Ponder this, how many people have had an enjoyable experience with a bewb? Now how many people have had an enjoyable experience with a penis? The vast majority of people are not analytical philosophers, they don’t know the logical fallacies and they don’t know the cognitive biases and as such they can’t stop themselves from making them. Furthermore I have found that neural myelination accounts for 90% of the decision making of human beings which means cellular memory. I refer to humans as organic computers because they are predictable. In their judgments there are certain patterns that emerge, such as a pro female bias.
Contemplate how many more people spend on breast cancer than veterans or prostrate cancer and the fact that Veterans charities are rampant with fraud and theft, which is not tolerated with breast cancer awareness, people are much more hyper vigilant. But women didn’t sacrifice themselves for us. Every person that served protected the entire nation from threats. A woman having breasts is not necessarily a mother or our mother. Yet we are far more sympathetic to feminine concerns than masculine concerns.
Every year at least $1.5 billion is spent on breast cancer research. Some of this money comes from an ever-growing number of breast cancer non-profit organizations, but the vast majority comes from government organizations such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Defense (DoD). The funds go largely to preventionand early detection.http://thinkbeforeyoupink.org/?p=1772
Men women and children have the same bias, choosing in favor of femininity and weakness. Men are even insensitive to their own desires. Men don’t even question this when asked to sacrifice themselves for women and children, they just presuppose the validity of it. Women also don’t question it. Women have gotten so arrogant and so expectant that men will sacrifice their desires and wishes for women and children that even after not having contributed anything meaningful to a man’s life women finding they don’t have enough of what they want will turn to the man and expect him to sacrifice himself so that she can have more.
The manliest men go off to war, they are in relationship with death and the threats and the ugliness, they create the outside perimeter, the grizzled, gnarly, rind, the crust, the tough outer layer. That is why I say the male mind is sociopathic.
Inside that are the effeminate men, the champions of normalcy and pleasantness, captain save a ho, the white knights, the arm chair philosophers, with their feminist, elitist, bias. It is the guy that is not fit to go into battle. He acts as a moral authority protecting the women from the manly men, but also gaming the system for his own benefit. He is to cowardly to do what the manly man does. He is a champion of femininity.
The butch women essentially perform the same function as the effeminate men, protecting women from the truth, reality, ugliness, and death. Lying to women about themselves. Telling them they are equals to the men and not to worry. The butch women are closer to the women and children then the effeminate men. Women have an innate feeling of inferiority to men, Sigmond Freud got that right. If you observe women in their reasoning, arguing, and behavior, they want to control the penis, they want to own it. They want to direct the activities of the penis. They want to send it to attack their enemies. They want to control how it thinks and they want to be the focal point of its attention and the only source of its happiness.
Penis envy in Freudian psychoanalysis refers to the theorized reaction of a girl during her psychosexual development to the realization that she does not have a penis. Freud considered this realization a defining moment in the development of gender and sexual identity for women[1] — the parallel reaction in boys to the realization that women do not have a penis being castration anxiety. In contemporary culture, the term sometimes refers inexactly or metaphorically to women who are presumed to wish they were men.[2]
What is the most fascinating is how the behaviors used to champion negate their own arguments. The manly women copy the behavior of men, therefore demonstrating that they tacitly believe that masculinity is dominant. Fritz Perls said that you copy what ever behavior you believe is dominant when you want to win. So the fact that they use masculine behavior when they want to win demonstrates that they believe masculinity is dominant. You have to understand the psychosis that the individual must have to use a means different from their argument in order to obtain a sense of victory. Women do this because it is a natural psychopathic/female strategy to expand and increase feminine authority. Women think of themselves as a group, WOMEN. Whereas men do not think of themselves as MEN, they think of themselves as a man. Men do not feel that their position is increased by being men, while women do, and this comes from the fact that their need recognition was stimulated in that they closetedly feel inferior to men, thus the need for the repeated conquest against men.
The effeminate man will argue that the woman is the equal of man in mental function and ability, but if that is so why does she need the protection of the effeminate man? The effeminate man argues against reason, and the participation therewith to increase the amount of poontang he has available to himself and not being able to compete with the manly man in manly endeavors, he adopts a strategy flying in the face of reason he presupposes that women need protection from the manly man and that they are incapable of dealing with reality and handling the truth.
The fascinating thing about people’s judgments, when they are no analytical philosophers, is that their judgments always make themselves correct. It always justifies why they are good for wanting what they want. Because their are so many weak, stupid, and incorrect people out their all of these strategies and judgments create a disparate impact in favor of weakness, stupidity, and failure. Why are we attracted to emotional pornography? Puppies, babies, kittens? because they are harmless, because we feel like we could protect them and contribute to them, that has positive survival data for us, it means we are surviving well and that we are capable of providing for another. If we were really secure we wouldn’t judge so hatefully and immediately against things that pose potential threats. We wouldn’t be controlled by our emotional reactions and pre emptively attack people because they appear strong or smart.
http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/organic-computers-definition-by-joxuashiva/ https://thoughtuncommon.wordpress.com/2013/10/22/deuchebag-nation-womans-world-part-2/ http://finscribeofwisdom.blogspot.com/2012/10/unsustainable-emergent-patterns-in.html http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/armchair-philosophers/ http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/histrionic-co-morbidity-psychopaths-at-work-part-2/ http://terminclature.wordpress.com/2013/10/11/emotional-pornography/
Thought Uncommon 