Tag Archives: Moral authority

Strange Days…

neo-nazi

The Obama Regime was supporting NEO NAZIS in the Ukraine before Putin stepped in.

Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught falsehoods in school. And the person that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool.

Plato (c.427 – 347 BC)

Part of the Obama Regime’s plan for destroying America was a private collusion with the leaders of the Muslim world.  Obama started his presidency with a pilgrimage to Mecca to speak with the “Supreme Leader” of Saudi Arabia, “where Islam began,”.  His term in office has been marked by secret meetings, agreements, and handshakes behind closed doors that the American People don’t know about and that circumvent the separation of powers created by the founding fathers to protect us from tyranny.  The congress is not considered “illuminated” enough to grasp subtle concepts and to make decisions for us as our elected representatives, instead decision making authority has been concentrated in one mysterious man whose rhetoric and actions are confusing and whose intentions and motivations are unclear.

Obama invited the Muslim Brotherhood to the United States and takes counsel with CAIR both of which are categorized as terrorist organizations by the United Arab Emirates.  Hussein then began a deliberate infiltration of the United States espionage institution with the Muslim Brotherhood, which created an environment of mistrust and suspicion.  His “Brothers” could not only report to him I also suspect part of their agenda was to inform ISIS of any meaningful threat to their existence or survival.  Muslim CIA chief John O. Brennan, refused to take the oath of office on the Bible but instead on a copy of the constitution before the Bill of Rights was amended to it.

It is not common knowledge but recently Vladimir Putin has been killing American CIA, within the past few months Israeli IDF have also been warned about getting recruited by CIA operatives as resources.  How did our Nation become led by the bad guys?  First of all the CIA was originally created with the help of S.S. agents captured from WWII, but that is not to say that our boys are bad, if they were they wouldn’t need to be infiltrated by Muslims but assuming that you were a closeted Muslim (as Obama is) and that you secretly hate the Jews and blame them for all of the evil in the world (as Obama does) and that you are only a Christian in name because nobody would knowingly elect a non Christian president of the United States (as Hitler was) then you would realize that Muslims and Nazis have one thing in common, a morbid hatred of the Jews above all else.  If you wanted to make the world stop being suspicious of the intentions of the Invasive War Cult of Islam thinly shrouded as a religion (Ishmaelite Order of Assassins) then you would understand, especially if you were secretly an enthusiast of Adolf Hitler, that if you were able to persuade people towards Fascism not only would you have more tyrannical control of the populace you could direct their aggressions away from the real problem (Islam) towards a scapegoat (the Jews).

ban sharia4

Link to George Soros article and interview.

Fortunately for us, our cute little Dick Tater is so arrogant and full of himself that he can’t quit gloating and leaking his plans to his Illuminati brethren in the Music Industry.  They can’t stop telegraphing their intentions to warp the minds of your children. . . Link to Nazi Propaganda in Niki Minaj video.   While doing research for this blog I found that Liveleak is also promoting Nazi propaganda.  They have a speech from Hitler in which he blames the problems of Germany on the United States, claiming that for years we had been trying to start wars all over the world, when the fact of the matter is that before WWI we had been very much isolationist as we were before we were forced to join in WWII.  Not only is it a well known fact that psychopaths are pathological liars, and strategic rhetoric is one of the main tools of the skilled politician, you always portray yourself as a victim, as the second cause, and as the cause of the good but Hitler was a spy, he was trained in psychological warfare and in counter-intel, not to mention he had fought in WWI and was frustrated that Germany had laid down it’s arms.  He swore to himself that he would never surrender again and expected all of his troops to fight to the death for the Fatherland which is why he respected the Japanese and allied himself with them.  The speech they don’t want you to see.

This is a tacit emotional appeal by liberal progressives, who have disproportionate access to our children and their education, to indoctrinate them into self loathing by framing America as the greatest cause of evil in the world when the reverse is the actual truth.  The chicanery is so thick, it never ceases to amaze me how much time evil spends plotting.  In tricking our children into not being self interested in America as a strong moralizing influence on the world, they lead them towards being self-interested, in Islamo-Fascist Evil as the True Moral Authority in the world.  How do you think it is that so many children are sneaking off fight with ISIS because they have been seduced by malicious propaganda?  It isn’t an accident.  While you work 2 or 3 jobs to scrape by you don’t have time to scrutinize the horse crap your children are being taught.  The rabbit hole is so much deeper than you know.

The Liberal Progressive modus operandi is that of attacking first, acting like a victim, and accusing the other party of doing exactly what THEY THEMSELVES are doing.  The mind boggles at how well this tactic works on inferior minds in spite of its being used ad nauseam.  Liberals will be the first to accuse other people of using the argumentum ad hitlerum, a logical fallacy in the form of demonization yet in spite of their own hypocrisy as their agenda and tactics have become exposed, they march out the Useful Idiots to accuse everyone who doesn’t agree with them of being a Nazi en masse.  Conservatives are Nazis like ISIS, Donald Trump is a Nazi, Trump supporters are like Nazis.  All of this to distract from what is happening on the world scene, this is a distraction, they want us to be focused on what is happening on the inside of the country, when we can’t afford to ignore what the liberal progressives are doing in the rest of the world.

There is a war coming, indeed some say the war has already started.  There is a rule in warfare, “never fight a battle on two fronts,”  the nature of the war that is coming might very well be a Civil War and a World War simultaneously.  About a week ago I put out a warning cry that has been trending, I created an image that said #WWIIIisNow!  The first warning shot that was fired across my bow was my face being put into a photo-shop on Stephen Colbert’s late show, of course I was the butt of a Hitler joke.  Link to blog & screen shot.   It was at that time that I realized that my advocacy was succeeding and that good in the world was indeed, waking up.

Advertisements

The Pole Position in Relationship

Image

Women have a strategic advantage in relationship that they tend to exploit unbeknownst to themselves. These instincts, behaviors, and strategies have been hardwired into the human organic computer through millions of years of neural myelination that have been passed on in the form of cellular memory.  Women don’t think about it, they don’t do it consciously, they aren’t aware that they tacitly interpret and judge reality in the experiencing of it.

The female mind was created to be in relationship with children.  The woman thinks that femininity is superior to masculinity, that is why she is female, as such when their is a disagreement between the male and female she refuses to look from his perspective or compromise or negotiate.  She uses her bias and the feminine bias of society and the children to get her way.  She basically hijacks the relationship and holds it for ransom.

If you observe women’s arguing styles you realize that they can’t get over their programming, they act like a mother in the following ways.  They presuppose their moral authority, they try to control the narrative as though they are talking to a child.  They correct the narrative, changing words, they are not just expressing a different sentiment they think that they have the final edit on the conversation.  They talk over you, interrupt your, nag, whine, repeat themselves, refuse to agree, participate, or move towards the solution or compromise, they quote people outside of the relationship whose opinions don’t matter and they will even violate the boundaries of the relationship by bringing people into the argument who are not part of the conversation in order to take their side.  These are not the behaviors of a person who is in relationship or a person who give equal credence to their partner.  The correlation between psychopaths and the narcissistic narrative has recently been discovered and fascinatingly, my theories show that the female brain, especially in relationship with a male brain acts psychopathicly, whereas the male brain is more sociopathic.

Image

The female brain operates from moral authority, operating on superficial aesthetic snap decisions as to what looks right and what sounds right.  The female mind is in relationship with its own authority and as such wants to expand and intensify its authority so it uses illegitimate behaviors and strategies in relationship to create a disparate impact in its own favor.  While men think about creating value for the relationship women think about getting what they want from the relationship and in this way women attack the relationship.  Even in a relationship of two women will try to increase their status, social climbing.  Women don’t debate analytically offering evidence,  and reasons, or being open to experiment, they argue emotionally not being able to conceive of any other solution besides the one that they are leaning towards.  They ask leading questions, they try to control the direction of the conversation, they force an emotional moral frame editing the consideration set of the conversation as if they were the arbitrary judge of the conversation and they try to force you to participate with their premise.

The female mind sees reason as a hostile, alien, influence and refuses to participate with it, or she will conflate moral authority with sapiential authority and herself the high priestess of both, but she is absolutely incapable of not being perfectly predictable in her positions and behavior.

Image

The woman acts as a mediator between father and child, a liaison, a go between, and she can use her position to bring the family unit closer together or to sabotage the father.  She can try to win the child’s favor so that he likes her more by spoiling the child.  If the father competes in this way it is more damaging for the child because he can play the parents off each other and the child starts to think in terms of possessions instead of relationship.  The mother can misrepresent the father to the son and further damage the relationship between them.  Some women go so far as to make the father an object of contempt and ridicule to the children.

Image

For those of you that are familiar with my theories on emergent properties in collective judgments of societies you might remember this piece I did to illustrate how society protects women from men they are in relationship with.  Note further that the man is basically accepted into a society by having children, that is his root in society, his entrance into a society.  Women use every possible strategy to expand and intensify their control, to make it permanent.

Most cultures have an age of adulthood which has historically ended the authority of the mother and begins the authority of the father and the preparation of the child to be a responsible and functional part of society, which also means that the issues that the mother has protected and instilled in the child through invasive narrative or psychological manipulation have to be removed and the child has to be made mentally and emotionally healthy and a contributor to society.  The child is also at this time responsible for the laws of the land and is no longer able to make appeals to feminine authority in the form of mercy and charity claiming to not be responsible for their actions and the consequences thereof.  The problem with America is that none of the social strictures on women apply and at the same time women are unconscious of their instincts and processes and of the evil they do innately.  They don’t have to scrutinize themselves or criticize themselves and they refuse to take responsibility for their actions or the consequences of them.  At the same time the refuse to confine their attentions and judgment to realms in which they are valid and get good results, completely incapable of not tacitly judging and interpreting everything from the position of moral authority.  Refusing to participate with reason they are passive aggressive and perceive themselves at the same time as being passive resisters and reformers of society while all they are really doing is making society weak and vulnerable.

Image