Tag Archives: rabbi baal shivah

Ted Cruz is NOT a Christian.

ted_cruz13.jpg

A CHRISTIAN FOLLOWS THE NEW TESTAMENT NOT THE OLD TESTAMENT.  A CHRISTIAN, BY DEFINITION IS A FOLLOWER OF CHRIST.

“Innovations of New Words of Torah is the Old Way.” the Zohar

There are 3 Torahs,the Abrahamic, the Mosaic and the Messianic.  Moses separated the Waters of Abrahamic Torah from the Mosaic Torah when he weeded out the Jews that clung to Babylon & Egypt, the Mizraim.  That was his Mitzvah.  Jesus is the Greater Moses (Messiah) because he once again separated “The lost children of Israel” from the invasive Babylonian Death Cults that had concealed themselves in their ranks in the form of the Sicarii.  This necessitated the Creation of Islam by Mohammed who claimed to be a Judeo-Christian religion, resurrected the Abrahamic Torah, and claimed he was the last Prophet of God and the Quran abrogated all of the Judeo-Christian Scriptures.  In the Bible they start out violent and are Abrogated by the Peaceful scriptures, the Quran starts out peaceful and is abrogated by Scriptures of Violence. . .

Islam is an Invasive Death Cult, not a Religion.

Al_Gazi__the_assassin_by_hunqwert

“Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans. But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Matthew 10: 5-6)

Samaritan (n.) Look up Samaritan at Dictionary.comOld English, “inhabitant of Samaria,” a district of Palestine, from Late Latin Samaritanus, from Greek Samareia (see Samaria). A non-Hebrew race was settled in its cities by the king of Assyria after the removal of the Israelites from the country. They later adopted some Jewish ways, but largely remained apart.  http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Samaritan

I have written on the subject before but I find it necessary to reiterate. The image of the Good Samaritan has become so reified in the consciousness of Christians.  His goodness has become used to characterize the Samaritans in general as Good, this is called the fundamental attribution error, characterizing things in terms of essences.  Jesus was a Philosopher King and as such he taught High Philosophy, he was a part of the Math Cults created by Pythagoras and he was in the tradition of Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates.  In order to be a carpenter he had to be conversant in Algebra.  Jesus was asked the Question, “Who is my neighbor.” and as was his tradition he answered the question in the form of a parable as was the Jewish Tradition which has Layers of meaning ( Jewish tradition of layered meaning.)

The Samaritans were anything but “Good” they were the ones stoning people to death, they were the ones praying in the streets like the hypocrites, just as Muslims are doing today. ( Samaritans )  The reason Jesus used them for an example is for several reasons, the word used for Neighbor translates to “near” and is a reference to shepherding. ( The Reason Jesus used Shepherding Metaphors ) Jesus taught a Philosophical family and he was using the word Neighbor as though it were the word Brother as in Philia, Philoish, or Philosophy ( Philia Sophia, Platonic Love of Wisdom).  As every philosopher that is worth his salt knows the exception proves the rule not the exception because it is an exception.  As an exception it is an implicature, inviting scrutiny and contemplation, what was it that made him a brother that should be brought near?

As you can imagine, if you weren’t supposed to step foot in a Samaritan camp you wouldn’t be building your neighborhood for your philosophical family next to theirs.   Now the Sadducee and the Pharisee that passed up the person who had been assaulted and robbed by Highway men were both of the same Torah or philosophy that the Samaritan subscribed to, what was different was his behavior.  He had treated the wounded person as though he were an equal.  He had applied the Golden Rule to the person who was abandoned in his plight.  So a brother is as a brother does, even if he is a Samaritan.

It is also quite likely that among the Samaritans the Jewish Babylonian Zealots known as the Sicarii were living and hiding.  There are 3 law covenants, the Abrahamic Law Covenant, the Mosaic Law Covenant, and the Messianic Law Covenant.  Just as the Muslim Holy day is on Friday, and the Jewish Sabbath is on Saturday, the Christian Holiday is Sunday.  In the same wa,y as the Judeo-Christian religion evolved the grosser more violent elements that tied them to tyrannical Babylon were eliminated.  The people that were the Jews back then are not the people that are the Jews today.  Because the Invasive Babylonian Death Cults could no longer conceal themselves among the Jews, because they were no longer welcome,  Mohammed created Islam and rebranded it as a Judeo-Christian religion, once again trying to blend in with the people he intended to stab in the back.  As the Muslim saying goes, “First comes Saturday, then comes Sunday.”

Remember that the Samaritans were the people that moved into the area and adopted a portion of the Hebrew laws, not all of them, just enough so Yahweh would tolerate their presence.  ( Palestinians are Philistines, Literally.)  Whereas before, the assassins were hiding amongst the Jewish populations, as the Jewish and Gentile population merged and moved farther west now these assassins can only hide amongst their own people.  Only and Idiot like Barack Hussein Obama would knowingly invite them into our midst.

Ancient Mystic Order of Samaritans.

amossticker

Rabbi Ba’al Shivah Reveals the Secret of Nebuchadnezzar’s Dream.

nebuchadnezzar

I’m not going to bother proving every single point, part of this is going to be preliminary research for a “fictional” vignette for Shivastus Solomonicus.  Many of you know that I am rather gifted at kabbalah, and an expert on Jewish Exegesis among some of my other talents.  So it would not behoove me to explain everything to novitiates.  I’m going to talk to the people that at least know something.  It had never really piqued my interests before but recently I have been studying Pythagoras, and realized how much of an influence he had on Plato.  What we know about Plato is actually completely inextricable from what we know about Pythagoras.  We literally can’t tell where one ends and the other begins.  We don’t know why Pythagoras broke his own vows of secrecy in order to teach Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates so many of the highest level initiatory secrets.  Did they have their own secret society outside of the Pythagorean math cults?

Of further interest is that we see none of the layered meaning and nuanced coded sophistry that we see in the Old and New Testament in the Quran or the Hadith.  While it attempts to mimic the verbiage and typography it is completely flat and one dimensional, given to a single understanding and meaning.  The Quran and Hadith are obviously the work of a different inferior perspective.  Whoever wrote them have no understanding of the Jewish practice of imbedding layered meaning into text through the practice of PaRDeS a phonetic homage to paradise.  To understand is to be in the Promised Land.

There is no doubt in my mind that the people that wrote the bible possessed the secrets for creating the major civilizations that were “blessed by God” in the form of their becoming World Powers at one time or another.  For the math cults every mathematical formula was a name of god which you didn’t earn the right to hear until you had passed psychological and moral tests.  You were in fact always being tested.  You were never allowed to speak a name of god to one who hadn’t earned the right to hear it.  The bible was written as a secret history for these people who were constantly running west away from the tyrannical people that would steal their secrets and destroy them.

Now I actually stumbled on this information when I was researching a quote by Plato: “Dictatorship naturally arises out of democracy, and the most aggravated form of tyranny and slavery out of the most extreme liberty.”   It just so happens that it comes from a part of the Republic in which he was discussing the 5 Regimes that signal the Cycles of Decline of a Civilization.  According to Plato the most ideal form of Government was the Aristocracy with the Philosopher King as Ruler.  After a certain period of time had elapsed and a certain number of mistakes had been made this would lead to a degradation of Government and ruler ship into the form of “Timocracy” ruled by a Warrior King.  So we started with Solomon and we Devolved into David, what we see immediately is that the Judeo-Christian religion was interested in reversing the process of decay.

A timocracy (timē, “price, worth” and -κρατία -kratia, “rule”)[1] is a state where only property owners may participate in government. The more extreme forms of timocracy, where power derives entirely from wealth with no regard for social or civic responsibility, may shift in their form and become a plutocracy where the wealthy and powerful use their power to entrench their wealth.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timocracy

Which again would devolve into Oligarchy, or ruling families.  In this Regime the middle class is gone and you have the haves and the have nots.  There are no Military Victories & wealth is squandered and lost.  Will Durant once said that Oligarchies are created when rulers give relatives they are financially supporting positions of authority so they don’t have to financially support them anymore.  Knowing why they received the position they make no effort to execute the office faithfully.  Instead they leach as much money out of the people as they can with taxation and don’t make their lives better.  Wise but poor people have no voice and no influence for the better on the government.  That form of rule then devolves into Democracy.

Democracy is a very bad word for Plato.  There is to much variety and no virtue, the masses are ruled by their passions.  The least desirable element of society breeds and rapidly grows.  They are literally breeding violence and ignorance.  This then evolves into Tyranny.

Under tyranny nobody has any discipline, self-restraint, intelligence or wisdom.  It is complete anarchy, people are lawless, and godless.  There is only violence.  The Tyrant king must kill many people in order to maintain order and prevent himself from being deposed and killed.

You will notice the close correlation between the Dream of Nebuchadnezzar and Plato’s 5 regimes.  What I have just expounded is the true meaning of the dream.  This pattern seems to repeat not only throughout history but in the actual history of a single government.  It is an emergent property that seems to work like a fractal.  Not only did it start at the beginning of civilization it also happens in the life cycle of a Nation.  Plato made reference to a specific number which he didn’t overtly name known as the Number of Man that governs the cycle.  He mentioned a number, which I believe is the actual number at another time 216.  There are several ways of arriving at this number that connect to many of Plato’s theories, but perhaps the most interesting to me is multiplying the number 6 x 6 x 6.  Also of interest is the fact that in 2002 the United States of America turned 216 years old.

I am one of those that believes that the ancients did possess Wisdom and Secret knowledge that we have lost or forgotten.  Even if the numbers aren’t right that doesn’t mean that the psychology is wrong but only time will tell.  What I do know is that Kabbalists were obsessed with gematria just as were the early philosophers and Pythagoras.  The Monadists of which Pythagoras was one believed that the universe was generated by numbers.  He said something I can’t find right now that associated name and number, suggesting that number was greater than name because it actually created the thing.  Remember Adam in the garden of Eden naming all the animals, (binomial nomenclature) as God Numbered them?

A Fated Meeting, Rabbi Ba’al Shivah

lon milo duquette

The Chicken Qabalah was not the first book I had read on the subject.  Still when I read it it spoke to me in a unique voice.  At that time I was communing with Yeshivel who was teaching me the Sephyr Yeshivel.  Yeshivel is a curious entity, his soul energy is that of Jesus and Shiva but it is not all of Shiva’s energy and it is not the Jesus that people think existed.  He is very gentle and very soft spoken.  As I would read he would speak to me in my thoughts and emotions.

I remember reading the explanation of how Ain sof poured itself into Chockmah first and then it flowed into Binah.  Yeshivel had already taught me that Godself had made the universe by separating godself in the form of No Thingness into matter and energy simultaneously, so I immediately, violently, reacted.

wrong

Maybe Twenty years later I found myself living in Aliso Viejo California.  I started getting into painting and one of my first paintings was created with the intention that I would give it to a Chassidic Rabbi to explain for him a mystery that he didn’t understand.  I impregnated the painting with that intention.  At that time I had no idea who the rabbi might be.

564620_141011412707498_1149441917_n

About seven years later I started having some bizarre experiences, spiritual experiences.  It started around the 4th of july 2013.  My soul energy was being activated by my higher self for the work I was preparing to do.  I was receiving my calling.  I was attempting to create a spiritual revival a spiritual revolution.  Much like Jesus, my trials were now at hand.

moses maimonides

A girl that I had worked with at Whole Foods found out some of the stuff that I was interested in and told me that her step father knew some stuff about that.  I met him and came to find out he was personal friends of Lon Milo Duquette, who lived near by and who had a little class every Monday at his house as he had been doing for years.  At our first meeting I brought him the painting having realized that things had come full circle. I also brought my copy of the Chicken Qabalah which he signed for me.

chicken qabalah

I attended that class for several months as we studied the occult literature of Aleister Crowley and the implications of his work.  Lon was of high rank in the O.T.O. I repeatedly pointed out the allusions to Hindu Philosophy that for some reason Crowley had mostly left out of the explanations but which were recurring themes in his visionary poetry.  I became worried that my presence was causing a disturbance with some of Lon’s other students whom he had known for a longer time.  I started coming less frequently.

At the last few meetings Lon started teaching us about his true love.  Enochian Vision magick, of which Lon is probably the foremost expert in the world.

lon

Lon was very proud of these tablets that he had made years before and he happily trotted them out.  We eventually did some scrying in the Enochian Planes.  The first one was rather uneventful for me.  I started to have some experiences like I was going into trance and then there was silence, and then a voice spoke to me, “they are afraid of you because of who you are.”  Constance found this very, very interesting.

The next heaven that we scryed was Air of Air. That one was a lot more eventful.  I saw an image of swords crossed up and down, and then a sword in a hand raised that was in a stained glass window.  This vision occurred right after the government shut down and before I was asked to decode the symbolism of the dove attack of pope Francis.

Click here for my prediction as to whether this would be a year of peace or not.

What it meant to me was that the heavens were embroiled in a battle.  In which no compromise was possible because they were completely at odds with one another.  This was a big, serious, deal.  An astral event.  And it needed a veritable Alexander to cut the Gordion knot.  As a High Level Astral Initiate, I have never sworn a vow to any Secret Society and I come upon my knowledge through the power of my own abilities and those spiritual agencies and entities that aid me.  So nobody had the right to punish me for giving away secrets that I came upon with my own psychic abilities.

Frensham . March 2011 162

At this point it had become very obvious to me that I was having an adverse affect on the other people attending Lon’s meetings.  I stopped coming all together but I would send an emissary to bring gifts for Lon.  I felt that his students weren’t properly appreciating him as the guru he rightly was.  Most of them were interested in him doing stuff for them and trying to increase their own prestige by knowing him.  I wanted to set a good example for how one was supposed to treat a guru.  Also I was at a point where I could attend his classes in spirit without physically being present and I needed to hear myself think.  I was entering a spiritual phase known as the Curse of the Magus. I was listening to the Astral planes and I wasn’t liking what I was hearing.  I needed to be completely focused.

I had heard that Lon was starting a series of trips to China to promote his writings.  There was a plane that had mysteriously  disappeared in that area everybody was speculating where it was and what had happened to it.  I became very concerned sensing a convergence in possible time lines.  I decided to go to one of Lon’s meetings.  He was very surprised to see me as was Constance.  The topic of the missing airliner came up lightly and we speculated on what had happened to it.  I through out a response as a test.  Lon nodded his head that was a possibility.  I told him, “Don’t say that.”  We were throwing the I Ching to see what would happen on Lon’s trip.  With maybe 15 people in the class the same answers came up over and over again.  Lon would have to be very careful and he might get stuck in China for the rest of his life.  It was not a good reading.

Lon did return without event and he offered this explanation.  The people were very concerned about the missing Jet, and the topic came up almost immediately, he had remembered the conversation that we had and he didn’t speculate on what had happened to the air craft, which was completely out of character for him and against his nature, but he was very conscious and prepared and with a perfect poker face, he said he thought it was in the water.

At a later time Lon wanted to appreciate his students by doing readings on them.  I wasn’t physically present but my student at the time was so he did one for me in spirit.  Lon was astounded, he had never seen that many face cards in a single reading.  I knew the reading was legit because when I get an authentic reading this card always shows up to symbolize me.

The-Sun9

Lon had a premonition before the last card came up.  He said, “this better not be the card I think it is.”  and then he said, “Oh, my God!”

RWS_Tarot_15_Devil

lon milo duquett

Origins of Western Philosophy, Rabbi Ba’al Shivah

A huge help in putting together my theories was the work of Okko Behrends.  What I do is I look for the movement of ideas, words, philosophies, processes, practices (praxis) from one culture to another over time.  These create rhetorical tautologies or identical patterns.  Some cultures adopt and keep those patterns because of an affinity and others do not.

Frankly I think that the Augur’s of Pre-Greek Minoan cult were originally from India and in India I believe they were called the Aghori.

The Aghori (Sanskrit: अघोरaghōra)[2] are asceticShaivasadhus.

The Aghori in Shaivism.

The Aghori are known to engage in post-mortem rituals. They often dwell in charnel grounds, have been witnessed smearing cremationashes on their bodies, and have been known to use bones from human corpses for crafting skull bowls (which Shiva and other Hindu deities are often iconically depicted holding or using) and jewelry. Due to their practices that are contradictory to orthodox Hinduism, they are generally opposed.[3][4]

Many Aghori gurus command great reverence from rural populations as they are supposed to possess healing powers gained through their intensely eremitic rites and practices of renunciation and tápasya. They are also known to meditate and perform worship in haunted houses.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aghori

8 minutes in Behrend’s defines Auctoritatus as a form of authority not based on force but based on reason, what I refer to as Sapiential Authority.

In ancient Rome, Auctoritas referred to the general level of prestige a person had in Roman society, and, as a consequence, his clout, influence, and ability to rally support around his will. Auctoritas was not merely political, however; it had a numinous content and symbolized the mysterious “power of command” of heroic Roman figures.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auctoritas#Auctoritas_principis

28When Jesus had finished saying these things, the crowds were amazed at his teaching, 29because he taught as one who had authority, and not as their teachers of the law.  Matthew 7

cicero

44 minutes okko quotes cicero

Auctoritas is determined by it’s good results and it’s success and by the merit of reason.  The High priest of the Augure’s didn’t create the law, he didn’t manufacture it, he expounded the law that already existed in the universe the Law that governed success.  They were readers of omens, signs, and portents.

The augur was a priest and official in the classical world, especially ancient Rome and Etruria. His main role was the practice of augury, interpreting the will of the gods by studying the flight of birds: whether they are flying in groups or alone, what noises they make as they fly, direction of flight and what kind of birds they are. This was known as “taking the auspices.” The ceremony and function of the augur was central to any major undertaking in Roman society—public or private—including matters of war, commerce, and religion.

The Roman historian Livy stresses the importance of the augurs: “Who does not know that this city was founded only after taking the auspices, that everything in war and in peace, at home and abroad, was done only after taking the auspices?”[1]  

augur

It was also antithetical to tyranny. At 14 minutes tyranny = kingship.  The Augur, much like the president is supposed to be, (I am glaring at you Obama) is not above the law, they are also under the law.  This isn’t from Okko Behrends, but notice how to Remus was not chosen as the first king of Rome because he lived on Aventine hill which was full of “inauspicious birds”.  The reason the birds were present was because Aventine hill was used for the disposal of garbage and dead bodies, remember if you will that the Aghori also live in grave yards.

Roman augurs were part of a collegium of priests who shared the duties and responsibilities of the position. At the foundation of the Republic in 510 BC, the patricians held sole claim to this office.

Augury sought the divine will regarding any proposed course of action which might affect Rome’s pax, fortuna and salus (peace, good fortune and wellbeing).[2] Political, military and civil actions were sanctioned by augury, historically performed by priests of the college of augurs and by haruspices on behalf of senior magistrates.

According to Cicero, the auctoritas of ius augurum included the right to adjourn and overturn the process of law: consular election could be – and was – rendered invalid by inaugural error. For Cicero, this made the augur the most powerful authority in the Republic.

In ancient Rome the auguria were considered to be in equilibrium with the sacra (“sacred things” or “rites”) and were not the only way by which the gods made their will known. The augures publici (public augurs) concerned themselves only with matters related to the state.

The jus augurale (augural law) was rigorously secret, therefore very little about the technical aspects of ceremonies and rituals has been recorded.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augur

Shiva Shakti - Maha Shivratri

If you examine the Vigyan Bhairav Tantra you will find that the deep intimate conversation between Shiva and Shakti about the nature of reality becomes the basis of philosophical and scientific reasoning.  It became the Sohbet of Rumi and Shams and before that it was the intimate conversations that Jesus had with his disciples and before that it was the discussion of the Rabbi’s discussing Torah, or the law of the universe among themselves.

bywax

This became the Parrhesia of the ancient Greeks:

Reason is the capacity for consciously making sense of things, applying logic, establishing and verifying facts, and changing or justifying practices, institutions, andbeliefs based on new or existing information.[1] It is closely associated with such characteristically human activities as philosophy, science, language, mathematics, and art, and is normally considered[by whom?] to be a definitive characteristic of human nature.[2] The concept of reason is sometimes referred to as rationality and sometimes as discursive reason, in opposition to intuitive reason.[3]

The field of logic studies ways in which human beings reason through argument.[6]

  • The original Greek term was “λόγος”logos, the root of the modern English word “logic” but also a word which could mean for example “speech” or “explanation” or an “account” (of money handled).[7]
  • As a philosophical term logos was translated in its non-linguistic senses in Latin as ratio. This was originally not just a translation used for philosophy, but was also commonly a translation for logos in the sense of an account of money.[8]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason

In rhetoric, parrhesia is a figure of speech described as: to speak candidly or to ask forgiveness for so speaking.[1] There are three different forms of parrhesia. Parrhesia is its nominal form, is translated from Latin to English meaning “free speech”. Parrhesiazomai in its verbal form is to use parrhesia, and parrhesiastes is the one who uses parrhesia for example “one who speaks the truth”. [2] The term parrhesia first appears in Greek literature in Euripides and can be found and used in ancient Greek texts all throughout the end of the fourth century and during fifth century A.D. [3] The term is borrowed from the Greek παρρησία (πᾶν “all” and ῥῆσις “utterance, speech”) meaning literally “to speak everything” and by extension “to speak freely,” “to speak boldly,” or “boldness.” It implies not only freedom of speech, but the obligation to speak the truth for the common good, even at personal risk.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parrhesia

and that became the sciences, the logy’s, or the logic of, teleology, biology, psychology, ecology, geology, etc.  Each logy would have a guru or teacher that specialized in that subject.  The entire western civilization evolved out of this process as well as the Western brain and the way western people think in general.  Our separation of powers, our checks and balances in the government, our sense of propriety, all of them came from the same place.

27 minutes: The name Augustus was chosen by Octavian chose the name Augustus the name of the High Priest of the Augure’s instead of the name Romulus the first king of Rome, he chose between the two names.

‘In my sixth and seventh consulships [28-27 BC], after I had extinguished civil wars, and at a time when with universal consent I was in complete control of affairs, I transferred the republic from my power to the dominion of the senate and people of Rome…After this time I excelled all in influence [auctoritas], although I possessed no more official power [potestas] than others who were my colleagues in the several magistracies.’ (Res Gestae Divi Augusti 34.1-3)[[1]]

46 minutes, the separation of powers, the leader can assume command of the military upon leaving the polis, but upon entering the polis must relinquish control of the millitary, (a legitimate leader must never use the military against his people).

Compare that with what President Obama recently did, is he giving power back to the people of the united states?  Is he more like Augustus or Julius Caesar?

In the exact sense, a tyrant is an individual who arrogates to himself the royal authority without having a right to it. This is how the Greeks understood the word ‘tyrant’: they applied it indifferently to good and bad princes whose authority was not legitimate. [Rousseau, “The Social Contract”]  http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=tyrant

In a commentary of Oedipus I once read the author argued that Oedipus Rex should rightly have been called Oedipus Tyrannous because the original term didn’t have a negative meaning, it just meant popular ruler, Julius Caesar was very popular, he also was a usurper of the law.

PREEMPTIVE ARGUMENTS FOR THE HATERS

image0091

You are about to use the moving the goal fallacy with yourself as the goal and we are going to have an argument of infinite regress where you refuse to believe what I have just told you no matter how often I support it with facts.  You are not a linguisitic philosopher, an analytical philosopher or a philologist, I am.  Moreover, I am correct.

hamsa-temporary-tattoo

The Symbols above is known as the hamsa, it originated in India and was associated with the Jains, who were the Janis mentioned in the story of Moses.  The name comes from the Hindu concept of Harmlessness known as Ahimsa, notice the similar phonology?

Ahimsa (Sanskrit: अहिंसा; IAST: ahiṃsā, Pāli:[1]avihiṃsā) is a term meaning ‘not to injure’. The word is derived from the Sanskrit root hiṃs – to strike; hiṃsā is injury or harm, a-hiṃsā is the opposite of this, i.e. cause no injury, do no harm.[2][3] Ahimsa is also referred to as nonviolence, and it applies to all living beings – including all animals – according to many Indian religions.[4]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahimsa

The word itself derives from So Ham the inbreaths and outbreaths of Brahma if you are familiar with my work you know that I believe that Abraham and Brahma are one and the same, I am not the first or the only person who believes this.

Soham (सो ऽहम्so ‘ham[1]) is the Sanskrit for “I am He/That”. (See also: Tat Tvam Asi.)

When it applies to a person’s name, according to Vedic philosophy it means identifying oneself with the universe or ultimate reality. Some say that when a child is born it cries Koham-Koham which means Who am I? That is when the universe replies back Soham. You are the same as I am. It also stems from the Sanskrit word which means, “self pride.”

I am

“May [God] bless the lads, and let them carry my name, along with the name of my fathers, Abraham and Isaac. May they increase like fish in the land.” (Gen. 48:16)

The Talmud (Berachot 55b) explains that Joseph shared a special quality with fish:

“The fish in the waters are concealed by the water, and thus not susceptible to the Evil Eye. So too, the descendants of Joseph are not susceptible to the Evil Eye.” http://ravkooktorah.org/VAYEHI59.htm

Kabbalists such as myself know that “water” is a metaphor for Torah which is synonymous with the law of the Universe that is studied by rabbis, and augurs, and expounded.  Fish live in the water, so this zen like koan, which is so paradoxical is saying that the philosophers, the rational people need to be increased.  It is these philosophers who are protected from the evil eye.

The nounkohen is used in the Torah to refer to priests, both Jewish and non-Jewish, such as the Jewish nation as a whole,[1] as well as the priests (Hebrewkohanim) of Baal (2 Kings 10:19).

The Hebrew noun kohen is most often translated as “priest”, whether Jewish or pagan, such as the priests of Baal or Dagon, though Christian priests are referred to in Hebrew by the term komer (Hebrew כומר). The word derives from a Semitic root common, at minimum, to the Central Semitic languages; the cognateArabic wordكاهنkāhin means “soothsayer, augur, or priest“.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kohen

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

OK ONE LAST SECRET

untitled

The Origins of Rock and Roll, Rabbi Ba’al Shiva

devil-horns-metal

For those of you familiar with my research on the movement of ideas, Philology, through time and across countries this will not come as a surprise to you or as a deviation from my regular narrative. For those of you reading this for the first time it will sound like I am making this up.  I am not.

image009

Not only am I a Cohanim Rabbi, I am also a Jnana Guru, to those non-initiates that don’t understand the occult philosophy behind religion they will not understand how those things cannot be mutually exclusive, they also won’t understand how I can think of myself as a Buddhist and a Christian mystic, and at the same time, in some ways, a Satanist.  The answer is simple, I understand the Religions, their origins and their philosophies and I can be all of them at the same time and defend my positions in rational debate with evidence and reason.

There  are no good definitions for this available, Transgressive Sacrality is a ritual practice of non-conformity used in the Aghori Shaivist community who smoke massive amounts of weed and meditate in grave yards.

ash

The practice is for removing unwarranted feelings of superiority known as vidya, or division.  Avidya is the goal, and this practice is prescribed for the curing of puritannically obsessive mentalities, that presuppose cleanliness as a virtue and a mark of superiority.  Practices vary from drinking one’s own urine, eating feces, or consuming small portions of a corpse.

The reason you won’t find any accurate descriptions is because of a natural instinct in religions in an effort to protect their authority and to make themselves look good, the conceal the truth, and reveal themselves in a way in which they look better than they actually are.

untitled1

For me the trail of this tradition is obvious and plain.  I see the evidence of it moving from here to there throughout time.  It is no mystery for me.  This satanic impulse of rebellion is how Evolution protects life on earth, through diversification, not through homogenization.  If you observe the obsessively compulsive nature’s of people’s that have a puritanical fetish, you realize that an aseptic environment is also a dead environment, look at the lack of creativity and art in the Muslim community, their hatred and contempt of the Creative intelligence of others and their down right lack of intelligence as a group.  http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2012/10/20/islamabad-freelance-columnist-800-million-muslims-out-of-1-4-billion-are-illiterate/

It is not commonly known that there are texts that show that Rabbi’s were supposed to practice Qabalah at 12:00 at night, the same time that one starts practicing black magick.

The worship of intelligence, of the God of Reason is the hidden subject.  I am going to go out on a limb here and trace this tradition right up to the present, this might not make any sense to you and you might not believe me, but I have trained myself to recognize rhetorical tautologies and to be able to know things about people and groups of people based on their narrative.

So here goes, nothing.

i-love-lucy-tv-history

I love Lucy is code for I love Lucifer, which means to carry light, it essentially means I love light, it is significant also that she has red hair and blue eyes.

Paramount Studios and RKO Studios were built on the back half of the original cemetery grounds, where they still stand today (RKO became Desilu Studios, owned by Desi Arnaz—I Love Lucy was shot there, along with the original Star Trekseries, before Lucy and Desi sold out to sprawling neighbor Paramount in the late 1960s).  http://freemasonsfordummies.blogspot.com/2010/04/hollywoods-most-unusual-masonic-lodge.html

Desilu productions is associated with Viacom which owns Comedy central.

Colbert Devil Horns GIF

A few of you might have noticed the poor reception of Anthony Jesilnik and his sucky show and brand of humor.  He was not well liked or respected by the rest of the comedians on Comedy Central, why? Because he was an invasive shill for Sumner Redstone, who I wrote about in Secret Society Wars IV.  He was promoted as and I quote THE DARK PRINCE OF COMEDY.  http://www.npr.org/2014/08/14/340113255/anthony-jeselnik-the-dark-prince-of-comedy

jeselnik-horizontal---resized_wide-cf8f8df3802f4ba67aeb6c6b8e3f3f17f6f5398d-s4-c85

Well that is all the time I have today to kick some light.  I hope you all found that entertaining.  You might think I am an idiot, but you would be wrong, here are some related articles.

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2014/09/07/who-really-was-jesus-rabbi-baal-shiva/

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2014/08/19/secret-society-wars-iv-what-is-really-going-on/

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/rabbi-baal-shivah-the-hindu-hebrew-connection/

Rabbi Ba’al Shivah, the reason Muslims are not descendants of Adam.

1360_muslim_adam_eve

Muslim’s claim descent from Adam, as a matter of fact they claim to be the original man and the conceit of being the perfect man.  This informs their belief that they are a type of royalty, even though they are the most illiterate group of people on their planet.  From their perspective everything and everyone is under their authority and subject to their judgment and punishment. They are the original, the final, and the only cause of the good and everything they do is good because they are the one’s doing it.  You can manufacture this manner of stupidity when you have an illiterate people who can’t read themselves, and is told what to do, think and feel by a very small priest class.  It is difficult to not be flippant on this subject or respectful even because it is so, so, stupid.  Let’s examine. . . 

Âdam ( Arabic: آدمtranslit.: ʾĀdam, Alternate Spelling: Adem ) is believed to have been the first human being and the first prophet and messenger in Islam.[1] Adam’s role as the father of the human race is looked upon by Muslims with reverence. Muslims also venerate his wife, Eve, as the “mother of mankind”.[2] Muslims see Adam as the first Muslim, as the Qur’an promulgates that all the prophets preached the same faith of submission to God.[3] His story is told in theQur’an in numerous places, though his Qur’anic narrative differs from that in the Torah in some aspects.

According to the Qur’an, God Created humankind out of clay,[13] shaped it to a form and then commanded the angels to bow (submit) to Adam. Iblis (Devil) refused out of pride[14] and was banished from Jannah (Heaven). Iblis was one of the jinn to begin with.[15][16]

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_in_Islam

Coming after the Jews, they take the Jewish story and make it about themselves, dismissing everyone and everything that came before themselves as irrelevant.  The interesting way this gets interpreted is that anybody that doesn’t recognize the superiority of the Muslims, is Iblis, this is why they refer to the jews as shayateen, Satan, and the United States as the Great Satan. 

In an article previous to this I mentioned the phonological similarities of the word ibis and Iblis and the fact that Thoth has the head of an Ibis and I find this very significant.  I will get into more of that later.  Now, let’s use my Jewish exegesis to discover why Muslims cannot be descendants of Adam as they say.  

Thoth Ok

Pardes refers to (types of) approaches to biblical exegesis in rabbinic Judaism (or – simpler – interpretation of text inTorah study). The term, sometimes also spelled PaRDeS, is an acronym formed from the name initials of the following four approaches:

  • Peshat (פְּשָׁט) — “plain” (“simple”) or the direct meaning.[1]
  • Remez (רֶמֶז) — “hints” or the deep (allegoric: hidden or symbolic) meaning beyond just the literal sense.
  • Derash (דְּרַשׁ) — from Hebrew darash: “inquire” (“seek”) — the comparative (midrashic) meaning, as given through similar occurrences.
  • Sod (סוֹד) (pronounced with a long O as in ‘bone’) — “secret” (“mystery”) or the esoteric/mystical meaning, as given through inspiration or revelation.
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pardes_(Jewish_exegesis)

First of all the Christians got it wrong, perhaps intentionally, the forbidden fruit was not sex it was in all actuality the human brain, it was the tree of knowledge after all.  And in partaking of it one becomes like god.  The whole purpose of life on earth was to be like god from the ancient perspective, in living you were performing Theurgia, the work of god.  You balanced out the 4 elements fire, water, earth, and air just like god did.  In living as a human you were attempting to understand god, this is what separates us from the angels and makes us their superiors.  Secondly, since all will is god’s will the devil is actually doing gods will, “The devil is god’s hitman.” my saying and you can quote me on that.  

 

When Adam and Eve were in the Garden of Eden, which is essentially heaven or the Yin world… (http://adstc.wordpress.com/2014/01/26/the-yin-world/)  …they were happily unconscious not thinking with their brains but with their emotions, they didn’t have to think about practicality or survival, everything was provided for them.  Now that they had chosen to be like god they had to live consciously not like ignorant little animals.  Now here is the kicker, Muslims don’t do their own thinking, they reject thinking, they have a priest class to do their thinking for them.  Most of them are illiterate and Saudi Arabia translates fewer books into their language than Greece does, and Greece has a much smaller population, Muslims are largest, fastest growing population on earth, reproducing irresponsibly.  Muslims never left the Garden of Eden so they can’t be descendants of Adam.  

Secondly, they rejected the temple of Thoth in Egypt, as a philologist I frankly think the word thought comes from the Egyptian god Thoth. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_language)  I suspect that they named their devil Iblis after the ibis headed Thoth and made him their Satan.  Intelligence and wisdom and reason is their Satan. Thoth was a scribe, he recorded things, which means that he had memory, Muslims refuse to remember, they lie about history.  In the UK they banned teaching the Holocaust in school to avoid offending Muslims.  (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-445979/Teachers-drop-Holocaust-avoid-offending-Muslims.html)

 Image

Muhammad was very clever in an insane, evil, stupid kind of way.  He re branded the old evil traditions and superstitions of Babylon as a new religion carrying on in the tradition of Moses and Jesus, when their reforms were to remove the co mingling of the insane, evil, murderous, social climbing Persians from their midst and rank.  What he tried to do and is being somewhat successful in doing is making it as though Christianity and Judaism never happened, and extending the Persian empire as was always their tyrannical instinct and purpose.  

Rebranding is a marketing strategy in which a new name, term, symbol, design, or combination thereof is created for an established brand with the intention of developing a new, differentiated identity in the minds of consumers, investors, and competitors.[1][2] Often, this involves radical changes to a brand’s logo, name, image, marketing strategy, and advertising themes. Such changes typically aim to reposition the brand/company, occasionally to distance itself from negative connotations of the previous branding, or to move the brand upmarket; they may also communicate a new message a new board of directors wishes to communicate.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebranding

Muslim’s are the children of the lie, and they spread their religion by lying, concealing the evil of it, lying about history and their deeds and their intent, killing anybody that tells others what they are really about and snickering all the while as their evil plan succeeds.  The Pharisees in the bible that plagued Jesus were of this creed, it is obvious from the rhetorical tautologies in their narrative and from Jesus own words, “don’t even step foot in a samaritan encampment…”  

mathew 10:5 These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: “Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans.

Matthew 10: 16 “I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves.

 

The Samaritans are adherents of Samaritanism, an Abrahamic religion closely related to Judaism. Based on theSamaritan Pentateuch,[3] Samaritans say that their worship is the true religion of the ancient Israelites prior to theBabylonian Exile, preserved by those who remained in the Land of Israel, as opposed to Judaism, which they say is a related but altered and amended religion, brought back by those returning from the Babylonian exile.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samaritans

Remember if you will how the Pharisees lost debate after debate to Jesus, and they were constantly asking him questions to put him in a trap, where either he would say something illegal by Roman Law, or by Rabbinical Law.  This same philosophical battle wages today.  Jesus argued against the violent interpretation of the law from the old testament.  Argued against stoning women.  Argued against a violent revolution.  And when he spoke to the Roman leaders they respected him because he spoke with authority, they treated him as an equal.  

In ancient Rome, Auctoritas referred to the general level of prestige a person had in Roman society, and, as a consequence, his clout, influence, and ability to rally support around his will. Auctoritas was not merely political, however; it had a numinous content and symbolized the mysterious “power of command” of heroic Roman figures.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auctoritas

Muslims claim that Jesus was a prophet of Allah, not true, he serves another god.  But if that was the case why then do they have this obsession with the Pharoahs of Egypt that persecuted the Jews? 

Quran (9:30)“And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!”

 

Telling Lies, Duping Delight

So, who are they really?  Well I am glad you asked.  

But recite unto them with truth the tale of the two sons of Adam, how they offered each a sacrifice, and it was accepted from the one of them and it was not accepted from the other. (The one) said: I will surely kill thee. (The other) answered: Allah accepteth only from those who ward off (evil). Even if thou stretch out thy hand against me to kill me, I shall not stretch out my hand against thee to kill thee, lo! I fear Allah, the Lord of the Worlds. Lo! I would rather thou shouldst bear the punishment of the sin against me and thine own sin and become one of the owners of the fire. That is the reward of evil-doers. But (the other’s) mind imposed on him the killing of his brother, so he slew him and became one of the losers. Then Allah sent a raven scratching up the ground, to show him how to hide his brother’s naked corpse. He said: Woe unto me! Am I not able to be as this raven and so hide my brother’s naked corpse? And he became repentant. For that cause We decreed for the Children of Israel that whosoever killeth a human being for other than manslaughter or corruption in the earth, it shall be as if he had killed all mankind, and whoso saveth the life of one, it shall be as if he had saved the life of all mankind. Our messengers came unto them of old with clear proofs (of Allah’s Sovereignty), but afterwards lo! many of them became prodigals in the earth. (Surah 5:27-32 Pickthall)

http://www.answering-islam.org/authors/masihiyyen/cain_abel.html

If you carefully read this transliteration, and you deconstruct the vagueness’s, obfuscation, and manipulations you see that they are defending the one that killed his brother and placing blame for the killing on the one that got killed.  It is unbelievable, they are saying that the one (unnamed) whose offering was accepted, wanted to kill his brother, he didn’t say it, he thought it, and apparently the murderous one had the ability to read minds even though god didn’t accept his sacrifice.  “But (the other’s) mind imposed on him the killing of his brother, so he slew him and became one of the losers…”  how is that not insane?  You forced me to kill you with the power or your brain, but I forgive myself because Allah forgives me.  (smh)

One last thing I have said how throughout history these two different peoples strove one against the other, an epic battle between good and evil.  Ponder this after everything I have told you, who are muslims really descended from? 

Ahura Mazda (/əˌhʊrəˌmæzdə/;[1]), (also known as Ohrmazd, Ahuramazda, Hourmazd, Hormazd, and Hurmuz,Lord or simply as spirit) is the Avestan name for a higher spirit of the Old Iranian religion who was proclaimed as the uncreated spirit by Zoroaster, the founder of Zoroastrianism. Ahura Mazda is described as the highest spirit of worship in Zoroastrianism, along with being the first and most frequently invoked spirit in the Yasna. The literal meaning of the word Ahura means light and Mazda means wisdom.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahura_Mazda

Angra Mainyu[pronunciation?] (also: Aŋra Mainiiu) is the Avestan-language name of Zoroastrianism‘s hypostasis of the “destructive spirit” from which later conceptions of Satan derive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahura_Mazda

BELOW IS A RELATED ARTICLE, RABBINICAL LINEAGE OF SOME PEOPLE GOES ALL THE WAY BACK TO EGYPT, SOME PEOPLE POSSESSED THE SECRETS AND THEY TOOK THE SECRETS WITH THEM ON HOW TO BUILD, YOU HAD TO EARN THE RIGHT TO BE PRIVY TO THOSE SECRETS AND NOT EVERYBODY WAS ABLE TO PASS THE INITIATIONS.  IF THEY HAD ACCESS TO THOSE SECRETS THEY WOULD HAVE REMEMBERED THEM IF THEY WERE CAPABLE. 

VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2014/02/05/rabbi-baal-shivah-on-stalking-and-shamanism/

 

The Secret Society War Rabbi Baal Shivah part 1.

Skull-Bones

 

It has taken me a while to write this piece because of seeing the masks of all of the secret societies slip.  Being bombarded on a daily basis with propaganda from “news stations”  it is difficult to know what to believe.  Let me demonstrate a little Jewish exegesis for you. 

genesis 30: 

29Jacob said to him, “You know how I have worked for you and how your livestock has fared under my care. 30The little you had before I came has increased greatly, and the Lord has blessed you wherever I have been. But now, when may I do something for my own household?”

31“What shall I give you?” he asked.

“Don’t give me anything,” Jacob replied. “But if you will do this one thing for me, I will go on tending your flocks and watching over them: 32Let me go through all your flocks today and remove from them every speckled or spotted sheep, every dark-colored lamb and every spotted or speckled goat. They will be my wages. 33And my honesty will testify for me in the future, whenever you check on the wages you have paid me. Any goat in my possession that is not speckled or spotted, or any lamb that is not dark-colored, will be considered stolen.”

37Jacob, however, took fresh-cut branches from poplar, almond and plane trees and made white stripes on them by peeling the bark and exposing the white inner wood of the branches. 38Then he placed the peeled branches in all the watering troughs, so that they would be directly in front of the flocks when they came to drink. When the flocks were in heat and came to drink, 39they mated in front of the branches. And they bore young that were streaked or speckled or spotted. 40Jacob set apart the young of the flock by themselves, but made the rest face the streaked and dark-colored animals that belonged to Laban. Thus he made separate flocks for himself and did not put them with Laban’s animals. 41Whenever the stronger females were in heat, Jacob would place the branches in the troughs in front of the animals so they would mate near the branches,42but if the animals were weak, he would not place them there. So the weak animals went to Laban and the strong ones to Jacob. 43In this way the man grew exceedingly prosperous and came to own large flocks, and female and male servants, and camels and donkeys.

What does this actually mean?  It is a reference to the impact of controlling what the eye sees.  Those who control what you see control what you think, and in controlling what you think they control what you do and they also control your options, and you essentially a possession, part of a thought herd, unbeknownst to yourself. 

Rupert-Murdoch

“Mr Murdoch is entitled to his own view… he owns 70% of thenewspapers in this country.” – Prime Minister of Australia Kevin Rudd,

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/aug/08/rupert-murdoch-own-70-newspapers

By all accounts, the unexpected break for Murdoch in the Russian ad market came in 2002 after the assassination of Vladimir Kanevsky, then the billboard king of Moscow. 

http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2085878,00.html

360_murdoch_russia_0729

 

Now Rupert Murdoch wants to buy Time Warner, not only is this a monopoly, it is a conflict of interest.  

rm