As far as I’m concerned Newt Gingrich destroyed Megyn Kelly in this interview. I have no clue why she would wear such an obvious catsuit it’s disgusting. Newt Gingrich not only exposed Megyn Kelly he destroyed her utterly. It’s so obvious to me that Megyn Kelly has been using sex appeal in order to expand her brand for a long time and she’s just not that good. As far as I am concerned there’s nothing wrong with sex but using manipulating the feminine voice of Western Society for your own benefit , It just disgusts me.
Men in Saudi Arabia “can eat their wives if they are suffering severe hunger” under a bizarre new fatwa reportedly announced by a religious leader in the country.
Saudi Arabian grand mufti Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah allegedly issued the guidelines to allow a husband to eat his wife’s body parts in extreme circumstances.
The cleric is reported to have said the ruling represents the “sacrifice of women and obedience to her husband” – but campaigners are understandably outraged.
The announcement has sparked major concerns about the already well-documented poor treatment of women in the country.
A statement reportedly from the cleric’s office said: “A fatwa attributed to the Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah, which allows a man to eat his wife or parts of her body if the husband was afflicted with a severe hunger, raised concern and debate over social media since yesterday evening.
“The fatwa is interpreted as evidence of the sacrifice of women and obedience to her husband and her desire for the two to become one.”
The controversial Muslim leader has previously called on all churches to be destroyed under Islamic law.
Van Gogh was murdered by Mohammed Bouyeri while cycling to work on 2 November 2004 at about 9 o’clock in the morning, in front of the Amsterdam East borough office (stadsdeelkantoor), on the corner of the Linnaeusstraat and Tweede Oosterparkstraat ( ). The killer shot Van Gogh eight times with an HS2000 handgun. Bouyeri was also on a bicycle and fired several bullets, hitting Van Gogh and two bystanders. Wounded, Van Gogh ran to the other side of the road and fell to the ground on the cycle lane. According to eyewitnesses, Van Gogh’s last words were: “Mercy, mercy! We can talk about it, can’t we?” Bouyeri walked up to Van Gogh, who was on the ground, and calmly shot him several more times at close range.
Bouyeri cut Van Gogh’s throat with a large knife and tried to decapitate him, after which he stabbed the knife deep into Van Gogh’s chest, reaching his spinal cord. He attached a note to the body with a smaller knife. Van Gogh died on the spot. The two knives were left implanted. The note was addressed to and contained a death threat to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who went into hiding. It also threatened Western countries and Jews, and referred to ideologies of the Egyptian organization Takfir wal-Hijra.
The killer, Mohammed Bouyeri, a 26-year-old Dutch-Moroccan citizen, was apprehended by the police after a chase, during which he was shot in the leg. Authorities have alleged that Bouyeri has terrorist ties with the Dutch Islamist Hofstad Network. He was charged with the attempted murder of several police officers and bystanders, illegal possession of a firearm, and conspiring to murder others, including Hirsi Ali. He was convicted at trial on 26 July 2005 and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theo_van_Gogh_(film_director)#Murder
I apologize ahead of time, I am going to be repeating some of my material for those people reading my stuff for the first time, but there will be some new information in here and some new connections made for older subscribers.
People read an ancient book that was written over millenia by multiple different authors, they assume that nothing has changed, they assume the book was written by their people about their history, none of this is true, you have to understand that the bible was written as a mythological allegory, names were changed and it was written as a myth because there was a force in the world trying to conceal and destroy the truth. The children of the lie, the offspring of vipers, they conceal the truth about themselves, and they represent themselves falsely, all the while spreading themselves across the land in an effort to increase and expand the authority of an ancient evil. In this blog we will go a step further towards revealing this hidden hand throughout history.
For years it was thought that it was a myth that the 12 tribes of Judah were ever used as zodiac symbols, recent evidence shows that indeed it was.
Every major world civilization has a few things in common, they have a variety of peoples there, they are wealthy or as the bible says it, “blessed by god.” They have a large middle class. This large middle class allows the movement of people from different cultures that are also successful, to move about freely from one culture to the next. These craftsmen are often part of secret societies, sometimes spreading revolutionary ideas. This allows philosophies, and best practices to be exposed to different societies. These come from math cults started by Pythagorus, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle were part of these math cults as were Jesus an Shams. This horizontal, democratic, movement of ideas moved through nomadic peoples, the jews, who weren’t particularly allowed to own land throughout history but were exposed to many different cultures and adopted the successful practices from those cultures. As evidence of this pattern I offer to you the Gypsies who were named after Egypt, when coming from Egypt and were also referred to as the Romani when coming from Rome. The poet and Sufi Mystic known as Jalāl ad-Dīn Muhammad Balkhī had the nickname Rumi being named after Rome. His best friend, spiritual instructor, and possibly gay lover Shams was like a freemason and he was part of the Math Cults started by Pythagorus, and he was in the spirit of Jesus. Also he was eventually kidnapped and beheaded by some of Rumi’s jealous students most likely including one of Rumi’s own sons.
Shams is the Arabic word for “sun” (شمس). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shams
Shams-i-Tabrīzī (Persian: شمس تبریزی) or ‘Shams al-Din Mohammad’ (1185–1248) was a PersianMuslim, who is credited as the spiritual instructor of Mewlānā Jalāl ad-Dīn Muhammad Balkhi, also known as Rumi and is referenced with great reverence in Rumi’s poetic collection, in particular Diwan-i Shams-i Tabrīzī (The Works of Shams of Tabriz). Tradition holds that Shams taught Rumi in seclusion in Konya for a period of forty days, before fleeing for Damascus. The tomb of Shams-i Tabrīzī was recently nominated to be a UNESCO World Heritage Site. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shams_Tabrizi
According to contemporary Sufi tradition, Shams Tabrizi mysteriously disappeared: some say he was killed by close disciples of Mowlana Jalaluddin Rumi who were jealous of the close relationship between Rumi and Shams. It is also said that Shams Tabrizi left Konya and died in Khoy where he was buried. Sultan Walad, Rumi‘s son, in his Walad-Namamathnawi just mentions that Shams mysteriously disappeared from Konya with no more specific details.
In Jesus time Rome had reached an apex, the Roman Roads made travel very easy and since all roads lead to Rome, it attracted some unsavory characters. Bad things started happening, all of a sudden there were these people that wouldn’t participate, these revolutionaries that wanted to take over, to judge everybody with their slave values, they felt entitled to judge and to rule everybody else. The funny thing was they had moved their to increase their own quality of life, now why would they think that they deserved to rule, seeing as how everywhere they went they created poverty and dust and famine, and murder?
It became necessary for Jesus to resurrect the old sciences once again and to make order out of chaos. The 12 tribes of Israel became the 12 disciples, a group of initiates sanctioned with separating the sheep from the goats and taking their message to a specific group of people so that the sheep might be saved and separated from those that didn’t respect the authority of reason. It is possible he was in league with some Roman officials but I don’t think it was the Flavian Caesars as some have postulated, I suspect they were in league with the Pharisees as Flavius Josephus the historian that bares their name was a Pharisee.
As I mentioned in the piece, “WHO REALLY WAS JESUS, RABBI BA’AL SHIVA” Jesus didn’t like the Pharisees and he didn’t like the Samaritans, he didn’t like anybody that adhered to the Abrahamic Law Code. He used the Good Samaritan as an example to illustrate his concept of a philosophical family a philoish, and the Good Samaritan was the exception to the rule, as we know the exception proves the rule because it is the exception.
Conflicts between Pharisees and Sadducees took place in the context of much broader and longstanding social and religious conflicts among Jews, dating back to the Babylonian captivity and exacerbated by the Roman conquest. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees
Which raises the question, Who was Judas? The bible very cleverly and necessarily changes names in order to implicate patterns, the word Messiah, comes from the word Moses, which is why Jesus was the greater Moses, and that words comes from proto-indo-european and can be traced back to India.
In Indian religions and Indian philosophy, Moksha (Sanskrit: मोक्षmokṣa), also called vimoksha, vimukti and mukti,means emancipation, liberation or release. In soteriological and eschatological sense, it connotes freedom fromsaṃsāra, the cycle of death and rebirth. In epistemological and psychological sense, moksha connotes freedom, self-realization and self-knowledge. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moksha
Likewise, the name Solomon was not a real persons name although there is trace evidence in our very language that something happened there that was very significant and not unlike what happened in Rome, and is now happening in the United States and all across Europe. Solomon derives from Shalom, and Solomon was the king of peace.
Solomonmasc. proper name, Biblical name of David’s son, king of Judah and Israel and wisest of all men, from Greek Solomon, from Hebrew Sh’lomoh, from shelomo “peaceful,” from shalom “peace.” http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Solomon
So back to the question at hand, Who was Judas Iscariot, even his first name is reminiscent of Jewery, lets examine the last name for linguistic clues, Iscariot.
- One popular explanation derives Iscariot from Hebrew איש־קריות, Îš-Qrîyôth, or “man of Kerioth“. The Gospel of John refers to Judas as “son of Simon Iscariot” (although some translations only refer to him as “the son of Simon” (Jn 6:71, Jn 13:26, King James Version)), implying it was not Judas, but his father, who came from there. Some speculate that Kerioth refers to a region in Judea, but it is also the name of two known Judean towns.
- A second theory is that “Iscariot” identifies Judas as a member of the sicarii. These were a cadre of assassins among Jewish rebels intent on driving the Romans out of Judea. However, some historians maintain the sicarii arose in the 40s or 50s of the 1st century, in which case Judas could not have been a member. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judas_Iscariot#Etymology
So, now let’s follow the trail left for us by this mythological allegory and see if we can make any sense of it.
Sicarii (Latin plural of Sicarius “dagger-men”, in Modern Hebrew rendered siqariqim סיקריקים) is a term applied, in the decades immediately preceding thedestruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE, to an extremist splinter group of the JewishZealots, who attempted to expel the Romans and their partisans from the Roman province of Judea. The Sicarii carried sicae, or small daggers, concealed in their cloaks, hence their name. At public gatherings, they pulled out these daggers to attack Romans or Roman sympathizers, blending into the crowd after the deed to escape detection. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicarii
Hmm! Well that is interesting! Does that remind anybody about anything happening today? Like maybe a tactic used ad nauseum by a certain group of people?
Let us consult the Legend of King Solomon passed down by the Freemasons to see if we can find any recurring patterns.
The legend goes as follows..
Hiram Abiff, “a widow’s son” from Tyre, skilful in the working of all kinds of metals, was employed to help build King Solomon’s Temple.
The legend tells us that one day, whilst worshipping the Grand Architect of the Universe (GAOTU) within the Holy of Holies, Hiram was attacked by three ruffians, (called ‘Jubela’, ‘Jubelo’ & ‘Jubelum’ and known collectively as ‘The Juwes’) who demanded the “Master’s word”, that is, the secret name of God.
The first ruffian, named Jubela, struck Hiram across the throat with a 24 inch gauge. The second ruffian, named Jubelo, struck Hiram’s breast, over the heart, with a square. The third ruffian, named Jubelum, struck Hiram upon the forehead with a gavel, whereupon Hiram fell dead. His blood, therefore, was shed within the temple.
Hiram, having been killed, was carried out the East gate of the Temple and buried outside Jerusalem on Mount Moriah. http://www.christian-restoration.com/fmasonry/hiram.htm
Well, that got weird fast. Let’s take the Wayback machine back about 1,000 years ago and see what we can learn from history…
During the time of Moses Maimonides the Jews were once again living under the tyranny of the Persian, Babylonian, ideology of tyranny and terrorism. Jews were allowed to practice their faith in secret paying lip service to Allah, but living in fear, not allowed to gather on the streets without attracting negative attention. Once again they lived under fear and persecution as the Muslims tried to convert them with violence and threats and the Kara-ites with Muslim ties and sympathies were corrupting the Jewish faith by soliciting the fundamentalist Abrahamic doctrine of the earliest form of un evolved Judaism.
Much like myself Rabbi Maimonides was a Qabalist, and investigated the holy writings in his own way reinterpreting them and looking for hidden wisdom that had been left for later generations to glean. Her is what he said:
In your letter you mention that the apostle has spurred on a number of people to believe that several verses in Scripture allude to the Madman (Mohammed), such as “bimeod meod” (Genesis 17:20), “he shined forth from Mount Paran” (Deuteronomy 33:1), “a prophet from the midst of thee” (Deuteronomy 18:15), and the promise to Ishmael “I will make him a great nation” (Genesis 17:20). These arguments have been rehearsed so often that they have become nauseating. It is not enough to declare that they are altogether feeble; nay, to cite as proofs these verses is ridiculous and absurd in the extreme. For these are not matters that can confuse the minds of anyone.
But the Muslims themselves put no faith in their own arguments, they neither accept nor cite them, because they are manifestly so fallacious. Inasmuch as the Muslims could not find a single proof in the entire Bible nor a reference or possible allusion to their prophet which they could utilize, they were compelled to accuse us saying, “You have altered the text of the Torah, and expunged every trace of the name of Mohammed therefrom.” They could find nothing stronger than this ignominious argument the falsity of which is easily demonstrated to one and all by the following facts.
The motive for their accusation lies therefore, in the absence of any allusion to Mohammed in the Torah.
The phrase “a great nation” cited above does not connote a people in possession of prophecy or a Law, but merely one large in numbers just as in reference to idolaters Scripture says “nations greater and mightier than yourselves.” (Deuteronomy 11:23).
Similarly, the phrase “bimeod meod” simply signifies “exceedingly.” Were there any allusion in the verse to Mohammed, then it would have read “and I shall bless him bimeod meod,” and whoever likes to hang on to a spider’s web might then discover a reference to Mohammed therein. As it is, since Scripture says “I shall increase him bimeod meod,” it can only denote an extravagant increment in numbers.
There is no question that the Divine assurance to Abraham to bless his descendants, to reveal the Torah to them, and to make them the Chosen People, refers only to the offspring of Isaac. For Ishmael is mentioned as an adjunct and appendage in the blessing of Isaac, which reads “and also of the son of the bond-woman will I make a nation.” (Genesis 21:13). This verse suggests that Isaac holds a primary position and Ishmael a subordinate place. This point is made even more explicit in the blessing which ignores Ishmael entirely. “For in Isaac shall seed be called in thee.” (Genesis 21:12).The meaning of God’s promise to Abraham is that the issue of Ishmael will be vast in numbers but neither pre-eminent nor the object of divine favor, nor distinguished for the attainment of excellence. Not because of them will Abraham be famed or celebrated, but by the noted and illustrious scions of Isaac. The phrase “shall be called” simply means, shall be renowned, as it does in the verse, “Let thy name be called in them, and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac.” (Genesis 48:16). http://stephanhuller.blogspot.com/2009/08/maimonides-on-yemenite-argument-that.html
WEAVING SPIDERS COME NOT HERE
The Jews of Freemasonry, are not the Jews of today, they are the Muslims, the Ishmaelite order of Assassins cleverly rebranded by Mohammed. The KKK is wrong in blaming the Jews for the death of Jesus as He told his disciples to go not to the Samaritan Jews, and he hated the Pharisees and Sadducees that traced their origin to Babylon, he told them instead to g to the lost children of Israel. It was the Persian Jews that wanted Jesus dead. And the Muslims are nothing new, they claim to be of the lineage of Moses, and Jesus, but the resurrect the law code of Abraham, which is in itself a misuse since that law code was created when Abraham was individuating and separating from the Evil practices of Babylon and he had to use tactics that would succeed against a ruthless and immoral enemy.
The Muslims know that the are lying, they know that they are liars, this is no secret, it is in their own holy books.
Don’t let them fool you with their clever obfuscations, it is because of the nature of the Persian languages who have had caste systems for 6,000 years that their language is given to multiple different translations of meaning depending on who you are and what their intent is. Their very language, their very thought processes are given to manipulation and concealment and lying. This is a valid translation, it is not a transliteration, this is what they teach the inmost initiates of Islam translating it differently for suspicious westerners in order to conceal the evil intent that lies therein.
Maybe some of you can sit back and watch the Persian Babylonian Empire take over the entire world as was their intent in the beginning, but I cannot in good conscious sit back and watch it happen silently. We have been pushed to the ends of the earth. Historicly, every time these people come together it is them, that causes the problem because they are a psychopathic people they are arrogant, superior, entitled, histrionic, greedy, evil, conniving human beings. Every time their has been a world power it was the introduction of these horrible human beings that signaled the collapse of that civilization. Egypt, Israel, Rome, and now France, Germany, Britain, Australia, and eventually the United States of America.
Today I am going to discuss some of the similarities between the Hebrews and the Hindus with my atheist friends and explain some of my ideas on the mind and psychology for them. Above we see the Hamsa, which was originally used by the Jains in India. Even the word Hamsa comes from the Indian word ahimsa, which means:
Ahimsa (Sanskrit: अहिंसा; IAST: ahiṃsā, Pāli:avihiṃsā) is a term meaning ‘to not injure’. The word is derived from the Sanskrit root hiṃs – to strike; hiṃsā is injury or harm, a-hiṃsā is the opposite of this, i.e. cause no injury, do no harm. Ahimsa is also referred to as nonviolence, and it applies to all living beings including animals according to many Indian religions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahimsa
We see that the Hamsa is actually a stylized penis, masquerading as a hand, hands by their very nature are not equilateral, the Shiva lingam represents Shiva’s penis.
The lingam (also, linga, ling, Shiva linga, Shiv ling, Sanskrit लिङ्गं, liṅgaṃ, meaning “mark”, “sign”, or “inference”) is a representation of the Hindu deity Shiva used for worship in temples. In traditional Indian society, the linga is rather seen as a symbol of the energy and potential of the God.
The lingam is often represented alongside the yoni, a symbol of the goddess or of Shakti, female creative energy. The union of lingam and yoni represents the “indivisible two-in-oneness of male and female, the passive space and active time from which all life originates”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_Linga
Shiva being the God of Death is also at the same time the God of life.
Even if you look at the similarities between the so called “horned alphabet” and sanskrit you see similarities. Hebrew was a revolutionary language for a secretive people, it was simplified and modified from sanskrit making it easier to use, it was the language of revolt, Kabbalists have always been very secretive in their communication of revolutionary ideas.
Origins of the word
The term cabal derives from Cabala (a word that has numerous spelling variations), the Jewish mystical interpretation of the Hebrew scripture. In Hebrew it means “reception” or “tradition”, denoting the sod (secret) level of Jewish exegesis. In European culture (Christian Cabala, Hermetic Qabalah) it became associated withoccult doctrine or a secret. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabal#Origins_of_the_word
Have you ever considered the meaning of Moses finding the Hebrew god on Mount Sinai?
According to some biblical scholars[who?], Horeb is thought to mean “glowing/heat”, which seems to be a reference to the sun, whileSinai may have derived from the name of Sin, the Sumerian deity of the moon, and thus Sinai and Horeb would be the mountains of the moon and sun, respectively.
Interesting that Shiva himself is a moon god, is it not? I frankly think that the burning bush was marijuana, the Aghori shaivists smoke massive amounts of marijuana, and then meditate in grave yards.
Because the Jews were aware of psychology, when they were a warring tribe if you killed in battle you had to sit Shiva and meditate for 7 days before you were clean (kosher) and allowed back into the city. My nom de plume means, Lord of Meditation, because in my slaying of the ego I have killed more than anybody else.
The Hebrew word “shiva” means “seven”, and the official shiva period is seven days. The day of the funeral is counted as the first day of shiva, even though the practice does not begin until after the mourner(s) arrive at the designated location following the funeral. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_(Judaism)#Length_of_shiva
Shiva was a wandering philosopher, India was famous as being a source of wandering philosophers that went walkabout and took their traditions far and wide. When he went to a strange land he would sleep in the grave yard because he was surrounded by an entourage of disembodied spirits to which he ministered, this is not bizarre in the Kabbalist tradition, many rabbis are known to have angelic and even demonic familiars with which they can be seen conversing.
Below we see the Origins of the muslim epithet, “shayateen”.
Had you been a cartographer and geographer working for the British East India company in the 17th and 18th centuries, you would have found all over India thousands of Hebrew-like place names with similar meanings in both languages as well. The map excerpt on this page shows a small section of ancient Seuna-Desa (Zion Land) in what is now Maharashtra (to right). At the bottom right of the excerpt is the city of Paithan, on the banks of the river Godivari. The Indo-Hebrews named the part of the river passing through Paithan’s territory Paithan (Pison, Phison), according to their traditions. In the upper left-hand corner is the city of Satana. According to the legends of the Yadavas (Indo-Hebrews), Satana would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorah envious. The Seunas and the Satanas decided to resolve their moral and religious differences on the battlefield. The forces of “Satan” lost, but their defeat didn’t dishearten them. Eventually, we came to think of “Satan” as a being who lost the battle but not the war. The bible tells us that such a peace treaty hasn’t yet been signed between these two ancient enemies.
Later in that same article it says this:
Holger Kersten wrote in Jesus Lived in India,
“The relation between ancient Israel and Kashmiri can most clearly be demonstrated linguistically. Kashmirian is different from all the other Indian languages, the origins of which are Sanskrit. The development of the language of Kashmir has been greatly influenced by the Hebrew. Abdul Ahad Azad writes, ‘The language of Kashmir derives from Hebrew.’ According to tradition, in ancient times Jewish peoples settled here, whose language changed into the Kashmirian of today. There are many Hebrew words that are quite obviously connected with the language of Kashmir.” (pp. 68-69.)
24But when the Pharisees heard this, they said, “It is only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, that this fellow drives out demons.” Matthew 12: 24
The pharisees who were practicing the old Abrahamic law code essentially accused Jesus of casting out demons by the power of Satan. Are you starting to see the connection here? Instead of denying it, Jesus mentions the Temple of Solomon, and makes a reference to a house being divided against itself. Solomon built gods temple by enslaving spirits and forcing them to do his bidding. Then he turns it around on the Pharisees and asks them by what power they themselves cast out demons.
It has recently occurred to me that their is a huge similarity between the phonology of the words Shayateen and Chaitanya.
The Sanskrit word, Chaitanya, means ‘consciousness’ or ‘universal soul’ or ‘spirit’ or ‘intelligence’ or ‘sensation’. It is the pure Consciousness or the cosmic intelligence, the consciousness that knows itself and also knows others. It also means energy or enthusiasm. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaitanya_(consciousness)
If you remember the Muslims hate the color saffron, which is the color of the robes of the Sarasvati order monks. Notice too the familiar phonology of the word Charlatan and what Mohammed said about Shaytan, he is the whisperer. Remember that Mary Magdalene moved to France after Jesus alleged death. Remember too that Proto-indo-european is more or less a fact. I, being a phonologist, track the movements of ideas across countries and through time.
The word comes from Frenchcharlatan, a seller of medicines who might advertise his presence with music and an outdoor stage show. The best known of the Parisian charlatans was Tabarin, who set up a stage in the Place Dauphine, Paris in 1618, and whose commedia dell’arte inspired skits and whose farces inspired Molière. The word can also be traced toSpanish; charlatán, an indiscreetly talkative person, a chatterbox. Ultimately, etymologists trace “charlatan” from either theItalianciarlare, to prattle; or from Cerretano, a resident of Cerreto, a village in Umbria, known for its quacks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlatan
Imagine if you will the Pharisees bursting in and yelling, “Shayateen! Charlatan! Chaitanya!”. Remember that they reject thought, they reject consciousness, they avoid thinking as much as possible. They fear intelligence.
I am familiar with the word Chaitanya because my Shaktipat Initiatore, Gurumayi Chidvilasananda has a root word in her name. Her name means, Energy = chit, moves= vilas= velocity, bliss= ananda, Sarasvati order monks adopt the suffix “ananda”. The word Chit, energy, comes from Chaitanya, consciousness. The words Chi, ki, come from this root as well as the words Chan and Zen.
Now it is no secret that I think Abraham and Brahma are the same being historically, I am not the first person to think this, many others have come to the same conclusion. If you observe closely you will find many similarities between the marriages of Brahman families and Chassidic jews, what is of interest is that the Aghori, the lingayats, and the Kashmir Shaivists rejected more or less the authority of the Brahman priest class, who are very much like the muslims adhering to the old Abrahamic law code. The lingayats, were poets and mystics, they wore a shiva lingam around their neck and they had a personal relationship with god, and no mediator separating them from god. They had their own nickname for Shiva, and they visualized him in a form that was sacred to themselves. It was very much a personal relationship with god.
According to Heinrich Zimmer, whose work was edited and published posthumously by Joseph Campbell, there is only on Temple for Brahma, and the vast majority of demons worshiped Brahma. This is of further interest when you consider that the Indian demons look so much like Muslims.