Tag Archives: linguistics

Did Donald Trump support the Iraq War?

“Yeah, I guess sooooooo, uuuuuuh.  I wish the first time it was done correctly.” ~Donald Trump, September 11th, Anniversary.

The Alt-Left is using this as evidence that Donald Trump supported the Iraq War.  They are doing so precluding his personal testimony about his own perspective at that time and they are ignoring the Emotional Data that he communicated as he made this comment. 

In linguistics, prosody (from Ancient Greek) is concerned with those elements of speech that are not individual phonetic segments (vowels and consonants) but are properties of syllables and larger units of speech. These contribute to linguistic functions such as intonation, tone, stress, and rhythm. Prosody may reflect various features of the speaker or the utterance: the emotional state of the speaker; the form of the utterance (statement, question, or command); the presence of irony or sarcasm; emphasis, contrast, and focus; or other elements of language that may not be encoded by grammar or by choice of vocabulary. (SOURCE)

The amount of hesitation in his voice demonstrates a lack of commitment and he is communicating negative emotions exhibiting a lack of confidence in the position followed immediately by a modification of the original comment that shows he wished the decision would never have to be made in the first place.  We know that Donald Trump is Frugal, some would say stingy, but we can all agree on the fact that he doesn’t like to waste money because he is efficient and he would have considered the Iraq war a huge waste of money with little to no return on the investment.  To this day he’s against Nation Building and all the money we spent rebuilding Iraq’s infrastructure is now forfeit.  So we can all see that he was right in more ways than one from the beginning and he only agreed tentatively because of Patriotism and because he didn’t want to contradict the Politicians who were supporting the War who’s campaigns he was contributing to at the time. 

It’s not just that though, listen to the pitch, timber, and tone of his voice.  You can obviously hear the distress in his voice when he agrees to the war and then the immediate return of confidence and his relaxation when he wishes that it wouldn’t have to be a question in the first place. 


Video translated by my new advocate.

I found this video being shared recently by ISIS propagandists on G+.

Below is the translation and summation of my Arabic speaking advocate:

Obama discrimination of Putin over coalition airstrikes fighting in Syria .The president said it wiki Barack Obama Ovvanstan The experience of the Taz not present in the minds of Russians. And that NATO is going through arrangements.  Says that TURKEY dropped ammunition and supplies for ISIS to fight Russia last week..maybe explains why Turkey shot down that Russian jet .

Chaitanya, Charlatan, & Shayateen



In order to show the continuity between the mentality that Jesus himself confronted in ancient Rome I am going to demonstrate my theories on Proto-Indo-European and the evolution of Language, Thought, and Western Civilization.  When the Pharisees accused him of driving out demons by the power of Beelzebub the must have accused him of being Shayateen, the Arabic word for Satan.  It is important to realize that modern day Muslims refer to Christians as Devil Worshippers. Muslims claim Jesus was a prophet but of Allah but presuppose the doctrine of Mohammed, whose teachings are antithetical to those of the Christ, over that of Jesus.  Mohammed also instructs Muslims not to take Jews or Christians as friends.

This word, I believe, comes from the Hindu word, “Chaitanya” meaning Consciousness it is associated with Chit, which became the Chinese work chi and the Japanese Ki, meaning energy.  Also Chai tea takes its name from Chaitanya being an homage to the energy from the caffeine.  Many of the deities in India have the Peacock as their Vamana.  The Peacock was brought from India to Persia where it had never been seen before.  Muslim scholars refer to Satan as the Peacock of Angels, because the Peacock is associated with Pride and the Yazidi who are persecuted by Muslims and are native to the area having Green & Blue eyes and blonde or red hair worship the Peacock Angel who is often depicted, with blue skin.

As I have reported elsewhere Mohammed forbade the wearing of Saffron because Sarasvati order monks wear use the color ritualistically:

1798. Anas (May Allah be pleased with him) said: The Prophet (PBUH) prohibited men from wearing saffron-dyed clothes.
[Al-Bukhari and Muslim]. 1799.
`Abdullah bin `Amr bin Al-`As (May Allah be pleased with them) said: The Prophet (PBUH) saw me dressed in two saffron-coloured garments and asked, “Has your mother commanded you to wear these?” I asked him, “Shall I wash them out?” He replied, “You had better set them to fire.”

Another narration is: “These are garments of the disbelievers. So do not wear them.”

A close examination of the Aramaic language that Jesus spoke will show the influence of Sanskrit.

Much evidence shows that the Wandering Philosophers came from the area of India, Bodidharma, Buddha, and many others created disciplines and schools of philosophy.  Obviously they made their way to Ancient Egypt and Greece as well, unsurmountable evidence confirms this.

After Jesus died Mary Magdalene moved to France. Not only is French a Proto-Indo-European but the Phonology of the words is almost identical.  The meaning of the word is also congruent with the topic we are discussing.  Imagine a philosopher going to a place where people are less intelligent and philosophical trying to explain to them higher thought, mathematics, meditation, etc.  How would they perceive that individual with no respect or understanding of the topics?

charlatan (n.)Look up charlatan at Dictionary.com1610s, from French charlatan “mountebank, babbler” (16c.), from Italian ciarlatano “a quack,” from ciarlare “to prate, babble,” from ciarla “chat, prattle,” perhaps imitative of ducks’ quacking. Related: Charlatanism; charlatanical; charlatanryhttp://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=charlatan&searchmode=none


Shaming in order to make Same.


I have actually been thinking about this for a while.  The word Allah was a Generic word for God, it was not a specific personal deity.  In ancient times it was a pagan deity.  Mohammed rebranded the term already in use because it was a widely recognized name for God IN GENERAL what Mohammed did was he ENSOULED it with a different spirit.  What was that spirit?  Based on my research occult, philological, psycholinguistic, exegetical, and hermeneutical, in nature, I have arrived at the conclusion that he ensouled or rebranded a generic name for god with an evil Jinn known as an Ifrit.

Theodore Shoebat wrote a pretty good article that confirms many of my suspicions when I was finalizing my research on the topic today. (http://shoebat.com/2012/09/13/the-oldest-reference-to-allah/) The fact of the matter is that no prophet of god, including Jesus Christ, ever spoke poorly of Wise King Solomon, who is also the namesake of my spiritual name, “Shivah Solomon or Shivastus Solomonicus”

I suspect that Solomon had to learn about other gods in order to make one Nation in which all people could live together in peace, and in order to do that he had to understand how everybody thought, what compelled them.  In order to create a sustainable society some people had to be shamed in order to make them the same.  *Shem* (Hebrew: שֵם,) “renown; prosperity; name”   the term Semitic (from the biblical “Shem”, Hebrew: שם‎)

Sibilance is a manner of articulation of fricative and affricate consonants, made by directing a stream of air with the tongue towards the sharp edge of the teeth (Trident = 3 teeth,ש,Ψ )The meaning of the word Shin is 3 fold. Its meaning is tooth, ivory, and to replace. – See more at: http://www.yeshshem.com/shin-page.htm#sthash.VZ85dkPn.dpufExamples
of sibilants are the consonants at the beginning of the English words sip, zip, ship, chip, and Jeep, and the second consonant in vision.
A shibboleth (which is the etymology of the word sibilance) is a word or custom whose variations in pronunciation or style can be used to differentiate members of ingroups from those of outgroups. Within the mindset of the ingroup, a connotation or value judgment of correct/incorrect or superior/inferior can be ascribed to the two variants.
Recorded in the Book of Judges, chapter 12, after the inhabitants of Gilead inflicted a military defeat upon the tribe of Ephraim (around 1370–1070 BCE), the surviving Ephraimites tried to cross the Jordan River back into their home territory and the Gileadites secured the river’s fords to stop them. In order to identify and kill these refugees, the Gileadites told each refugee to say the word shibboleth. The Ephramite dialect did not contain the “sh” sound and so those who pronounced the word as sibboleth were identified as Ephramites and killed.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shibboleth

IN ORDER TO MAKE TWO THINGS THE SAME THAT ARE NOT EQUAL ONE OF THEM YOU HAVE TO SHAME.  The bible was written in Jewish Exegesis which means real names were often not used this is why there is no record of a King by the name of “Solomon” his name derives directly from Shalom which means Peace, as he was the King of Peace.  Representing, the sephiroth Chesed, and the Planet Jupiter also associated with Zeus, and the Namesake of the Chassidim.

The Reason I am MGTOW

L051247Now to be honest I am not officially a member yet because I haven’t signed on to their site.    But in another manner of speaking I have been MGTOW for years in spirit just not in name.  I started this page 3 maybe 4 years ago and it is currently connected to an ex-gf’s account.


I have not had a lot of good luck with women in my life.  As a matter of fact the vast majority of my problems have been caused by women or been about women. https://usaguru.wordpress.com/author/

american guru

After my first girl friend and Fiance’ I promised myself that I would never get involved in an exclusive relationship with another woman until I understood women.  I spent the next 20 years studying women and relationship, human psychology, history, the occult, philosophy, philology, linguistics, etc.  I was a bouncer, a stripper, a chef, a stand up comedian, and an author.  I now will not get in an exclusive relationship with a woman BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND WOMEN.

As I was repairing the problems with modern psychology as it is practiced, I noticed something peculiar, what inspired me was deborah Tannen’s work on male and female communication rituals.  I realized that if you took every logical fallacy and every cognitive bias and used them all of the time, you would sound exactly like a woman.

This prompted me to look at the problem like this.  From a linguistic philosopher’s perspective, how are male and female brain’s in relationship with on another?  How does the extreme feminine bias of the western mind factor into emergent properties that come out of collective western judgments and opinions?  What does this mean for society and the future of Western society?  What does it mean for me?


I realized that men have certain traits that occur more commonly than they do in women.  Our society forbids us from scrutinizing or criticizing women, it treats women like a privileged class of people that is not inclined to look at it’s own failures, learn from them, or correct them.  A type of sex based oligarchy in which women are considered moral authorities on account of having a vagina.  This was affecting the relationships of the individuals, and it was creating these social events which I began to predict with more and more accuracy.  I studied the natural inclination or women when left unchecked and what they would do, how they socially climb, how they think.  What I realized was that women were destroying the civilized world and making it weak and indefensible for the incursion of Islam.


What I observed was the emasculation of the male mind through the forcing of female communication rituals or radical political correctness, a meritocracy of pleasantness in which a person could be an incorrect douchebag pleasantly, but you couldn’t speak the truth if it was unpleasant and you couldn’t point out the psychopaths or expose the pretenders to reason like Socrates did without being forced to drink the Hemlock.

the-mind-hackerI originally wrote a piece for my ex-gf’s blog, which she has so considerately set to invitation only, even though I generated all of the content on her blog and it was still generating web traffic without her promoting it.  The name of the piece was called “As the Structures of Authority collapse”  there was another piece called, “unsustainable emergent properties in human judgments”.  They were time stamped so you can see exactly when they were written, and that they were indeed predictive.

Anyway, I have learned not to rely on women, and I hope never to be dependent on a woman again for her to do her part in a relationship and to carry her own weight.  I want a working relationship and women, much like psychopaths, enter into relationship for their own benefit, to steal from relationship or to socially climb in relationship, they are detrimental to relationship and they antagonize their own and everybody else’s success, because they only look at things to see how those things might benefit themselves and they never create more value than they consume.  Their life some is always less than zero, they are oxygen thieves, attention suckers, and space fillers.  They aren’t homo sapiens.


Response to Scientific American: A Matter of Time.


I was very intrigued by your recent article on time, I wanted to respond to it in my own terms or thought technology as I like to refer to it.  Since time seems to disappear from the formulas of theorists and doesn’t appear necessary to exist many people in the scientific and physics communities believe that it is an illusion.  Time doesn’t necessarily need to exist.


Albert Einstein Quotes Wallpapers3[15]

Why does the human experience exist?

This is how I want to approach the subject.  To quote myself, “All humans have finite capacity, if they had infinite capacity they would be the universe.”  This is a reference to Einstein’s reason for thinking that man cannot travel at the speed of light because he would approach infinite mass, becoming everything in the universe.  Which is interesting because it suggests that the person moving at the speed of light would become the super position, everywhere at the same time.  If you look at the concept of time dilation, there would be much more time from the perspective of that person because time would be moving much more slowly for him.

It is because we have finite capacity that time appears to exist because we the individual are not whole and in order to make ourselves whole we must continue to interact with our surroundings to maintain a kind of wholeness.  We return to the universe for food, sustenance, shelter, to expel waste, to procreate, and for us survival is wholeness.  One self must rely on the ONE SELF, the universe for survival.

If you look at the connection between mind time and pain what you realize is that pain stimulates the mind and the mind exists to help us connect ourselves with that which would temporarily make us whole, what we need, what we want.


The reason we have failed to discover the theory of everything is because of the cornerstone that we reject, the human perspective.  Fred Hoyle, formerly an atheist, became a deist when discovering the Triple-Alpha process.  This was the first time the Anthropic principle was invoked predictively.  It suggested that the universe might exist for the experience of human beings.

From my experience humans are the brain cells of god.  Intelligence is a very mysterious thing, even though we know it exists and we know it has a huge effect on it’s environment we can’t quantify intelligence like we do everything else.

I have a series of questions for you:  Is intelligence native to the universe?  If so do you believe it had to be here in some form at the inception of the universe?  Would you agree that there is a big difference between intelligent creatures and inanimate objects insofar as we are able to influence our environment?  Now please tell me what percentage of the universe is intelligent?  What percentage of the earth is intelligent?  What percentage of the human body is intelligent?  What percentage of the human brain is intelligent?

Human beings and the human perspective are integral to the theory of everything.  If you examine the way in which math and language frame the problem one (language) presupposes relationship and the other presupposes a singular will, which would be the will of the universe, which would be god’s will, which the mathematician conflates with his own will.



There are two different perspectives that the human being can have.  The person that perceives the universe as an object presupposes tacitly a singular will, one volition, and from their perspective they possess that will and they objectify the universe and those around them, I call this being delusional towards people or relationship.  The person who perceives the universe as a person might be delusional about facts but they tend to be less delusional about relationship, imho.  There is a meeting place between Psychology and Philosophy where the rational man stands, both non-deluded about facts and the universe and non deluded about people as well.

The Ancient Indian Philosophers tell a story of Markandeya, one of the greatest Hindu saints, that like Jonah found himself expelled from the mouth of Vishnu who symbolized the universe.  Outside of Vishnu he found himself floating in cold water in permanent night, not being able to see anything.  Until suddenly he saw Vishnu floating on the water in the lion’s pose, after much prayer he was able to get back into Vishnu’s mouth and into our Universe.  This story communicates to me that our universe was created for our mind.  There is no reason we should be able to understand or contemplate the universe.  And I doubt that anything outside of the universe would be in the least way intelligible to the human brain.  We are god, understanding god, inside of god.  Think of our lives as introspection as it were.  Life has experiential data.  It has meaning for the individual that it doesn’t communicate to anyone else.  Our life, in a way, is like a private conversation between us and the universe.


My Organic Computer Theory suggests that humans are not as unpredictable as we think.  Every event or fact or statement has positive or negative survival data to the individual, which creates negative or positive emotions.  (the binary code for Organic Computers) This depends on how the individual defines themselves.  The definition set of the individual determines who they project their sense of self onto (plasticity of the sense of self) and who they retract their sense of self from.  This is determined by the character they are playing and the story they think they are in.

Linguistic science and cognitive science believe that we remember things in a matrix of narrative.  That is how we string facts together and how we remember them.  If we genuinely understand an individual we know how they will interpret events and what kind of impact those events will have on their psyche.

Unlike facts and objects humans are less predictable, less objectifiable, more difficult to understand.  So the person good with science and numbers might be almost retarded when it comes to relationship.  Thus I refer to humans as Intelligent Objects to distinguish them from facts and objects.



The above is how I describe the universe, if their is nothing their can’t be change, and if their is change their can’t be nothingness.  If the universe has the ability to settle into grosser and finer elements when nothing is happening. Then one end of the spectrum would be more active and the other end more static, if you were to turn this pole in a circle and touch both ends you would get an explosion as faster and slower moving elements came into contact with one another.

Ponder this, if their were only one source of light in the universe and no mass, their would be no friction and therefore their would be also no heat.

Furthermore, if nothingness, the original substance is like a fluid, if it were to be stirred would it create brecciated nothingness?  If that was the case than once again their would be difference and their would be change.


Another question I have pondered, if time doesn’t exist, why does empty space exist?  How come everything isn’t smashed so close together movement is impossible?  You see I am very suspicious of this thing called empty space that allows me to see from here to there.  What is this substance that I am looking through?  I think empty space is a very mysterious substance.  We don’t contemplate it because we categorize it as nothing.  Is there some force that is the opposite of gravity, perhaps levity that is simultaneously pushing things apart and separating them?  Observe how quickly some substances diffuse in a vacuum or even a fluid.  Why doesn’t everything diffuse to fill empty space.

In the article it is suggested the time can be a singular dimension not necessarily associate with the other 3.  For example, like a photograph their could be space but their wouldn’t be time so their wouldn’t be movement.  But why is there space in the first place?  Why is their separation?  If nothing banged why is it not like we are living in a singularity?


One final comment, if time is an illusion, that means that there must be some time some place before time or outside of time.  Which means that all their is right now is the singularity and the illusion of plurality. I wrote a fiction piece a while back showing how this would work, potentially.  From the perspective of the person in the singularity every moment of time would be immediately accessible.  (http://shivastus.wordpress.com/2013/09/22/out-of-time-2nd-noah-socrates-story/)

If time isn’t real, the Universe isn’t real because the big bang never banged.  Which means all their is, is the ONE SELF.  So, if that is the case, are we the dream of God?