You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn’t we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion [Islam] too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?
I can imagine people being enthusiastic about the paradise of Mohammed, but as for the insipid paradise of the Christians! In your lifetime, you used to hear the music of Richard Wagner. After your death, it will be nothing but hallelujahs, the waving of palms, children of an age for the feeding bottle, and hoary old men. The man of the isles pays homage to the forces of nature. But Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery. A n***** with his taboos is crushingly superior to the human being who seriously believes in transubstantiation.
Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers -already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity! -then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism [Islam], that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so.
The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death. A slow death has something comforting about it. The dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science… The instructions of a hygienic nature that most religions gave, contributed to the foundation of organized communities. The precepts ordering people to wash, to avoid certain drinks, to fast at appointed dates, to take exercise, to rise with the sun, to climb to the top of the minaret — all these were obligations invented by intelligent people. The exhortation to fight courageously is also self-explanatory. Observe, by the way, that, as a corollary, the Moslem was promised a paradise peopled with sensual girls, where wine flowed in streams — a real earthly paradise. The Christians, on the other hand, declare themselves satisfied if after their death they are allowed to sing hallelujahs! …Christianity, of course, has reached the peak of absurdity in this respect. And that’s why one day its structure will collapse. Science has already impregnated humanity. Consequently, the more Christianity clings to its dogmas, the quicker it will decline.!
Islam started 1,400 years ago approximately. A close examination of their history and their beliefs reveals that the religion is based on a lie and promotes and protects itself with lies, this is known even to the most astute scholars of Islam. It even says so in their “Holy” scriptures.
Mohammed in his Brilliant Charles Manson-esque insanity, took the mantle of an Abrahamic religion and Hi-jacked the judeo-christian religion. He did this to conceal his people to blend in as was their custom. The Roman Roads allowed the rapid spread of Christianity but they also attracted Highwaymen, Revolutionaries, and Zealots.
Sicarii (Latin plural of Sicarius “dagger-men”, in Modern Hebrew rendered siqariqim סיקריקים) is a term applied, in the decades immediately preceding thedestruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE, to an extremist splinter group of the Jewish Zealots, who attempted to expel the Romans and their partisans from the Roman province of Judea. The Sicarii carried sicae, or small daggers, concealed in their cloaks, hence their name. At public gatherings, they pulled out these daggers to attack Romans or Roman sympathizers, blending into the crowd after the deed to escape detection.
While early Christian Saints were peaceful and non violent being persecuted by Romans, to be Martyred means to die while trying to kill as many others as possible. Islam claims that Jesus was a prophet of Allah but then tells it’s people to Crucify Christians, which they do, I could post examples but I will spare you the gory details.
Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”
Furthermore, Allah is not Jehovah:
TWISTING THE SCRIPTURES
If you observe the way the twist they twist the scriptures it becomes obvious that they are aware of the disparity and their own origins. First of all, they taking the Judeo-Christian Scriptures as their own, claim Adam was the first Muslim. But then they twist the story of Cain and Abel making Cain the Protagonist and the victim of Abel’s psychic powers who after receiving god’s blessing thought that he would kill Cain, and Cain being psychic as he apparently was knew. But that isn’t the end, he also forced Cain with his obvious Mind Control to kill himself, and Cain was very distraught, but Allah forgave him and Cain was eventually able to forgive himself.
Secondly, Abraham didn’t attempt to sacrifice Isaac, but Ishmael, and Muslims are the descendants of Ishmael, how convenient.
On the day of feasting during which Abraham celebrated the weaning of Isaac, Ishmael was “mocking” or “playing with” Isaac (the Hebrew word is ambiguous) and Sarah asked Abraham to expel Ishmael and his mother, saying: “Get rid of that slave woman and her son, for that slave woman’s son will never share in the inheritance with my son Isaac.” This proposition was grievous in Abraham’s sight because of his son and the bondwoman, Hagar. Abraham only agreed when God told him that “for in Isaac your seed shall be called”, and that He would “make a nation of the son of the bondwoman” Ishmael, since he was a descendant of Abraham. (Genesis 21:11–13) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishmael
It is important to note that according to Moses Maimonides, Ishmael did not share in the blessing of Isaac, and he was nothing special. His blessing was to have a large nation, which means a large amount of ungifted, unspectacular people. In Gematria, the word “exceedingly” has the exact same numerical value as Mohammed. Ishmael was only blessed in numbers nothing else, this is an important distinction.
Also of note is that Muslims are very distraught at the fact that while the Christ is prophesied in the bible Mohammed is not, precisely because the coming of Mohammed was a none event.
SO HOW DID ALL OF THIS HAPPEN?
Well, I believe, in my humble opinion, that when Mohammed was born the Christian religion had been embraced by Rome and the evil and violent Ishmaelite order of Assassins was being exposed and routed. Their HAMAS like tactics of moving where there was a better quality of life and trying to avail themselves of the good things in life while at the same time not embracing those values and trying to force their Sharia Law down everybody else’s throats was failing. Mohammed, realized what was going on, the tide was turning against the fastest growing population of the stupidest and most violent people on earth. So, he created the lie that is Islam to protect his evil brethren. It cemented a type of equality between things that weren’t equal. Just as one group of people that wants to kill all of the Jews is not equal to the Jews wanting to stay alive and worship their god Jehovah.
With their massive inferiority complex, victim complex, and a closeted superiority complex, these people, descendants of Cain and Ishmael, have always wanted and always will want to subjugate or decimate God’s Children. They feel entitled because of their poverty and desolation, which they create wherever their feet land (daesh). Wherever their people go, if their isn’t already a desert, they turn everything into a desert.
“France’s Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said in a statement. “The Arabs call it ‘Daesh’ and I will be calling them the ‘Daesh cutthroats.'”
The name Daesh, according to France24, is a “loose acronym” for “Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant” (al-Dawla al-Islamiya al-Iraq al-Sham). The name is commonly used by enemies of ISIS, and it also has many negative undertones, as Daesh sounds similar to the Arabic words Daes (“one who crushes something underfoot”) and Dahes (“one who sows discord”).
ISLAM IS NOT ABRAHAMIC
“Rabbi Shim’on opened saying,”In the beginning God created (genesis 1:1). This verse calls for contemplation, for anyone claiming that there is another god is extirpated from worlds, as is said: ‘Thus chall you say to them: The gods who did not make heaven and earth shall perish from earth and from under these heavens.'”
This quote from a Hebrew prayer: “God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, protect your beloved people Israel from all hurt, in your love. As the beloved holy Sabbath goes away, that the week, and the month, and the year, should come to us with perfect faith, with faith in the sages, with love and attachment to good friends, to attachment to the blessed Creator, with belief in your thirteen principles of faith, and in the ultimate redemption, may it be soon, and the Resurrection of the dead, and in the prophecy ofMoses, our teacher, may he rest in peace.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_of_Abraham
I don’t think I need to point out that the god of Cain, Ishmael, and Mohammed, is not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob…
Furthermore, it is known in Kabbalah and in the Zohar that “new innovations of Torah are the old way.” What does this mean? It means that the Abrahamic religion was meant to evolve and adapt itself to the times it was not mean to be dogmatic and stagnant. The Abrahamic Law Code was created when the Jews were separating their identity from the evil and violent Persio-Babylonian mentality, and unfortunately they had to adopt some of the war tactics that were being used at the time in order to succeed and survive. But as time went on and things got better this Torah was supposed to evolve into a more enlightened and peaceful and loving interpretation. If you examine the tactics of such terrorist organizations as HAMAS and ISIS what you realize is that they are completely unnecessary and out of date. They don’t go back to Abraham, they go back to before Abraham. They are the embodiment of the mentality and ideology that the Judeo-Christian identity was trying to escape.
In conclusion, Islam is not a religion of peace, and it is not an Abrahamic religion…
Arabic: ومكروا ومكر الله والله خير الماكرين
Transliteration: Wamakaroo wamakara Allahu waAllahu khayru almakireena
Literal: And they cheated/deceived and God cheated/deceived, and God (is) the best (of) the cheaters/deceivers.
Arabic: افامنوا مكر الله فلايامن مكر الله الا القوم الخاسرون
Transliteration: Afaaminoo makra Allahi fala ya/manu makra Allahi illa alqawmu alkhasiroona
Literal: Did they secure God’s scheme/deceit ? So no(one) trusts God’s scheme/deceit except the nation the losers.
According to Kepel, Salafist jihadism combined “respect for the sacred texts in their most literal form, … with an absolute commitment to jihad, whose number-one target had to be America, perceived as the greatest enemy of the faith.”
but even more dangerous was theMuslim Brotherhood, who were believed by Salafi Jihadists to be excessively moderate and lacking in literal interpretation of holy texts. Iyad El-Baghdadi describes Salafism as “deeply divided” into “mainstream (government-approved, or Islahi) Salafism”, and Jihadi Salafism.
According to Mohammed M. Hafez, contemporary jihadi Salafism is characterized by “five features”:
- immense emphasis on the concept of tawhid (unity of God);
- God’s sovereignty (hakimiyyat Allah), which defines right and wrong, good and evil, and which supersedes human reasoning is applicable in all places on earth and at all times, and makes unnecessary and un-Islamic other ideologies such as liberalism or humanism;
- the rejection of all innovation (Bid‘ah) to Islam;
- the permissibility and necessity of takfir (the declaring of a Muslim to be outside the creed, so that they may face execution);
- and on the centrality of jihad against infidel regimes.
Al Franken is a multiple genius. I am not exaggerating. So you know when this Democrat criticizes the President on his handling of Isis that it isn’t without good reason.
“I was troubled by the President’s recent suggestion that the Administration has not yet developed a comprehensive strategy to address the growing threat of ISIL’s activities in Syria,” Franken writes. He adds, “We must act diligently and responsibly to prevent Americans from taking up arms with ISIL, or from reentering our country if they do.”
What is making Democrats and Republicans come together and agree with one another while at the same time disagreeing with the President? Hell, even people like Tom Delay are starting to sound reasonable.
“In defending America against radical Islamic terrorism, Barack Obama cannot be trusted,” DeLay said.
“Barack Obama was raised a Muslim, and he claims he is a Christian, and I can’t say for sure whether he’s a Christian or not, but he has shown over the last few years that he has great sympathies with Islam,” DeLay explained.
“You combine that with Obama’s political orientation that is far to the left,” he continued, “and you get a president who hates war, hates the military, and you have a formula for military inaction when it comes to combating radical Islamic terrorists like we are seeing in ISIS.”
Yesterday I posted a link to an article from richarddawkins.net about Sue Blackmore’s experience at Oxford and how she tried to get the students that came to her lecture to think of a new meme, all they did was think of meme’s that humiliated Christians, when she asked the students to contemplate meme’s that mocked Muslims and Islam 100 stood up and walked out and today I go to look at the same link and it has been data assassinated.
Anyway, I strongly recommend everybody read this article.
Now I look today and the article is back up.
Introducing memes, I asked for volunteers to come up on the stage and invent a new meme. This same young man, called Moritz, was up in a flash, followed by four others. I asked him, at the word ‘go’, to make some simple movements and sounds. ‘One, two, three, Go,’ I said, and he waved one hand around in a circle, chanting ‘In the beginning was the word, and the word ….’. The others then imitated him and that was fun. Three obediently began reciting from the Bible but the fourth threw both arms in the air and declared ‘There’s a big old man in the sky’ and raised a huge laugh and cheer from (some of) the audience. This seemed an opportunity not to be missed so I asked the whole audience, at the word ‘go’, to imitate either of these two new memes, whereupon a great cry burst out of, ‘In the beg…’, ‘There’s an old man …’. Great, I said, we’ve now got two memes, you have just seen meme creation and selection at work.
I explained the idea of religions as memeplexes: they package up a set of doctrines, tell believers to learn them, to pass them on, to have faith and not doubt, and they ensure obedience with fearsome threats and ridiculous promises. This I illustrated with images of Christian heaven and hell. Then I read from the Koran “those that have faith and do good works, Allah will admit them to gardens watered by running streams … pearls and bracelets of gold.” “Garments of fire have been prepared for the unbelievers. They shall be lashed with rods of iron.” More walked out. By the time I arrived at a slide calling religions (Richard’s fault!) ‘Viruses of the mind’, the lecture hall was looking rather empty.
THIS COMES AS A RESPONSE TO A QUESTION POSED MY BY OOGENHAND.
I had this brainstorm last night. A lot of you don’t know that I have for the last 2 years had this experience of awakening what I refer to as my cellular memory, I think many people mistake this experience for past lives. My mind works in bizarre ways and kind of does things on it’s own looking for patterns and going over and over what I know. Well, last night I got all of this information downloaded or maybe uploaded to me about the separation of the Jewish Identity from the Babylonian mentality of the current day Persians and Muslims.
The Persians were arrogant, totalitarian, tyrannical, superior, and supremacist, they wanted to rule the world and force or manipulate everybody’s participation. What we now call the “jews” were originally the scribes, and they recorded the history of the Babylonians, they were more intelligent and they had memory, and they studied history.
Thoth (/ˈθoʊθ/ or /ˈtoʊt/; from Greek Θώθ thṓth, from Egyptianḏḥwty, perhaps pronounced */tʃʼiħautiː/ or */ɟiħautiː/, depending on the phonological interpretation of Egyptian’s emphatic consonants) was one of the deities of theEgyptian pantheon. In art, he was often depicted as a man with the head of an ibis or a baboon, animals sacred to him. His feminine counterpart was Seshat, and his wife was Ma’at.[1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoth
In Islam, the Devil is known as Iblīs (Arabic: إبليس, plural: ابالسةabālisah) or Shayṭān (Arabic: شيطان, plural: شياطينshayāṭīn), born under the name Azazel. In Islam Iblis is a jinni who refused to bow to Adam.
The primary characteristic of the Devil, besides hubris, is that he has no power other than the power to cast evil suggestions into humans and jinn, although the Quran mentions appointing jinn to assist those who are far from God in a general context. “We made the evil ones friends (only) to those without faith.”
Being smarter than the slave class that couldn’t read or write and had no recollection of history because the priest class told them what to do there was an ideation, a disagreement. It occured to me that the word idiot actually goes back to ideate.
Definition of IDEATEtransitive verb: to form an idea or conception ofintransitive verb: to form an idea
idea (n.) late 14c., “archetype of a thing in the mind of God; Platonic `idea,'” from Latin idea “idea,” and in Platonic philosophy “archetype,” from Greek idea “ideal prototype,” literally “the look of a thing (as opposed to the reality); form; kind, sort, nature,” from idein “to see,” from PIE *wid-es-ya-, suffixed form of root *weid- “to see” (seevision). Sense of “result of thinking” first recorded 1640s. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=idea
What this did was it created a division between the two people and there was an otherization, a violent separation of sense of self, like a mitosis of identity. Whereas before there was only we and us now there was also “you” or Jew.
- (n.) Hence, any brutish or vicious character.
- (n.) A raw countryman; a lout; a greenhorn.
- (n.) One of a race of filthy brutes in Swifts “Gullivers Travels.” See in the Dictionary of Noted Names in Fiction.
It seems that this pattern, throughout history repeats over and over with the same people. The western mind and the eastern mind are completely incompatible and they cannot be successfully mixed, because in order for them to mix, the stupid arrogant people would have to humble themselves and stop trying to dominate and control the smart people and at the same time, they would actually have to submit and recognize the superiority of the other to themselves, which they refuse to do, this is also a recurring theme in the bible.
oh, hai, i had a dream that I was special and would do great things one day…
THROw YOUR BROTHER IN THE PIT AND SELL HIM INTO SLAVERY!!!
Let’s see….can we think of any group of people that believed in human slavery for, I don’t know, maybe since human civilization began? 😉
A shibboleth (/ˈʃɪbəlɛθ/ or /ˈʃɪbələθ/) is a word or custom whose variations in pronunciation or style can be used to differentiate members of ingroups from those of outgroups. Within the mindset of the ingroup, a connotation or value judgment of correct/incorrect or superior/inferior can be ascribed to the two variants.
Gilead then cut Ephraim off from the fords of the Jordan, and whenever Ephraimite fugitives said, ‘Let me cross,’ the men of Gilead would ask, ‘Are you an Ephraimite?’ If he said, ‘No,’ they then said, ‘Very well, say “Shibboleth” (שבלת).’ If anyone said, “Sibboleth” (סבלת), because he could not pronounce it, then they would seize him and kill him by the fords of the Jordan. Forty-two thousand Ephraimites were killed on this occasion.
Sibilance is a manner of articulation of fricative and affricateconsonants, made by directing a stream of air with the tongue towards the sharp edge of the teeth, which are held close together; a consonant that uses sibilance may be called a sibilant. Examples of sibilants are the consonants at the beginning of the English words sip, zip, ship, chip, and Jeep, and the second consonant in vision. The symbols in theInternational Phonetic Alphabet used to denote the sibilant sounds in these words are, respectively, [s] [z] [ʃ] [tʃ] [dʒ] [ʒ]. (The sounds [tʃ] [dʒ], as in chip and Jeep, are affricates; the rest are fricatives.) Sibilants have a characteristically intense sound, which accounts for their non-linguistic use in getting one’s attention (e.g. calling someone using “psst!” or quieting someone using “shhhh!”).
In linguistics and ethnology, Semitic (from the Biblical “Shem“, Hebrew: שם, translated as “name”) was first used to refer to alanguage family of West Asian origin, now called the Semitic languages. This family includes the ancient and modern forms ofAhlamu, Akkadian (Assyrian-Babylonian), Amharic, Ammonite, Amorite, Arabic, Aramaic/Syriac, Canaanite(Phoenician/Carthaginian/Hebrew), Chaldean, Eblaite, Edomite, Ge’ez, Maltese, Mandaic, Moabite, Sutean, Tigre andTigrinya, and Ugaritic, among others.
As language studies are interwoven with cultural studies, the term also came to describe the extended cultures andethnicities, as well as the history of these varied peoples as associated by close geographic and linguistic distribution.Today, the word “Semite” may be used to refer to any member of any of a number of peoples of ancient Southwestern Asiadescent including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews (Jews), Arabs, and their descendants.
Ephraim/ˈiːfriːəm/; (Hebrew: אֶפְרַיִם/אֶפְרָיִם, StandardEfráyimTiberianʾEp̄ráyim/ʾEp̄rāyim) was, according to the Book of Genesis, the second son of Joseph and Asenath. Asenath was an Egyptian woman whom Pharaoh gave to Joseph as wife, and the daughter of Potipherah, a priest of On. (Genesis 41:50-52) Ephraim was born in Egypt before the arrival of thechildren of Israel from Canaan. (Genesis 48:5)
“All antiquity believed …in a Mediator or Redeemer, by means of whom the Evil Principle was to be overcome and the Supreme Deity reconciled to His creatures. The belief was general that he was to be born of a virgin and suffer a painful death. The Hindus called him Krishna; the Chinese, Kioun-tse; the Persians, Sosiosch; the Scandinavians, Balder; the Christians, Jesus; the Masons, Hiram“
Pirtle, The [Masonic] Kentucky Monitor 14,15
The legend tells us that one day, whilst worshipping the Grand Architect of the Universe (GAOTU) within the Holy of Holies, Hiram was attacked by three ruffians, (called ‘Jubela’, ‘Jubelo’ & ‘Jubelum’ and known collectively as ‘The Juwes’) who demanded the “Master’s word”, that is, the secret name of God.
The first ruffian, named Jubela, struck Hiram across the throat with a 24 inch gauge. The second ruffian, named Jubelo, struck Hiram’s breast, over the heart, with a square. The third ruffian, named Jubelum, struck Hiram upon the forehead with a gavel, whereupon Hiram fell dead. His blood, therefore, was shed within the temple.
The Samaritans are adherents of Samaritanism, an Abrahamic religion closely related to Judaism. Based on theSamaritan Pentateuch, Samaritans say that their worship is the true religion of the ancient Israelites prior to theBabylonian Exile, preserved by those who remained in the Land of Israel, as opposed to Judaism, which they say is a related but altered and amended religion, brought back by those returning from the Babylonian exile.
In this article I intend to prove to the reader that Islam should not be allowed to categorize itself as a religion in the Western World. Eventually, we will be circulating a petition from Change.org where people can vote that hope. The evidence that I lay down in this article will be based on recent events, recurring patterns throughout history, philosophical, and rhetorical tautologies and icons within the “Religion” itself.
When a person sees to people arguing for fighting back and forth, they assume the correctness of their own perspective, from that perspective both parties are acting irrationally and part of the problem, one assumes that both parties are equally responsible for the conflict, this decision making process precludes the origin of the conflict, and ignores the perspective of the person who knows how the conflict started and who is setting things right. To cause an arbitrary ceasefire in the conflict rewards the malicious party that attacked first and since we know psychopaths can’t reform and they will strike again the person acting as a moral authority and bringing a false peace is now also a potential target of the initial attacker, also having caused a disparate impact in favor of the attacker and rewarding their strategic behavior by making it worthwhile for them.
The bible is a mythological allegory, a mythological history based on true events but encoded so that other people reading it wouldn’t know how to decipher it correctly and understand it, and in not being able to do that they couldn’t get offended by it and punish the possessors of it. I am not making this up, one of my pen names is Rabbi Ba’al Shiva, under that alias I deconstruct bible myths with PaRDeS, Jewish exegesis. The bible was written by the Jews, not by the Christians, and as such they are more of an authority on the meaning of the scripture, and they do not interpret the scripture literally.
The first scriptures in the bible were written by Persian Jews, trying to break away from the evil religions they saw in Persia, the sacrificing of babies to Moloch as a sacrament and as a post natal form of abortion. The story of Abraham and Isaac was an allegory showing that the Jewish god no longer approved of human sacrifice, this was a revolution in religion and their would be more to come. At this time the Jewish people were trying to break away as an identity from the Persian mentality. This would be a long, concerted, coordinated effort as we will see.
The Practices of war in the bible were necessary not because the Jewish god invented them but because the forces they were fighting used them. When you are fighting a force of people that is arrogant, superior, and ruthless, and uses technique at its disposal to completely destroy its enemy you have to use tactics that can compete and succeed, still in Jewish law we see as much compassion being used as it is possible to use under the circumstances. Raping women and taking wives were part of the spoils of war back in those days. To quote Richard Dawkins: “I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism…”
If you examine closely the story of Moses, what you see is a people once again trying to separate their identity from that of the Persian mentality. Remember the Persian’s were constantly trying to expand their vast empire. By this time they had expanded their authority yet again into the realm in which the Jews had attained some amount of success Egypt.
The story of the Exodus from Egypt corresponds, interestingly enough, with the creation of the Chassidim and the kosher diet. The metaphorical wandering for 40 years in the wilderness was a metaphor for purging themselves from the Mizraim, the people that were more interested in the “nations” than in the Jewish identity, to preserve their identity as separate from this once more expanding empire.
It wasn’t bad enough that the Jewish people kept on being conquered by the Persians every time they were conquered by the Persians they were dragged back to Persian and “re-educated” or brainwashed back into the Persian mentality. After the collapse of the Temple of Solomon, once again the Jews were dragged back to Persia and re-indoctrinated once again.
JESUS EVOLVES JUDAISM
Matthew 10:15 These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: “Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans….
Samaritans say that their worship is the true religion of the ancient Israelites prior to theBabylonian Exile, preserved by those who remained in the Land of Israel, as opposed to Judaism, which they say is a related but altered and amended religion, brought back by those returning from the Babylonian exile. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samaritans
ENTER MOHAMMED THE VIOLENT, ILLITERATE, CHILD RAPIST
In Salman Rushdie’s book, the Satanic verses, he frames Mohammed as a religious zealot who considers himself as carrying on the Guru lineage of Jesus Christ, but as he goes from aghora to aghora debating with the philosophers in the market places he is routinely humiliated and falsified, as he should be. What Mohammed did is he undid all of the evolution that religion had succeeded in, taking it back to the worst of times, before Jesus, before Moses, and before even Abraham.
Due to the rhetorical tautologies in the Unholy Quran it predisposes itself to the most violent and stupid interpretation.
According to AFP, the ISIS leader told worshippers at the mosque: “I am the wali (leader) who presides over you, though I am not the best of you, so if you see that I am right, assist me.
“If you see that I am wrong, advise me and put me on the right track, and obey me as long as I obey God in you.”
Muslims are the fastest growing population of the stupidest and most violent people on earth. Their very life style is based on spreading Islam all over the face of the earth and eradicating any person that will not submit to Allah under threat of violence. They have re-instituted a priest class which has not been seen for thousands of years. Which is to say, Saudi Arabia, translates fewer books into Arabic than anybody else IN THE WORLD including Greece which translates more books than they do and being in control of much fewere people. Not only that the majority of Muslims are illiterate which means their priest class tells them what to think, what to feel, and what to do. In their religion they are allowed to rape women and then stone those women for being prostitutes and women of ill repute especially if those women are foreign. Although, they have at times raped young Muslim women and them told them they can be stoned to death or martyr themselves by blowing up infidels and thereby have their honor restored. Some stupid western women say, “but not all Muslims are bad, I have had sex with a Muslim man.” Well guess what, there is no law in Islam about how many sharmouta (whores) a man can sleep with, but, just see what happens when a Western non-Muslim man has sex with a woman of Muslim descent.
RHETORICAL TAUTOLOGIES IN ISLAM
Islam is a religion that is spread by violence, anybody who will not convert is an infidel and that is punishable by death.
Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing…
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)”
Quran (3:56) – “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”
Quran (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”.
Quran (4:89) – “They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”
Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”
ISLAM THE WAR CULT
Sharia law is essentially martial law applied to a civilian population, that is why they don’t distinguish between military or civilian targets. Sharia is also the purest form of Islam. Islam is in a constant state of Jihad holy war intent on spreading Islam, all Muslims are combatants. Muslims are taught to always be spreading and furthering Islam’s message by any and all means. Taqu
iyya is the act of spreading or protecting Islam by lying or concealing the truth. There is another term, which I can’t remember, that essentially means retreat, but what it actually means is resting to gain strength for more jihad later. Also, Islam has no problem with genocide and torture.
Since, Islam is against Western society and America it is only fair that Islam not be granted equality to other religions in the west. Islam is not tolerant of other cultures or religions, they persecute every religion that is not Muslim, Hindus, B’hai, Yazidis, Buddhists, Christians, Jews, all of them, they are even in a state of perpetual civil war with themselves.
Ever since the violent revolution inside Islam orchestrated by Ibn Tumart in which they killed off all of the intelligent people and the artists, Islam has never been the same. You can read the article I wrote here. (https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2014/06/08/islam-will-not-change/) What is happening now is the re-Conquest of the Muslim world by the stupidest and most violent Muslims. Muslims are contemptuous of other peoples art, which is forbidden in their world because images of humans or animals or anything but artistically rendered letters is an act of idolatry. That is why they blew up the Buddhas that were carved out of the mountains.
Well, I can’t make my position any clearer than that. Treating another group of people as they treat you is not prejudice, it is justice, turnabout is fair play.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_ad_bellum#Just_cause.2F_Right_intention)
VVV—IMAM CALLS FOR GENOCIDE OF HINDUS AND BUDDHISTS—VVV
ANOTHER ARTICLE I WROTE SHOWING THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WESTERN AND EASTERN CULTURE—VVV
Old Persian Saying: “It only takes one stray dog to ruin the saffron water for a whole village.”
“Salahuddin mosque are bracing for protests today (Sept 14) as part of “Walk Your Dog in Front of a Mosque Day.”
The event is being organized by supporters of a man who claims Muslim protestors kicked his English mastiff, Cupcake, during an anti-Israel rally last month.
While claiming that they wanted to draw attention to Muslim attitudes toward dogs, the organizers’ Facebook page is replete with hostilities. One man wrote that he would throw protestors into a “lake of fire” and shoot their dogs, and the event has been promoted on a white supremacist website,.” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/15/islam-on-dogs-can-you-be-_n_1885580.html
According to Islaamic Sharee’ah, it is not permitted to keep a dog except within narrowly-defined limits, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) explained: “Whoever keeps a dog, his good deeds will decrease every day by one qeeraat (a unit of measurement), unless it is a dog for farming or herding.” According to another report: “. . . unless it is a dog for herding sheep, farming or hunting.” (Reported by al-Bukhaari, al-Fath, 2322)
Dogs are extremely naajis (impure, unclean). The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “If a dog drinks from the vessel of any one of you, let him wash it seven times” (reported by Muslim, no. 279). According to another report: “. . . and clean it the eighth time with earth.” (Saheeh Muslim, no. 280).
It is forbidden in Islaam to sell a dog and to receive payment for it, as is reported in Saheeh al-Bukhaari from Abu Mas’oud al-Ansaari: the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) forbade (accepting) the price of a dog. (al-Fath, no. 2237)
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) told us not to resemble dogs by placing our forearms on the ground during sujood (prostration), as in reported in the hadeeth narrated by Anas ibn Maalik, according to which the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Do sujood properly; none of you should spread his forearms like a dog does.” (al-Bukhaari, Fath, no. 822).
Whoever keeps a dog in his house is denied the blessing of the angels’ presence in his house, as the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog.” (Reported by al-Bukhaari, 3225). https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081223090814AAKGBdK
Muhammad made strange and harsh statements about dogs and these edicts affect dogs in a tragic way. His teachings may have come from cultural bias, Pagan concepts, or his own imagination, but wherever they came from they led to the cruel treatment of dogs.
None of the statements regarding dogs are found in the Quran but they abound in the various collections of traditions (hadith). These traditions are a primary foundation of Islamic theology and are the basis of many Islamic laws. They render dogs as “impure” and worse. Per Muhammad’s orders most dogs were to be killed and all dogs of a specific color (black) had to be killed.
Muhammad claimed to be a prophet of God and as such his word was to be obeyed. With the teeth of Islam biting worldwide it is vital that Muhammad’s teachings be scrutinized to determine if he were a nut or a prophet. http://www.answering-islam.org/Silas/dogs.htm
Shaytan as a “whisperer”
In Islamic theology, Shaytan and his minions are “whisperers,” who whisper into the chests of men and women, urging them to commit sin. This is where the desire to sin comes from, according to Islam.
They are from both men and jinn.
The Quran provides a supplication for mankind, aimed at fighting the tempting of Satan and his minions:
Say: I seek refuge with the Lord and Cherisher of Mankind,
The King (or Ruler) of Mankind,
The God (or judge) of Mankind,-
From the mischief of the Whisperer (of Evil), who withdraws (after his whisper),-
(The same) who whispers into the hearts of Mankind,-
Among Jinn and among men.
JEWISH ATTITUDES TOWARDS DOGS
It is important to remember that the Jewish people repeatedly escaped from the Persians and were repeatedly recaptured and re-educated by the Persians.
Jewish people are very good at concealing the fact that dogs are not part of the definition but they are a part of the connotation, this is known and concealed.
“But he kept telling her, “First let the children be filled. It is not right to take the children’s bread and throw it to the puppies.” Mark 7:27
Jesus here uses the term “little dogs” to lessen the insult to the gentiles.
DOGS IN THE HINDU RELIGION
Dogs have a major religious significance among the Hindus in Nepal also in India particularly in Mithlanchal, North Bengal and Sikkim. The dogs are worshipped as a part of a five-day Tihar festival that falls roughly in November every year. In Hinduism, it is believed that dogs guard the doors of Heaven and Hell. This is a day when the dog is worshipped by applying tika (the holy vermilion dot), incense sticks and garlanded generally with marigold flower.Sarama, the female dog of the gods, is described as the mother of all dogs.
The dog (Shvan) is also the vahana or mount of the Hindu god Bhairava. Yudhisthira had approached heaven with his dog, therefore among many Hindus, the common belief exists that caring for dogs can also pave way to heaven. ~WIKIPEDIA
REMEMBER TO THAT THERE WAS A BLACK DOG CULT OF INDIA ABOUT WHICH STILL LITTLE IS KNOWN.
“Anubis (/əˈnuːbəs/ or /əˈnjuːbəs/; Ancient Greek: Ἄνουβις) is the Greek name for a jackal-headed godassociated with mummification and the afterlife in ancient Egyptian religion. According to the Akkadian transcription in the Amarna letters, Anubis’ name was vocalized in Egyptian as Anapa. The oldest known mention of Anubis is in theOld Kingdom pyramid texts, where he is associated with the burial of the pharaoh. At this time, Anubis was the most important god of the dead but he was replaced during the Middle Kingdom by Osiris.
He takes names in connection with his funerary role, such as He who is upon his mountain, which underscores his importance as a protector of the deceased and their tombs,” ~wikipedia
IN ANCIENT GREECE
Origin of the Cynic name ~WIKIPEDIA
The name Cynic derives from Ancient Greek κυνικός (kynikos), meaning “dog-like”, and κύων (kyôn), meaning “dog” (genitive: kynos). One explanation offered in ancient times for why the Cynics were called dogs was because the first Cynic, Antisthenes, taught in the Cynosarges gymnasium at Athens. The word Cynosargesmeans the place of the white dog. It seems certain, however, that the word dog was also thrown at the first Cynics as an insult for their shameless rejection of conventional manners, and their decision to live on the streets. Diogenes, in particular, was referred to as the Dog, a distinction he seems to have revelled in, stating that “other dogs bite their enemies, I bite my friends to save them.” Later Cynics also sought to turn the word to their advantage, as a later commentator explained:
There are four reasons why the Cynics are so named. First because of the indifference of their way of life, for they make a cult of indifference and, like dogs, eat and make love in public, go barefoot, and sleep in tubs and at crossroads. The second reason is that the dog is a shameless animal, and they make a cult of shamelessness, not as being beneath modesty, but as superior to it. The third reason is that the dog is a good guard, and they guard the tenets of their philosophy. The fourth reason is that the dog is a discriminating animal which can distinguish between its friends and enemies. So do they recognize as friends those who are suited to philosophy, and receive them kindly, while those unfitted they drive away, like dogs, by barking at them.
ATTITUDES ON DOGS IN ROME