Tag Archives: President

Rational Praxicism, or Ratiocracy/Logocracy, My Philosophy.


So, how would I describe my philosophy?  It is impossible to sum up in one post, I have spent years studying this old philosophical relationship and the processes in it. Literally everything I say and do is based on this relationship which has been forgotten in this day and age.  Never heard of.  There is so much intellectual crap and prancing intellectual buggery floating around out there.  Even when people hear my philosophy and think to themselves, “That sounds good.”  They turn around and do the opposite, because they are using a normative bias, and haven’t learned to detect logical fallacies that they are making.  

The only way I can teach this relationship is as a type of guru with an ashram or philosopher with a gymnasium.  It has to be shown, it can’t be told, because people are terrible at detecting their own horse shit.  This is a type of relationship in which people only relate to others rationally and positively keeping their judgments to themselves.  Your resources do your will, you prehend your resources.  You have earned them they are yours.  I can’t take your resources and use them against your will.  Taxation without representation. 

Not only does a person focus on creating value for others in the community, they focus on doing so in a rational way.  The most rational person gets his way, the most rational argument wins.  Everyone in the community is a philosopher king and is working on increasing his understanding.  Nobody is above the law of reason, and everybody submits to it.  If it can’t be proven it can’t be argued.  This prevents the type of intellectual faggotry that adopts a philosophy and then is successful in spite of it, which means that you are dragging the philosophy along, you are not applying the philosophy, you are championing it and proselytizing it.  Your success should be directly related to your philosophy, your philosophy is your soul, and your sword and your word.  If you discover you are wrong your amend your philosophy and your behavior.  

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses of the word Praxis, see Praxis (disambiguation).
So, I tried to do a kind of semantic clarification in which praxis—if not on the thither side of this divide—was perhaps somehow between the theoretical and the practical as they are generally understood, and particularly as they are understood in modern philosophy. Praxis as the manner in which we are engaged in the world and with others has its own insight or understanding prior to any explicit formulation of that understanding…Of course, it must be understood that praxis, as I understand it, is always entwined with communication.
 —Calvin O. Schrag[1]

Praxis is the process by which a theory, lesson, or skill is enacted, practiced, embodied, or realised. “Praxis” may also refer to the act of engaging, applying, exercising, realizing, or practicing ideas. This has been a recurrent topic in the field of philosophy, discussed in the writings of PlatoAristotleSt. AugustineImmanuel KantSøren KierkegaardKarl MarxMartin HeideggerHannah ArendtPaulo Freire,Ludwig von Mises, and many others. It has meaning in the political, educational, and spiritual realms.

It is also important to note that because of the nature of Moral Authority and its constant habit of usurping Sapiential Authority by making emotional appeals certain guards are created for preventing the passive aggressive take over of this pattern which eventually, universally, creates the degradation of all good systems.  Processes and patterns that aren’t logical and can’t be defended logically fly in the face of reason to repeatedly destroy all of the good that was created.  Everybody, man or woman must respect the authority of reason and if they can’t defend their position rationally with rational means they are not allowed to speak.  You don’t get to argue that one person or group must spend their resources on another person or group, this thwarts meritocracy.  If you want to be merciful and charitable you do so with your own resources and your fate and reputation are tied to those that you are helping and you are responsible for their actions.  If you want to own slaves, you are responsible for them and you don’t get to use your sentimental arguments to obfuscate or caste doubt or stumble reasonable discourse on its path.  In order to be a citizen you have to be equal to the task.  There is no freedom while their is ignorance.


Everyone in the society has their personal responsibilities, what would be power if it were extracted from them in the form of a law or structure of authority to serve them.  This would then attract psychopaths which would use that authority as power.  The point is to have a democracy amongst philosopher kings, Warrior philosophers.  Only when you have equality amongst genii can you unleash the highest common good.  When you have the false forced equality of making an irresponsible, social climbing, acquisitive, idiot the equal of a philosopher king, you have sabotaged yourself and your way of life.  Psychopaths ruin all of the good by refusing to understand and participate.  Should a person not accept their responsibilities their power must be given back to them forcefully or they must not be allowed to benefit from the surplus of value created by this type of relationship.  The quality of life is created by the philosophy itself, and the immigrants to this philosophy who do not adopt it and apply it are there for no other reason but to benefit themselves without contributing value, more value than they consume.  







I never thought that world war III would be a psychological game of chess.  Manipulating the masses to see who is more popular.  I give it up to Putin for being a marketing genius.  He is actually beating America at her own game.  The thing with the homosexuals was brilliant, I couldn’t tell if he did it intentionally at first, the image of a bus of gay people getting torn into, there is now a group of Americans that feel more akin to Russian politics than American politics, and now his blocking of the President and being the voice of reason.  Iowahawk put it succinctly when he said that “Putin is doing donuts in Obama’s front lawn.”

Here is the thing, the Neo-cons took credit for the collapse of Russia by funding the Afghanies and getting Russia to over invest in its military.  Did all Russians die?  No, the economy was temporarily upset but Russians are a strong people used to having a difficult life, and now they are back.  The Neo cons turned around and what did they do?  They got us involved in a land war in Afghanistan where we are hemorrhaging money and on the brink of collapse.  Why so smart neo cons?

Consider for a moment the attitude of such people as Samuel Adams.  This is what patriotism used to sound like.  Now people that are proud of their country must whimper in their hearts instead of shouting in the streets.  When you are expected to apologize every day because you are an American.  When you aren’t allowed to pick up the banner of your own country and nobody else will.  They just want you to leave your flag in the dirt while they tread on it.  Helping themselves to the quality of life that was created by the genius and hard work of your founding fathers, to create a country free from the tyranny of big business, and the tyranny of the stupid majority, and the tyranny of special interests.  How did their love of freedom become so thwarted?  Why are we as Americans so weak now?  Is it not because we are not taught civics?  We are not taught to understand why the founding fathers created what they did, so how can we protect it?  How do we recognize our enemies?

“A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.”
― Samuel Adams

“All might be free if they valued freedom, and defended it as they should.”
― Samuel Adams

“Nothing is more essential to the establishment of manners in a State than that all persons employed in places of power and trust must be men of unexceptionable characters.”
― Samuel Adams

“Nil desperandum, — Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it.”
― Samuel Adams


A little about the meaning of the communist flag.  The image you see above is not technically communist because it has no star.  This is in a way a pagan symbol and in another way a stylized shivalingam.  Men do the building.  Women do the harvesting.  This is a sustainable way of life.  Close to the earth.  When survival is easy you have feminine virtues and it is easy to be corrupt and perverted.  When survival is hard masculine virtues dominate.  Things make sense.

They refer to white people as Caucasians the word derives from Caucasus, and the Caucasus mountains are in, thats right you guessed it Russia.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasus  The Russians know more about the Persians, and the Muslims and the Pakistanis, and the Afghanis and the Chinese than any of us, because they have grown up around them.  Why is it that stupid Americans with their feminine judgments thinking about what is and is not pleasant always want to stick our fingers in other peoples pies without thinking of the consequences.  When we destroy other countries based on our whim and our superficial aesthetic snap decisions presupposing our own moral superiority over others to judge and punish without any discussion with the people that will actually be affected by the interference and have to deal with the aftermath.  Evolution doesn’t subscribe to a feminine narrative.  A series of pleasant events doesn’t make the world a better place to live.

There are the Fuckers and the Fuckees.  Nature rewards the Fuckers.  Stop perverting the natural order.  Stop rewarding failure.  Rain doesn’t fall up.  Time doesn’t move backwards.