living in your ivory towers for a while, but it will effect the working class American and the state.
f Giuliani doesn’t get to determine who loves the country, how is it you get to decide what it means to be racist?
You use the Race Card because Giuliani used the 911 card. Let me ask you a question, did you experience slavery? Have you experienced discrimination based on your race or your sex? I have, lot’s of it all my life. I have been physically beaten up several times in my life because of my race, I have been discriminated against at work all of my life because of my race and my sex. I have been denied promotions and harassed by people in my company because of my race and my sex. Both sides of my family, which were large families, were almost entirely in landscape maintenance in Phoenix Arizona. They had to compete with uninsured, uneducated, illegal immigrants, who would steal their equipment and under bid them. My father took college classes, went to seminars, and got licensed to expand his business. But Americans like yourself, who like to think that they are good open-minded and merciful people, would hire the illegals. Guess how many of my family members are still in Landscape Maintenance? That’s right, zero. I wish you would have to compete for your job with illegal immigrants, you arrogant pizza shirt.
Our Founding Fathers in their Genius and Love for us provided for us certain Positive Freedoms. They created for us a government with checks and balances to protect us from tyranny in any form. Our Representative Democracy was created to protect us from Tyranny in any form and one of those forms was The tyranny of the majority.
tyr•an•ny (ˈtɪr ə ni)
n., pl. -nies.
Obama has embraced identity based politics and in doing so he is catering to the tyranny of the majority in order to arbitrarily turn the tide of public opinion in his favor. Name dropping Ferguson Missouri in front of the United Nations, how would he feel if Michele Obama aired their dirty laundry in public?
Catering to the Mexican vote and the Vote of the Muslim majority the fastest growing population of the most illiterate and violent people on earth, is an obvious breach of protocol.
The phrase “tyranny of the majority” (or “tyranny of the masses“), used in discussing systems of democracy andmajority rule, involves the scenario in which decisions made by a majority place its interests above those of an individual or minority group, constituting active oppression comparable to that of tyrants and despots. In many cases a disliked ethnic, religious or racial group is deliberately penalized by the majority element acting through the democratic process.
Supermajority rules, constitutional limits on the powers of a legislative body, and the introduction of a Bill of Rights have been used to counter the problem. A separation of powers may also be implemented to prevent the problem from happening internally in a government.
Obama, is planning on writing laws and passing them all by himself.
Obama was touted as the next Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was the great Uniter, he brought the people together and kept the Union in tact. Obama is more like the great divider, we have never been more divided as a nation, Feminists, Christians, Muslims, Mexicans, Homosexuals. It is more like he is trying to start a Civil War than prevent one.
Obama, intellectually, never developed beyond the point of being a biased lawyer, he never even tried to become the mental equivalent of a judge. He was always one sided and prejudiced. He has always been on one side, his own side, projecting his sense of self onto people that he identifies with and incapable of being impartial and judicious.
Our government was created to be a meritocracy of Reason and Results, not a tyranny of issues. The world is not a better place since Obama’s rule began nor is the Nation. To reward people based on their issues and their feelings of victimization when they haven’t raised themselves to a place where they can create value for people other than themselves, and to put them in positions of authority as equals is a sabotage of our government. Failure is not equal to success. Reason is not equal to unreason. Tacitly validating people’s emotional appeals is a dynamic tautology of a logical fallacy. The intensity of your emotion doesn’t make you any more correct.
In order to unleash the HIGHEST COMMON GOOD you need the consent of the wisest and most reasonableand most educated. What Obama is doing is invoking the LOWEST COMMON GOOD. He is dragging all Americans down to equality with hood rats, and welfare babies in the ghettos of the United States that only parasite off the economy, and they will only ever parasite off the economy because while they benefit from an increased quality of life in the United States they are also contemptuous of our values, the values that create the surplus that creates their quality of life.
Every act of theft or unwarranted gain in a monetary unit decreases all of the value of all of the money in that monetary unit proportionately. Instead of being lead by our better angels Obama is being lead by his worser demons.
There are certain terms that are synonymous with tyranny.
Arbitrary comes from the Latin arbitrarius, the source of arbiter; someone who is tasked to judge some matter. An arbitrary legal judgment is a decision made at the discretion of the judge, not one that is fixed by law. In some countries, a prohibition of arbitrariness is enshrined into the constitution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbitrariness
When one rules in such a way as to create a disparate impact in favor of a people incapable of reimbursing or equitably returning whatever they were granted, and without an inclination to be appreciative for whatever gain they accrue from the source of that accrual, that is an act of theft and sabotage. That is rewarding failure and punishing success.
I will leave you with this…
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed;
We…solemnly publish and declare, that these colonies are and of a right ought to be free and independent states…and for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honour.”
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Ben Affleck was recently on Bill Maher with Sam Harris and couldn’t help but start leaking his contempt and disgust before he even started talking.
He angrily asks Sam Harris, “Are you the person who understands the officially codified doctrine of Islam? You are the interpreter of that?”
The mistake that Ben Affleck is making is by trusting a psychopathic religion full of psychopathic people with psychopathic doctrines to tell the truth about themselves and their believes, when their own scripture says it is based on a lie and they have a policy of spreading and protecting their religion by lying about it.
In Islam, taqiyya تقية (alternative spellings taqiyeh, taqiya, taqiyah, tuqyah) is a form of religious dissimulation, or a legal dispensation whereby a believing individual can deny his faith or commit otherwise illegal or blasphemous acts while they are in fear or at risk of significant persecution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya
Some early Muslim jurists such as Muadh bin Jabal were opposed to the concept altogether as they felt it implied “lying” (kidhb) and “hypocrisy” (nifaq). In modern times, it is understood that both Kitman and Taqiyya are both forms of altering or concealing information. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitman
BEN AFFLECK: “How about more than a billion people who aren’t fanatical, who don’t punch women, who just want to go to school, have some sandwiches, pray 5 times a day, and don’t do any of the things you’re saying of all Muslims. It’s stereotyping.”
Dear Mister Shit4Brains Ben Affleck, all musims in good standing pay Zakat, and in doing so fund Jihad. Observe:
According to the Qur’an, the Zakat funds must be used for the following purposes.
- The Fuqara poor. They are the poor who do not beg for support.
- The Masakin. The destitute; They are the poor who beg for support.
- Amil’ Zakah. Those who administer the collection and distribution of the Zakat funds.
- Mu’Allaf. Those who may be enticed to Islam as well as new converts who need financial support.
- Riqab. Those in bondage; Those Muslim slaves who may have their freedom purchased.
- Fi sabi `Lillah. Those who are fighting in the Cause of Allah, e.g., the Mujahideen.
- Ibn as’Sabil. The wayfarer; Muslim travelers who need assistance while on a journey.
- Gharimun – ‘people burdened with debt’
Does the flag look familiar to you Mr. Too Big For His Britches Ben Affleck? Do you know what it says on it? Fi sabi `Lillah
SAM HARRIS: Just imagine you have some concentric circles. You have at the center, you have jihadists, these are people who wake up wanting to kill apostates, wanting to die trying. They believe in paradise, they believe in martyrdom. Outside of them, we have Islamists, these are people who are just as convinced of martyrdom and paradise and wanting to foist their religion on the rest of humanity but they want to work within the system. They’re not going to blow themselves up on a bus. They want to change governments, they want to use democracy against itself. Those two circles arguably are 20% of the Muslim world.
BEN AFFLECK: What are you basing that research on?
Anand Shinde“Bill Maher – This are the statistics that Bill refers to in some of his shows. Reza Aslan keeps saying that Indonesia is a model country….Ok…..30% there wants you stoned to death if you leave Islam. Some progress!!”
FACTS, STUPID! AND RESEARCH! AND READING BOOKS AND SHIT! STATISTICS SON!
HARRIS: There are a bunch of poll results that we can talk about. To give you one point of contact: 78% of British Muslims think that the Danish cartoonist should have been prosecuted. 78%. So, I’m being conservative when I roll this back to 20%. But outside of that circle you have conservative Muslims who can honestly look at ISIS and say that does not represent us, we’re horrified by that but they hold views about human rights, and about women, and about homosexuals that are deeply troubling. So, these are not Islamists, they are not jihadists, but they often keep women and homosexuals immiserated in these cultures and we have to empower the true reformers in the Muslim world to change it. And lying about doctrine and this behavior is not going to do that…
I don’t like you Ben Affleck, I think you are a schmuck a schmooze artist, a social climbing douchebag without a spine or a moral center. And you are arguing from ignorance. Everything you do and say is in relationship with your reputation in order to appear to be smarter than you actually are and in order to appear to be something that you aren’t.
Schmuck or shmuck in American English is a pejorative meaning one who is stupid or foolish; or an obnoxious, contemptible or detestable person. The word entered English from Yiddish (שמאָק, shmok), where it has similar pejorative meanings, but its original meaning in Yiddish is penis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmuck_(pejorative)
I got several quotes for this blog from the transcript found here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/10/03/bill_maher_vs_ben_affleck_on_islam_mafia_that_will_fucking_kill_you_if_you_say_the_wrong_thing.html
For those of you familiar with my research on the movement of ideas, Philology, through time and across countries this will not come as a surprise to you or as a deviation from my regular narrative. For those of you reading this for the first time it will sound like I am making this up. I am not.
Not only am I a Cohanim Rabbi, I am also a Jnana Guru, to those non-initiates that don’t understand the occult philosophy behind religion they will not understand how those things cannot be mutually exclusive, they also won’t understand how I can think of myself as a Buddhist and a Christian mystic, and at the same time, in some ways, a Satanist. The answer is simple, I understand the Religions, their origins and their philosophies and I can be all of them at the same time and defend my positions in rational debate with evidence and reason.
There are no good definitions for this available, Transgressive Sacrality is a ritual practice of non-conformity used in the Aghori Shaivist community who smoke massive amounts of weed and meditate in grave yards.
The practice is for removing unwarranted feelings of superiority known as vidya, or division. Avidya is the goal, and this practice is prescribed for the curing of puritannically obsessive mentalities, that presuppose cleanliness as a virtue and a mark of superiority. Practices vary from drinking one’s own urine, eating feces, or consuming small portions of a corpse.
The reason you won’t find any accurate descriptions is because of a natural instinct in religions in an effort to protect their authority and to make themselves look good, the conceal the truth, and reveal themselves in a way in which they look better than they actually are.
For me the trail of this tradition is obvious and plain. I see the evidence of it moving from here to there throughout time. It is no mystery for me. This satanic impulse of rebellion is how Evolution protects life on earth, through diversification, not through homogenization. If you observe the obsessively compulsive nature’s of people’s that have a puritanical fetish, you realize that an aseptic environment is also a dead environment, look at the lack of creativity and art in the Muslim community, their hatred and contempt of the Creative intelligence of others and their down right lack of intelligence as a group. http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2012/10/20/islamabad-freelance-columnist-800-million-muslims-out-of-1-4-billion-are-illiterate/
It is not commonly known that there are texts that show that Rabbi’s were supposed to practice Qabalah at 12:00 at night, the same time that one starts practicing black magick.
The worship of intelligence, of the God of Reason is the hidden subject. I am going to go out on a limb here and trace this tradition right up to the present, this might not make any sense to you and you might not believe me, but I have trained myself to recognize rhetorical tautologies and to be able to know things about people and groups of people based on their narrative.
So here goes, nothing.
I love Lucy is code for I love Lucifer, which means to carry light, it essentially means I love light, it is significant also that she has red hair and blue eyes.
Paramount Studios and RKO Studios were built on the back half of the original cemetery grounds, where they still stand today (RKO became Desilu Studios, owned by Desi Arnaz—I Love Lucy was shot there, along with the original Star Trekseries, before Lucy and Desi sold out to sprawling neighbor Paramount in the late 1960s). http://freemasonsfordummies.blogspot.com/2010/04/hollywoods-most-unusual-masonic-lodge.html
Desilu productions is associated with Viacom which owns Comedy central.
A few of you might have noticed the poor reception of Anthony Jesilnik and his sucky show and brand of humor. He was not well liked or respected by the rest of the comedians on Comedy Central, why? Because he was an invasive shill for Sumner Redstone, who I wrote about in Secret Society Wars IV. He was promoted as and I quote THE DARK PRINCE OF COMEDY. http://www.npr.org/2014/08/14/340113255/anthony-jeselnik-the-dark-prince-of-comedy
Well that is all the time I have today to kick some light. I hope you all found that entertaining. You might think I am an idiot, but you would be wrong, here are some related articles.
It has taken me a while to write this piece because of seeing the masks of all of the secret societies slip. Being bombarded on a daily basis with propaganda from “news stations” it is difficult to know what to believe. Let me demonstrate a little Jewish exegesis for you.
29Jacob said to him, “You know how I have worked for you and how your livestock has fared under my care. 30The little you had before I came has increased greatly, and the Lord has blessed you wherever I have been. But now, when may I do something for my own household?”
31“What shall I give you?” he asked.
“Don’t give me anything,” Jacob replied. “But if you will do this one thing for me, I will go on tending your flocks and watching over them: 32Let me go through all your flocks today and remove from them every speckled or spotted sheep, every dark-colored lamb and every spotted or speckled goat. They will be my wages. 33And my honesty will testify for me in the future, whenever you check on the wages you have paid me. Any goat in my possession that is not speckled or spotted, or any lamb that is not dark-colored, will be considered stolen.”
37Jacob, however, took fresh-cut branches from poplar, almond and plane trees and made white stripes on them by peeling the bark and exposing the white inner wood of the branches. 38Then he placed the peeled branches in all the watering troughs, so that they would be directly in front of the flocks when they came to drink. When the flocks were in heat and came to drink, 39they mated in front of the branches. And they bore young that were streaked or speckled or spotted. 40Jacob set apart the young of the flock by themselves, but made the rest face the streaked and dark-colored animals that belonged to Laban. Thus he made separate flocks for himself and did not put them with Laban’s animals. 41Whenever the stronger females were in heat, Jacob would place the branches in the troughs in front of the animals so they would mate near the branches,42but if the animals were weak, he would not place them there. So the weak animals went to Laban and the strong ones to Jacob. 43In this way the man grew exceedingly prosperous and came to own large flocks, and female and male servants, and camels and donkeys.
What does this actually mean? It is a reference to the impact of controlling what the eye sees. Those who control what you see control what you think, and in controlling what you think they control what you do and they also control your options, and you essentially a possession, part of a thought herd, unbeknownst to yourself.
By all accounts, the unexpected break for Murdoch in the Russian ad market came in 2002 after the assassination of Vladimir Kanevsky, then the billboard king of Moscow.
Now Rupert Murdoch wants to buy Time Warner, not only is this a monopoly, it is a conflict of interest.
In this article I intend to prove to the reader that Islam should not be allowed to categorize itself as a religion in the Western World. Eventually, we will be circulating a petition from Change.org where people can vote that hope. The evidence that I lay down in this article will be based on recent events, recurring patterns throughout history, philosophical, and rhetorical tautologies and icons within the “Religion” itself.
When a person sees to people arguing for fighting back and forth, they assume the correctness of their own perspective, from that perspective both parties are acting irrationally and part of the problem, one assumes that both parties are equally responsible for the conflict, this decision making process precludes the origin of the conflict, and ignores the perspective of the person who knows how the conflict started and who is setting things right. To cause an arbitrary ceasefire in the conflict rewards the malicious party that attacked first and since we know psychopaths can’t reform and they will strike again the person acting as a moral authority and bringing a false peace is now also a potential target of the initial attacker, also having caused a disparate impact in favor of the attacker and rewarding their strategic behavior by making it worthwhile for them.
The bible is a mythological allegory, a mythological history based on true events but encoded so that other people reading it wouldn’t know how to decipher it correctly and understand it, and in not being able to do that they couldn’t get offended by it and punish the possessors of it. I am not making this up, one of my pen names is Rabbi Ba’al Shiva, under that alias I deconstruct bible myths with PaRDeS, Jewish exegesis. The bible was written by the Jews, not by the Christians, and as such they are more of an authority on the meaning of the scripture, and they do not interpret the scripture literally.
The first scriptures in the bible were written by Persian Jews, trying to break away from the evil religions they saw in Persia, the sacrificing of babies to Moloch as a sacrament and as a post natal form of abortion. The story of Abraham and Isaac was an allegory showing that the Jewish god no longer approved of human sacrifice, this was a revolution in religion and their would be more to come. At this time the Jewish people were trying to break away as an identity from the Persian mentality. This would be a long, concerted, coordinated effort as we will see.
The Practices of war in the bible were necessary not because the Jewish god invented them but because the forces they were fighting used them. When you are fighting a force of people that is arrogant, superior, and ruthless, and uses technique at its disposal to completely destroy its enemy you have to use tactics that can compete and succeed, still in Jewish law we see as much compassion being used as it is possible to use under the circumstances. Raping women and taking wives were part of the spoils of war back in those days. To quote Richard Dawkins: “I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism…”
If you examine closely the story of Moses, what you see is a people once again trying to separate their identity from that of the Persian mentality. Remember the Persian’s were constantly trying to expand their vast empire. By this time they had expanded their authority yet again into the realm in which the Jews had attained some amount of success Egypt.
The story of the Exodus from Egypt corresponds, interestingly enough, with the creation of the Chassidim and the kosher diet. The metaphorical wandering for 40 years in the wilderness was a metaphor for purging themselves from the Mizraim, the people that were more interested in the “nations” than in the Jewish identity, to preserve their identity as separate from this once more expanding empire.
It wasn’t bad enough that the Jewish people kept on being conquered by the Persians every time they were conquered by the Persians they were dragged back to Persian and “re-educated” or brainwashed back into the Persian mentality. After the collapse of the Temple of Solomon, once again the Jews were dragged back to Persia and re-indoctrinated once again.
JESUS EVOLVES JUDAISM
Matthew 10:15 These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: “Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans….
Samaritans say that their worship is the true religion of the ancient Israelites prior to theBabylonian Exile, preserved by those who remained in the Land of Israel, as opposed to Judaism, which they say is a related but altered and amended religion, brought back by those returning from the Babylonian exile. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samaritans
ENTER MOHAMMED THE VIOLENT, ILLITERATE, CHILD RAPIST
In Salman Rushdie’s book, the Satanic verses, he frames Mohammed as a religious zealot who considers himself as carrying on the Guru lineage of Jesus Christ, but as he goes from aghora to aghora debating with the philosophers in the market places he is routinely humiliated and falsified, as he should be. What Mohammed did is he undid all of the evolution that religion had succeeded in, taking it back to the worst of times, before Jesus, before Moses, and before even Abraham.
Due to the rhetorical tautologies in the Unholy Quran it predisposes itself to the most violent and stupid interpretation.
According to AFP, the ISIS leader told worshippers at the mosque: “I am the wali (leader) who presides over you, though I am not the best of you, so if you see that I am right, assist me.
“If you see that I am wrong, advise me and put me on the right track, and obey me as long as I obey God in you.”
Muslims are the fastest growing population of the stupidest and most violent people on earth. Their very life style is based on spreading Islam all over the face of the earth and eradicating any person that will not submit to Allah under threat of violence. They have re-instituted a priest class which has not been seen for thousands of years. Which is to say, Saudi Arabia, translates fewer books into Arabic than anybody else IN THE WORLD including Greece which translates more books than they do and being in control of much fewere people. Not only that the majority of Muslims are illiterate which means their priest class tells them what to think, what to feel, and what to do. In their religion they are allowed to rape women and then stone those women for being prostitutes and women of ill repute especially if those women are foreign. Although, they have at times raped young Muslim women and them told them they can be stoned to death or martyr themselves by blowing up infidels and thereby have their honor restored. Some stupid western women say, “but not all Muslims are bad, I have had sex with a Muslim man.” Well guess what, there is no law in Islam about how many sharmouta (whores) a man can sleep with, but, just see what happens when a Western non-Muslim man has sex with a woman of Muslim descent.
RHETORICAL TAUTOLOGIES IN ISLAM
Islam is a religion that is spread by violence, anybody who will not convert is an infidel and that is punishable by death.
Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing…
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)”
Quran (3:56) – “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”
Quran (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”.
Quran (4:89) – “They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”
Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”
ISLAM THE WAR CULT
Sharia law is essentially martial law applied to a civilian population, that is why they don’t distinguish between military or civilian targets. Sharia is also the purest form of Islam. Islam is in a constant state of Jihad holy war intent on spreading Islam, all Muslims are combatants. Muslims are taught to always be spreading and furthering Islam’s message by any and all means. Taqu
iyya is the act of spreading or protecting Islam by lying or concealing the truth. There is another term, which I can’t remember, that essentially means retreat, but what it actually means is resting to gain strength for more jihad later. Also, Islam has no problem with genocide and torture.
Since, Islam is against Western society and America it is only fair that Islam not be granted equality to other religions in the west. Islam is not tolerant of other cultures or religions, they persecute every religion that is not Muslim, Hindus, B’hai, Yazidis, Buddhists, Christians, Jews, all of them, they are even in a state of perpetual civil war with themselves.
Ever since the violent revolution inside Islam orchestrated by Ibn Tumart in which they killed off all of the intelligent people and the artists, Islam has never been the same. You can read the article I wrote here. (https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2014/06/08/islam-will-not-change/) What is happening now is the re-Conquest of the Muslim world by the stupidest and most violent Muslims. Muslims are contemptuous of other peoples art, which is forbidden in their world because images of humans or animals or anything but artistically rendered letters is an act of idolatry. That is why they blew up the Buddhas that were carved out of the mountains.
Well, I can’t make my position any clearer than that. Treating another group of people as they treat you is not prejudice, it is justice, turnabout is fair play.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_ad_bellum#Just_cause.2F_Right_intention)
VVV—IMAM CALLS FOR GENOCIDE OF HINDUS AND BUDDHISTS—VVV
ANOTHER ARTICLE I WROTE SHOWING THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WESTERN AND EASTERN CULTURE—VVV