Tag Archives: reason

Same ness (poem)

solomon

THE FOLLOWING IS AN EXAMPLE OF LINGUISTIC POETRY WRITTEN BY JOXUA LUXOR, HE IS A PHILOLOGIST AND A LINGUISTIC PHILOSOPHER, THIS POEM IS WRITTEN AS A MEMORY PEG DEVICE TO SHOW HOW HISTORICAL LEAVE TRACES IN THE EVOLUTION OF OUR LANGUAGE:

Wise King Solomon, the king of peace, made them the same, he gave them a new name, the Same-ites but in order to do that one of them he had to shame.  

Those who can respect the authority of reason on the right, those that only respect violence on the left, one of them sinister, one of them righteous.  The sheep get the Shepherd’s Crook the goats get the flail.  

As it was then, so it is again.  They can not atone, because they are not at one, which is why they can not attune, their attention is in the wrong place. 

king-tut

They demand to hear gods real name, Shemhamphorasch, but they are deaf to it, it singes their ears.  they are incapable of accepting their status in life.  

They cling to their sibboleths and we to our shibboleths, a man cannot slave for too masters, for either one serves  The Goddess of Reason, or one slaves for Mammon. It is a sisibilantie that binds. Sibil disobedience. 

Two brothers apparently alike in form but completely different in spirit.  

shemp

 

AT THIS POINT JOXUA WILL POST SOME DEFINITIONS TO CLARIFY HIS CRYPTIC, VAGUE, AND ESOTERIC REFERENCES:

Shalom (שָׁלוֹם) (Sephardic Hebrew/Israeli Hebrew: shalom; Ashkenazi Hebrew/Yiddish: sholom, sholem, sholoim, shulem) is a Hebrew word meaning peace, completeness, prosperity, and welfare and can be used idiomatically to mean bothhello and goodbye.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shalom

 

SolomonLook up Solomon at Dictionary.commasc. proper name, Biblical name of David’s son, king of Judah and Israel and wisest of all men, from Greek Solomon, from Hebrew Sh’lomoh, from shelomo “peaceful,” from shalom “peace.” The Arabic form is Suleiman. The common medieval form was Salomon (Vulgate, Tyndale, Douai); Solomon was used in Geneva Bible and KJV. Used allusively for “a wise ruler” since 1550s. Related: Solomonic; Solomonian. The Solomon Islands were so named 1568 by Spanish explorers in hopeful expectation of having found the source of the gold brought to King Solomon in I Kings ix:29.  http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Solomon

 

In linguistics and ethnology, Semitic (from the BiblicalShem“, Hebrew: שם‎) was first used to refer to a language family ofWest Asian origin, now called the Semitic languages. This family includes the ancient and modern forms of Ahlamu, Akkadian,Amharic, Ammonite, Amorite, Arabic, Aramaic/Syriac, Canaanite (Phoenician/Carthaginian/Hebrew), Chaldean, Eblaite,Edomite, Ge’ez, Old South Arabian, Modern South Arabian, Maltese, Mandaic, Moabite, Sutean, Tigre and Tigrinya, andUgaritic, among others.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_people

 

Shem (Hebrew: שֵם, ModernShemTiberianŠēm ; Greek: ΣημSēm; Ge’ez: ሴም, Sēm; “renown; prosperity; name”; Arabic:سامSām) was one of the sons of Noah in the Hebrew Bible as well as in Islamic literature. He is popularly regarded as the eldest son, though some regard him as the second son. According to some Rabbinic traditions, Shem was born without a foreskin (aposthia); which may indicate a basis for circumcision that predates the covenant of Abraham.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shem

 

A shibboleth (/ˈʃɪbəlɛθ/[1] or /ˈʃɪbələθ/[2]) is a word or custom whose variations in pronunciation or style can be used to differentiate members of ingroups from those of outgroups. Within the mindset of the ingroup, a connotation or value judgment of correct/incorrect or superior/inferior can be ascribed to the two variants.

 

Gilead then cut Ephraim off from the fords of the Jordan, and whenever Ephraimite fugitives said, ‘Let me cross,’ the men of Gilead would ask, ‘Are you an Ephraimite?’ If he said, ‘No,’ they then said, ‘Very well, say “Shibboleth” (שבלת).’ If anyone said, “Sibboleth” (סבלת), because he could not pronounce it, then they would seize him and kill him by the fords of the Jordan. Forty-two thousand Ephraimites were killed on this occasion.

Judges 12:5–6, NJB  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shibboleth
 
Sibilance is a manner of articulation of fricative and affricateconsonants, made by directing a stream of air with the tongue towards the sharp edge of the teeth, which are held close together; a consonant that uses sibilance may be called a sibilant. Examples of sibilants are the consonants at the beginning of the English words sip, zip, ship, chip, and Jeep, and the second consonant in vision. The symbols in theInternational Phonetic Alphabet used to denote the sibilant sounds in these words are, respectively, [s] [z] [ʃ] [tʃ] [dʒ] [ʒ]. (The sounds [tʃ] [dʒ], as in chip and Jeep, are affricates; the rest are fricatives.) Sibilants have a characteristically intense sound, which accounts for their non-linguistic use in getting one’s attention (e.g. calling someone using “psst!” or quieting someone using “shhhh!”).  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sibilant
 
The Cult of Reason (French: Culte de la Raison)a was a belief system established in France and intended as a replacement for Christianity during the French Revolution.[1]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_of_Reason
 
Mammon /ˈmæmən/, in the New Testament of the Bible, is material wealth or greed, most often personified as a deity, and sometimes included in the seven princes of Hell.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammon
 
Early mentions of Mammon appear to stem from the personification in the Gospels, e.g., Didascalia, “Do solo Mammona cogitant, quorum Deus est sacculus”; and Saint Augustine, “Lucrum Punice Mammon dicitur” (Serm. on Mt., ii). Gregory of Nyssa also asserted that Mammon was another name for Beelzebub.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammon
 
Beelzebul claims to cause destruction through tyrants, to cause demons to be worshipped among men, to excite priests to lust, to cause jealousies in cities and murders, and to bring on war.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beelzebub#Testament_of_Solomon
 

An Ifrit is mentioned in the Qur’an, Sura An-Naml (27:39-40):

An ifrit (strong one) from the jinn said: “I will bring it to you before you rise from your place. And verily, I am indeed strong, and trustworthy for such work.” One with whom was knowledge of the Scripture said: “I will bring it to you within the twinkling of an eye!” Then when Solomon saw it placed before him, he said: “This is by the Grace of my Lord – to test me whether I am grateful or ungrateful! And whoever is grateful, truly, his gratitude is for (the good of) his ownself; and whoever is ungrateful, (he is ungrateful only for the loss of his ownself). Certainly my Lord is Rich (Free of all needs), Bountiful.  

 

The Ifrits are in a class of infernal Jinn noted for their strength and cunning. An ifrit is an enormous winged creature of fire, either male or female, who lives underground and frequents ruins. Ifrits live in a society structured along ancient Arab tribal lines, complete with kings, tribes, and clans. They generally marry one another, but they can also marry humans.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ifrit

 

 

 
LINK TO RELATED POEM BELOW
 

 

Advertisements

The Metaphysics of Joxua Luxor.

Image

I am a deist. My god is the faculty of reason in man, which is the only evidence I need of god.  The early Christians, Hindus, Hebrews, and Buddhists if you understand their occult philosophy, didn’t believe that god existed as a manifest being in the physical universe.  The word Amen, “let it be” comes from the creator god Amun, that manifested everything but never manifested himself.  The reason for this is very simple.  The universe is made out of the body of god infinitely sub divided.  Time is created as a separation of self from self.  The mind exists in order to connect self with self, and to help us get what we need to survive and in the act of surviving understanding god.  Our mind is that part of ourselves our reason which god gave us, to contemplate himself.

Time though is also an illusion, which means that time doesn’t actually exist.  God is outside of time and outside of the universe in his perfect undivided whole.  We, with the tiny shard of godself that we possess are living in an illusion of time, as an act of theurgy to understand god and do his will.  In the indian story of Markandeya  he is vomited outside of god because of not appreciating his life, once outside of god swimming in an ocean without light he realizes that god is the only thing that exists and outside of god there is nothing, because the human brain was not designed to understand anything outside of this universe.  The Hebrew story of Jonah is an homage to this Hindu story.  

But the theme is recurring and ongoing throughout the different systems.  The highest form of god in the Tibetan system according to the Dalai Lama is Samantabhadra, who is male and female engaged in the act of coitus, because god is the creator, and in order to create you have to have male and female.

Image

Furthermore, you see this recurring theme in all of the traditions, (well all of the ones that came from a valid tradition) the reason the celebrate the Sabbath on Friday night after sunset is because that is when the day representing the sacred father and mother meet.  That is why you are supposed to roger your wife on the sabbath.  That was one of the first human rights reforms that meant you couldn’t work or force someone to work 7 days a weak, of fear of offending god.  It was quite simply an unsustainable, undesirable process.  And there is no evidence in the world of the mother and father meeting, this happens in concealment.  The ancients knew there was no evidence of god in the world.  Observe the continuing metaphor.

Image

Ganesh sits guarding the entrance to his mother’s bedroom.  It was in trying to prevent Shiva from entering his wife’s bedroom that he was beheaded, and was resurrected by Shiva with the head of the elephant.  Heinrich Zimmer whose research was edited posthumously and published by Joseph Campbell affirmed that Buddhism is a sub sect of Hinduism which makes sense since the Siddartha came from India.

In closing god doesn’t exist inside the universe, he exists outside of the universe, and the only evidence of him inside the universe is intelligence, life, consciousness, etc.  The whole concept of sitting in seated meditation posture without moving comes from an effort to emulate the prime mover unmoved, any movement is a negation of godself because god doesn’t move and doesn’t act in the world.  The division of duties between the husband and wife was also based on this concept of the prime mover.  The man moves in the world in the polis but upon entering the oikos the house everything is done for him, he doesn’t lift a finger.  The Agency through which god influences the world is through the holy spirit, or the shechinah, god’s active force.

Shekhinah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 ShekinahShechinahShechina, or Schechinah (Hebrewשכינה‎), is the English spelling of agrammatically feminine Hebrew name of God in Judaism. The original word means the dwelling orsettling, and denotes the dwelling or settling of the Divine Presence of God, especially in theTemple in Jerusalem.

 

Participating with the Premise.

Image In debate, not only is it necessary to remain rational it is necessary to remain consistently rational.  When a person makes a logical fallacy or a cognitive bias it needs to be addressed and corrected before the conversation can continue.  If you continue the debate without correcting the error you are granting equity to the other person in the conversation.  You are acting as though they have not made an error and by staying in the conversation you are participating with the premise that they are being and have consistently been rational. If the other person in the conversation is not being rational, the conversation itself is not rational.  If one person tries to remain rational in a debate while the other person is making no effort to be rational or proceed rationally, this creates a disparate impact in favor of the person that isn’t being rational.  When you get in a fight with a clown, even if you win you lose. It is necessary to proceed correctly.  The words process and practice come from the greek word praxis.  All valid philosophies have a praxis. A philosophy by its very nature has to be self referentially consistent, if it creates disparate impact it is invalid and therefore not a rational philosophy.  If a person can’t be falsified by their own philosophy it is not a philosophy and they are not rational.  So as you see they falsify themselves by their own procedure.  A rational person proceeds rationally, nothing can be proven by irrational means, that is why due process exists.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
 
So, I tried to do a kind of semantic clarification in which praxis—if not on the thither side of this divide—was perhaps somehow between the theoretical and the practical as they are generally understood, and particularly as they are understood in modern philosophy. Praxis as the manner in which we are engaged in the world and with others has its own insight or understanding prior to any explicit formulation of that understanding…Of course, it must be understood that praxis, as I understand it, is always entwined with communication.  —Calvin O. Schrag[1]

Praxis is the process by which a theory, lesson, or skill is enacted, practiced, embodied, or realised. “Praxis” may also refer to the act of engaging, applying, exercising, realizing, or practicing ideas. This has been a recurrent topic in the field of philosophy, discussed in the writings of PlatoAristotleSt. AugustineImmanuel KantSøren KierkegaardKarl MarxMartin HeideggerHannah ArendtPaulo Freire,Ludwig von Mises, and many others. It has meaning in the political, educational, and spiritual realms.

 

The Tyranny of Reason

Image

In order for a philosophy to be valid it has to be unfalsifiable and yet specific, and it can’t create disparate impact.  Now if you study enough philosophy you realize that every philosophy is invalid because their is a point at which the philosophy is self contradictory or it fails to get desired results.  This has less to do with philosophy and more to do with the nature of the universe being not entirely rational.  The universe itself is sometimes rational and at other times irrational.  Most people get disheartened when having studied one philosophy they find errors in it.  Most people do not study many philosophies and find the errors in those as well.  So their is no perfectly valid philosophy which is not to say that philosophy is worthless.  Philosophy is very important.

It is very difficult to be rational and yet society, successful society, is based on reason, and the success of that society is directly related to the reasonableness of that society.  So while the universe might not be rational, success in relationship is governed by reason.

Image

Relationship and society can only be successful under the auspices of reason.  Which means that analysis and not emotion have to govern society.  That means that logical fallacies such as emotional appeals cannot make up the majority of the reasoned dialogue if society and relationship are to be successful.  Which is to say that the sentimental perspective of women is not equal to that of a mentally and emotionally stable man, educated in logic, debate, and philosophy.  Women are incapable of making hard choices.  They presuppose a surplus created for them by someone else.  When you have these self-appointed moral authorities forcing us, in a failing economy, to give our money to other people while our own cupboards are going bare, instead of creating an ACTUAL SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM THAT CREATES THE MAXIMUM VALUE FOR EVERYBODY, you have the downfall of a civilization…

Image

You cannot place feminine thinking as an equal with true Reason.  It is not equal because it is dependent on it.  The feminine principle can only be merciful and charitable out of the surplus created by the masculine principle, in the form of Wisdom, Reason, Logic, Understanding, etc.  Analysis and analytical data have to be the basis of the rational relationship.

Image

I created the term “tyranny of reason” as an experiment that I was going to unleash on the world and observe the reaction that people have to it.  Due to the nature of the mind being 10x more averse to that which it doesn’t want (my philosophic calculus) people would focus in on the word “tyranny” and react negatively to it. Because human beings are organic computers (in my theories).  The female mind making superficial aesthetic snap decisions reacts before it understands.  Reason by it’s very nature does not and cannot be tyrannical.  But the word “tyranny” has negative survival data to the mind, and in my theories every thing said, or done, every object and person has survival data for the individual, communicating to the individual that they are surviving well or poorly.

Image

REASON IS PREJUDICED

A Meritocracy of Reason also creates disparate impact because not everybody can be equally reasonable.  Is Reason prejudiced?  or is Reality prejudiced?  The only sustainable relationship or society is a tyranny of reason, a system that is prejudiced towards reason and that knows how to recognize it.  People always ask me if I am prejudiced and who “my people” are.  My response, People that are reasonable.  And my love of them is directly related to their ability to be rational in relationship with me.

 organic-comp

RELATED ARTICLES

The Direction of the Conversation

Image

Most people do not study enough philosophy to realize that it is about something real.  Most people don’t learn to debate well enough to learn that if it can’t be argued rationally it is crap.  Most people don’t learn the logical fallacies or the cognitive biases.  Conversations have a direction.  The conversation is either moving towards reason in a rational direction or one party is arguing against reason, arguing for vagueness, making emotional appeals.  You are either reasoning or rationalizing.  You are either talking about something real, good, true and useful or you are trying to make a turd smell like a flower, which is it?  Be honest with yourself.

It is out of necessity that great philosophers had to pre-empt conversation.  They only want rational conversation.  Don’t waste my time with your horse shit.  You can’t prove anything using irrational means.  That is what praxis is.  You can only prove something using rational means, that is why we have due process.  If you don’t communicate correctly you don’t think correctly and you don’t act correctly.  So the reason that you aren’t communicating correctly is because you are engaged in strategic behavior to make unreason appear to be reasonable.

Image

STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION:

A phrase coined by Joxua/Shivah to describe irrational communication used to control or manipulate the flow of conversation.

Conversation blocking- a form of strategic communication designed to stop a conversation or to prevent a topic from being discussed

Conversation dropping- a form of strategic communication designed to prevent a person from acknowledging their wrong or from participating in a conversation that is going a direction they don’t want to follow.

Communicating understanding- from shared state theory of communication meaning to communicate accurately your perspective on a subject based on understanding the topic, thinking before you speak, accounting for how it will be interpreted by the listener, listening to yourself as you speak and observing pragmatically the persons understanding of what you said and their application of it.  Associated with Socratic dialectic.

http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/strategic-communication-definition-by-joxuashiva/

RELATED ARTICLES

Treatise on Cosmic Light and the Christ Consciousness by Rabbi Ba’al Shiva

Image

This is the Sephyr Yeshivel as it was taught me by the archangel Azrael.  The black ring represents Binah, the Grey circle represents Da’ath, the brown represents unfecundated/unfertilized earth.  All of the sephiroth below Da’ath take place withing Da’ath which is also why it is the hidden sephiroth because to count it would be redundant.  Da’ath is the bedroom in which the creative intelligence exists, where the father and mother meet in the middle and become one.  Creative intelligence by it’s very necessity needs to be male and female.

Image

In this separation between matter and energy, between sun and moon, (solomon) there is the possibility of movement, and choice,

CRISIS:

Etymology[edit]

From Ancient Greekκρίσις (krisis, “a separating, power of distinguishing, decision, choice, election, judgment, dispute”), from κρίνω(krinō, “pick out, choose, decide, judge”)

This allows the illusion of free will, this allows self discovery, this allows chaos and upredictability, this allows the small self the id to become aware of the BIG SELF, god.  It allows jiva to rediscover SHIVA.  Godself mutes himself in the form of Dark matter, disappearing into the diamond light of empty space.  All we see is the noumenal world, their is no evidence of god.  And in that absence of the presence we become aware of the necessity of god.  The One Self that transcends the individual.  As our intellect becomes more and more refined we become aware that something is missing, a hidden hand, that is here and there and all around us.  And we laugh at the joke that we now understand, the slight of hand that is being perpetrated by a loving teacher, telling children an interesting bed time story that they take way too seriously and in so doing stab themselves all over with many pains.  This is the ignorance of the enslaved mind, and with this ignorance, their is no freedom.

THE CHRIST PERSONALITY

Image

Above is a symbol that was shown to me in meditation as I conversed with Azrael.  We see that 3 of the colors are hot and three cold.  As such 3 are of levity or light and 3 of gravity or earth and water.  3 masculine, and 3 feminine.  Now just as their could be red water and red earth, in the same vain there could be blue fire and green air.  In fact, out of necessity this is true.  We see that the white upward pointing triangle is latent in the 3 cool colors and at the same time the black downward pointing triangle is latent in the hot colors.  Energy is matter moving quickly and matter is energy moving very slowly, the speed or frequency at which you vibrate determines where in the spectrum you are.

Now each of the colors is a facet or a face, an angel or an angle of the Pure White Light, which is the Buddha/Krishna/Christ consciousness.  Red is catabolism or righteous indignation or Din or judgement.  Blue is anabolism, the Peace King that builds up.  Green and Orange are Flora and Fauna, Orange is appetite, sexual and other wise, I always think of Hod as the Horned God.  Green is kind of mysterious and hard to describe, essentially it stores the energy of the sun in a form that living creatures can use, as fuel.  Purple is another one that is difficult to describe, it is the most balanced of the colors, being like steam, the combination of fire and water, slightly more cold than it is hot.  It is the color of the Magus, the magician, that has married the male and female inside himself in the form of creative intelligence, this is the god man.  Yellow is the integrating intelligence, it is the color of sense of humor, it figures out how to get all the energies to cooperate for a successful endeavor.

THE PURE WHITE LIGHT

It has always been a mystery to me that everybody thinks they know what the Messiah should act like or how he should be.  If you know what he should be doing you can do it yourself, but if you need to be saved you necessarily do not know what the Christ consciousness is.  People think of the Christ personality is an absence of personality, quite the opposite is true, it is the source of all personality.  I refer to this as the Messiah Paradox.

“So, because you are lukewarm–neither hot nor cold–I am about to spit you out of my mouth.”  Revelation 3:16

People think that the messiah is going to be loved by all and openly recognized by all as the Messiah, this is not the case, the Messiah, the Logos is the incarnation of Logic and Reason, that is what makes him the son of god.  As such only those people who have attained to wisdom and are not pretenders to wisdom will be able to recognize him.  Jesus was a revolutionary figure and as such he was more a Satanic figure to most people, he threatened their perception of reality, he threatened the peace of the community, he threatened the authority of the structures of authority…

34“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35For I have come to turn

“ ‘a man against his father,

a daughter against her mother,

a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law—

36a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’c

37“Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. 38Whoever does not take up their cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39Whoever finds their life will lose it, and whoever loses their life for my sake will find it.

http://biblehub.com/niv/matthew/10.htm

525158_419926694746211_1407469946_n

The Pole Position in Relationship

Image

Women have a strategic advantage in relationship that they tend to exploit unbeknownst to themselves. These instincts, behaviors, and strategies have been hardwired into the human organic computer through millions of years of neural myelination that have been passed on in the form of cellular memory.  Women don’t think about it, they don’t do it consciously, they aren’t aware that they tacitly interpret and judge reality in the experiencing of it.

The female mind was created to be in relationship with children.  The woman thinks that femininity is superior to masculinity, that is why she is female, as such when their is a disagreement between the male and female she refuses to look from his perspective or compromise or negotiate.  She uses her bias and the feminine bias of society and the children to get her way.  She basically hijacks the relationship and holds it for ransom.

If you observe women’s arguing styles you realize that they can’t get over their programming, they act like a mother in the following ways.  They presuppose their moral authority, they try to control the narrative as though they are talking to a child.  They correct the narrative, changing words, they are not just expressing a different sentiment they think that they have the final edit on the conversation.  They talk over you, interrupt your, nag, whine, repeat themselves, refuse to agree, participate, or move towards the solution or compromise, they quote people outside of the relationship whose opinions don’t matter and they will even violate the boundaries of the relationship by bringing people into the argument who are not part of the conversation in order to take their side.  These are not the behaviors of a person who is in relationship or a person who give equal credence to their partner.  The correlation between psychopaths and the narcissistic narrative has recently been discovered and fascinatingly, my theories show that the female brain, especially in relationship with a male brain acts psychopathicly, whereas the male brain is more sociopathic.

Image

The female brain operates from moral authority, operating on superficial aesthetic snap decisions as to what looks right and what sounds right.  The female mind is in relationship with its own authority and as such wants to expand and intensify its authority so it uses illegitimate behaviors and strategies in relationship to create a disparate impact in its own favor.  While men think about creating value for the relationship women think about getting what they want from the relationship and in this way women attack the relationship.  Even in a relationship of two women will try to increase their status, social climbing.  Women don’t debate analytically offering evidence,  and reasons, or being open to experiment, they argue emotionally not being able to conceive of any other solution besides the one that they are leaning towards.  They ask leading questions, they try to control the direction of the conversation, they force an emotional moral frame editing the consideration set of the conversation as if they were the arbitrary judge of the conversation and they try to force you to participate with their premise.

The female mind sees reason as a hostile, alien, influence and refuses to participate with it, or she will conflate moral authority with sapiential authority and herself the high priestess of both, but she is absolutely incapable of not being perfectly predictable in her positions and behavior.

Image

The woman acts as a mediator between father and child, a liaison, a go between, and she can use her position to bring the family unit closer together or to sabotage the father.  She can try to win the child’s favor so that he likes her more by spoiling the child.  If the father competes in this way it is more damaging for the child because he can play the parents off each other and the child starts to think in terms of possessions instead of relationship.  The mother can misrepresent the father to the son and further damage the relationship between them.  Some women go so far as to make the father an object of contempt and ridicule to the children.

Image

For those of you that are familiar with my theories on emergent properties in collective judgments of societies you might remember this piece I did to illustrate how society protects women from men they are in relationship with.  Note further that the man is basically accepted into a society by having children, that is his root in society, his entrance into a society.  Women use every possible strategy to expand and intensify their control, to make it permanent.

Most cultures have an age of adulthood which has historically ended the authority of the mother and begins the authority of the father and the preparation of the child to be a responsible and functional part of society, which also means that the issues that the mother has protected and instilled in the child through invasive narrative or psychological manipulation have to be removed and the child has to be made mentally and emotionally healthy and a contributor to society.  The child is also at this time responsible for the laws of the land and is no longer able to make appeals to feminine authority in the form of mercy and charity claiming to not be responsible for their actions and the consequences thereof.  The problem with America is that none of the social strictures on women apply and at the same time women are unconscious of their instincts and processes and of the evil they do innately.  They don’t have to scrutinize themselves or criticize themselves and they refuse to take responsibility for their actions or the consequences of them.  At the same time the refuse to confine their attentions and judgment to realms in which they are valid and get good results, completely incapable of not tacitly judging and interpreting everything from the position of moral authority.  Refusing to participate with reason they are passive aggressive and perceive themselves at the same time as being passive resisters and reformers of society while all they are really doing is making society weak and vulnerable.

Image