Is not, will not, was.
A new type of fuzz.
Sittin on his haunches.
Listening to the buzz.
worried about the races
can’t detect the traces.
In the world of spieses
not to be outdoes.
Spying on the Frances.
got caught without his pantses,
Now all the nations
think he is a scuzz.
Is not, will not, was.
thank you to Adam Wolfe comedy for this photoshop
This image was originally created to encourage women to do masculine jobs while men were off sacrificing themselves for the good of the country to protect American interests in a world that was falling into the hands of evil tyrannical powers. Certain functions needed to continue in this country to support the economy and those men that were losing their lives and risking their lives. It became, however, a corrupted symbol for women not needing men.
As women continued to promote feminine “rights” to the exclusion of reason, and in opposition to equality and fairness, the female lobby with no self scrutiny and no internally critical voice strove not for equality but for dominance of femininity over masculinity and the subjugation of masculinity in spite of the contributions men had made. This is a recurring pattern. These lobbies never go away, they have no incentive to, they get money to continue promoting their cause. Every month they send out a news letter celebrating their victories, never have you heard of one of these lobbies saying, “well guess what folks, we have accomplished our goals and we are now equal, so we are not accepting any more money and we are shutting our doors”.
Think back to the prohibition…
One of the biggest influences in the prohibition was to monopolize pussy, women wanted control of men so that they could control the happiness of the man in a depressed economy where life was miserable, and those bitches on the left look really stingy, if you know what I mean, the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union. You have to understand how the woman edits her consideration set.
Women are only concerned about women and children, they are not concerned for men. I am saying this because it comes from my theory on evolutionary psychology and neural myelination as it is passed on from generation to generation. Millions of years of repeated patterns creating the male and female brains, and a touch of hormone rewires the brains to think differently from one another.
Men and women are essentially the same but were compartmentalized by nature to be specialized in two different arenas that are mutually in opposition to one another. Protection and nurturing. Men do not feel that they are increased in value by being men, although for their own protection maybe they should. Women on the other hand do feel that their value is increased by being a woman. Men can survive longer in a state of nature right now. Women in a state of nature will die almost immediately. The reason that this neural myelination was passed on to us is because THAT IS HOW WE SURVIVED!!! DEAD PEOPLE DON’T PASS ON NEURAL MYELINATION!!!! In order to be tough men have to ignore their emotions, but women judging tacitly from analogy think their perspective is superior and judge masculinity and try to turn men into women. She relies on him and yet she wants him to be like her.
The female mind only concerns itself with feminine subjects. It doesn’t like thinking about ugliness and evil in the world. The worst evil the woman knows about is her husband. But because of a natural and innate arrogance she feels she is superior and tries to turn him into a woman. She doesn’t want him thinking about manly things, doing manly things, or wanting manly things. She tries to remove all incentives for him being a man. He should be happy with what little she provides him in the way of reward and he should not look to indulge his masculine identity elsewhere.
This pattern repeats everywhere in our society and our history. We the most feminine and feminized nation in the world still blame all of the bad on men and we do so tacitly, men and women. Listen to people talking as I do being a linguistic philosopher, tally the number of times you hear this conversation… “that lady is insane a real, bitch.” “Well, some man probably really screwed her over.” I can’t tell you the number of times I have heard this. If we deconstruct this for value we see that sympathy is for the woman, and she is not responsible for her own actions, or for the fact that she is not mentally or emotionally healthy, women are allowed to be crazy and self interested, damaged. They are allowed to throw histrionic fits, and pursue their insane agendas. The crazy person in the relationship is dominant, trust me, that is the definition of a tyrant. http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/cause-of-the-bad/
The very word “civilization” comes from the word chevalier, the french word for knight, and we see that according to Proto-indo-european it moved over here, across continents and through time. Men championing the whims of women. Men the active cause women the passive cause. And yet, in the most feminine country in the world women STILL do not take responsibility for anything. Why should they when they can just complain about it and blame men until they fix it for you.
MARRIAGE, A WOMAN’S INSTITUTION
About 10 years ago I downloaded everything I could from I-tunes university and I would listen to it while I drive, because their is a shortage of intelligent conversation in the world which is why I have so many conversations with myself. Anyway, back to my point, one of the pieces I downloaded was from a black, female, judge in Chicago giving a speech, she talked about the no-fault divorce and how it was created to get women out of abusive relationships but it created this wind fall of divorce. She blamed the loss of the American family on women, I thought this very poignant and it led me to look for answers in directions that are forbidden to society. Unfortunately, I don’t remember her name or I would give her credit, but I thank her for her brilliant synopsis, and her moral courage in speaking out against a group few seem to have the courage to.http://articles.chicagotribune.com/keyword/no-fault-divorce/featured/4
Bill Hicks famously said, and I am paraphrasing because I can’t find the original quote, “the people in your society that you can’t criticize, they are in control.” and from my perspective that is women. They don’t criticize themselves and nobody else is allowed to. They have victim status. And you can’t say anything even constructively critical to them without being considered a bully. Society reinforces this.
I am going to show you how this pattern repeats literally everywhere around us through something that recently happened to me.
Now this is not a quote, I am using my philosophy and psychological technique to create the verbal equivalent or tautology of what she actually thinks based on her behavior. This woman poses as a spiritualist and is in all point of fact a closeted man hater. As such she tries to monopolize spiritual authority as a feminine realm. Not being gainfully employed she coasts on the money provided her from her rich husband while at the same time, talking shit about men and her husband behind his back. Wanting his support she also conceals the fact that she despises him. Being in relationship with past trauma and not wanting to be emotionally and mentally healthy she holds onto her damage as a source of power. She is a player in a grass roots spiritualist movement in orange county, that tries to marginalize masculine spiritual authority while at the same time increasing spiritual feminine authority. http://spiritualcoop.wix.com/spiritualcoop
Humorously I wrote a piece on a blog about crediting your sources when you quote somebody or they teach you something you have never heard before. I was in her group on facebook at the time and she started arguing against the necessity of quoting your sources and it being a form of spiritual theft. It was ironic because a month earlier she had told my gf at the time that it was ok to use her stuff as long as she quoted her. The difference between D. Marie and myself is that she is not an original content generator and I am. I am an initiated shaktipat and jnani guru. She can’t compete with my creative or spiritual content. I knew that the people in her group were feminazis and that all they would do is plagiarize my ideas and take credit for them.
Here is another interesting tidbit. One of D. Marie’s gurus is Jean Houston who at a meeting of http://sistergiant.com/sistergiant/ gave a speech that basically said women need to be more concernful of men and treat them as equals. She was complaining about the feminist spiritual movement. Marie, who get’s some of her authority from being a disciple of Jean Houston basically entirely ignored this exhortation on her part…..
- Emergent Properties in Human Judgments. (thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com)
- femal douchebag (priscillaescamilla28.wordpress.com)
- Masculine and Feminine (aobanes.wordpress.com)
- Feminine and Masculine… WHATEVER! (skyefreedomlyka.wordpress.com)
- Woman are Aggressive Communicators (thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com)
- A douchebag’s lament: Pickup Artists have failed to tame the Wild American Bitch (manboobz.com)
Imagine everybody just turns off their computers, stops paying for their smart phones, stops paying for cable, and stops using social networking sites. Since July 4th of 2012 my ability to predict events has gotten kinda crazy. What I have been seeing in my minds eye is a kind of post-modernist movement, people getting fed up with all of these accouterments, luxuries that they can no longer afford, feeling like the system is just not about them anymore.
According to Thomas Hobbes the right to rule is determined by whether the government makes your life better by existing. Now our government has hinged itself, for better or for worse on capitalism, and there are no jobs and there is little money, and the government jobs make more money than the private sector, and many of us are working to keep the government funded so it can fine and punish us. So, does the government have the right to rule?
Where did the money go? Well it was pilfered by such banks as all of them, but mainly Goldman Sachs. Money was taken out of our economy and invested in China which began manipulating currency, buying our debt, stealing our patents and reverse engineering our products. Corporations invested in China with our money not for our benefit but for their profit.
Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty. Plato
From the perspective of Plato and Aristotle Merchants were slaves and they should have no political influence.
“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered…I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies… The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” ~founding father Thomas Jefferson
“There are three classes of men; lovers of wisdom, lovers of honor, and lovers of gain.”
So if people just dropped out, stopped investing in relationships that don’t pay them back, stop paying attention to things that aren’t about themselves, keep their money in their economies, and invest in their relationships, we could rebuild over time but the economy is not coming back any time soon because corporations requires some manner of surplus to exploit.
It seems obvious to me that this is a trap set for Obama by the Republicans. It reminds me of the scribes and the Pharisees trying to create a catch 22 for Jesus where no matter how he answered he would offend some structure of authority, whether it be the religious or political authority.
“15 Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in his talk.
16 And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying, Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person of men.
17 Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto Caesar, or not?
18 But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?
19 Shew me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.
20 And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription?
21 They say unto him, Caesar’s. Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.
22 When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and went their way.” Matt. 2
I want to be clear, I am not comparing Obama to Jesus, I am comparing the Republicans to the Pharisees. They are saying that he could have prevented the shutdown, and he probably could have, but then they would have said that he wasn’t respecting the legislature and he was a tyrant and we have a tradition in the west for dealing with tyrants.
“Et tu brute?”
On another note…
one of my favorite quotes about fascism is this:
“Fascism is when the businesses own the government, communism is when the government owns the businesses.”
and I can’t for the life of me remember who said it. While you might not consider it relevant I have this concept of hidden tautologies which are patterns that are essentially equivalent.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Creeping normality refers to the way a major change can be accepted as the normal situation if it happens slowly, in unnoticed increments, when it would be regarded as objectionable if it took place in a single step or short period. Examples would be a change in job responsibilities or a change in a medical condition.
But that is not the only problem:
Federal employees earn higher average salaries than private-sector workers in more than eight out of 10 occupations, a USA TODAY analysis of federal data finds.
Accountants, nurses, chemists, surveyors, cooks, clerks and janitors are among the wide range of jobs that get paid more on average in the federal government than in the private sector.http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-03-04-federal-pay_N.htm
The reason that this is a problem is that our government currently is based on capitalism. When you have government employees making more money than people in the private sector in equivalent positions what you have is an over class, that is being propped up by the underclass. It is unsustainable and it is wrong. It means that the people are working to pay for people in the same profession as themselves to make more money than themselves. This is a perversion, a corruption. It is unsustainable. It means that the average American is now a second class citizen. We are working for the government instead of the government working for us.
I never thought that world war III would be a psychological game of chess. Manipulating the masses to see who is more popular. I give it up to Putin for being a marketing genius. He is actually beating America at her own game. The thing with the homosexuals was brilliant, I couldn’t tell if he did it intentionally at first, the image of a bus of gay people getting torn into, there is now a group of Americans that feel more akin to Russian politics than American politics, and now his blocking of the President and being the voice of reason. Iowahawk put it succinctly when he said that “Putin is doing donuts in Obama’s front lawn.”
Here is the thing, the Neo-cons took credit for the collapse of Russia by funding the Afghanies and getting Russia to over invest in its military. Did all Russians die? No, the economy was temporarily upset but Russians are a strong people used to having a difficult life, and now they are back. The Neo cons turned around and what did they do? They got us involved in a land war in Afghanistan where we are hemorrhaging money and on the brink of collapse. Why so smart neo cons?
Consider for a moment the attitude of such people as Samuel Adams. This is what patriotism used to sound like. Now people that are proud of their country must whimper in their hearts instead of shouting in the streets. When you are expected to apologize every day because you are an American. When you aren’t allowed to pick up the banner of your own country and nobody else will. They just want you to leave your flag in the dirt while they tread on it. Helping themselves to the quality of life that was created by the genius and hard work of your founding fathers, to create a country free from the tyranny of big business, and the tyranny of the stupid majority, and the tyranny of special interests. How did their love of freedom become so thwarted? Why are we as Americans so weak now? Is it not because we are not taught civics? We are not taught to understand why the founding fathers created what they did, so how can we protect it? How do we recognize our enemies?
“A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.”
― Samuel Adams
“All might be free if they valued freedom, and defended it as they should.”
― Samuel Adams
“Nothing is more essential to the establishment of manners in a State than that all persons employed in places of power and trust must be men of unexceptionable characters.”
― Samuel Adams
“Nil desperandum, — Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it.”
― Samuel Adams
A little about the meaning of the communist flag. The image you see above is not technically communist because it has no star. This is in a way a pagan symbol and in another way a stylized shivalingam. Men do the building. Women do the harvesting. This is a sustainable way of life. Close to the earth. When survival is easy you have feminine virtues and it is easy to be corrupt and perverted. When survival is hard masculine virtues dominate. Things make sense.
They refer to white people as Caucasians the word derives from Caucasus, and the Caucasus mountains are in, thats right you guessed it Russia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasus The Russians know more about the Persians, and the Muslims and the Pakistanis, and the Afghanis and the Chinese than any of us, because they have grown up around them. Why is it that stupid Americans with their feminine judgments thinking about what is and is not pleasant always want to stick our fingers in other peoples pies without thinking of the consequences. When we destroy other countries based on our whim and our superficial aesthetic snap decisions presupposing our own moral superiority over others to judge and punish without any discussion with the people that will actually be affected by the interference and have to deal with the aftermath. Evolution doesn’t subscribe to a feminine narrative. A series of pleasant events doesn’t make the world a better place to live.
There are the Fuckers and the Fuckees. Nature rewards the Fuckers. Stop perverting the natural order. Stop rewarding failure. Rain doesn’t fall up. Time doesn’t move backwards.
Lynn: You have such a unique perspective I wanted to talk to you about this Florida case that everybody seems to be obsessed with. So what do you think about it?
Joxua: The way we handle race relations in this country is like a pendulum. One group gets to punish another group for crimes of the past or crimes that somebody else committed. Opinions can be invalid and ignored or not allowed to be voiced in the first place because of the opinion or the source of the opinion. If its not hip or PC or pleasant you are not allowed to say it and you’re not suppose to be thinking it. I call it the pleasantness fallacy. We can’t have an honest discussion when we are not allowed to bring up unpleasant topics and if our opinion is preemptively rejected we have no reason to participate with anybody else’s solution.
Lynn: What is your opinion on Trayvon Martin?
Joxua: I don’t really know enough about him to have an opinion. If I had an opinion it would be based on superficial aesthetic snap decisions and it would be informed by my own personal bias. He seems like a normal enough kid to me and what happened to him saddens me but I don’t think he was without some culpability.
Lynn: How do you feel about Zimmerman?
Joxua: I think he is an overzealous, beady-eyed, little fuck. I have a saying “It is not that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely it is that where the corrupt mind perceives power it reaches for it eagerly. Another uncorrupt person will perceive responsibility where the other perceives power and reaches for it slowly. It is interesting that Zimmerman wanted a scenario just like this, but he did’t think beyond the actual event. He wanted to force his will on somebody else, but he didn’t want the aftermath. There is an old saying “You have the rights to your actions, but not to the results of your actions.” Zimmerman wanted to prove himself to the police and in the form of the conquest, he demonstrated that he was unfit to be a policeman, but his behavior was what he thought they would approve of which shows his perception of the police not as protectors and servants but as violent, intrusive overlords and this is the kind of people that are attracted to being police.
Lynn: What do you think about the stand your ground laws?
Joxua: I think we are likely to see more of them when the economy is this bad there is more crime and less money for police so authority has to be given back to the people. You should be allowed to be tribal, self-interested and suspicious in your own neighborhood. We are likely to see more instances such as this. When there is no money for a structure of authority to govern then people must govern themselves. There were seven houses robbed in Zimmerman’s neighborhood so he wasn’t being just selfish for himself he was being concernful of his neighbors however misguided his actions were.
Lynn: What do you think of President Obama’s voicing his opinion?
Joxua: I find it interesting that Cornel West likens Obama to Zimmerman for his decisions in America’s wars. Strong words from Cornel West he’s really getting his parr hesia on. I love my brother Cornel West. I personally think Obama overstepped his boundaries as a president expanding his sense of self to include Trayvon saying things like Trayvon reminds him of himself at that age and Trayvon looks like the son that he’s always wanted. He has basically thrown himself into the fray and faked a foul. Now Zimmerman didn’t just shoot a wanna be gangster that was beating him unconscious he shot the president as a young man or he shot the president’s son.
Obama is not thinking like or acting like the president. He hasn’t transcended his attorneyness. He is acting like a propagandist and throwing his weight on one side. He is essentially throwing gasoline in a fire. He is being divisive. The president sets the precedent. Obama should be thinking like a judge and not like an attorney. He should be unifying the nation not taking sides in polarizing debates.
Lynn: I know you voted for Obama twice. I am wondering how you feel about it now.
Joxua: I think he is showing some pressure under the stress. I am really disappointed with how he has proceeded on this topic. I still don’t feel that the other presidential options were any better. I don’t think that the president has as much artistic control as other people think the president has with they moneyed and political forces that he has to contend with I don’t think he can control what happens but he can influence the sequence of events in which things happen.
Lynn: Thank you for your input.