Tag Archives: male rights activist

The Reason I am MGTOW

L051247Now to be honest I am not officially a member yet because I haven’t signed on to their site.    But in another manner of speaking I have been MGTOW for years in spirit just not in name.  I started this page 3 maybe 4 years ago and it is currently connected to an ex-gf’s account.

untitledhttps://en-gb.facebook.com/pages/Adam-Wolfe/383505548376524?hc_location=stream

I have not had a lot of good luck with women in my life.  As a matter of fact the vast majority of my problems have been caused by women or been about women. https://usaguru.wordpress.com/author/

american guru

After my first girl friend and Fiance’ I promised myself that I would never get involved in an exclusive relationship with another woman until I understood women.  I spent the next 20 years studying women and relationship, human psychology, history, the occult, philosophy, philology, linguistics, etc.  I was a bouncer, a stripper, a chef, a stand up comedian, and an author.  I now will not get in an exclusive relationship with a woman BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND WOMEN.

As I was repairing the problems with modern psychology as it is practiced, I noticed something peculiar, what inspired me was deborah Tannen’s work on male and female communication rituals.  I realized that if you took every logical fallacy and every cognitive bias and used them all of the time, you would sound exactly like a woman.

This prompted me to look at the problem like this.  From a linguistic philosopher’s perspective, how are male and female brain’s in relationship with on another?  How does the extreme feminine bias of the western mind factor into emergent properties that come out of collective western judgments and opinions?  What does this mean for society and the future of Western society?  What does it mean for me?

untitled4

I realized that men have certain traits that occur more commonly than they do in women.  Our society forbids us from scrutinizing or criticizing women, it treats women like a privileged class of people that is not inclined to look at it’s own failures, learn from them, or correct them.  A type of sex based oligarchy in which women are considered moral authorities on account of having a vagina.  This was affecting the relationships of the individuals, and it was creating these social events which I began to predict with more and more accuracy.  I studied the natural inclination or women when left unchecked and what they would do, how they socially climb, how they think.  What I realized was that women were destroying the civilized world and making it weak and indefensible for the incursion of Islam.

rezn1

What I observed was the emasculation of the male mind through the forcing of female communication rituals or radical political correctness, a meritocracy of pleasantness in which a person could be an incorrect douchebag pleasantly, but you couldn’t speak the truth if it was unpleasant and you couldn’t point out the psychopaths or expose the pretenders to reason like Socrates did without being forced to drink the Hemlock.

the-mind-hackerI originally wrote a piece for my ex-gf’s blog, which she has so considerately set to invitation only, even though I generated all of the content on her blog and it was still generating web traffic without her promoting it.  The name of the piece was called “As the Structures of Authority collapse”  there was another piece called, “unsustainable emergent properties in human judgments”.  They were time stamped so you can see exactly when they were written, and that they were indeed predictive.

Anyway, I have learned not to rely on women, and I hope never to be dependent on a woman again for her to do her part in a relationship and to carry her own weight.  I want a working relationship and women, much like psychopaths, enter into relationship for their own benefit, to steal from relationship or to socially climb in relationship, they are detrimental to relationship and they antagonize their own and everybody else’s success, because they only look at things to see how those things might benefit themselves and they never create more value than they consume.  Their life some is always less than zero, they are oxygen thieves, attention suckers, and space fillers.  They aren’t homo sapiens.

brad

Advertisements

Parriah Pottymouth takes on Heforshe

emma_watson-g+profile

I would like to thank Parriah Pottymouth for bringing this to my attention first.  Her blog where she tackles the logical fallacies and cognitive biases of Emma Watson’s failed philosophical calculus is here (https://parriahpottymouth.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/13-sexist-things-about-heforshe-everything-sexist-about-emma-watsons-un-speech/)

HeForShe-Screen-740x385

Parriah brings up a lot of great points, It infuriates me that I should have to respond to the drivel of people like Emma Watson who have no idea what they are talking about, she doesn’t know anything about psychology, or people in groups or sustainable societies or anything.  Based on her status of being an actress, living in an artificial environment where life has always been easy for her and everything has been done for her she infers her life experience to solve global problems.  And apparently being a not entirely disgusting looking female who is well known and has a good reputation for the fake characters she has played in the movies, she is now a moral philosopher and an authority on male and female rights, for her own benefit and the benefit of those people she projects her sense of self on to.

emma watson hitler

Her ill advised campaign as a rhetorical tautology.  He for she.  Is reminiscent of the communist phrase “from those with greater ability to those with greater need.”  Now the reason that this philosophical calculus fails is for the simple reason that it incentivizes being needy, which means the less you contribute the more you will get back from the system.  Which means that people actually stop contributing in the first place and the relationship creates no value.  Just as we see the failing economy in Cuba, that takes care of the old and the crippled first and puts men in prison for trying to make a little extra cash with their ability.  When everybody has the same nobody has anything because those who create value are counter incentivized while those that do not create value are incentivized until the incentives run out.  Also because people are acquisitively mimetic, they will copy behaviors they see being rewarded.

mine for her 3

THE PASSIVE CAUSE AND THE ACTIVE CAUSE

The problem is this, men already to stuff for women, much of the evil done in the world was done by men for women.  The problem is that when men do anything for women because the women do not commit the act themselves they can either take credit for the action because it was done for them or they can deny blame for the action because they didn’t physically do it. They can literally say whatever they want, whatever would benefit them and protect their reputation.  They both did and did not do the deed, and indeed you will see them saying whatever makes them look good at any particular point in time.  This is a bifurcation that is inherent in feminine reasoning, which I myself discovered.  (http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/passive-cause-vs-active-cause/)

mine for her2

If men and women are equal as we say, but don’t really believe, then why are they not the same? The problem with that reasoning is that is exactly how the sexes are raised in the first place, that is gender role reification, boys are raised to be thoughtless of their own feelings, needs, and desires and women are raised to think only of their feelings, needs, and desires.  Why should men be concernful of women and not concernful of themselves?  Would it not be better to provide a rational relationship where they could both benefit themselves from the relationship?  Where it creates equitable value for both of them?  Furthermore, how is a man supposed to provide a surplus for a woman when he can’t even provide for himself?  Are we asking men to just go kill themselves?  Or allow themselves to be plundered by people weaker and stupider than themselves?

PUSSY STARVED

he for she

Every day literally every where I go I catch facial expressions (because I read micro expressions and body language, I am also a psycholinguist) and tones of voices and body language of people communicating disgust to me.  I am a proud unapologetic male, I don’t apologize for my dick.  I am a dude and I want what dudes’ want and I am interested in the things that dudes are interested in. I am not a bad man for wanting sex or for being interested in sex, it is natural for me, just as women are not bad for wanting babies or for being interested in the things women are interested in.  The world would not be a better place if I too thought and acted like a woman.  When that guy ran into the white house and threw the female agent aside like a rag doll I think a little masculine thought and energy would have pre-empted that embarrassment, don’t you?  The fact of the matter is if we can’t talk and act like men we won’t be able to think like men and we won’t have an incentive too.  Hitler knew that the feminized nations of Britain and France would not be able to stop him, they would complain but they didn’t have the balls to actually resist him, that is why he used the Blitzkrieg warfare, the same that ISIS is using right now.

181326_385999098127169_1781878132_n

I think the humorous thing for me is that these people that judge me, and abuse me, and talk shit about me, and prevent me from getting promoted, and try to get me fired, and try to assassinate my character, those same people genuinely would expect me to risk life and limb defending them from a violent attacker.  That is a colossal error on their part, I like myself, and I will not lift a finger to defend anybody who abuses me or thinks poorly of me.  I use my resources for the benefit of my friends.  I am not every man, throughout history, I am me.  I am not society, and I don’t have to agree with society, I am me.  You cannot punish or fine me or demand my agreement of participation to fix an unequality you incorrectly believe men have created.  I have always been rational in my relationships.  I accept no blame in this matter.

Crabby Business Woman Screaming into a Megaphone

HeForShe-Screen-740x385