Tag Archives: linguistic determinism

Chaitanya, Charlatan, & Shayateen

 

5158987207_c4f2a4c4b5

In order to show the continuity between the mentality that Jesus himself confronted in ancient Rome I am going to demonstrate my theories on Proto-Indo-European and the evolution of Language, Thought, and Western Civilization.  When the Pharisees accused him of driving out demons by the power of Beelzebub the must have accused him of being Shayateen, the Arabic word for Satan.  It is important to realize that modern day Muslims refer to Christians as Devil Worshippers. Muslims claim Jesus was a prophet but of Allah but presuppose the doctrine of Mohammed, whose teachings are antithetical to those of the Christ, over that of Jesus.  Mohammed also instructs Muslims not to take Jews or Christians as friends.

This word, I believe, comes from the Hindu word, “Chaitanya” meaning Consciousness it is associated with Chit, which became the Chinese work chi and the Japanese Ki, meaning energy.  Also Chai tea takes its name from Chaitanya being an homage to the energy from the caffeine.  Many of the deities in India have the Peacock as their Vamana.  The Peacock was brought from India to Persia where it had never been seen before.  Muslim scholars refer to Satan as the Peacock of Angels, because the Peacock is associated with Pride and the Yazidi who are persecuted by Muslims and are native to the area having Green & Blue eyes and blonde or red hair worship the Peacock Angel who is often depicted, with blue skin.

As I have reported elsewhere Mohammed forbade the wearing of Saffron because Sarasvati order monks wear use the color ritualistically:

1798. Anas (May Allah be pleased with him) said: The Prophet (PBUH) prohibited men from wearing saffron-dyed clothes.
[Al-Bukhari and Muslim]. 1799.
`Abdullah bin `Amr bin Al-`As (May Allah be pleased with them) said: The Prophet (PBUH) saw me dressed in two saffron-coloured garments and asked, “Has your mother commanded you to wear these?” I asked him, “Shall I wash them out?” He replied, “You had better set them to fire.”

Another narration is: “These are garments of the disbelievers. So do not wear them.”

A close examination of the Aramaic language that Jesus spoke will show the influence of Sanskrit.

Much evidence shows that the Wandering Philosophers came from the area of India, Bodidharma, Buddha, and many others created disciplines and schools of philosophy.  Obviously they made their way to Ancient Egypt and Greece as well, unsurmountable evidence confirms this.

After Jesus died Mary Magdalene moved to France. Not only is French a Proto-Indo-European but the Phonology of the words is almost identical.  The meaning of the word is also congruent with the topic we are discussing.  Imagine a philosopher going to a place where people are less intelligent and philosophical trying to explain to them higher thought, mathematics, meditation, etc.  How would they perceive that individual with no respect or understanding of the topics?

charlatan (n.)Look up charlatan at Dictionary.com1610s, from French charlatan “mountebank, babbler” (16c.), from Italian ciarlatano “a quack,” from ciarlare “to prate, babble,” from ciarla “chat, prattle,” perhaps imitative of ducks’ quacking. Related: Charlatanism; charlatanical; charlatanryhttp://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=charlatan&searchmode=none

BAN SHARIA5

Advertisements

Literacy as a tool of Revolution and Religion

Image

I am a linguistic philosopher and a psycholinguist.  I find the history of language fascinating and the way it predisposes itself to certain emergent properties in the culture.  I am a bit of a linguistic determinist in that I do think the thought tools included in a language keep the people in that culture thinking a certain way, especially if the language is dogmatically kept from evolving.  Very few people have the ability to rise above the linguistic barrier, and see the forms of the good themselves, (plato’s cave) without the help of meditation or hallucinogenic or mind expanding experimentation.  If you don’t give yourself permission, artistic license to coin new phrases or to express yourself poetically in new ways, you will not see or do anything new or unpredictable.

Back in the day, every civilization had a priest class, and only they could read and write, languages were very complicated, 2,000 hieroglyphs in Egyptian and 80,000 Chinese characters.  Only the aristocracy was allowed to read and write and they made the laws, they were the deciders, they did all of the thinking.  I am of a particular school of thought that believes that Abraham and Brahma are one and the same person.  I am not the only person that thinks this, others have come to the same conclusion, furthermore, evidence has been found of a patriarchial ancestor matching the description of Abraham.  (http://www.aish.com/ci/sam/48936742.html)  My personal theory is that Abraham created a mutation and that mutation dealt with reading.  If you observe people that do not have direct blood line with Abraham what you will notice is a marked difficulty and even disinterest in reading, sometimes even having problems like Dyslexia as is the case with Native Americans, what is interesting to note is that Mexicans from Mexico City have less of a problem with reading, and they have Spanish DNA.

Image

If you read the Kabbalistic writings from around 300 years ago in spain you find some very interesting things on how Abraham attracted god’s attention by creating.  In the act of creating artistically he was acting like god the creator and attracted god’s attention and blessing.  There are even meditations on how to psych yourself up before setting hand to paper.

“Heresy arises as a pained outcry to liberate us from this strange, narrow pit, to raise us from the darkness of letters and platitudes to the light of thought and feeling. Such heresy eventually takes its stand in the centre of morality. It has a temporary legitimacy, for it must consume the filthy froth clinging to mindless faith. [………..] On the desolate ruins wrought by heresy, the sublime knowledge of God will build her temple.” 
― Daniel Chanan MattThe Essential Kabbalah: The Heart of Jewish Mysticism

You think about literary revolutions like the Gutenberg press and how it allowed everybody to have their own bible, and then later how the printing presses were used in revolutions in order to print one’s own propaganda, or apologetics, or polemics, in order to influence the minds of others and to express one’s own perspective on reality, what sweeping changes these were.  If you think about ideas moving across continents and through time and which philosophies and concepts they retained and which they discarded that too is interesting.  Which philosophies succeeded and so were kept.  Which one’s were forgotten and so the people perished or dispersed.

Some languages allowed for things to be expressed more quickly yet more informally, causing them to sound banal or crass or low brow.

Hieratic is a cursive writing system, used in the provenance of the pharaohs in Egypt and Nubia, that developed alongside the hieroglyphic system,[1] to which it is intimately related. It was primarily written in ink with a reed brush on papyrus, allowing scribes to write quickly without resorting to the time-consuming hieroglyphs.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hieratic

English, for example, is currently the Lingua franca of science.

lingua franca also called a bridge language, or vehicular language, is a language systematically (as opposed to occasionally, or casually) used to make communication possible between persons not sharing a mother tongue, in particular when it is a third language, distinct from both mother tongues.[1]

 

Etymology[edit]

The term “lingua franca“, Italian for “Frankish language”, is from a particular example, Mediterranean Lingua Franca. Lingua Franca was a mixed languagecomposed mostly (80%) of Italian with a broad vocabulary drawn from Old FrenchGreekArabicPortugueseOccitan and Spanish.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lingua_franca

Not many people know this but the reason that America doesn’t have a national language is because the French, Germans, and British throughout history were constantly warring with one another.  So in order to choose a national language, that would have created a disparate impact in favor of one particular group.  Also our law code is an amalgam of french law and British law, which is why we have redundancies and invasive french terminology.

Image

Ponder the language Aramaic…

Aramaic (Classical SyriacܐܪܡܝܐAramaya) is a family of languages (traditionally referred to as “dialects”) belonging to the Semitic family. More specifically, it is a part of the Northwest Semitic subfamily, which also includes Canaanite languages such as Hebrew and Phoenician. The Aramaic script was widely adopted for other languages and is ancestral to both the Arabic and modern Hebrewalphabets.

During its over 3,000 years of written history,[2] Aramaic has served variously as a language of administration of empires and as a language of divine worship.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aramaic

The language no longer exists today but it was the language of a people that wandered, hunter gatherers, back and forth across a vast territory, exposing themselves to many ideas and philosophies, that was one of the languages that Jesus spoke.  No wonder he could connect with so many people and speaking their language convey something to them, touch them in a way nobody else could.  Make connections that nobody else could.

Similar to the Romani who were named after the Romans, and are also known as the Gypsies, when coming from Egypt.  Think of how much knowledge and wisdom and understanding was lost when the library at Alexandra was burned, the Treasure trove of the Gnostics and all the Mysteries of Hypatia possibly the wisest woman to ever have lived.

Image

Now contemplate what Islam is doing, literally devolving the species.  The fastest growing religion in the world is also the least literate.  Why? They are literally devolving the species in terms of literacy.  They have re instituted the tyrannical priest class, that tells them what to think and what to do.  Saudi Arabia tyrannically controls all of the translating of books into Arabic, they control what people read, they control what people see, and they control what people think.  Not only does the language predispose itself to pretension, and arrogance, it also predisposes itself to vagueries, obfuscation, and manipulation, which is built into the language.  It allows the person speaking it to say one thing and to mean another, or to translate it differently at different times, to different people, depending on their status.  This allows the person with Authority to arbitrarily rank another person, and translate the language in such a way as it puts the person understanding it in a position of power and control.  Observe a few examples:

Islam (n.)Look up Islam at Dictionary.com“religious system revealed by Muhammad,” 1818, from Arabic islam, literally “submission” (to the will of God), from root of aslama “he resigned, he surrendered, he submitted,” causative conjunction of salima “he was safe,” and related to salam “peace.”  http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Islam

The Religion that is spread at sword tip on threat of death is named after Peace, which also means surrender, submit yourself to God at the tip of my sword.

Harem (pronounced [haˈɾem]Turkish, from Arabicحرم‎ ḥaram “forbidden place; sacrosanct, sanctum”, related to حريم ḥarīm, “a sacred inviolable place; female members of the family” and حرام ḥarām, “forbidden; sacred”) refers to the sphere of women in what is usually a polygynous household and their enclosed quarters which are forbidden to men. The term originated with the Near East. Harems are composed of wives and often sex slaves known as concubines. For the South Asian equivalent, see purdah and zenana.

Here in lies the question, Who is it sacred for?  Who is it forbidden for?  and who is “family”?

Image

Image

A little exert from a blog on how to learn Arabic:

I have been asked several times at my university in Oman to do a brief “cultural introduction” to native speakers of English from North America and Europe who have come to improve their Arabic. I start by mentioning that there is a large difference between learning how to speak a language and learning how to navigate a culture. Then I segue into a discussion of how to dress appropriately. My watchwords are: no knees or elbows on display in public. Usually, at this point, several of the listeners look angry, disbelieving and/or bored, especially the men wearing tight, casual T-shirts and women in spaghetti-strap underwear shirts.

But when I speak with Western students who are studying Arabic, most of them are dressed casually: sloppy flannel shirts, ripped jeans, shorts, bra straps, and sometimes underwear on display.    http://chronicle.com/article/To-Learn-Arabic-You-Have-to/132057/

THE LANGUAGE OF SELF DISCIPLINE

Image

 

Ponder this,

you have to hate who you are in order to change.  

As long as you like yourself you will not change, as long as you are content with yourself you will not change.  You have to despise yourself, loath your self, you have to be unpleasant with yourself, harsh with yourself.  Like a vociferous army general you have to bark at yourself and snap to attention for yourself. 

If I am fat, and I don’t want to be fat, I have to want to kill fat Joxua.  I have to humiliate and ridicule fat Joxua.  I have to take fat Joxua’s ass and put him on a treadmill.  I have to keep my eye on him like he is a criminal and he wants to steal some fat and become one with it again,  And once I kill fat joxua, if he starts crawling out of his grave again I have to stomp on his fingers and cave his head in with a shovel.  

My point is this, Male communication rituals are the language of self transformation, they are the language of self discipline.  Female communication rituals are pleasant.  Without Masculine communication rituals you don’t have the thought tools, the thought technology necessary for self transformation.  there is a theory, linguistic determinism, that essentially states that our vocabulary determines what we can do.  And its true, unless you are a wizard, or a linguistic philosopher or a shaman, you can’t break pattern without the words.  Without MCR you can’t and wont discipline yourself and you won’t change unless an outside force exerts itself on you. 

Image