Tag Archives: marines

Ban Sharia Law: Penalty for Theft

sharia1

The penalty for theft

Theft (stealing) is a hudud crime in sharia, with a fixed punishment. The punishment is amputating (cutting off) the hands or feet. However, before a person is punished, two eyewitnesses must testify that they saw the person stealing.[Qur’an 5:38]  http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia_law#The_penalty_for_theft

Advertisements

Islam will not change.

Image

The following is a commentary on exerts from the Biography of Moses Maimonides by Abraham Joshua Heschel

“The Carthaginians, Romans, Vandals, and Byzantines who took possession of the land never succeeded in getting the long established inhabitants, the crude Berber people, to mature sufficiently to share in their culture.  Only the militant missionaries of the Koran could accomplish this.  But even though the Berbers adopted a faith in Allah and in his prophet Mohammed, along with Arab mores and manners, they were never fully integrated into Arab cultural circles, nor did they ever fully merge into the vast Arabic world.”

Image

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Abeed (Arabicعبد‎, plural Abeed عبيد or El Abeed العبيد) is a derogatory term in Arabic meaning “slave” and is usually applied as an insult to Black people to invokestereotypes. The name has been explained as an allusion to the submission that Muslims owe to Allah. Meyer dismisses this as “efforts by propagandists [to] explain the term away [that are] at the least, disingenuous”.[1]
 
Notice, that what is being said is that the people don’t recognize Sapiential Authority, the authority of reason, which is why others failed to incorporate them.  The reason that Islam succeeded is because of a willingness to apply physical force, which they respect, which is Coercive Authority.  And at the same time the people that converted them continued to look down on them as inferiors which apparently didn’t bother the Berbers enough to rebel against Muslim authority.  
Image
 
I am going to paraphrase the book a little now to speed things along:
 
Ibn Tumart, a religious fanatic from Morrocco, declares a jihad against the ruling class for being too liberal with the application of Islam blaming the rulers for the imperfections in the understandings of the people who were anthropomorphizing Allah by imagining him as human.  He believed that anybody that conceived of Allah as human deserved expulsion from Islam.  He blamed the rulers for secularization, for the public sale of wine and pigs in the streets where Mohammedans lived, (the same pigs that were recently killed off because of swine flu and come to find out they were eating the garbage that Muslims were too holy to pick up).  He accused the most righteous in Islam of being heretics, he even accused Christians of being polytheists because of the Trinity.  He would empty every bottle of wine and smash EVERY MUSICAL INSTRUMENT that he saw in the streets (because that is what a good Muslim he was).  
He really resonated with the Berbers who felt that “commitment to the cause of Allah was better than any consideration of human life and property.” “the command of the Mahdi is the commandment of Allah.”  They eventually took over Morrocco calling themselves ‘the Confessors of the Unity of Allah”.  They ruthlessly slaughtered anybody that resisted the “true Islamic Religion”. 
Jews were forced to embrace Islam or migrate or accept martyrdom.  Many succumbed to fear and pretended to be Muslims.”
Image

Usage in Herodotus’ histories[edit]  wikipedia

In Book 4, Herodotus mentions for the first time the term earth and water in the answer of king Idanthyrsos of the Scythians to king Darius. In Book 5, it is reported that Darius sent heralds demanding earth and water from king Amyntas I of Macedon. In the 6th book, Darius sent heralds throughout Hellas bidding them demandearth and water for the king. In Book 7, he recounts that when the Persians sent envoys to the Spartans demanding the traditional symbol of surrender, an offering of soil and water, the Spartans threw them into a deep well, suggesting that upon their arrival at the bottom, they could “Dig it out for yourselves.”[1]

Interpretation[edit]

The demand for earth and water symbolized that those surrendering to Persians gave up all their rights over their land and every product of the land. Giving earth and water they recognized the Persian authority over everything; even their lives belonged to the king of Persians. Then negotiations would take place to specify the obligations and the benefits of the liegemen.

The phrase earth and water, even in modern Greek, symbolizes unconditional subordination to a conqueror.

BACK TO MY PARAPHRASING:

At first it was acceptable for Jews to be Pseudo-Muslims because in these countries privacy is highly respected, you can do whatever you want in your home, (with your 6 year old “wife”). But Jews were not allowed to pray in the streets or to even gather without attracting suspicion.  Apostacy is punishable by death in the Muslim community.  


COMMENTARY

Years ago, when Myspace had Groups and a philosophy forum, I wrote my fundamentalist drift theory which showed an emergent property in evangelizing and proselytizing ones beliefs.  I first observed this pattern in the Jehovah’s Witness religion in which I was raised, the bigger the religion got the more dumbed down it got.  As you include people of different ethnicities and cultures you also include their prejudices, sensitivities, and issues.  When you make them all equals and you keep lowering the bar you make desirable virtues, equal to superstitious vices.  What happens is that you have to remove everything that offends anybody.  You end up with a sterile environment in which nothing meaningful can be communicated.  I refer to this as the meritocracy of butthurt.  It creates a disparate impact in favor of the stupidest most easily offended, most violent people.  It is a false forced equality.  Wisdom and Ignorance are not equal are they?  

The thing is that in order to sell your message to boost your number in order to increase and expand your authority you need to make stupid people feel that your belief system has something to do with them, that they have some influence or control over it, that they have a voice.  In a rational relationship between a rational and irrational person, the irrational person benefits more than the rational person, and they for better or worse lead by virtue of being stupider, sensitive to their own issues and judgements, and feelings of correctness.  You have to be able to exert an influence on this element to ameliorate themselves and aspire to something that is indeed better than they are, just as children have to grow up and make themselves suitable for the world and society and not the reverse.  

I witnessed this pattern repeat, on Facebook, and then with the Dawkinites, the followers of Richard Dawkins, and then I noticed again as the same pattern repeated in the United States itself.  The positive freedom, Freedom of Speech slowly turned into Freedom from speech.  Female communication rituals were being forced on society.  

Here is the other thing, Israelites were a nomadic people for a long time, they got persecuted by almost every civilization.  The reason they started loaning money, even though usury is forbidden by Kosher law, is because they weren’t allowed to own land anywhere so that they could put down roots, so in order for them to have some manner of appreciating interest.  Israel needs to stay right where it is or else a greater evil and problem will ensue with history repeating yet again, worse than before.  Muslims need to deal with it.  Not only does Islam want and intend to spread itself all over the earth, since time immemorial they have wanted to completely eradicate the Jews.  Israel is not the cause of the problem.  The intolerance and violent stupidity of Islam is the problem.  There, I said it, I feel better. 

WOMAN’S WORLD: Douchebag Nation (PART 2)

598479_453216694738742_1187664564_n

thank you to Adam Wolfe comedy for this photoshop

This image was originally created to encourage women to do masculine jobs while men were off sacrificing themselves for the good of the country to protect American interests in a world that was falling into the hands of evil tyrannical powers.  Certain functions needed to continue in this country to support the economy and those men that were losing their lives and risking their lives.  It became, however, a corrupted symbol for women not needing men.

WW

As women continued to promote feminine “rights” to the exclusion of reason, and in opposition to equality and fairness, the female lobby with no self scrutiny and no internally critical voice strove not for equality but for dominance of femininity over masculinity and the subjugation of masculinity in spite of the contributions men had made.  This is a recurring pattern.  These lobbies never go away, they have no incentive to, they get money to continue promoting their cause.   Every month they send out a news letter celebrating their victories, never have you heard of one of these lobbies saying, “well guess what folks, we have accomplished our goals and we are now equal, so we are not accepting any more money and we are shutting our doors”.

Think back to the prohibition…

Lips-that-touch-liquor

One of the biggest influences in the prohibition was to monopolize pussy, women wanted control of men so that they could control the happiness of the man in a depressed economy where life was miserable, and those bitches on the left look really stingy, if you know what I mean, the  Woman’s Christian Temperance Union.  You have to understand how the woman edits her consideration set.

Women are only concerned about women and children, they are not concerned for men.  I am saying this because it comes from my theory on evolutionary psychology and neural myelination as it is passed on from generation to generation.  Millions of years of repeated patterns creating the male and female brains, and a touch of hormone rewires the brains to think differently from one another.

astro-boy

Men and women are essentially the same but were compartmentalized by nature to be specialized in two different arenas that are mutually in opposition to one another.  Protection and nurturing.  Men do not feel that they are increased in value by being men, although for their own protection maybe they should.  Women on the other hand do feel that their value is increased by being a woman.  Men can survive longer in a state of nature right now.  Women in a state of nature will die almost immediately.  The reason that this neural myelination was passed on to us is because THAT IS HOW WE SURVIVED!!!  DEAD PEOPLE DON’T PASS ON NEURAL MYELINATION!!!!   In order to be tough men have to ignore their emotions, but women judging tacitly from analogy think their perspective is superior and judge masculinity and try to turn men into women.  She relies on him and yet she wants him to be like her.

batman-massacre

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/aurora-shooting-died-bullets-sweeties-article-1.1119395

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/exchange/node/497

The female mind only concerns itself with feminine subjects.  It doesn’t like thinking about ugliness and evil in the world.  The worst evil the woman knows about is her husband.  But because of a natural and innate arrogance she feels she is superior and tries to turn him into a woman.  She doesn’t want him thinking about manly things, doing manly things, or wanting manly things.  She tries to remove all incentives for him being a man.  He should be happy with what little she provides him in the way of reward and he should not look to indulge his masculine identity elsewhere.

This pattern repeats everywhere in our society and our history.  We the most feminine and feminized nation in the world still blame all of the bad on men and we do so tacitly, men and women.  Listen to people talking as I do being a linguistic philosopher, tally the number of times you hear this conversation… “that lady is insane a real, bitch.”  “Well, some man probably really screwed her over.”  I can’t tell you the number of times I have heard this.  If we deconstruct this for value we see that sympathy is for the woman, and she is not responsible for her own actions, or for the fact that she is not mentally or emotionally healthy, women are allowed to be crazy and self interested, damaged.  They are allowed to throw histrionic fits, and pursue their insane agendas.  The crazy person in the relationship is dominant, trust me, that is the definition of a tyrant. http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/cause-of-the-bad/

435px-leighton-god_speed

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/08/24/america-the-most-feminine-country-in-the-world/

The very word “civilization” comes from the word chevalier, the french word for knight, and we see that according to Proto-indo-european it moved over here, across continents and through time.  Men championing the whims of women.  Men the active cause women the passive cause.  And yet, in the most feminine country in the world women STILL do not take responsibility for anything.  Why should they when they can just complain about it and blame men until they fix it for you.

MARRIAGE, A WOMAN’S INSTITUTION

About 10 years ago I downloaded everything I could from I-tunes university and I would listen to it while I drive, because their is a shortage of intelligent conversation in the world which is why I have so many conversations with myself.  Anyway, back to my point, one of the pieces I downloaded was from a black, female, judge in Chicago giving a speech, she talked about the no-fault divorce and  how it was created to get women out of abusive relationships but it created this wind fall of divorce.  She blamed the loss of the American family on women, I thought this very poignant and it led me to look for answers in directions that are forbidden to society.  Unfortunately, I don’t remember her name or I would give her credit, but I thank her for her brilliant synopsis, and her moral courage in speaking out against a group few seem to have the courage to.http://articles.chicagotribune.com/keyword/no-fault-divorce/featured/4

Bill Hicks famously said, and I am paraphrasing because I can’t find the original quote, “the people in your society that you can’t criticize, they are in control.”  and from my perspective that is women.  They don’t criticize themselves and nobody else is allowed to.  They have victim status.  And you can’t say anything even constructively critical to them without being considered a bully.  Society reinforces this.

I am going to show you how this pattern repeats literally everywhere around us through something that recently happened to me.

member_20797751http://www.meetup.com/POETs-OC/members/2883667/

Now this is not a quote, I am using my philosophy and psychological technique to create the verbal equivalent or tautology of what she actually thinks based on her behavior.  This woman poses as a spiritualist and is in all point of fact a closeted man hater.  As such she tries to monopolize spiritual authority as a feminine realm.  Not being gainfully employed she coasts on the money provided her from her rich husband while at the same time, talking shit about men and her husband behind his back.  Wanting his support she also conceals the fact that she despises him.  Being in relationship with past trauma and not wanting to be emotionally and mentally healthy she holds onto her damage as a source of power.  She is a player in a grass roots spiritualist movement in orange county, that tries to marginalize masculine spiritual authority while at the same time increasing spiritual feminine authority.  http://spiritualcoop.wix.com/spiritualcoop

Humorously I wrote a piece on a blog about crediting your sources when you quote somebody or they teach you something you have never heard before.  I was in her group on facebook at the time and she started arguing against the necessity of quoting your sources and it being a form of spiritual theft.  It was ironic because a month earlier she had told my gf at the time that it was ok to use her stuff as long as she quoted her.  The difference between D. Marie and myself is that she is not an original content generator and I am.  I am an initiated shaktipat and jnani guru.  She can’t compete with my creative or spiritual content.  I knew that the people in her group were feminazis and that all they would do is plagiarize my ideas and take credit for them.

Here is another interesting tidbit.  One of D. Marie’s gurus is Jean Houston who at a meeting of  http://sistergiant.com/sistergiant/  gave a speech that basically said women need to be more concernful of men and treat them as equals.  She was complaining about the feminist spiritual movement.  Marie, who get’s some of her authority from being a disciple of Jean Houston basically entirely ignored this exhortation on her part…..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5SQhxMc9DmE

Pink-wallpaper-pink-color-10579422-1024-768

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/idiocracy-douchebag-nation-part-1/

We-The-People