Tag Archives: paul eckman

Ben Affleck is a Douchebag.

ben-affleck-batman-batfleck1

Ben Affleck was recently on Bill Maher with Sam Harris and couldn’t help but start leaking his contempt and disgust before he even started talking.

ben affleck is a doucheben affleck is a dick

He angrily asks Sam Harris, “Are you the person who understands the officially codified doctrine of Islam? You are the interpreter of that?”

ben affleck is an ass

The mistake that Ben Affleck is making is by trusting a psychopathic religion full of psychopathic people with psychopathic doctrines to tell the truth about themselves and their believes, when their own scripture says it is based on a lie and they have a policy of spreading and protecting their religion by lying about it.

In Islamtaqiyya تقية (alternative spellings taqiyehtaqiyataqiyahtuqyah) is a form of religious dissimulation,[1] or a legal dispensation whereby a believing individual can deny his faith or commit otherwise illegal or blasphemous acts while they are in fear or at risk of significant persecution.[2]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya

Kitman (Arabic kitmān كتمان “secrecy, concealment”) is the act of paying lip service to authority while holding personal opposition.

Some early Muslim jurists such as Muadh bin Jabal were opposed to the concept altogether as they felt it implied “lying” (kidhb) and “hypocrisy” (nifaq). In modern times, it is understood that both Kitman and Taqiyya are both forms of altering or concealing information.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitman

14-1

BEN AFFLECK: “How about more than a billion people who aren’t fanatical, who don’t punch women, who just want to go to school, have some sandwiches, pray 5 times a day, and don’t do any of the things you’re saying of all Muslims. It’s stereotyping.”

Dear Mister Shit4Brains Ben Affleck, all musims in good standing pay Zakat, and in doing so fund Jihad.  Observe:

According to the Qur’an, the Zakat funds must be used for the following purposes.

  1. The Fuqara poor. They are the poor who do not beg for support.
  2. The Masakin. The destitute; They are the poor who beg for support.
  3. Amil’ Zakah.  Those who administer the collection and distribution of the Zakat funds.
  4. Mu’Allaf. Those who may be enticed to Islam as well as new converts who need financial support.
  5. Riqab.  Those in bondage; Those Muslim slaves who may have their freedom purchased.
  6. Fi sabi `Lillah. Those who are fighting in the Cause of Allah, e.g., the Mujahideen.
  7. Ibn as’Sabil. The wayfarer; Muslim travelers who need assistance while on a journey.
  8. Gharimun – ‘people burdened with debt’

601490_542160262472389_547128326_n

Does the flag look familiar to you Mr.  Too Big For His Britches Ben Affleck?  Do you know what it says on it?  Fi sabi `Lillah

SAM HARRIS: Just imagine you have some concentric circles. You have at the center, you have jihadists, these are people who wake up wanting to kill apostates, wanting to die trying. They believe in paradise, they believe in martyrdom. Outside of them, we have Islamists, these are people who are just as convinced of martyrdom and paradise and wanting to foist their religion on the rest of humanity but they want to work within the system. They’re not going to blow themselves up on a bus. They want to change governments, they want to use democracy against itself. Those two circles arguably are 20% of the Muslim world.

BEN AFFLECK: What are you basing that research on?

Muslims punishment

Anand Shinde

“Bill Maher – This are the statistics that Bill refers to in some of his shows. Reza Aslan keeps saying that Indonesia is a model country….Ok…..30% there wants you stoned to death if you leave Islam. Some progress!!”

FACTS, STUPID! AND RESEARCH!  AND READING BOOKS AND SHIT! STATISTICS SON!

HARRIS: There are a bunch of poll results that we can talk about. To give you one point of contact: 78% of British Muslims think that the Danish cartoonist should have been prosecuted. 78%. So, I’m being conservative when I roll this back to 20%. But outside of that circle you have conservative Muslims who can honestly look at ISIS and say that does not represent us, we’re horrified by that but they hold views about human rights, and about women, and about homosexuals that are deeply troubling. So, these are not Islamists, they are not jihadists, but they often keep women and homosexuals immiserated in these cultures and we have to empower the true reformers in the Muslim world to change it. And lying about doctrine and this behavior is not going to do that…

ben affleck is a bitch

untitled2

I don’t like you Ben Affleck, I think you are a schmuck a schmooze artist, a social climbing douchebag without a spine or a moral center.  And you are arguing from ignorance.  Everything you do and say is in relationship with your reputation in order to appear to be smarter than you actually are and in order to appear to be something that you aren’t.

Schmuck or shmuck in American English is a pejorative meaning one who is stupid or foolish; or an obnoxious, contemptible or detestable person. The word entered English from Yiddish (‏שמאָק, shmok), where it has similar pejorative meanings, but its original meaning in Yiddish is penis.[1][2]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmuck_(pejorative)

gone girl sucks

ben affleck is a pussy

BEN AFFLECK IS A FA

I got several quotes for this blog from the transcript found here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/10/03/bill_maher_vs_ben_affleck_on_islam_mafia_that_will_fucking_kill_you_if_you_say_the_wrong_thing.html

CLX0707OUT503-de

Advertisements

MINDHACKING 101 #1 MIRROR TECHNIQUE

Image

I have been asked repeatedly to write down my techniques for what I learned to do with human behavior and psychology.  I think Cris Blakk will particularly find this technique interesting so I dedicate this blog to him.  https://plus.google.com/115599668920707439466/posts

When I think a person might be behaving strategically towards me, which is any unprovoked deviation from rational relationship for the purpose of maximizing what they are getting from the relationship without contributing equal value, or an attempt to establish dominance or leverage themselves, or refusing to participate, communicate, understand I have a little test to see if they are being self-referentially consistent.

Most people in trying to falsify another person do so from their own perspective making visual emotional judgements.  “I feel that you are wrong, therefore you are wrong”.  In order to actually falsify someone you have to do so from their perspective, which means understanding their philosophy if it is valid and non arbitrary, and if it is sound prove to them that their behaviors are not congruent with their beliefs.

I will use a tautology of the behavior or the strategic communication on them and see how they react to their own strategy.  If they respond as they want me to respond when they use it I know they are not intentionally being strategic, but if they don’t I know it is some manner of subterfuge.

I came up with this technique from my ASCENDING DRAGON STYLE TAI CHI that i created when I was in Washington state.  The concept is that you only turn the energy used to attack you back on your opponent.  You must make your ego very small and remove your judgments and interpretations from the interaction to ensure that they are in relationship with their own tactics through you.  I also sometimes refer to this as the silver ray technique. http://finscribeofwisdom.blogspot.com/2012/10/ascending-dragon-style-tai-chi.html

One of the tests for intelligence in animals is to see how long it takes them to realize that they are fighting their own reflection.  The mirror technique is fascinating because you get to see how the person is in relationship with their own strategies.  There is a part of my consciousness that sits back and just observes.  If you use 100% of your energy for the physical stuff or the emotional stuff you will not have the energy to sit back and learn and remember.  You can’t be completely invested in the conflict, you have to have a reserve of energy to learn and remember so that you can improve and compensate for that strategy in the future.

They are not fighting me, they are fighting themselves.  Sometimes people become aware of this.  Other times they become psychotic and feel they must destroy me.  They use as much dumb physical force as they muster and they enter a self destruction loop.  They become completely unconscious and completely obsessed with my destruction.  Paul Eckman refers to this as a refractory state, he says that a permanent refractory state is synonymous with insanity.  This is the technique I used to troll trolls and entire groups of trolls off the internet.  Right now I am apparently too controversial for facebook, lol.  They won’t let me have a single profile and it has been 6 months.  WINNING!

Image