You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn’t we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion [Islam] too would have been more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?
I can imagine people being enthusiastic about the paradise of Mohammed, but as for the insipid paradise of the Christians! In your lifetime, you used to hear the music of Richard Wagner. After your death, it will be nothing but hallelujahs, the waving of palms, children of an age for the feeding bottle, and hoary old men. The man of the isles pays homage to the forces of nature. But Christianity is an invention of sick brains: one could imagine nothing more senseless, nor any more indecent way of turning the idea of the Godhead into a mockery. A n***** with his taboos is crushingly superior to the human being who seriously believes in transubstantiation.
Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers -already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the Jews, so gutless a thing Christianity! -then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism [Islam], that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world. Christianity alone prevented them from doing so.
The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death. A slow death has something comforting about it. The dogma of Christianity gets worn away before the advances of science… The instructions of a hygienic nature that most religions gave, contributed to the foundation of organized communities. The precepts ordering people to wash, to avoid certain drinks, to fast at appointed dates, to take exercise, to rise with the sun, to climb to the top of the minaret — all these were obligations invented by intelligent people. The exhortation to fight courageously is also self-explanatory. Observe, by the way, that, as a corollary, the Moslem was promised a paradise peopled with sensual girls, where wine flowed in streams — a real earthly paradise. The Christians, on the other hand, declare themselves satisfied if after their death they are allowed to sing hallelujahs! …Christianity, of course, has reached the peak of absurdity in this respect. And that’s why one day its structure will collapse. Science has already impregnated humanity. Consequently, the more Christianity clings to its dogmas, the quicker it will decline.!
Islam started 1,400 years ago approximately. A close examination of their history and their beliefs reveals that the religion is based on a lie and promotes and protects itself with lies, this is known even to the most astute scholars of Islam. It even says so in their “Holy” scriptures.
Mohammed in his Brilliant Charles Manson-esque insanity, took the mantle of an Abrahamic religion and Hi-jacked the judeo-christian religion. He did this to conceal his people to blend in as was their custom. The Roman Roads allowed the rapid spread of Christianity but they also attracted Highwaymen, Revolutionaries, and Zealots.
Sicarii (Latin plural of Sicarius “dagger-men”, in Modern Hebrew rendered siqariqim סיקריקים) is a term applied, in the decades immediately preceding thedestruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE, to an extremist splinter group of the Jewish Zealots, who attempted to expel the Romans and their partisans from the Roman province of Judea. The Sicarii carried sicae, or small daggers, concealed in their cloaks, hence their name. At public gatherings, they pulled out these daggers to attack Romans or Roman sympathizers, blending into the crowd after the deed to escape detection.
While early Christian Saints were peaceful and non violent being persecuted by Romans, to be Martyred means to die while trying to kill as many others as possible. Islam claims that Jesus was a prophet of Allah but then tells it’s people to Crucify Christians, which they do, I could post examples but I will spare you the gory details.
Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”
Furthermore, Allah is not Jehovah:
TWISTING THE SCRIPTURES
If you observe the way the twist they twist the scriptures it becomes obvious that they are aware of the disparity and their own origins. First of all, they taking the Judeo-Christian Scriptures as their own, claim Adam was the first Muslim. But then they twist the story of Cain and Abel making Cain the Protagonist and the victim of Abel’s psychic powers who after receiving god’s blessing thought that he would kill Cain, and Cain being psychic as he apparently was knew. But that isn’t the end, he also forced Cain with his obvious Mind Control to kill himself, and Cain was very distraught, but Allah forgave him and Cain was eventually able to forgive himself.
Secondly, Abraham didn’t attempt to sacrifice Isaac, but Ishmael, and Muslims are the descendants of Ishmael, how convenient.
On the day of feasting during which Abraham celebrated the weaning of Isaac, Ishmael was “mocking” or “playing with” Isaac (the Hebrew word is ambiguous) and Sarah asked Abraham to expel Ishmael and his mother, saying: “Get rid of that slave woman and her son, for that slave woman’s son will never share in the inheritance with my son Isaac.” This proposition was grievous in Abraham’s sight because of his son and the bondwoman, Hagar. Abraham only agreed when God told him that “for in Isaac your seed shall be called”, and that He would “make a nation of the son of the bondwoman” Ishmael, since he was a descendant of Abraham. (Genesis 21:11–13) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ishmael
It is important to note that according to Moses Maimonides, Ishmael did not share in the blessing of Isaac, and he was nothing special. His blessing was to have a large nation, which means a large amount of ungifted, unspectacular people. In Gematria, the word “exceedingly” has the exact same numerical value as Mohammed. Ishmael was only blessed in numbers nothing else, this is an important distinction.
Also of note is that Muslims are very distraught at the fact that while the Christ is prophesied in the bible Mohammed is not, precisely because the coming of Mohammed was a none event.
SO HOW DID ALL OF THIS HAPPEN?
Well, I believe, in my humble opinion, that when Mohammed was born the Christian religion had been embraced by Rome and the evil and violent Ishmaelite order of Assassins was being exposed and routed. Their HAMAS like tactics of moving where there was a better quality of life and trying to avail themselves of the good things in life while at the same time not embracing those values and trying to force their Sharia Law down everybody else’s throats was failing. Mohammed, realized what was going on, the tide was turning against the fastest growing population of the stupidest and most violent people on earth. So, he created the lie that is Islam to protect his evil brethren. It cemented a type of equality between things that weren’t equal. Just as one group of people that wants to kill all of the Jews is not equal to the Jews wanting to stay alive and worship their god Jehovah.
With their massive inferiority complex, victim complex, and a closeted superiority complex, these people, descendants of Cain and Ishmael, have always wanted and always will want to subjugate or decimate God’s Children. They feel entitled because of their poverty and desolation, which they create wherever their feet land (daesh). Wherever their people go, if their isn’t already a desert, they turn everything into a desert.
“France’s Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said in a statement. “The Arabs call it ‘Daesh’ and I will be calling them the ‘Daesh cutthroats.'”
The name Daesh, according to France24, is a “loose acronym” for “Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant” (al-Dawla al-Islamiya al-Iraq al-Sham). The name is commonly used by enemies of ISIS, and it also has many negative undertones, as Daesh sounds similar to the Arabic words Daes (“one who crushes something underfoot”) and Dahes (“one who sows discord”).
ISLAM IS NOT ABRAHAMIC
“Rabbi Shim’on opened saying,”In the beginning God created (genesis 1:1). This verse calls for contemplation, for anyone claiming that there is another god is extirpated from worlds, as is said: ‘Thus chall you say to them: The gods who did not make heaven and earth shall perish from earth and from under these heavens.'”
This quote from a Hebrew prayer: “God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, protect your beloved people Israel from all hurt, in your love. As the beloved holy Sabbath goes away, that the week, and the month, and the year, should come to us with perfect faith, with faith in the sages, with love and attachment to good friends, to attachment to the blessed Creator, with belief in your thirteen principles of faith, and in the ultimate redemption, may it be soon, and the Resurrection of the dead, and in the prophecy ofMoses, our teacher, may he rest in peace.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_of_Abraham
I don’t think I need to point out that the god of Cain, Ishmael, and Mohammed, is not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob…
Furthermore, it is known in Kabbalah and in the Zohar that “new innovations of Torah are the old way.” What does this mean? It means that the Abrahamic religion was meant to evolve and adapt itself to the times it was not mean to be dogmatic and stagnant. The Abrahamic Law Code was created when the Jews were separating their identity from the evil and violent Persio-Babylonian mentality, and unfortunately they had to adopt some of the war tactics that were being used at the time in order to succeed and survive. But as time went on and things got better this Torah was supposed to evolve into a more enlightened and peaceful and loving interpretation. If you examine the tactics of such terrorist organizations as HAMAS and ISIS what you realize is that they are completely unnecessary and out of date. They don’t go back to Abraham, they go back to before Abraham. They are the embodiment of the mentality and ideology that the Judeo-Christian identity was trying to escape.
In conclusion, Islam is not a religion of peace, and it is not an Abrahamic religion…
Arabic: ومكروا ومكر الله والله خير الماكرين
Transliteration: Wamakaroo wamakara Allahu waAllahu khayru almakireena
Literal: And they cheated/deceived and God cheated/deceived, and God (is) the best (of) the cheaters/deceivers.
Arabic: افامنوا مكر الله فلايامن مكر الله الا القوم الخاسرون
Transliteration: Afaaminoo makra Allahi fala ya/manu makra Allahi illa alqawmu alkhasiroona
Literal: Did they secure God’s scheme/deceit ? So no(one) trusts God’s scheme/deceit except the nation the losers.
According to Kepel, Salafist jihadism combined “respect for the sacred texts in their most literal form, … with an absolute commitment to jihad, whose number-one target had to be America, perceived as the greatest enemy of the faith.”
but even more dangerous was theMuslim Brotherhood, who were believed by Salafi Jihadists to be excessively moderate and lacking in literal interpretation of holy texts. Iyad El-Baghdadi describes Salafism as “deeply divided” into “mainstream (government-approved, or Islahi) Salafism”, and Jihadi Salafism.
According to Mohammed M. Hafez, contemporary jihadi Salafism is characterized by “five features”:
- immense emphasis on the concept of tawhid (unity of God);
- God’s sovereignty (hakimiyyat Allah), which defines right and wrong, good and evil, and which supersedes human reasoning is applicable in all places on earth and at all times, and makes unnecessary and un-Islamic other ideologies such as liberalism or humanism;
- the rejection of all innovation (Bid‘ah) to Islam;
- the permissibility and necessity of takfir (the declaring of a Muslim to be outside the creed, so that they may face execution);
- and on the centrality of jihad against infidel regimes.
Al Franken is a multiple genius. I am not exaggerating. So you know when this Democrat criticizes the President on his handling of Isis that it isn’t without good reason.
“I was troubled by the President’s recent suggestion that the Administration has not yet developed a comprehensive strategy to address the growing threat of ISIL’s activities in Syria,” Franken writes. He adds, “We must act diligently and responsibly to prevent Americans from taking up arms with ISIL, or from reentering our country if they do.”
What is making Democrats and Republicans come together and agree with one another while at the same time disagreeing with the President? Hell, even people like Tom Delay are starting to sound reasonable.
“In defending America against radical Islamic terrorism, Barack Obama cannot be trusted,” DeLay said.
“Barack Obama was raised a Muslim, and he claims he is a Christian, and I can’t say for sure whether he’s a Christian or not, but he has shown over the last few years that he has great sympathies with Islam,” DeLay explained.
“You combine that with Obama’s political orientation that is far to the left,” he continued, “and you get a president who hates war, hates the military, and you have a formula for military inaction when it comes to combating radical Islamic terrorists like we are seeing in ISIS.”
Yesterday I posted a link to an article from richarddawkins.net about Sue Blackmore’s experience at Oxford and how she tried to get the students that came to her lecture to think of a new meme, all they did was think of meme’s that humiliated Christians, when she asked the students to contemplate meme’s that mocked Muslims and Islam 100 stood up and walked out and today I go to look at the same link and it has been data assassinated.
Anyway, I strongly recommend everybody read this article.
Now I look today and the article is back up.
Introducing memes, I asked for volunteers to come up on the stage and invent a new meme. This same young man, called Moritz, was up in a flash, followed by four others. I asked him, at the word ‘go’, to make some simple movements and sounds. ‘One, two, three, Go,’ I said, and he waved one hand around in a circle, chanting ‘In the beginning was the word, and the word ….’. The others then imitated him and that was fun. Three obediently began reciting from the Bible but the fourth threw both arms in the air and declared ‘There’s a big old man in the sky’ and raised a huge laugh and cheer from (some of) the audience. This seemed an opportunity not to be missed so I asked the whole audience, at the word ‘go’, to imitate either of these two new memes, whereupon a great cry burst out of, ‘In the beg…’, ‘There’s an old man …’. Great, I said, we’ve now got two memes, you have just seen meme creation and selection at work.
I explained the idea of religions as memeplexes: they package up a set of doctrines, tell believers to learn them, to pass them on, to have faith and not doubt, and they ensure obedience with fearsome threats and ridiculous promises. This I illustrated with images of Christian heaven and hell. Then I read from the Koran “those that have faith and do good works, Allah will admit them to gardens watered by running streams … pearls and bracelets of gold.” “Garments of fire have been prepared for the unbelievers. They shall be lashed with rods of iron.” More walked out. By the time I arrived at a slide calling religions (Richard’s fault!) ‘Viruses of the mind’, the lecture hall was looking rather empty.