Tag Archives: rape

Islam is not a Religion it is an Invasive War Cult.


In this article I intend to prove to the reader that Islam should not be allowed to categorize itself as a religion in the Western World.  Eventually, we will be circulating a petition from Change.org where people can vote that hope.  The evidence that I lay down in this article will be based on recent events, recurring patterns throughout history, philosophical, and rhetorical tautologies and icons within the “Religion” itself.  


When a person sees to people arguing for fighting back and forth, they assume the correctness of their own perspective, from that perspective both parties are acting irrationally and part of the problem, one assumes that both parties are equally responsible for the conflict, this decision making process precludes the origin of the conflict, and ignores the perspective of the person who knows how the conflict started and who is setting things right.  To cause an arbitrary ceasefire in the conflict rewards the malicious party that attacked first and since we know psychopaths can’t reform and they will strike again the person acting as a moral authority and bringing a false peace is now also a potential target of the initial attacker, also having caused a disparate impact in favor of the attacker and rewarding their strategic behavior by making it worthwhile for them.


The bible is a mythological allegory, a mythological history based on true events but encoded so that other people reading it wouldn’t know how to decipher it correctly and understand it, and in not being able to do that they couldn’t get offended by it and punish the possessors of it.  I am not making this up, one of my pen names is Rabbi Ba’al Shiva, under that alias I deconstruct bible  myths with PaRDeS, Jewish exegesis.  The bible was written by the Jews, not by the Christians, and as such they are more of an authority on the meaning of the scripture, and they do not interpret the scripture literally.

The first scriptures in the bible were written by Persian Jews, trying to break away from the evil religions they saw in Persia, the sacrificing of babies to Moloch as a sacrament and as a post natal form of abortion.  The story of Abraham and Isaac was an allegory showing that the Jewish god no longer approved of human sacrifice, this was a revolution in religion and their would be more to come.  At this time the Jewish people were trying to break away as an identity from the Persian mentality.  This would be a long, concerted, coordinated effort as we will see.

The Practices of war in the bible were necessary not because the Jewish god invented them but because the forces they were fighting used them.  When you are fighting a force of people that is arrogant, superior, and ruthless, and uses technique at its disposal to completely destroy its enemy you have to use tactics that can compete and succeed, still in Jewish law we see as much compassion being used as it is possible to use under the circumstances.  Raping women and taking wives were part of the spoils of war back in those days.  To quote Richard Dawkins:  “I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours. Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism…”

If you examine closely the story of Moses, what you see is a people once again trying to separate their identity from that of the Persian mentality.  Remember the Persian’s were constantly trying to expand their vast empire.  By this time they had expanded their authority yet again into the realm in which the Jews had attained some amount of success Egypt.


The story of the Exodus from Egypt corresponds, interestingly enough, with the creation of the Chassidim and the kosher diet.  The metaphorical wandering for 40 years in the wilderness was a metaphor for purging themselves from the Mizraim, the people that were more interested in the “nations” than in the Jewish identity, to preserve their identity as separate from this once more expanding empire.

It wasn’t bad enough that the Jewish people kept on being conquered by the Persians every time they were conquered by the Persians they were dragged back to Persian and “re-educated” or brainwashed back into the Persian mentality.  After the collapse of the Temple of Solomon, once again the Jews were dragged back to Persia and re-indoctrinated once again.


Matthew 10:15 These twelve Jesus sent out with the following instructions: “Do not go among the Gentiles or enter any town of the Samaritans…. 

Samaritans say that their worship is the true religion of the ancient Israelites prior to theBabylonian Exile, preserved by those who remained in the Land of Israel, as opposed to Judaism, which they say is a related but altered and amended religion, brought back by those returning from the Babylonian exile.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samaritans



In Salman Rushdie’s book, the Satanic verses, he frames Mohammed as a religious zealot who considers himself as carrying on the Guru lineage of Jesus Christ, but as he goes from aghora to aghora debating with the philosophers in the market places he is routinely humiliated and falsified, as he should be.  What Mohammed did is he undid all of the evolution that religion had succeeded in, taking it back to the worst of times, before Jesus, before Moses, and before even Abraham.

Due to the rhetorical tautologies in the Unholy Quran it predisposes itself to the most violent and stupid interpretation.

According to AFP, the ISIS leader told worshippers at the mosque: “I am the wali (leader) who presides over you, though I am not the best of you, so if you see that I am right, assist me.

“If you see that I am wrong, advise me and put me on the right track, and obey me as long as I obey God in you.”




Muslims are the fastest growing population of the stupidest and most violent people on earth.  Their very life style is based on spreading Islam all over the face of the earth and eradicating any person that will not submit to Allah under threat of violence.  They have re-instituted a priest class which has not been seen for thousands of years.  Which is to say, Saudi Arabia, translates fewer books into Arabic than anybody else IN THE WORLD including Greece which translates more books than they do and being in control of much fewere people.  Not only that the majority of Muslims are illiterate which means their priest class tells them what to think, what to feel, and what to do.  In their religion they are allowed to rape women and then stone those women for being prostitutes and women of ill repute especially if those women are foreign.  Although, they have at times raped young Muslim women and them told them they can be stoned to death or martyr themselves by blowing up infidels and thereby have their honor restored.  Some stupid western women say, “but not all Muslims are bad, I have had sex with a Muslim man.”  Well guess what, there is no law in Islam about how many sharmouta (whores) a man can sleep with, but, just see what happens when a Western non-Muslim man has sex with a woman of Muslim descent.




Islam is a religion that is spread by violence, anybody who will not convert is an infidel and that is punishable by death.

Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief] is worse than killing…

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)” 

Quran (3:56) – “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”

Quran (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”.

Quran (4:89) – “They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”

Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”




Sharia law is essentially martial law applied to a civilian population, that is why they don’t distinguish between military or civilian targets.  Sharia is also the purest form of Islam.   Islam is in a constant state of Jihad holy war intent on spreading Islam, all Muslims are combatants.  Muslims are taught to always be spreading and furthering Islam’s message by any and all means.  Taqu

iyya is the act of spreading or protecting Islam by lying or concealing the truth.  There is another term, which I can’t remember, that essentially means retreat, but what it actually means is resting to gain strength for more jihad later.  Also, Islam has no problem with genocide and torture.

Since, Islam is against Western society and America it is only fair that Islam not be granted equality to other religions in the west.  Islam is not tolerant of other cultures or religions, they persecute every religion that is not Muslim, Hindus, B’hai, Yazidis, Buddhists, Christians, Jews, all of them, they are even in a state of perpetual civil war with themselves.

Ever since the violent revolution inside Islam orchestrated by Ibn Tumart in which they killed off all of the intelligent people and the artists, Islam has never been the same.  You can read the article I wrote here.  (https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2014/06/08/islam-will-not-change/)  What is happening now is the re-Conquest of the Muslim world by the stupidest and most violent Muslims.  Muslims are contemptuous of other peoples art, which is forbidden in their world because images of humans or animals or anything but artistically rendered letters is an act of idolatry.  That is why they blew up the Buddhas that were carved out of the mountains.


Well, I can’t make my position any clearer than that.  Treating another group of people as they treat you is not prejudice, it is justice, turnabout is fair play.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jus_ad_bellum#Just_cause.2F_Right_intention)










Phony, fake, facetious, fulsome, facades,

two-faced, insincere, sarcastic, cynical.

This humiliating redundant insult called life,

the long, tedious, denigrating anal rape of reason,

the cheerful prostitution of the intellect.

This is a living death, nothing to be a part of,

nothing to live for, nothing to die for.

We are all allowed to be just barely alive,

you can have a little stuff so that THEY 

can threaten to take it away if you don’t behave.

I am the most wanted criminal

the Thought Police want me dead,

because I am alive.

Why do we still consider it a virtue to crap forth life?

When the world is this over populated?

Feed all of the starving children today,

and their will be a million more tomorrow.

Perseveration of crazy people,

rewarding failure,

punishing success…





Lynn:  You have this scathingly brilliant theory on the movement of “the true religion” from India and China through the west to the founding of western civilization could you please give us some of the highlights of that theory?

Joxua:  I would love too, I am excited that we are finally getting into my deeper philosophical and psychological theories, I will try to tie things in without getting too far off topic.  I recently was studying male and female communication rituals and I read a book called THE GENIUS FACTORY and I came up with some theories to tie what I was studying all in together based on some other patterns that I had already observed to create a historical narrative.  I noticed when I was reading the book that their seemed to be this pattern, women rejected the men that were radically intelligent as sexual partners preferring men that were more “normal”  or less spectacular, because as one women said, “I don’t want my children to be freaks.”  This was indicative to me of a herd mentality, the female mind presupposes a “herd” and wants to fit into that herd perfectly and then once in the herd to socially climb and increase status and rank.  The women didn’t want to start off with ridiculous skill or talent that came from the father’s side of the gene pool.  This suggested a tacit narcissism on the part of females in general as far as breeding selection goes.  I began to extrapolate away from this pattern that had been observed and question myself as to other cultures in which the female does not personally and completely choose her mate for herself and i found some fascinating patterns.  Just about every other culture in the world has some manner of marriage selection process where the female is not the singular authority on her mate, why is this I wondered?  And I believe I have come up with a solution.  When women are left alone in the decision making process for breeding and mate selection they breed for males they can control and in doing so the rob the gene pool of intelligent and talented men, they basically breed stupidity into the gene pool, they breed to make drones.

I was studying male and female communication rituals at the same time and I was plugging my philosophical and psychological models into them to deconstruct them and to look for answers and patterns and I became aware of this weird kind of relationship between male minds and female minds based on patterns in their rituals.  I need to give credit to Deborah Tannen for the research although I disagree with some of her conclusions not as far as the research goes but in her refusing to make judgements about which is better in given situations.  Psycholinguistics seems to try to be mainly a descriptive science.  Back to my point, in my system the way a person speaks reflects the way they think and influences their behavior.  What I saw with male and female communication rituals is that the female mind when left alone with the male mind in conversation parasites off of it.  Female communication rituals were designed to establish a subtle dominance over the male mind through emotional abuse rituals and so forth and so on.  Male and female rituals reflect millions of years of neural myelination that have been passed on in the form of cellular memory to us and they inform our judgements and our behavior.  Older cultures that were less distracted from relationship and more understanding of human behavior recognized these emergent properties of male and female minds and made certain rules and traditions to prevent negative fallout from this parasitic relationship between the female and male minds, for the sake of the relationship, and the family, and the city.  Male minds have to be protected from females minds. 

Lynn:  Could you briefly explain your theory on how the male mind and the female mind are one single mind that were compartmentalized by nature to serve different functions in the family unit? 


Joxua:  Yes, I think we touched on that in another article but I will go over it again quickly.  I believe that we have the neural myelination from millions of years of evolution passed on through cellular memory and that was passed on to us because those were the creatures that survived, they had the best patterns and relationships to survive which is why they did survive.  All herding creatures and many other mammals in the presence of a threat make concentric circles with the males on the outside dealing with the brunt of the attack, and the females on the inside protecting the babies, and the babies even farther inside.  Due to the adverseness of the mind this brief period of time accounts for 90% of our judgements and choices and all people judge in the same way.  In a crisis we enter into a state that has been called temporary autism by such authors as Malcolm Gladwell and when that happens we return to the most hardwired of our unconscious programs.  When you have a murder suicide attempt like what happened in the batman movie people switch to their most basic instinct their primal programming.  3 men died protecting their girl friends, how many women threw themselves bodily into the line of fire to stop the bullets in order to protect their boyfriends?  Have you ever heard of that happening?  No, but you do hear about how women will protect their babies, wrapping their bodies around them in jet crashes and what have you, we were wired that way for survival.  Women focus on the babies, men protect the herd from natural threats. 


Female communication rituals are designed for and effective for talking to children and dealing with other females in the herd.  Masculine communication rituals are designed for maximum results in combat and sports, antagonistic functions based on survival.  Imagine if the seal team that was taking out bin laden was trying to use female communication rituals, wouldn’t that be awkward?  But all humans have the same prejudices when it comes to making judgements between men, women, and children, even men women and children, which indicates to me that we are a single organism and we are of a single mind to a certain extent, we just haven’t learned to live with ourselves scientifically based on a profound understanding of ourselves and our natures, our programming. 


Lynn:  Brilliant!  what does all of this have to do with rape? 

Joxua:  Well rape didn’t always carry the stigma it does now, it used to be very common practice, hell, it used to be normal, routine even.  Take for example this quote by Genghis Khan,

“The greatest happiness is to vanquish your enemies, to chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth, to see those dear to them bathed in tears, to clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters.”  

This prolific rapist has 16 million descendants living on the planet today.  What does that tell us?  Rape works.  http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/02/0214_030214_genghis.html
you can complain all you want if you are a descendant of the western civilization chances are that you have in you DNA that comes from a successful rape.  Rome was created by the kidnapping of the Sabine women and using them for breeding stock.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rape_of_the_Sabine_Women  I think that there were certain types of intelligences that were forced into the same genome by these marriages, that basically intelligence was forced into the human genome through these acts of rape and now that same intelligence is being slowly eradicated and removed by the judgements of women and feminine judgements in general. 
Lynn:  Wow, rape seems so bad it is difficult to see how it could ever be a positive thing or desirable or permissible even. 
Joxua:  That is because you are inducing the current environment in which survival is easy.  If we lived in ancient times where survival was hard and everything was a struggle and everything sucked all of the time rape wouldn’t be considered such a bad thing.  “What are you going to do Friday night Ethel?”  “Oh, I don’t know, go down to the watering hole and drink some amoeba water and then starve from a lack of protein, I will probably get raped and maybe try to steal a piece of Grissel from one of those big assholes, what are you doing Lucy?”  “probably the same, maybe if we stick together we won’t accidentally piss them off and get killed.” “sounds like a date.” 
What you have to remember is that this environment that we live in, civilization, is not a natural environment, it is an unnatural environment.  it is only because we have been so good at surviving that we were able to kill off and domesticate nature, and now our dominion over nature is becoming the cause of our demise.  Too many stupid, greedy, arrogant, idiots that think that things can’t go back the way they were.  They presuppose the existence of this environment when tomorrow we could be living in the stone ages again or worse.  history doesn’t have a narrative that it needs to satisfy.  If it did that would be evidence of a god.  History is telling us a happy story with a happy ending?  I don’t think so.  History doesn’t subscribe to fairy tales.  it is survival of the fittest not survival of the fanciful.  Nature is not pleasant, it is not your friend, it is not rational, nature doesn’t care if you are a baby or a lady, it doesn’t care if you have a sweet face or a sexy ass, it doesn’t care if you are a feminist, or a lesbian, or a raw food vegan,  nature is self interested and it wants what it wants and if you stand in the way of nature and nature can kill you, it will.  Nature doesn’t give a single fuck about you and your judgements unless it has a reason to, unless your survival is attached to its own survival.  Nature is perfectly rational in that it is self interested, and perfectly irrational in its treatment of the individual because from its perspective we are unnatural.  Nature is a meritocracy of strength, speed, endurance, talent, intelligence, attentiveness and gumption.  Nature is an environment that is prejudiced towards masculinity not femininity and not childishness.  It is because of this unnatural environment in which we live that we have this false depreciation of masculinity. 
Lynn:  This reminds me of your term “survival data”  and how all living things are “organic computers”.  You said something once about how when a man rapes a woman it might be a way of treating her as an equal under a different paradigm or something to that affect do you remember that?
Joxua:  Yes, I suggested that when a man rapes he might be treating a woman as an equal under masculine values.  I came up with this concept when I was studying the inklings, a writing group made up of J. R. R. Tolkien and C. S. Lewis.  I am not sure which one of them said it but they were raised in an all boy school and they remarked that they hated these certain bullying behaviors that were made by the older boys, known as “fagging” and “tarting” in which boys would humiliate other boys by forcing them to do sexual things or they would offer sexual favors as a form of currency.  I immediately thought about how men behave in prisons.  I thought it would be interesting if this was a natural emergent property of men being isolated and separated from women.  I then began to compare it to the value system of ancient Greece and Rome when they were more masculine dominant before their decline.  A masculine value system appreciates strength, skill in combat, speed, and rewards this dominant behavior.  From the perspective of pure unadulterated masculinity the rapist has earned his bounty. 
This same value system existed in early combat as well.  It is interesting because many anti theists try to conflate the bibles mentioning of kidnapping and raping women with the existence of the practice, as though the bible being aware of the practice god had somehow sanctioned and created it.  This is delusional, conflationary thinking, correlation is not causation and quite frankly if you want to compete you have to be relevant.  If the enemy is sacking your kingdoms and carrying off your women and making more soldiers to attack you and carry off your women how are you going to confront that?  Your possessions and your people are going to dwindle and you are going to die.  So, it was common practice, it was just part of war, you are the victor you get the spoils, if you want another wife you can have her.  It is a meritocracy of military prowess, of masculine virtue. 
Lynn:  Interesting, you had mentioned that rape was quite possibly a recurring theme in our history and caused hybridization and cultural revolution.  Could you please tel us something about that?
Joxua:  India originally had only one deity and it was a female one, Lakshmi, all of the other deities in the Indian pantheon were invasive deities.  It is said that India was invaded by northern tribes and I suspect that those tribes were possibly viking like and had some manner of connection with the Celts in Ireland. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gundestrup_antlered_figure.jpg There are some interesting artifact that show reverence for a shiva-esque figure known are Kern or kernunnos that looks very much like pashupati the form of shiva that governs animals kind of like a tarzan.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Shiva_Pashupati.jpg
It is also of interest that India is for the most part vegetarian and eats meat very sparingly, I suspect that these invaders were eventually and slowly weeded out but not without leaving there permanent mark.  I think they were essentially exiled over time and forced to move west, I think they were an offshoot of the aghori sect and they became the cult of the augures that worshipped Jupiter and was part of the minoan pre-Greek culture.  interestingly enough the created the concept of authority and our entire philosophical, legal, and political structures and even our religious ideas are based on the philosophy of their cult. 
The invasion was not entirely bad, there is a comparison of conquest to contribution that is often invoked.  Some people say that we don’t historically remember people that don’t contribute anything in their conquest and we do indeed remember this group.  They brought an explosion of creativity, curiosity, intelligence, art, literature, experimentation, and thought to the area.  They broke people out of their routine, got them to expand their sense of self, to enrich themselves.
Lynn:  Fascinating stuff.  i believe you were suggesting that their might have even been a period where acts of rape actually created what we now know as human beings. 
Joxua:  Yes, it is well documented now that the neanderthals and cro magnon interbred for the most part but there is still a place on earth where
 people are 100% cro magnon and are not at all hybridised as is the case for most humans on earth and that place is Africa.  All people that are not native born to Africa are part neanderthal.  http://news.discovery.com/human/genetics-neanderthal-110718.htmI don’t know why we would assume that the marrying of these two genomes of proto-humans would be peaceful and rational happening through Socratic dialogue and under the auspices of reasoned conversation, it seems more than likely that is a fantasy we tell ourselves for our own mental comfort.  I am not saying that it was all rape, but it was probably, initially mostly rape.  If you think about these two cultures meeting for the first time you imagine that there would be contempt and disgust and curiosity.  Much as Africans were treated as a curiosity in the western world and thought of as some manner of animal for the longest time, this same mentality probably was probably common then. 
 I believe in THE EPIC OF GILGAMESH, which might be the oldest text known to man, there is a story of meeting a creature that would free the animals from the traps that were set to procure food, and it was described as an animal that looked peculiarly human. 

“The gods heard their lament, the gods of heaven cried to the Lord of Uruk, to Anu the god of Uruk: ‘A goddess made him, strong as a savage bull, none can withstand his arms. No son is left with his father, for Gilgamesh takes them all; and is this the king, the shepherd of his people? His lust leaves no virgin to her lover, neither the warrior’s daughter nor the wife of the noble. When Anu had heard their lamentation the gods cried to Aruru, the goddess of creation, ‘You made him, O Aruru; now create his equal; let it be as like him as his own reflection, his second self; stormy heart for stormy heart. Let them contend together and leave Uruk in quiet.’
So the goddess conceived an image in her mind, and it was of the stuff of Anu of the firmament. She dipped her hands in water and pinched off clay, she let it fall in the wilderness, and noble Enkidu was created. There was virtue in him of the god of war, of Ninurta himself. His body was rough, he had long hair like a woman’s; it waved like the hair of Nisaba, the goddess of corn. His body was covered with matted hair like Samugan’s, the god of cattle. He was innocent of mankind; he knew nothing of the cultivated land.
Enkidu ate grass in the hills with the gazelle and lurked with wild beasts at the water-holes; he had joy of the water with the herds of wild game. But there was a trapper who met him one day face to face at the drinking-hole, for the wild game had entered his territory. On three days he met him face to face, and the trapper was frozen with fear. He went back to his house with the game that he had caught, and he was dumb, benumbed with terror. His face was altered like that of one who has made a long journey. With awe in his heart he spoke to his father: ‘Father, there is a man, unlike any other, who comes down from the hills. He is the strongest in the world, he is like an immortal from heaven. He ranges over the hills with wild beasts and eats grass; the ranges through your land and comes down to the wells. I am afraid and dare not go near him. He fills in the pits which I dig and tears up-my traps set for the game; he helps the beasts to escape and now they slip through my fingers.’ “

Lynn:  Incredibly insightful!  I feel like we have exhausted this topic and we should probably not let it run on and bleed over into your other insights so I think we will stop here.  Thank you for your participation.

Joxua: You’re  welcome.








I have always found this interesting, because if you examine the modern rhetoric the 1950’s would be the ideal time as far as women are concerned if you believe what they tell you about what they want from relationship.  It was also the hay day of the color chartreuse, which is interesting because according to a witch I once studied under, it was used in insane asylums to keep the patients calm.  Yes, chartreuse keeps you sane when you are about to go fucking nuts apparently.  What I am getting at is that women should have been very happy.  Men were loyal, families were big, everything was in its proper place and everybody knew their duty.  The only problem is that women were not getting laid.  Oh, noes!  What to do???




The phenomena of rape fantasies started popping up.  The reason that this is interesting is what it tells us about the female psyche.  Women do not and will not take responsibility for their sexual desires.  Due to the innate feminine need to be pursued, to be the object of desire, the rape fantasy was constructed to remove from herself responsibility for the sex act.  She was not initiating it.  She was not pursuing the man.  It was the fact that she was so sexy he could not contain himself, he had to force himself on her.  In a way her desirability was to blame.  This is fascinating too because women reify their attractiveness and (we will get into this later as I keep on writing down my theories) the value of their vagina.  Yes, women associate their vagina with monetary value.  If she enjoyed it a little she can’t really be held accountable because she didn’t have a choice. 

So what were the men doing?  They had hobbies, they were being fathers, they were involved in intellectual pursuits.  My grandpa was an ex-navy architect with 5 children when my grandma banged her doctor, she was a nurse by the way, and they were Jehovah’s Witnesses……  Even when women have everything exactly the way they want it, they still are not content.  What is interesting to me is that women desiring their own sexual fantasies at the same time judge and refuse to participate with male fantasies.  And don’t talk to me about porn because women get paid like 10 to 100 times what men get paid.  That has NOTHING to do with satisfying a man, that has to do with getting paid.  

You can read more on an article I wrote on the subject that talks about how women rationalize this and thoughts like these here…



26,000 Sexual Assault Cases in the Millitary



This is the fault of the American people and their stupid judgement making abilities, there I said it, I feel better, allow me to explain….  Our military is full of manly men that like being manly men, they are unapologetically masculine as they should be if they are going to protect our country from foreign threats.  They are proud of being men, full up to their eyeballs with semen and nothing to do with it.  Living in a sexless country.  It is easy to say to yourself “well that sounds like a their problem kind of thing.”

 Thinking that they should just not have sex is not a valid solution.  That mentality is part of the problem.  It might be easy for some sexless, pussy starved, vagina worshiping armchair philosopher to think that one can go on a 1-10 year tour of duty and forego sex but that perspective is stupid and wrong.  There is no easy solution because none of the solutions survive our superficial aesthetic snap decisions, none of the solutions look good at a glance, it is an ugly problem and the solution is going to be unattractive as well but we cannot hide from the problem by sticking our heads in our butts.  It was our avoiding understanding that caused the problem in the first place.  These guys are fuckers not fuckees, they pride themselves on not getting fucked while fucking.  

Possible solutions, the government pays for prostitutes.  Can you imagine the outcry of the american people?  people complaining that their taxes are paying prostitutes?  and what is a good rate?  What if the Muslims found out that we were paying for prostitutes in their country?  They would have moral leverage.  This isn’t like vietnam where there was a booming sex trade.  Muslims don’t want Americans sleeping with their women, they are racist and tribal to an extent that is not allowed by Americans for their own people.  

Anybody that says sex isn’t a necessity is an idiot.  Sex is a need, not a luxury and the people that say different are not strong enough, smart enough, honest enough, or fast enough to defend this country from its enemies.  If you can’t rap your mind around an unattractive solution for an ugly problem you have no business weighing in on the matter.  I despise chicken hawks because they need others to do something for them that they can’t do for themselves and then they sit in arrogant judgement of the needs and demands of those saving them from themselves.  I call them choosy beggars.  But by all means, lets put some guns in the hands of some hipster doucebags, froggy bull-dikes, armchair philosophers, smug elitists, feminazis, and have them put their money where there mouth is.  

Protecting this country is the problem and responsibility of every one living here.  Just like Israel everyone should have to serve 2 years in the military so we do not have this douchey sense of separateness and superiority created by specialization, and feel like we can sit in judgement of those sacrificing themselves for us.  The reason that you can be a radical pacifist and a vegan and a liberal elitist feminist douchebag is because of the efforts of these people that you despise, not in spite of them.  Anyway, take a look at a piece I wrote a while back on the history of rape.